do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-564/22: Action brought on 13 September 2022 — Pierre Balmain v EUIPO — Story Time (Representation of a lion head)
Date: 2022-09-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, precious metal, precious stones, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022424EN.01004301.xml










7.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 424/43






Action brought on 13 September 2022 — Pierre Balmain v EUIPO — Story Time (Representation of a lion head)
(Case T-564/22)
(2022/C 424/55)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Pierre Balmain (Paris, France) (represented by: J. Iglesias Monravá and S. Mainar Roger, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Story Time sp. z o.o. (Poznań, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark (Representation of a lion head) — Application for registration No 17 515 099

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 June 2022 in Case R 96/2022-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order anyone opposing the action to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 12 September 2022 2022/C 350/03
Date: 2022-09-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022350EN.01000301.xml










13.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 350/3






Euro exchange rates (1)

12 September 2022
(2022/C 350/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0155 




JPY


Japanese yen


144,49 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4365 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86778 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,6368 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9667 




ISK


Iceland króna


140,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,9718 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,546 




HUF


Hungarian forint


395,73 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6965 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9135 




TRY


Turkish lira


18,5232 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4749 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3194 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


7,9709 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6499 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4168 




KRW


South Korean won


1 397,58 




ZAR


South African rand


17,3220 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,0348 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5195 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 083,83 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5733 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,701 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,873 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,1933 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,1025 




INR


Indian rupee


80,6920 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-215/22: Order of the President of the Court of 13 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Research Consorzio Stabile Scarl, acting on its own account and as agent of the association of undertakings to be constituted (Research-Cisa), C.I.S.A. SpA, acting on its own account and as agent of the same association (Research-Cisa), Debar Costruzioni SpA, acting on its own account and as agent of the association to be constituted with Consorzio Stabile COM Scarl, C.N. Costruzioni Generali SpA and Edil.Co. Srl, Invitalia — Agenzia Nazionale per l’Attrazione degli Investimenti e lo Sviluppo di Impresa v Invitalia — Agenzia Nazionale per l’Attrazione degli Investimenti e lo Sviluppo di Impresa, Debar Costruzioni SpA, acting on its own account and as agent of the association to be constituted with Consorzio Stabile COM Scarl, C.N. Costruzioni Generali SpA and Edil.Co. Srl, Research Consorzio Stabile Scarl, acting on its own account and as agent of the association of undertakings to be constituted (Research-Cisa), C.I.S.A. SpA, acting on its own account and as agent of the same association (Research-Cisa), intervening party: Invitalia — Agenzia Nazionale per l’Attrazione degli Investimenti e lo Sviluppo di Impresa
Date: 2022-09-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, award of contract, freedom to provide services, national law, public procurement, right of establishment, subcontracting, tendering








C_2023015EN.01003402.xml










16.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 15/34






Order of the President of the Court of 13 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Research Consorzio Stabile Scarl, acting on its own account and as agent of the association of undertakings to be constituted (Research-Cisa), C.I.S.A. SpA, acting on its own account and as agent of the same association (Research-Cisa), Debar Costruzioni SpA, acting on its own account and as agent of the association to be constituted with Consorzio Stabile COM Scarl, C.N. Costruzioni Generali SpA and Edil.Co. Srl, Invitalia — Agenzia Nazionale per l’Attrazione degli Investimenti e lo Sviluppo di Impresa v Invitalia — Agenzia Nazionale per l’Attrazione degli Investimenti e lo Sviluppo di Impresa, Debar Costruzioni SpA, acting on its own account and as agent of the association to be constituted with Consorzio Stabile COM Scarl, C.N. Costruzioni Generali SpA and Edil.Co. Srl, Research Consorzio Stabile Scarl, acting on its own account and as agent of the association of undertakings to be constituted (Research-Cisa), C.I.S.A. SpA, acting on its own account and as agent of the same association (Research-Cisa), intervening party: Invitalia — Agenzia Nazionale per l’Attrazione degli Investimenti e lo Sviluppo di Impresa
(Case C-215/22) (1)

