do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-566/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 26 August 2022 — Inkreal s. r. o. v Dúha reality s. r. o.
Date: 2022-08-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, application of EU law, establishment, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, private international law








C_2022432EN.01001201.xml










14.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 432/12






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 26 August 2022 — Inkreal s. r. o. v Dúha reality s. r. o.
(Case C-566/22)
(2022/C 432/14)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší soud

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Inkreal s. r. o.

Defendant: Dúha reality s. r. o.

Question referred

From the perspective of the existence of an international element, which is required for Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters to apply, is the application of that regulation to be based solely on the fact that two parties with their seat in the same Member State agree on the jurisdiction of courts of another EU Member State?


(1)  OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 25 August 2022 2022/C 322/01
Date: 2022-08-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022322EN.01000101.xml










26.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 322/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

25 August 2022
(2022/C 322/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


0,9970 




JPY


Japanese yen


136,07 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4374 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84293 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5525 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9616 




ISK


Iceland króna


140,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,6400 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,648 




HUF


Hungarian forint


408,93 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,7578 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8758 




TRY


Turkish lira


18,1120 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4306 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,2881 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


7,8234 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6006 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,3857 




KRW


South Korean won


1 331,98 




ZAR


South African rand


16,7903 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,8317 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5140 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 753,15 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,4586 




PHP


Philippine peso


55,842 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


35,732 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,0879 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,8132 




INR


Indian rupee


79,6555 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-572/22 P: Appeal brought on 26 August 2022 by Ana Carla Mendes de Almeida against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 13 June 2022 in Case T-334/21 Mendes de Almeida v Council
Date: 2022-08-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Public Prosecutor's Office, abuse of power, administrator, appointment of members, equal treatment, public prosecutor's department, right to justice, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU)








C_2022463EN.01001701.xml










5.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 463/17






Appeal brought on 26 August 2022 by Ana Carla Mendes de Almeida against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 13 June 2022 in Case T-334/21 Mendes de Almeida v Council
(Case C-572/22 P)
(2022/C 463/22)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Appellant: Ana Carla Mendes de Almeida (represented by: R. Leandro Vasconcelos, P. Almeida Sande and M. Tavares, advogados)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union
By order of 16 September 2022, the President of the Court ordered that the case be removed from the register.
Case T-518/22: Action brought on 26 August 2022 — GKP v EUIPO — Cristalfarma (TIARA RUBIS)
Date: 2022-08-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, electronic commerce, hairdressing and beauty care, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law








C_2022398EN.01003301.xml










17.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/33






Action brought on 26 August 2022 — GKP v EUIPO — Cristalfarma (TIARA RUBIS)
(Case T-518/22)
(2022/C 398/40)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: GKP GmbH (Ehrenhausen an der Weinstraße, Austria) (represented by: I. Hödl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cristalfarma Srl (Milan, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark TIARA RUBIS — Application for registration No 18 205 571

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2022 in Case R 1878/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul paragraph 2 of the operative part of the contested decision;










—


uphold in its entirety paragraph 1 of the operative part of the contested decision; and










—


order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs, including the costs of the earlier stages of the proceedings.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in respect of certain services in class 35;










—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in respect of goods in class 5 and certain services.
Case C-565/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 26 August 2022 — Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Sofatutor GmbH
Date: 2022-08-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, contract terms, distance selling, termination of a contract








C_2022441EN.01001201.xml










21.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 441/12






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 26 August 2022 — Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Sofatutor GmbH
(Case C-565/22)
(2022/C 441/16)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: Verein für Konsumenteninformation

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Sofatutor GmbH

Question referred

Must Article 9(1) of Directive 2011/83/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights be interpreted as meaning that the consumer has a new right of withdrawal where a distance contract is ‘extended automatically’ (Article 6(1)(o) of that directive)?


(1)  Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64).
Case C-574/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 26 August 2022 — Criminal proceedings against CI, VF, DY
Date: 2022-08-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: charge, drug traffic, penal code, psychotropic substance








C_2022424EN.01003201.xml










7.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 424/32






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 26 August 2022 — Criminal proceedings against CI, VF, DY
(Case C-574/22)
(2022/C 424/42)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski gradski sad

Parties to the main proceedings

CI,
VF,
DY

Question referred

Do the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004, (1) which supplement the blanket provision of Article 354a of the Nakazatelen kodeks (Criminal Code, Bulgaria) in conjunction with Article 3(4) of the Zakon za kontrol varhu narkotichnite veshtestva i prekursorite (Law on the control of narcotic substances and drug precursors), allow a person to be found guilty of possession of a category 3 substance as per Annex I, namely hydrochloric acid (hydrogen chloride) in a quantity of 585 millilitres (0,585 litres)?


(1)  Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 (OJ 2004 L 47, p. 1).