do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-4/21: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Fédération des entreprises de la beauté v Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Cosmetic products — Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 — Article 27 — Safeguard clause — Article 27(1) — Scope — Provisional national safeguard measures — General measure — Application to a category of cosmetic products containing the same substance — Individual measure — Application to an identified cosmetic product — Provisional national measure imposing certain labelling requirements on a category of leave-on products containing phenoxyethanol)
Date: 2022-09-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: approximation of laws, cosmetic product, health risk, labelling, organic chemical, product safety








C_2022418EN.01000501.xml










31.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 418/5






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Fédération des entreprises de la beauté v Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM)
(Case C-4/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Cosmetic products - Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 - Article 27 - Safeguard clause - Article 27(1) - Scope - Provisional national safeguard measures - General measure - Application to a category of cosmetic products containing the same substance - Individual measure - Application to an identified cosmetic product - Provisional national measure imposing certain labelling requirements on a category of leave-on products containing phenoxyethanol)
(2022/C 418/06)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Fédération des entreprises de la beauté

Defendant: Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 27(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products must be interpreted as not allowing the competent authority of a Member State to adopt general provisional measures applying to a category of products containing the same substance.


(1)  OJ C 79, 8.3.2021.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 14 September 2022 2022/C 353/02
Date: 2022-09-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022353EN.01000201.xml










15.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 353/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

14 September 2022
(2022/C 353/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


0,9990 




JPY


Japanese yen


143,08 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4366 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86498 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,6750 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9612 




ISK


Iceland króna


139,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,1125 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,527 




HUF


Hungarian forint


402,90 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,7163 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9297 




TRY


Turkish lira


18,2397 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4873 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3177 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


7,8405 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6675 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4039 




KRW


South Korean won


1 391,97 




ZAR


South African rand


17,4342 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,9550 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5195 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 903,93 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5225 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,054 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,608 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,1827 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,0280 




INR


Indian rupee


79,4220 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-595/22 P: Appeal brought on 15 September 2022 by Jean-Marc Colombani against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 6 July 2022 in Case T-129/21, Colombani v EEAS
Date: 2022-09-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Canada, European official, Middle East, North Africa, Union delegation, alternative dispute resolution, competition (EU), diplomatic profession, managing director








C_2022482EN.01000502.xml










19.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 482/5






Appeal brought on 15 September 2022 by Jean-Marc Colombani against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 6 July 2022 in Case T-129/21, Colombani v EEAS
(Case C-595/22 P)
(2022/C 482/08)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Jean-Marc Colombani (represented by: N. de Montigny, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European External Action Service (EEAS)

Form of order sought by the appellant

The appellant claims that the Court should:
Allow the appeal and set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 6 July 2022 in Case T-129/21, Colombani v EEAS;
Hear the case and:






—


annul the EEAS decision of 17 April 2020 rejecting the appellant’s application for the post of Director for North Africa and Middle East (vacancy notice 2020/48);










—


annul the EEAS decision of 6 July 2020 rejecting the appellant’s application for the post of Head of the Delegation of the European Union to Canada (vacancy notice 2020/134);




Order the defendant at first instance to pay the costs incurred by the appellant on appeal and at first instance.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

In support of his appeal, the appellant relies on two grounds.
By his first ground of appeal, the appellant claims that the General Court committed several errors when it ruled that the application for annulment of the decision of 17 April 2020 was inadmissible.
When it considered that the appellant, by way of the mutual agreement of 9 February 2021 concluded with the EEAS in Case T-507/20, Colombani v EEAS, agreed to waive the right to challenge the decision rejecting his application for the post of Director, the General Court (i) erred in law in its interpretation of the agreement; (ii) ruled infra petita; (iii) failed to have regard to the appellant’s interest in obtaining an annulment of the contested decision; and (iv) erred in its analysis of the conditions to be fulfilled in order to claim that there was a defect in the appellant’s consent at the time when the agreement was signed.
By his second ground of appeal, the appellant alleges that the General Court infringed his procedural rights by limiting the examination of the merits of the case to the decision of 6 July 2020 alone, thereby excluding an analysis of the substantive pleas in so far as they also concern the decision of 17 April 2020.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10819 – OMERS / APG / GROENDUS) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 402/01
Date: 2022-09-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Netherlands, customers, economic concentration, energy consumption, investment company, merger control, provision of services, renewable energy








