do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-543/22: Action brought on 5 September 2022 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — BRM Extremities (BIOPLAN)
Date: 2022-09-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, medical device, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022408EN.01004001.xml










24.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 408/40






Action brought on 5 September 2022 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — BRM Extremities (BIOPLAN)
(Case T-543/22)
(2022/C 408/53)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Laboratorios Ern, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: S. Correa Rodríguez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: BRM Extremities Srl (Milan, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark BIOPLAN — Application for registration No 18 095 065

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2022 in Case R 2147/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and to BRM Extremities Srl, in case BRM Extremities Srl decides to intervene in the present proceedings, to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Special report 18/2022 ‘EU institutions and COVID-19 – Responded rapidly, challenges still ahead to make the best of the crisis-led innovation and flexibility’ 2022/C 339/04
Date: 2022-09-05
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: Council of the European Union, Court of Justice of the European Union, European Commission, European Parliament, coronavirus disease, epidemic, health risk, innovation, operation of the Institutions, teleworking








C_2022339EN.01000401.xml










5.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 339/4






Special report 18/2022
‘EU institutions and COVID-19 – Responded rapidly, challenges still ahead to make the best of the crisis-led innovation and flexibility’
(2022/C 339/04)
The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 18/2022 ‘EU institutions and COVID-19 – Responded rapidly, challenges still ahead to make the best of the crisis-led innovation and flexibility’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=61688
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 2 September 2022 2022/C 339/03
Date: 2022-09-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022339EN.01000301.xml










5.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 339/3






Euro exchange rates (1)

2 September 2022
(2022/C 339/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


0,9993 




JPY


Japanese yen


140,36 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4370 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86478 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,7498 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9839 




ISK


Iceland króna


141,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,0035 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,481 




HUF


Hungarian forint


398,38 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,7063 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8335 




TRY


Turkish lira


18,2072 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4671 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3131 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


7,8439 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6394 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4013 




KRW


South Korean won


1 360,84 




ZAR


South African rand


17,2791 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,9031 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5225 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 895,92 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,4809 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,854 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,624 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,2153 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,1024 




INR


Indian rupee


79,8096 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-551/22: Action brought on 5 September 2022 — QY v Commission
Date: 2022-09-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, control of State aid, corporation tax, job preservation, principle of legal certainty, right to justice, tax exemption, tax relief








C_2022424EN.01003901.xml










7.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 424/39






Action brought on 5 September 2022 — QY v Commission
(Case T-551/22)
(2022/C 424/50)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: QY (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, advogadas)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final, of 4 December 2020, on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal in favour of the Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III (Madeira Free Zone — Scheme III);










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.






1.


The first plea in law relates to the fulfilment of the requirements for the compatibility of the Zona Franca da Madeira — Regime III, namely the source of the earnings and the creation and maintenance of jobs in the region.










2.


The second plea in law relates to the allegedly unjustified delay in the Commission’s response.










3.


The third plea in law relates to the alleged failure to comply with the obligation to state reasons.










4.


The fourth plea in law relates to the right to a fair hearing.










5.


The fifth plea in law relates to the protection of legitimate expectations.










6.


The sixth plea in law relates to the principle of legal certainty.
Case C-584/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 5 September 2022 — QM v Kiwi Tours GmbH
Date: 2022-09-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, package travel, provision of services, termination of a contract








C_2022441EN.01001701.xml










21.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 441/17






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 5 September 2022 — QM v Kiwi Tours GmbH
(Case C-584/22)
(2022/C 441/24)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant and appellant on a point of law: QM

Defendant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Kiwi Tours GmbH

Questions referred

Is Article 12(2) of Directive (EU) 2015/2302 (1) to be interpreted






1.


as meaning that the assessment of the justification of the termination must be based solely on such unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances as have already occurred at the time of termination,










2.


or as meaning that it is also necessary to take into account unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances that actually occur after the termination but before the planned start of the journey?






(1)  Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements, amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC (OJ 2015 L 326, p. 1).
Case T-550/22: Action brought on 5 September 2022 — QW v Commission
Date: 2022-09-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, control of State aid, corporation tax, job preservation, principle of legal certainty, right to justice, tax exemption, tax relief








C_2022424EN.01003801.xml










7.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 424/38






Action brought on 5 September 2022 — QW v Commission
(Case T-550/22)
(2022/C 424/49)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: QW (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, advogadas)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final, of 4 December 2020, on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal in favour of the Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III (Madeira Free Zone — Scheme III);










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.






1.


The first plea in law relates to the fulfilment of the requirements for the compatibility of the Zona Franca da Madeira — Regime III, namely the source of the earnings and the creation and maintenance of jobs in the region.










2.


The second plea in law relates to the allegedly unjustified delay in the Commission’s response.










3.


The third plea in law relates to the alleged failure to comply with the obligation to state reasons.










4.


The fourth plea in law relates to the right to a fair hearing.










5.


The fifth plea in law relates to the protection of legitimate expectations.










6.


The sixth plea in law relates to the principle of legal certainty.