(2023/C 15/44)
Language of the case: Italian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 244, 27.6.2022.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10898 – PLATINUM EQUITY GROUP / HOP LUN) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 402/02
Date: 2022-09-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: clothing industry, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, supplier








C_2022402EN.01000201.xml










19.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 402/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10898 – PLATINUM EQUITY GROUP / HOP LUN)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 402/02)
On 13 September 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10898. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-565/22: Action brought on 13 September 2022 — HF v Parliament
Date: 2022-09-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, damages, harassment at work, staff regulations (EU)








C_2022408EN.01004301.xml










24.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 408/43






Action brought on 13 September 2022 — HF v Parliament
(Case T-565/22)
(2022/C 408/57)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: HF (represented by: A. Tymen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the present action admissible and well-founded;




and consequently,






—


annul the decision of 3 November 2021 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance of 11 December 2014;










—


in so far as necessary, annul the decision of 3 June 2022, received on 7 June 2022, rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 3 February 2022;










—


order the defendant to pay damages, fixed ex aequo et bono at EUR 50 000, as compensation for the non-material damage suffered by the applicant;










—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging irregularity in the procedure followed by the Committee, infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and infringement of Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’).










2.


Second plea in law, alleging errors of assessment, breach of the duty to provide assistance and infringement of Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations.
Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union 2022/C 350/04
Date: 2022-09-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, electronic equipment, packaging product, sound reproduction equipment








C_2022350EN.01000401.xml










13.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 350/4






Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
(2022/C 350/04)
Pursuant to Article 9(1), point (a), of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

On page 210


4202 31 00


to Articles of a kind normally carried in the pocket or in the handbag


4202 39 00


The following text is inserted after the existing text:


‘These subheadings also do not include articles used as protective covers for charging cases for wireless headphones. The covers are shaped to protect the wireless charging case from outside and are sold in many different designs (in one piece or in two pieces, of different material and colours, patterned, with images or text, may be combined with a snap hook etc.). These covers for charging cases for wireless headphones are to be classified according to the constituent material.’



(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

(2)  OJ C 119, 29.3.2019, p. 1.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 September 2022 on the draft Council decision concerning the conclusion of the amendments to the International Sugar Agreement, 1992 (07978/2022 — C9-0181/2022 — 2022/0082(NLE))
Date: 2022-09-13
Institutions: Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, Committee on Budgets, Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: commodity agreement, international organisation, multilateral agreement, revision of an agreement, sugar








C_2023125EN.01016701.xml










5.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 125/167






P9_TA(2022)0304
Conclusion of the amendments to the International Sugar Agreement, 1992 ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 September 2022 on the draft Council decision concerning the conclusion of the amendments to the International Sugar Agreement, 1992 (07978/2022 — C9-0181/2022 — 2022/0082(NLE))
(Consent)
(2023/C 125/16)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (07978/2022),










—


having regard to the draft amendments to the International Sugar Agreement, 1992 (07978/2022),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph, and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) (v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0181/2022),










—


having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4), and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A9-0229/2022),












1.


Gives its consent to the conclusion of the amendments to the agreement;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
Case T-170/21: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2022 — Ben Ali v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia — Death of the applicant — Proceedings not resumed by the successors — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2022-09-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Tunisia, damages, death, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2022451EN.01001401.xml










28.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 451/14






Order of the General Court of 13 September 2022 — Ben Ali v Council
(Case T-170/21) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia - Death of the applicant - Proceedings not resumed by the successors - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 451/16)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali (Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray, France) (represented by: A. de Saint Remy, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: L. Vétillard and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action, the applicant seeks, first, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, the annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/55 of 22 January 2021 amending Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia (OJ 2021 L 23, p. 22) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/49 of 22 January 2021 implementing Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 on restrictive measures against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia (OJ 2021 L 23, p. 5), in so far as those measures concern him and, second, on the basis of Article 268 TFEU, compensation for the damage which he has allegedly suffered as a result of those measures.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.
Case T-566/22: Action brought on 13 September 2022 — Sports Group Denmark v EUIPO (ENDURANCE)
Date: 2022-09-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, registered trade mark, retail trade, road safety, sports equipment, trade-mark law, wholesale trade








