do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-352/21: Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — Oi Dromoi tis Elias v Commission (Institutional law — Selection of partners to carry out Europe Direct (2021-2025) activities in Greece — Call for proposals procedure — Eligibility criteria — Rejection of application)
Date: 2022-09-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU programme, Greece, Peloponnese, award of contract, invitation to tender








C_2022463EN.01003002.xml










5.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 463/30






Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — Oi Dromoi tis Elias v Commission
(Case T-352/21) (1)

(Institutional law - Selection of partners to carry out Europe Direct (2021-2025) activities in Greece - Call for proposals procedure - Eligibility criteria - Rejection of application)
(2022/C 463/41)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: Politistikos Organismos Oi Dromoi tis Elias (Kalamata, Greece) (represented by: S. Vardalas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and F. Erlbacher, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Decision Ares (2021) 2580204 contained in the European Commission’s letter of 16 April 2021 informing it of the rejection of its proposal in the context of the procedure for the selection of partners to carry out the activities of the Europe Direct programme in Greece (ED-GREECE-2020).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Politistikos Organismos Oi Dromoi tis Elias to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 357, 6.9.2021.
Case T-454/21: Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — G-Core Innovations v EUIPO — Coretransform (G CORELABS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark G CORELABS — Earlier EU figurative mark CORE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2022-09-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Internet access provider, cloud computing, data transmission, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2022463EN.01003102.xml










5.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 463/31






Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — G-Core Innovations v EUIPO — Coretransform (G CORELABS)
(Case T-454/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark G CORELABS - Earlier EU figurative mark CORE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2022/C 463/43)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: G-Core Innovations Sàrl (Contern, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Axel Karnøe Søndergaard, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez and D. Gája, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Coretransform GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: U. Hildebrandt, lawyer)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 May 2021 (Case R 22/2021-2) (‘the contested decision’).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders G-Core Innovations Sàrl to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 368, 13.9.2021.
Case T-421/17 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — Leino-Sandberg v Parliament (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Document relating to a decision refusing a third party full access to trilogue tables relating to the proposal for a regulation of the Parliament and of the Council on Europol and repealing Decisions 2009/371/JHA and 2005/681/JHA — Refusal to grant access — Second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception for the protection of court proceedings and legal advice)
Date: 2022-09-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, disclosure of information, judicial proceedings, provision of documents








C_2022463EN.01002201.xml










5.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 463/22






Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — Leino-Sandberg v Parliament
(Case T-421/17 RENV) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Document relating to a decision refusing a third party full access to trilogue tables relating to the proposal for a regulation of the Parliament and of the Council on Europol and repealing Decisions 2009/371/JHA and 2005/681/JHA - Refusal to grant access - Second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 - Exception for the protection of court proceedings and legal advice)
(2022/C 463/29)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Päivi Leino-Sandberg (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: O. Brouwer, B. Verheijen and S. Schubert, lawyers)

Defendant): European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz and J.C. Puffer, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: M. Pere, acting as Agent), Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: C. Meyer-Seitz, H. Shev, H. Eklinder, A. Runeskjöld, M. Salborn Hodgson and R. Shahsavan Eriksson, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Decision A(2016) 15112 of the European Parliament of 3 April 2017 refusing to grant her access to Decision A(2015) 4931 of the Parliament of 8 July 2015 addressed to Mr Emilio De Capitani.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Decision A(2016) 15112 of the European Parliament of 3 April 2017 refusing to grant Ms Päivi Leino-Sandberg access to Decision A(2015) 4931 of the Parliament of 8 July 2015 addressed to Mr Emilio De Capitani;










2.


Orders the Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Päivi Leino-Sandberg;










3.


Orders the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own respective costs.






(1)  OJ C 293, 4.9.2017.