do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-497/22: Action brought on 12 August 2022 — Mordashova v Council
Date: 2022-08-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, economic sanctions, equal treatment, international sanctions, natural person, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, right to justice








C_2022368EN.01003101.xml










26.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 368/31






Action brought on 12 August 2022 — Mordashova v Council
(Case T-497/22)
(2022/C 368/52)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Marina Alexandrova Mordashova (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: T. Bontinck, D. Bogaert, A. Guillerme and L. Burguin, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/883 of 3 June 2022 in so far as it includes the applicant at No 1156 in the annex to that decision;










—


annul Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/878 of 3 June 2022 in so far as it includes the applicant at No 1156 in Annex I to that regulation;










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of her action against Decision (CFSP) 2022/883 (1) and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/878, (2) in so far as they concern her, the applicant relies on four pleas in law:






1.


The first plea in law alleges a breach of the right to effective judicial protection and the administration’s obligation to state reasons.










2.


The second plea in law alleges a manifest error of assessment in relation to the Council’s reasons.










3.


The third plea in law alleges a breach of the principle of proportionality and of fundamental rights as regards the adoption of restrictive measures against the applicant and unjustified interference with the applicant’s fundamental rights guaranteed under the Charter of Fundamental Rights.










4.


The fourth plea in law alleges a breach of the principle of equal treatment and the principle of legal certainty.






(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/883 of 3 June 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 153, p. 92).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/878 of 3 June 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 153, p. 15).
Corrigendum to Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10803 – ELKEM / HYDRO ENERGI INVEST / ALTOR FUND MANAGER / VIANODE) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (Official Journal of the European Union C 302 of 8 August 2022) 2022/C 307/11
Date: 2022-08-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, energy production, investment company, merger control, metallurgical industry, metals








C_2022307EN.01002601.xml










12.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 307/26






Corrigendum to Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10803 – ELKEM / HYDRO ENERGI INVEST / ALTOR FUND MANAGER / VIANODE) – Candidate case for simplified procedure

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 302 of 8 August 2022
)

(2022/C 307/11)
On page 2, point 1, first line:
for:

‘On 29 July 2022, …’,

read:

‘On 1 August 2022, …’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10795 – TA ASSOCIATES / VISTA / iCIMS) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 319/03
Date: 2022-08-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, electronic publishing, financial services, health care, investment company, merger control, service, software, technology








C_2022319EN.01000301.xml










23.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 319/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10795 – TA ASSOCIATES / VISTA / iCIMS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 319/03)
On 12 August 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10795. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-494/22: Action brought on 12 August 2022 — NSD v Council
Date: 2022-08-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, ownership, principle of proportionality








C_2022368EN.01003002.xml










26.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 368/30






Action brought on 12 August 2022 — NSD v Council
(Case T-494/22)
(2022/C 368/51)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: NKO AO National Settlement Depository (NSD) (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: N. Tuominen, M. Krestiyanova, J.-P. Fierens, C. Vangoidsenhoven and C. Gieskes, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/878 of 3 June 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, (1) and Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/883 of 3 June 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, (2) in their entirety insofar as they affect the applicant;










—


order the Council to pay the costs occasioned by these proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the contested acts breach the obligation to state adequate reasons.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the Council’s reasoning is vitiated by manifest errors of assessment. The applicant claims that the facts relied on by the Council are unsubstantiated, factually incorrect, and unfounded.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the effects resulting from the contested acts constitute a disproportionate restriction of the applicant’s fundamental rights protected, in particular, by Articles 16 and 17 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging that since the Council failed to meet the required standard of proof, individual sanctions against the applicant are unlawful.






(1)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/878 of 3 June 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (JO 2022 L 153, p. 15).

