do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-649/22: Action brought on 14 October 2022 — Shammout v Council
Date: 2022-10-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, economic sanctions, entrepreneur, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, principle of proportionality, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2022463EN.01006001.xml










5.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 463/60






Action brought on 14 October 2022 — Shammout v Council
(Case T-649/22)
(2022/C 463/88)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Issam Shammout (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: L. Cloquet, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/1277 of 21 July 2022 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (1), as far as it applies to the applicant,










—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1275 of 21 July 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (2), as far as it applies to the applicant,










—


sentence the Council to bear the full costs and expenses of the proceedings, including those set forth by the applicant.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging manifest error in assessing the facts. The Council made a manifest error in assessing the facts by considering that the applicant is a ‘leading business person operating in Syria’.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the general principle of proportionality.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging disproportionate infringement of the right of ownership and of exercise of a profession.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons provided in Article 296(2) TFEU.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the right of defence and of the right to a fair trial.






(1)  Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/1277 of 21 July 2022 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2022 L 194, p. 15).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1275 of 21 July 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (JO 2022 L 194, p. 8).
Case C-649/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco (Spain) lodged on 14 October 2022 — XXX v Randstad Empleo, S. A., Ferrovial Servicios, S. A., Axa Seguros Generales S. A. de Seguros y Reaseguros
Date: 2022-10-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: equal treatment, incapacity for work, indemnification, occupational accident, occupational accident insurance, temporary employment agency








C_2023112EN.01001401.xml










27.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/14






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco (Spain) lodged on 14 October 2022 — XXX v Randstad Empleo, S. A., Ferrovial Servicios, S. A., Axa Seguros Generales S. A. de Seguros y Reaseguros
(Case C-649/22)
(2023/C 112/18)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: XXX

Respondents: Randstad Empleo, S. A., Ferrovial Servicios, S. A., Axa Seguros Generales S. A. de Seguros y Reaseguros

Question referred

Must Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union and Article 3[1](f) and Article 5 of Directive 2008/104 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council be interpreted as precluding a case-law interpretation of Spanish legislation according to which compensation for a temporary agency worker whose employment contract has been terminated following a declaration of total permanent incapacity resulting from an accident at work sustained at the user undertaking is excluded from the concept of ‘basic working and employment conditions’?


(1)  Directive 2008/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on temporary agency work (OJ 2008 L 327, p. 9).