do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 13 October 2022 2022/C 395/02
Date: 2022-10-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022395EN.01000201.xml










14.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

13 October 2022
(2022/C 395/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


0,9739 




JPY


Japanese yen


142,94 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4385 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86513 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,0098 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9725 




ISK


Iceland króna


140,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,3525 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,569 




HUF


Hungarian forint


430,65 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,8303 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9355 




TRY


Turkish lira


18,1041 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5495 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3443 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


7,6440 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7314 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,3949 




KRW


South Korean won


1 392,71 




ZAR


South African rand


17,8173 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,9945 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5310 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 952,86 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5691 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,352 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,843 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,1214 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,4442 




INR


Indian rupee


79,9981 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-335/20: Order of the General Court of 14 October 2022 — Czech Republic v Commission
Date: 2022-10-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU aid, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, financial aid, payment, rural development








C_2022463EN.01006101.xml










5.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 463/61






Order of the General Court of 14 October 2022 — Czech Republic v Commission
(Case T-335/20) (1)

(2022/C 463/90)
Language of the case: Czech
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.
Notice for the attention of one person subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran 2022/C 395/06
Date: 2022-10-14
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2022395EN.01000601.xml










14.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/6






Notice for the attention of one person subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran
(2022/C 395/06)
The following information is brought to the attention of Mr. Ahmad Vahidi (no. 13), person appearing in Annex II, Part I, to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (1) and in Annex IX, Part I, to Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 (2) concerning restrictive measures against Iran.
The Council intends to include your name in the Annex to Decision 2011/235/CFSP (3) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran and in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 (4) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran.
The person concerned is hereby informed that he may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statement of reasons for his designation by 25 October 2022, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu


(1)  Council Decision of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ L 195, 27.7.2010, p. 39).

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ L 88, 24.3.2012, p. 1).

(3)  Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP of 12 April 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran (OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 51).

(4)  Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 of 12 April 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran (OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 1).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10640 – SAFRAN / MBDA / COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIELLE DES LASERS CILAS) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 440/01
Date: 2022-10-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: arms industry, economic concentration, electronics industry, merger control, metal coating, military equipment








C_2022440EN.01000101.xml










21.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 440/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10640 – SAFRAN / MBDA / COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIELLE DES LASERS CILAS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 440/01)
On 14 October 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10640. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 395/10
Date: 2022-10-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Lapland, Middle Norrland (Sweden), North Middle Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden, Upper Norrland (Sweden), air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2022395EN.01001101.xml










14.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/11






Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 395/10)






Member State


Sweden




Concerned routes








 


Arvidsjaur–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Gällivare–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Hagfors–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Hemavan–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Kramfors-Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Lycksele–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Pajala–Luleå










 


Sveg–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Torsby–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Vilhelmina–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Östersund–Umeå










 


Mora – Stockholm/Arlanda








Date of entry into force of the public service obligations


27 October 2023




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligations can be obtained


For further information please contact:





The Swedish Transport Administration




781 87 Borlänge




SWEDEN




Tel. 0771 921921
Int. +46 771921921
Contact person: Lisa Berglund
Email: lisa.a.berglund@trafikverket.se
Website : www.trafikverket.se
Case T-643/22: Action brought on 14 October 2022 — Yanukovych v Council
Date: 2022-10-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law








C_2022451EN.01002601.xml










28.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 451/26






Action brought on 14 October 2022 — Yanukovych v Council
(Case T-643/22)
(2022/C 451/30)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych (Rostov-on-Don, Russia) (represented by: B. Kennelly, Barrister)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1355 of 4 August 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (1) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1354 of 4 August 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (2), insofar as they apply to the applicant. The applicant also seeks his costs.

Plea in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, alleging that the Council made manifest errors of assessment in determining that the designation criterion had been satisfied. In particular, the Council accepted at face value, without any attempted verification whatsoever, unsubstantiated and largely historic assertions, allegations and even opinions from various media reports of questionable reliability. The Council presented these claims and accusations as fact, despite the many inaccuracies and inconsistencies identified by the applicant in his observations. The Council should have undertaken further investigation and conducted a proper examination of the sufficiency, credibility, and reliability of the material upon which it relied, but failed to do so. In consequence, there is no sufficiently solid factual basis for the 2022 August Sanctions and they should accordingly be annulled.


(1)  OJ 2022, L 204 I, p. 4.

(2)  OJ 2022, L 204 I, p. 1.
Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 395/09
Date: 2022-10-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Lapland, Middle Norrland (Sweden), North Middle Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden, Upper Norrland (Sweden), air transport, inland transport, invitation to tender, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2022395EN.01001001.xml










14.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/10






Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 395/09)






Member State


Sweden




Concerned routes








 


Arvidsjaur–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Gällivare–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Hagfors–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Hemavan–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Kramfors-Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Lycksele–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Pajala–Luleå










 


Sveg–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Torsby–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Vilhelmina–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Östersund–Umeå










 


Mora – Stockholm/Arlanda








Period of validity of the contract


27 October 2023 – 26 October 2027




Deadline for submission of tenders


2 months from publication of this notice




Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the pubic tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained


Web address for more information about the tender:
Procurements Swedish Transport Administration
For further information please contact:
Swedish Transport Administration
Phone : 0771 921921
Int. Phone : +46 771921921
Contact person: Lisa Berglund
Email: lisa.a.berglund@trafikverket.se





Address : Trafikverket




781 89 Borlänge




SWEDEN




Internet: www.trafikverket.se
Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1775 and Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1770 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Mali 2022/C 395/03
Date: 2022-10-14
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Mali, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2022395EN.01000301.xml










14.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/3






Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1775 and Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1770 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Mali
(2022/C 395/03)
The following information is brought to the attention of Mr. DIAW Malick, Mr. WAGUÉ Ismaël, Mr. MAÏGA Choguel, Mr. MAÏGA Ibrahim Ikassa, Mr. DIARRA Adama Ben A.k.a Ben Le Cerveau, persons appearing in Annex II to Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1775 (1) and in Annex Ia to Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1770 (2) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Mali.
The Council is considering maintaining the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons with amended statements of reasons. These persons are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons for their designation, before 21 October 2022, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu


(1)  OJ L 251, 29.9.2017, p. 23.

