do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-532/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj (Romania) lodged on 9 August 2022 — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Cluj v SC Westside Unicat
Date: 2022-08-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Internet site, VAT, provision of services, sexuality, video communications








C_2022451EN.01001001.xml










28.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 451/10






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj (Romania) lodged on 9 August 2022 — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Cluj v SC Westside Unicat
(Case C-532/22)
(2022/C 451/13)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Cluj

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Cluj

Defendant: SC Westside Unicat

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 53 of the VAT Directive (1) to be interpreted as applying to services of the type at issue in this dispute, which is to say services provided by a video chat studio to a website operator, consisting in interactive sessions of an erotic nature filmed and transmitted in real [time] via the Internet (live streaming of digital content)?










2.


In the event that the first question is answered in the affirmative, then, for the purposes of interpreting the phrase ‘the place where those events actually take place’, appearing in Article 53 of the VAT Directive, is the place where the performers appear in front of the webcam relevant, or the place where the organiser of the sessions is established, or the place where customers see the images, or should some other place be taken into account?






(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).
Case C-529/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 9 August 2022 — PA v trendtours Touristik GmbH
Date: 2022-08-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, package travel, provision of services, termination of a contract, traveller








C_2022441EN.01000501.xml










21.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 441/5






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 9 August 2022 — PA v trendtours Touristik GmbH
(Case C-529/22)
(2022/C 441/09)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Frankfurt am Main

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant and appellant: PA

Defendant and respondent: trendtours Touristik GmbH

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 12(2) of Directive (EU) 2015/2302 (1) of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements, amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC (‘the Package Travel Directive’) be interpreted as providing for a further right of termination — in addition to that provided for in Article 12(1) of that directive — the legal consequences of which apply only if the traveller invokes, in his or her declaration of termination, unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances occurring at the place of destination or its immediate vicinity and significantly affecting the performance of the package, or which significantly affect the carriage of passengers to the destination?










2.


Must Article 12(2) of the Package Travel Directive be interpreted as meaning that an obligation to pay a termination fee does not cease to apply where the traveller does not state a reason when terminating the package and justifies the termination only subsequently by reference to unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances at the time of termination, this being determined by means of a prognosis, or occurring at the time of travel at the place of destination or its immediate vicinity and significantly affecting the performance of the package, or which significantly affect the carriage of passengers to the destination?






(1)  OJ 2015 L 326, p. 1.
Case C-531/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 9 August 2022 — Getin Noble Bank and Others
Date: 2022-08-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, enforcement of ruling, evidence, injunction, judicial review, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, right to justice, rights of the defence, unfair terms of contract








C_2022424EN.01002801.xml










7.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 424/28






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 9 August 2022 — Getin Noble Bank and Others
(Case C-531/22)
(2022/C 424/37)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Claimants: Getin Noble Bank S.A., TF, C2, PI

Participants in the proceedings: TL, EOS, Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w Warszawie, MG, court enforcement officer AC

Questions referred







1.


Are Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, (1) and the principles of legal certainty, inviolability of final court judgments, effectiveness, and proportionality to be interpreted as precluding national legislation which provides that a national court may not carry out, of its own motion, a review of unfair contractual terms and attach consequences thereto where it is supervising enforcement proceedings conducted by a court enforcement officer pursuant to a final and enforceable order for payment issued in proceedings in which no evidence is taken?










2.


Are Articles 3(1), 6(1) and 7(1) and (2), and 8 of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the principles of legal certainty, effectiveness and proportionality, and the right to be heard by a court, to be interpreted as precluding a judicial interpretation of national legislation under which the entry of an unfair term in the register of unlawful terms renders that term unfair in any proceedings involving a consumer, including:






—


in respect of a seller or supplier other than that against which proceedings for entry of an unfair term in the register of unlawful terms were under way,










—


in respect of a term which is not linguistically identical but which has the same meaning and produces the same effect vis-à-vis the consumer?










(1)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.
Case C-481/21: Order of the President of the Court of 9 August 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden — Germany) — TX v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Date: 2022-08-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to information, data protection, judicial review, personal data, right to justice, right to work, threat to national security








C_2022408EN.01003502.xml










24.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 408/35






Order of the President of the Court of 9 August 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden — Germany) — TX v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
(Case C-481/21) (1)

(2022/C 408/47)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 422, 18.10.2021.
Joined Cases C-148/20 to C-150/20: Order of the President of the Court of 9 August 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln — Germany) — AC (C-148/20), DF (C-149/20), BD (C-150/20) v Deutsche Lufthansa AG, interested party: Bundeskriminalamt (C-150/20)
Date: 2022-08-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, data collection, data protection, data transmission, personal data, protection of privacy, third country, traveller








C_2023015EN.01003201.xml










16.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 15/32






Order of the President of the Court of 9 August 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln — Germany) — AC (C-148/20), DF (C-149/20), BD (C-150/20) v Deutsche Lufthansa AG, interested party: Bundeskriminalamt (C-150/20)
(Joined Cases C-148/20 to C-150/20) (1)

(2023/C 15/35)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the cases be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 8 August 2022 2022/C 304/04
Date: 2022-08-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022304EN.01000401.xml










9.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 304/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

8 August 2022
(2022/C 304/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0199 




JPY


Japanese yen


137,62 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4405 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84165 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3650 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9763 




ISK


Iceland króna


140,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,9405 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,515 




HUF


Hungarian forint


394,27 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,7043 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9163 




TRY


Turkish lira


18,3175 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4607 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3134 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,0061 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6202 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4058 




KRW


South Korean won


1 329,93 




ZAR


South African rand


16,9694 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,8931 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5123 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 147,65 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5477 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,554 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,380 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,2380 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,6810 




INR


Indian rupee


81,1660 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.