Joined Cases C-793/19 and C-794/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 September 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SpaceNet AG (C-793/19), Telekom Deutschland GmbH (C-794/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector — Confidentiality of communications — Providers of electronic communications services — General and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data — Directive 2002/58/EC — Article 15(1) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 6, 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) — Article 4(2) TEU)
Date: 2022-09-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: confidentiality, crime, data collection, data protection, personal data, protection of communications, provision of services, public safety, telecommunications








C_2022424EN.01000201.xml










7.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 424/2






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 September 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SpaceNet AG (C-793/19), Telekom Deutschland GmbH (C-794/19)
(Joined Cases C-793/19 and C-794/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector - Confidentiality of communications - Providers of electronic communications services - General and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data - Directive 2002/58/EC - Article 15(1) - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 6, 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) - Article 4(2) TEU)
(2022/C 424/02)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Respondents: SpaceNet AG (C-793/19), Telekom Deutschland GmbH (C-794/19)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), as amended by Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009, read in the light of Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
must be interpreted as meaning that:
it precludes national legislative measures which provide, on a preventative basis, for the purposes of combating serious crime and preventing serious threats to public security, for the general and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data;
it does not preclude legislative measures that:






—


allow, for the purposes of safeguarding national security, recourse to an instruction requiring providers of electronic communications services to retain, generally and indiscriminately, traffic and location data in situations where the Member State concerned is confronted with a serious threat to national security that is shown to be genuine and present or foreseeable, where the decision imposing such an instruction is subject to effective review, either by a court or by an independent administrative body whose decision is binding, the aim of that review being to verify that one of those situations exists and that the conditions and safeguards which must be laid down are observed, and where that instruction may be given only for a period that is limited in time to what is strictly necessary, but which may be extended if that threat persists;










—


provide, for the purposes of safeguarding national security, combating serious crime and preventing serious threats to public security, for the targeted retention of traffic and location data which is limited, on the basis of objective and non-discriminatory factors, according to the categories of persons concerned or using a geographical criterion, for a period that is limited in time to what is strictly necessary, but which may be extended;










—


provide, for the purposes of safeguarding national security, combating serious crime and preventing serious threats to public security, for the general and indiscriminate retention of IP addresses assigned to the source of an internet connection for a period that is limited in time to what is strictly necessary;










—


provide, for the purposes of safeguarding national security, combating crime and safeguarding public security, for the general and indiscriminate retention of data relating to the civil identity of users of electronic communications systems;










—


allow, for the purposes of combating serious crime and, a fortiori, safeguarding national security, recourse to an instruction requiring providers of electronic communications services, by means of a decision of the competent authority that is subject to effective judicial review, to undertake, for a specified period of time, the expedited retention of traffic and location data in the possession of those service providers,
provided that those measures ensure, by means of clear and precise rules, that the retention of data at issue is subject to compliance with the applicable substantive and procedural conditions and that the persons concerned have effective safeguards against the risks of abuse.






(1)  OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.