(2)  OJ L 251, 29.9.2017, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10902 – FEV CONSULTING / MITSUBISHI CORPORATION / JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 407/03
Date: 2022-10-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, entrepreneurship, management, merger control, provision of services








C_2022407EN.01000301.xml










24.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 407/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10902 – FEV CONSULTING / MITSUBISHI CORPORATION / JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 407/03)
On 14 October 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10902. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-647/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Ringkonnakohus (Estonia) lodged on 14 October 2022 — Globex International OÜ v Duclos Legnostrutture S.r.l. and RD
Date: 2022-10-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil procedure, enforcement of ruling, general legal principle, injunction, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU








C_2023007EN.01001502.xml










9.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 7/15






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Ringkonnakohus (Estonia) lodged on 14 October 2022 — Globex International OÜ v Duclos Legnostrutture S.r.l. and RD
(Case C-647/22)
(2023/C 7/19)
Language of the case: Estonian

Referring court

Tallinna Ringkonnakohus

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Globex International OÜ

Defendants: Duclos Legnostrutture S.r.l. and RD

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 1(2) of Regulation No 1896/2006 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a rule of national law such as Paragraph 371(1)(4) of the Estonian Code of Civil Procedure (under which a court may not admit an action inter alia where an order terminating proceedings which was made by an Estonian court in a dispute between the same parties concerning the same subject matter and on the same basis and which precludes further recourse to the courts in the same matter has become final) is an obstacle to the hearing of an action regarding a claim in respect of which a European order for payment has been issued and declared enforceable by a court of a Member State?










2.


If the first question is, in principle, to be answered to the effect that an obstacle exists, does the answer change where it appears that, after the European order for payment has been declared enforceable, service of the order for payment was not consistent with the minimum standards laid down in Articles 13 to 15 of Regulation No 1896/2006?










3.


If the second question is to be answered to the effect that an obstacle exists: May the court which issued and declared enforceable the European order for payment decide, of its own motion or upon application by the claimant, that the declaration of enforceability of the order for payment is invalid where it appears that, after the European order for payment has been declared enforceable, service of the order for payment was not consistent with the minimum standards laid down in Articles 13 to 15 of Regulation No 1896/2006?










4.


If the third question is to be answered in the affirmative: May the court which issued and declared enforceable the European order for payment, irrespective of the conduct, termination or outcome of the proceedings on enforcement before the court in the Member State of enforcement, decide on the invalidity of the declaration of enforceability of the order for payment?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure (OJ 2006 L 399, p. 1).
Case T-642/22: Action brought on 14 October 2022 — Yanukovych v Council
Date: 2022-10-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law








C_2022451EN.01002501.xml










28.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 451/25






Action brought on 14 October 2022 — Yanukovych v Council
(Case T-642/22)
(2022/C 451/29)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych (Saint Petersburg, Russia) (represented by: B. Kennelly, Barrister)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1355 of 4 August 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (1) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1354 of 4 August 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (2), insofar as they apply to the applicant. The applicant also seeks his costs.

Plea in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, alleging that the Council made manifest errors of assessment in determining that the designation criterion had been satisfied. In particular, the Council accepted at face value, without any attempted verification whatsoever, unsubstantiated and largely historic assertions, allegations and even opinions from various media reports of questionable reliability. The Council presented these claims and accusations as fact, despite the many inaccuracies and inconsistencies identified by the applicant in his observations. The Council should have undertaken further investigation and conducted a proper examination of the sufficiency, credibility, and reliability of the material upon which it relied, but failed to do so. In consequence, there is no sufficiently solid factual basis for the 2022 August Sanctions and they should accordingly be annulled.


(1)  OJ 2022, L 204 I, p. 4.

(2)  OJ 2022, L 204 I, p. 1.
Case T-646/22: Action brought on 14 October 2022 — Piaggio & C. v EUIPO — e-bility (Scooter)
Date: 2022-10-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, two-wheeled vehicle








C_2022463EN.01005802.xml










5.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 463/58






Action brought on 14 October 2022 — Piaggio & C. v EUIPO — e-bility (Scooter)
(Case T-646/22)
(2022/C 463/86)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Piaggio & C. (Pontedera, Italy) (represented by: F. Jacobacci and B. La Tella, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: e-bility GmbH (Remagen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design (Scooter) — Community design No 4363588-0001

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 August 2022 in Case R 1663/2020-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


declare the proprietor’s Community design registered under No 4363588-0001 invalid;










—


order the defendant and the proprietor to pay the procedural costs relating to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;










—


order EUIPO and the potential other party to the present proceedings to pay all of the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Incorrect assessment and unfounded exclusion of decisive evidence provided by the applicant;










—


Infringement of Article 25(1)(e) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of Article 25(1)(f) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.
Case T-11/22: Order of the General Court of 14 October 2022 — Medivet Group v EUIPO (MEDIVET)
Date: 2022-10-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, financial services, insurance, medical data, registered trade mark, retail trade, software, trade-mark law, veterinary medicine, wholesale trade








C_2022463EN.01006102.xml










5.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 463/61






Order of the General Court of 14 October 2022 — Medivet Group v EUIPO (MEDIVET)
(Case T-11/22) (1)

(2022/C 463/91)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 109, 7.3.2022.