do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Taking of the oath by new Members of the General Court
Date: 2022-09-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: General Court (EU), appointment of members, member of the Court of Justice (EU)








C_2022359EN.01000201.xml










19.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 359/2






Taking of the oath by new Members of the General Court
(2022/C 359/02)
Following their appointment as Judges at the General Court of the European Union for the period from 30 June 2022 to 31 August 2022 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 29 June 2022, (1) Ms Beatrix Ricziová and Mr Tihamér Tóth took the oath before the Court of Justice on 6 July 2022.


(1)  OJ L 173, 30.6.2022, p. 77.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10612 – NIS / HIPP) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 401/01
Date: 2022-09-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, energy industry, merger control, natural gas, oil industry, petrochemicals








C_2022401EN.01000101.xml










18.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 401/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10612 – NIS / HIPP)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 401/01)
On 19 September 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10612. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10894 – BC PARTNERS / BAIN CAPITAL / FEDRIGONI) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 467/01
Date: 2022-09-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, packaging product, provision of services, pulp and paper industry








C_2022467EN.01000101.xml










8.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 467/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10894 – BC PARTNERS / BAIN CAPITAL / FEDRIGONI)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 467/01)
On 19 September 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10894. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy (Official Journal of the European Union L 231 of 30 June 2021)
Date: 2022-09-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: Cohesion Fund, EU migration policy, European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, European Regional Development Fund, European Social Fund, European security, distribution of EU funding, external border of the EU, financial management, right of asylum








L_2022241EN.01001601.xml










19.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 241/16







Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 231 of 30 June 2021
)


On page 467, Annex VII, ‘Table 5: Common and programme specific output indicators for the ERDF, the Cohesion Fund, the JTF and the EMFAF (point (b) of Article 42(2))’, second row:
for:







‘Data on output indicators from the programme
[extracted from table 2 of point 2.1.1.1.2 of Annex V]


Progress in output indicators to date’





read:







‘Data on output indicators from the programme
[extracted from table 2 of point 2.1.1.1.2 of Annex V and table 2 of point 2.1.1.2.2. of Annex V]


Progress in output indicators to date’
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 16 September 2022 2022/C 358/02
Date: 2022-09-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022358EN.01000201.xml










19.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 358/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

16 September 2022
(2022/C 358/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


0,9954 




JPY


Japanese yen


142,53 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4366 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87400 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,7541 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9579 




ISK


Iceland króna


138,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,1985 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,497 




HUF


Hungarian forint


403,98 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,7143 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9238 




TRY


Turkish lira


18,1923 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4894 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3226 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


7,8133 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6717 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4025 




KRW


South Korean won


1 383,58 




ZAR


South African rand


17,6004 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,9787 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5235 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 904,67 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5141 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,111 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,800 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,2279 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,0028 




INR


Indian rupee


79,3605 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-788/21: Order of the General Court of 19 September 2022 — TDK Foil Italy v Commission (Action for annulment — Commercial policy — Dumping — Imports of aluminium flat-rolled products originating in China — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Independent importer — No individual concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2022-09-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, aluminium, anti-dumping duty, electronic component, flat product, import (EU), originating product








C_2022463EN.01004801.xml










5.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 463/48






Order of the General Court of 19 September 2022 — TDK Foil Italy v Commission
(Case T-788/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Commercial policy - Dumping - Imports of aluminium flat-rolled products originating in China - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Independent importer - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 463/69)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: TDK Foil Italy SpA (Rozzano, Italy) (represented by: F. Di Gianni, A. Scalini and G. Pregno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and M. Gustafsson, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1784 of 8 October 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of aluminium flat-rolled products originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2021 L 359, p. 6), in so far as that regulation includes raw aluminium foil used to produce high-voltage anode and tab foils for aluminium electrolytic capacitors within the scope of the anti-dumping duty.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


TDK Foil Italy SpA shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 84, 21.2.2022.
Case C-601/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Tirol (Austria) lodged on 19 September 2022 — Umweltverband WWF Österreich and Others v Tiroler Landesregierung
Date: 2022-09-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Austria, Tyrol, equal treatment, hunting, hunting regulations, protected species, protection of animals, wolf








C_2022441EN.01001801.xml










21.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 441/18






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Tirol (Austria) lodged on 19 September 2022 — Umweltverband WWF Österreich and Others v Tiroler Landesregierung
(Case C-601/22)
(2022/C 441/26)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Tirol

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Umweltverband WWF Österreich, ÖKOBÜRO — Allianz der Umweltbewegung, Naturschutzbund Österreich, Umweltdachverband, Wiener Tierschutzverein

Defendant: Tiroler Landesregierung

Questions referred







1.


Does Article 12 in conjunction with Annex IV to Directive 92/43/EEC, (1) as most recently amended by Directive 2013/17/EU, (2) according to which wolves are covered by the system of strict protection, exempting populations in several Member States, while no such exemption has been provided for Austria, infringe the ‘principle of equal treatment of Member States’ enshrined in Article 4(2) TEU?










2.


Is Article 16(1) of Directive 92/43/EEC, as most recently amended by Directive 2013/17/EU, according to which a derogation from the system of strict protection of wolves is only permitted if, inter alia, the derogation is not detrimental to the maintenance of the populations of the species concerned with a ‘favourable conservation status’ in their ‘natural range’, to be interpreted as meaning that the favourable conservation status must be maintained or restored not in relation to the territory of a Member State, but to the natural range of a population, which may encompass a significantly larger, cross-border biogeographical region?










3.


Is Article 16(1)(b) of Directive 92/43/EEC, as most recently amended by Directive 2013/17/EU, to be interpreted as meaning that, in addition to direct damage caused by a particular wolf, ‘serious damage’ also encompasses indirect (future) ‘economic’ damage that cannot be attributed to a particular wolf?










4.


Is Article 16(1) of Directive 92/43/EEC, as most recently amended by Directive 2013/17/EU, to be interpreted as meaning that ‘satisfactory alternatives’ are to be examined purely on the basis of actual feasibility or also on the basis of economic criteria, given the prevailing topographical, alpine farming and business conditions in the Province of Tyrol?






(1)  Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ 1992 L 206, p. 7).

(2)  Council Directive 2013/17/EU of 13 May 2013 adapting certain directives in the field of environment, by reason of the accession of the Republic of Croatia (OJ 2013 L 158, p. 193).
Case T-581/22: Action brought on 19 September 2022 — ECE Group v EUIPO — ECE Piknik Ürünleri Plastik ve Kömür Üretim Ithalat Ihracat (ECE QUALITY OF LIFE)
Date: 2022-09-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, aluminium, coal, decorative item, fuel wood, household article, plastics, registered trade mark, textile product, trade-mark law








C_2022463EN.01005401.xml










5.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 463/54






Action brought on 19 September 2022 — ECE Group v EUIPO — ECE Piknik Ürünleri Plastik ve Kömür Üretim Ithalat Ihracat (ECE QUALITY OF LIFE)
(Case T-581/22)
(2022/C 463/80)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: ECE Group GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Kloth, R. Briske, M. Tillwich and P. Funke, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ECE Piknik Ürünleri Plastik ve Kömür Üretim Ithalat Ihracat Anonim Sirketi (Dilovasi/Kocaeli, Türkiye)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark ECE QUALITY OF LIFE — Application for registration No 18 163 717

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 July 2022 in Case R 1384/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


amend the contested decision, so that the opposition is upheld in its entirety and the European Union trade mark application No 18 163 717 is refused in its entirety;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.