C_2022424EN.01004401.xml










7.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 424/44






Action brought on 13 September 2022 — Sports Group Denmark v EUIPO (ENDURANCE)
(Case T-566/22)
(2022/C 424/56)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Sports Group Denmark A/S (Silkeborg, Denmark) (represented by: T. Kruse Lie, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark figurative ENDURANCE — Application for registration No 1 542 490

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 July 2022 in Case R 1779/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in so far as it refused registration as an European Union trade mark of the figurative sign ENDURANCE in respect of the goods and services in Classes 9, 25, 28 and 35;










—


order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant, including the expenses necessarily incurred for the purpose of the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Special report 19/2022 ‘EU COVID-19 vaccine procurement – Sufficient doses secured after initial challenges, but performance of the process not sufficiently assessed’ 2022/C 350/05
Date: 2022-09-13
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU strategy, coronavirus disease, epidemic, security of supply, vaccination, vaccine








C_2022350EN.01000501.xml










13.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 350/5






Special report 19/2022
‘EU COVID-19 vaccine procurement – Sufficient doses secured after initial challenges, but performance of the process not sufficiently assessed’
(2022/C 350/05)
The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 19/2022: ‘EU COVID-19 vaccine procurement – Sufficient doses secured after initial challenges, but performance of the process not sufficiently assessed’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=61899
Case T-569/22: Action brought on 13 September 2022 — QZ v EIB
Date: 2022-09-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: absenteeism, disciplinary proceedings, indemnification, medical report, principle of legal certainty, staff regulations (EU)








C_2022451EN.01001501.xml










28.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 451/15






Action brought on 13 September 2022 — QZ v EIB
(Case T-569/22)
(2022/C 451/18)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: QZ (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)

Defendant: European Investment Bank

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the defendant’s decisions dated 5 October 2021 and 8 March 2022 in which the defendant alleges that the applicant had unjustified absences during three contested periods;










—


annul the defendant’s decision of 3 June 2022 rejecting the applicant’s request for an administrative review and confirming that the applicant had unjustified absences for three contested periods;










—


order the defendant to pay a compensation for the damage suffered by the applicant; and










—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.






1.


Regarding the first contested period, the applicant raises three pleas, alleging breach of the principle of legal certainty and of Article 3.6 of Annex X to the Staff Rules, breach of the duty to state reasons and of the right to a sound administration and, breach of the duty of care.










2.


Regarding the second contested period, the applicant raises two pleas, alleging breach of the duty of care and breach of Article 2.1, C, of Annex X to the Staff Rules.










3.


Regarding the third contested period, the applicant raises one plea, alleging that the defendant was not legally entitled to challenge of the applicant’s medical certificate.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 September 2022 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius on an extension of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius (05657/2022 — C9-0166/2022 — 2022/0014(NLE))
Date: 2022-09-13
Institutions: Committee on Budgets, Committee on Fisheries, European Parliament
Subjects: Mauritius, agreement (EU), catch quota, financial compensation of an agreement, fishing agreement, fishing rights, protocol to an agreement, ratification of an agreement, renewal of an agreement, sea fishing








C_2023125EN.01016801.xml










5.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 125/168






P9_TA(2022)0305
EU/Mauritius Fisheries Partnership Agreement: fishing opportunities and financial contribution 2017-2021. Extension of the Protocol ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 September 2022 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius on an extension of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius (05657/2022 — C9-0166/2022 — 2022/0014(NLE))
(Consent)
(2023/C 125/17)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (05657/2022),










—


having regard to the draft agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius concerning an extension of the Protocol on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius (05658/2022),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 43 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) (v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0166/2022),










—


having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Budgets,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries (A9-0211/2022),












1.


Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Mauritius.