C_2022402EN.01000101.xml










19.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 402/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10819 – OMERS / APG / GROENDUS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 402/01)
On 15 September 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10819. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-227/21: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — UAB ‘HA.EN.’ v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Right to deduct input VAT — Sale of an item of immovable property between taxable persons — Vendor subject to insolvency proceedings — National practice under which the purchaser is denied the right of deduction on the ground that he or she knew or should have known of the vendor’s difficulties in paying the output tax — Fraud and abuse of rights — Conditions)
Date: 2022-09-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, financial solvency, real property, sale, tax offence, tax relief, transfer of property








C_2022418EN.01000901.xml










31.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 418/9






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — UAB ‘HA.EN.’ v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos
(Case C-227/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Right to deduct input VAT - Sale of an item of immovable property between taxable persons - Vendor subject to insolvency proceedings - National practice under which the purchaser is denied the right of deduction on the ground that he or she knew or should have known of the vendor’s difficulties in paying the output tax - Fraud and abuse of rights - Conditions)
(2022/C 418/11)
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: UAB ‘HA.EN.’

Defendant: Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

Operative part of the judgment

Article 168(a) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, read in conjunction with the principle of fiscal neutrality,
must be interpreted as precluding a national practice under which, in the context of the sale of an item of immovable property between taxable persons, the purchaser is denied the right to deduct input value added tax (VAT) merely because he or she knew or should have known that the vendor was in financial difficulty, or even insolvent, and that that circumstance could result in the vendor not paying or not being able to pay VAT into the public purse.


(1)  OJ C 242, 21.6.2021.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10826 – GOLDMAN SACHS / NORGINE) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 401/02
Date: 2022-09-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Netherlands, banking, economic concentration, investment, investment company, merger control, pharmaceutical industry, provision of services, securities








C_2022401EN.01000201.xml










18.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 401/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10826 – GOLDMAN SACHS / NORGINE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 401/02)
On 15 September 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10826. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Corrigendum to definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2022/1432 of amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2022 (Official Journal of the European Union L 230 of 5 September 2022)
Date: 2022-09-15
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: EU migration policy, Russia, Ukraine, adoption of the budget, aid to refugees, amending budget, commitment of expenditure, emergency aid, financial year, general budget (EU), war








L_2022238EN.01000401.xml










15.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 238/4







Corrigendum to definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2022/1432 of amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2022

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 230 of 5 September 2022
)


On page 18, Section III – Commission, Expenditure, the table reads as follows:













‘Title


Heading


Budget 2022


Amending budget No 2/2022


New amount




Commitments


Payments


Commitments


Payments


Commitments


Payments




15


PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE


2 011 505 473 


2 371 704 787 


 


 


2 011 505 473 


2 371 704 787 




16


EXPENDITURE OUTSIDE THE ANNUAL CEILINGS SET OUT IN THE MULTIANNUAL FINANCIAL FRAMEWORK


50 000 000 


75 000 000 


 


 


50 000 000 


75 000 000 




20


ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION


3 868 129 450 


3 868 229 450 


 


 


3 868 129 450 


3 868 229 450 




21


EUROPEAN SCHOOLS AND PENSIONS


2 331 236 116 


2 331 236 116 


 


 


2 331 236 116 


2 331 236 116 




30


RESERVES


2 749 170 382 


2 547 838 000 


 


 


2 749 170 382 


2 547 838 000 




 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 





Total (excluding reserves)




177 317 600 897 




166 158 049 990 




99 768 521 




176 005 396 




177 417 369 418 




166 334 055 386 







Reserves: 30 02 02






24 506 411 






24 506 411 




 


 




24 506 411 






24 506 411 
’