do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 17 October 2022 2022/C 401/07
Date: 2022-10-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022401EN.01000901.xml










18.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 401/9






Euro exchange rates (1)

17 October 2022
(2022/C 401/07)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


0,9739 




JPY


Japanese yen


145,00 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4379 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86250 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,9893 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9762 




ISK


Iceland króna


140,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,3420 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,562 




HUF


Hungarian forint


418,30 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,8143 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9370 




TRY


Turkish lira


18,1043 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5599 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3452 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


7,6448 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7404 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,3896 




KRW


South Korean won


1 399,41 




ZAR


South African rand


17,6769 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,0130 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5265 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 061,80 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5934 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,433 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,169 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,1497 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,5000 




INR


Indian rupee


80,1280 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-657/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Prahova (Romania) lodged on 18 October 2022 — SC Bitulpetrolium Serv SRL v Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Prahova — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Ploiești
Date: 2022-10-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, administrative sanction, customs inspection, customs warehouse, excise duty, fuel oil, principle of proportionality, taxpayer








C_2023155EN.01002501.xml










2.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/25






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Prahova (Romania) lodged on 18 October 2022 — SC Bitulpetrolium Serv SRL v Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Prahova — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Ploiești
(Case C-657/22)
(2023/C 155/30)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Prahova

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: SC Bitulpetrolium Serv SRL

Defendant: Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Prahova — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Ploiești

Questions referred







1.


Are national provisions and practices such as those at issue in the present case, according to which the reintroduction into a tax warehouse of a heating fuel (heating oil) in the absence of a customs inspection [constitutes] an alleged infringement of the warehousing procedure justifying the application of excise duty at the rate fixed for gas oil — a fuel whose excise duty is more than 21 times higher than the excise duty on heating oil — contrary to the principle of proportionality and to Article 2(3), Article 5 and Article 21(1) of Directive 2003/96/EC[?] (1)











2.


Are national provisions and practices such as those at issue in the present case, according to which VAT is charged on additional amounts determined by the tax authority by way of excise duty on gas oil as a penalty for non-compliance with the customs supervision arrangements of the taxable person, as a result of the taxable person reintroducing into the warehouse energy products of the heating oil type, on which excise duty had already been paid, and which have been refused by customers and remain intact and [in storage] until a [new] buyer is identified, contrary to the principle of proportionality, the principle of neutrality of VAT and Articles 2, 250 and 273 of Directive 2006/112/EC? (2)







(1)  Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51).

(2)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).
Case T-416/22 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 18 October 2022 — Fresenius Kabi Austria and Others v Commission (Interim relief — Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Marketing authorisations for medicinal products containing the active substance ‘hydroxyethyl starch (HES), solutions for infusion’ — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)
Date: 2022-10-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: drug surveillance, market approval, medicinal product








C_2022463EN.01005302.xml










5.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 463/53






Order of the President of the General Court of 18 October 2022 — Fresenius Kabi Austria and Others v Commission
(Case T-416/22 R)
(Interim relief - Medicinal products for human use - Directive 2001/83/EC - Marketing authorisations for medicinal products containing the active substance ‘hydroxyethyl starch (HES), solutions for infusion’ - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)
(2022/C 463/79)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Fresenius Kabi Austria GmbH (Graz, Austria), and the 14 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: W. Rehmann and A. Knierim, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Escobar Gómez and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicants seek the suspension of operation of European Commission Implementing Decision C(2022) 3591 final of 24 May 2022 concerning, in the framework of Article 107p of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the marketing authorisations of medicinal products for human use which contain the active substance ‘hydroxyethyl starch (HES), solutions for infusion’ following an assessment of a post authorisation safety study.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10763 – NORDEA / TOPDANMARK LIV HOLDING) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 431/01
Date: 2022-10-18
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, banking, economic concentration, financial services, holding company, life assurance, merger control, pension fund








C_2022431EN.01000101.xml










14.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 431/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10763 – NORDEA / TOPDANMARK LIV HOLDING)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 431/01)
On 18 October 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10763. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
European Parliament decision of 18 October 2022 on the nomination of Laima Liucija Andrikienė as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0301/2022 — 2022/0807(NLE))
Date: 2022-10-18
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, European Parliament
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the Court of Auditors (EU)








C_2023149EN.01006001.xml










28.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 149/60






P9_TA(2022)0357
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Laima Liucija Andrikienė
European Parliament decision of 18 October 2022 on the nomination of Laima Liucija Andrikienė as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0301/2022 — 2022/0807(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2023/C 149/08)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0301/2022),










—


having regard to Rule 129 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0239/2022),










A.


whereas, by letter of 24 August 2022, the Council consulted Parliament on the nomination of Laima Liucija Andrikienė as a Member of the Court of Auditors;










B.


whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control then proceeded to evaluate Laima Liucija Andrikienė’s credentials, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; whereas in carrying out that evaluation, the committee received a curriculum vitae from Laima Liucija Andrikienė, as well as the replies to the written questionnaire that she had been sent;










C.


whereas the committee subsequently held a hearing with Laima Liucija Andrikienė on 6 October 2022, at which she made an opening statement and then answered questions put by the members of the committee;












1.


Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Laima Liucija Andrikienė as a Member of the Court of Auditors;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2044 of 18 October 2022 approving amendments to the specification for a Protected Designation of Origin or a Protected Geographical Indication (‘Roero’ (PDO))
Date: 2022-10-18
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, Piedmont, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, red wine, sparkling wine, white wine








L_2022275EN.01005201.xml










25.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 275/52








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/2044
of 18 October 2022
         
approving amendments to the specification for a Protected Designation of Origin or a Protected Geographical Indication (‘Roero’ (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Commission has examined the application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the Protected Designation of Origin ‘Roero’, forwarded by Italy in accordance with Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(2)


The Commission has published the application for the approval of the amendments to the specification in the Official Journal of the European Union (2), as required by Article 97(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(3)


No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(4)


The amendments to the specification should therefore be approved in accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(5)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Roero’ (PDO) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 18 October 2022.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

(2)  
            OJ C 170, 25.4.2022, p. 21.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 October 2022 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 as regards the use of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny in order to adapt it to Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (09279/1/2022 — C9-0282/2022 — 2016/0399(COD))
Date: 2022-10-18
Institutions: Committee on Legal Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: European Commission, claim, commercial law, delegated legislation, judicial cooperation, powers of the institutions (EU), transfer of competence








C_2023149EN.01006101.xml










28.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 149/61






P9_TA(2022)0358
Adapting a number of legal acts in the area of justice to Article 290 TFEU (Commission delegated acts) ***II
European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 October 2022 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 as regards the use of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny in order to adapt it to Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (09279/1/2022 — C9-0282/2022 — 2016/0399(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: second reading)
(2023/C 149/09)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Council position at first reading (09279/1/2022 — C9-0282/2022),










—


having regard to its position at first reading (1) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2016)0798),










—


having regard to Article 294(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to the provisional agreement approved by the committee responsible under Rule 74(4) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A9-0237/2022),












1.


Approves the Council position at first reading;












2.


Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the Council position;












3.


Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council, in accordance with Article 297(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;












4.


Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.












5.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.






(1)  OJ C 158, 30.4.2021, p. 832.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10763 – NORDEA / TOPDANMARK LIV HOLDING) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 429/01
Date: 2022-10-18
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, banking, economic concentration, financial services, holding company, life assurance, merger control, pension fund








C_2022429EN.01000101.xml










11.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 429/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10763 – NORDEA / TOPDANMARK LIV HOLDING)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 429/01)
On 18 October 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10763. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-653/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 18 October 2022 — J. P. Mali Kerékpárgyártó és Forgalmazó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
Date: 2022-10-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative sanction, customs debt, customs formalities, principle of proportionality








C_2023045EN.01000502.xml










6.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/5






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 18 October 2022 — J. P. Mali Kerékpárgyártó és Forgalmazó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
(Case C-653/22)
(2023/C 45/10)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: J. P. Mali Kerékpárgyártó és Forgalmazó Kft.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Question referred

Must Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (‘the Customs Code’) (1) be interpreted as meaning that the requirement of proportionality laid down in Article 42(1) thereof is satisfied by Article 84(8) of the az uniós vámjog végrehajtásáról szóló 2017. évi CLII. törvény (Law CLII of 2017 on the application of EU customs law; ‘the Law on customs’) which, in the case of the customs administrative fine which has to be imposed where a customs deficit has been incurred as a result of an offence relating to the correctness of information in the customs declaration, does not allow the customs authorities to assess all the circumstances of the case or the conduct attributable to the trader who lodged the customs declaration, but requires, as a mandatory rule, the imposition of a customs administrative fine equal to 50 % of the established customs deficit, irrespective of the seriousness of the offence committed and the examination and assessment of the liability attributable to that trader?


(1)  OJ 2013 L 269, p. 1.
Notice for the attention of the persons and entities to whom measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/1956 and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1955 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran apply 2022/C 401/05
Date: 2022-10-18
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person








C_2022401EN.01000601.xml










18.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 401/6






Notice for the attention of the persons and entities to whom measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/1956 and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1955 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran apply
(2022/C 401/05)
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP (1), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/1956 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1955 (4) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran.
The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons and entities should be included on the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/235/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 359/2011.
The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).
The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council before 31 December 2022, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu
The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.


(1)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 51.

(2)  OJ L 269 I, 17.10.2022, p. 9.

(3)  OJ L 162, 22.6.2011, p. 14.

(4)  OJ L 269 I, 17.10.2022, p. 1.