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/883 of 3 June 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (JO 2022 L 153, p. 92).
Case T-498/22: Action brought on 12 August 2022 — Melnichenko v Council
Date: 2022-08-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, economic sanctions, freedom of movement, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, protection of privacy, rights of the defence








C_2022368EN.01003201.xml










26.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 368/32






Action brought on 12 August 2022 — Melnichenko v Council
(Case T-498/22)
(2022/C 368/53)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Aleksandra Melnichenko (St. Moritz, Switzerland) (represented by: G. Lansky, P. Goeth and A. Egger, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul, pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/883 of 3 June 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions under-mining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (1) as well as Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/878 of 3 June 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, (2) in so far as those acts concern the applicant;










—


order the Council to pay the costs pursuant to Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the applicant’s designation unlawfully infringes upon the applicant’s rights protected under Articles 7, 17 and 45 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the applicant has not been given the right to be heard.






(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/883 of 3 June 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions under-mining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 153, p. 92).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/878 of 3 June 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 153, p. 15).
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 11 August 2022 2022/C 307/04
Date: 2022-08-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022307EN.01000801.xml










12.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 307/8






Euro exchange rates (1)

11 August 2022
(2022/C 307/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0338 




JPY


Japanese yen


136,57 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4395 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84575 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3600 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9712 




ISK


Iceland króna


139,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,8040 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,346 




HUF


Hungarian forint


394,18 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6828 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9055 




TRY


Turkish lira


18,5674 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4532 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3202 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,1118 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6045 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4151 




KRW


South Korean won


1 344,62 




ZAR


South African rand


16,7083 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,9668 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5150 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 215,93 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5952 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,225 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,343 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,2447 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,6398 




INR


Indian rupee


82,2845 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10823 – CLEARLAKE / TA ASSOCIATES / EPHESOFT) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 319/04
Date: 2022-08-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: cloud computing, economic concentration, electronic publishing, information storage and retrieval, investment company, merger control, service, software








C_2022319EN.01000401.xml










23.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 319/4






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10823 – CLEARLAKE / TA ASSOCIATES / EPHESOFT)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 319/04)
On 12 August 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10823. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 307/05
Date: 2022-08-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: France, Ile-de-France, Occitanie, air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2022307EN.01000901.xml










12.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 307/9






Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 307/05)






Member State


France




Route concerned


Castres - Paris (Orly)




Original date of entry into force of the public service obligation


6 May 2002




Date of entry into force of the changes


1 June 2023




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained


Order of 13 July 2022 amending the public service obligation imposed on scheduled air services between Castres and Paris (Orly)
NOR : TREA2216641A
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
For further information please contact:





Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile




DTA/SDS1




50 rue Henry Farman




75 720  Paris CEDEX 15




FRANCE




Tel. +33 158094321
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10839 – APOLLO CAPITAL MANAGEMENT / SCHUR FLEXIBLES GROUP) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 307/07
Date: 2022-08-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, merger control, packaging product, plastics industry








C_2022307EN.01001201.xml










12.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 307/12






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10839 – APOLLO CAPITAL MANAGEMENT / SCHUR FLEXIBLES GROUP)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 307/07)

1.   
On 2 August 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Apollo Capital Management, L.P. (‘Apollo’, United States),










—


Schur Flexibles GmbH, (‘Schur Flexibles’, Austria).




Apollo will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control over Schur Flexibles.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


for Apollo: investing in various businesses throughout the world including, inter alia, companies in the chemical, real estate, insurance, paper, and television production businesses,










—


for Schur Flexibles: production and sale of flexible packaging products and trading of raw materials for its manufacture at global level.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission no later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10839 – APOLLO CAPITAL MANAGEMENT / SCHUR FLEXIBLES GROUP
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10823 – CLEARLAKE / TA ASSOCIATES / EPHESOFT) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 222/06
Date: 2022-08-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: cloud computing, economic concentration, electronic publishing, information storage and retrieval, investment company, merger control, service, software








C_2023222EN.01003201.xml










26.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/32






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10823 – CLEARLAKE / TA ASSOCIATES / EPHESOFT)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 222/06)
On 12 August 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10823. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.