do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-622/21: Order of the General Court of 2 August 2022 — Puma v EUIPO — SMB Swisspour (PUMA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2022-08-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer equipment, iron and steel industry, measuring equipment, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2022398EN.01002501.xml










17.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/25






Order of the General Court of 2 August 2022 — Puma v EUIPO — SMB Swisspour (PUMA)
(Case T-622/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 398/28)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Schäfer and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: SMB Swisspour GmbH (Wildau, Germany)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 July 2021 (Case R 2493/2019-1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Puma SE shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 471, 22.11.2021.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10687 – D’IETEREN / PHE) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 154/01
Date: 2022-08-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, France, economic concentration, family business, general mechanical engineering, investment company, large vehicle, light-duty vehicle, merger control, provision of services, vehicle parts








C_2023154EN.01000101.xml










2.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 154/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10687 – D’IETEREN / PHE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 154/01)
On 2 August 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10687. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-481/22: Action brought on 2 August 2022 — Group of processors and producers of sheepmilk and goatmilk v EUIPO — Kolios (HALLOUMAKI)
Date: 2022-08-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, business administration, business management, company growth, provision of services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022368EN.01002702.xml










26.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 368/27






Action brought on 2 August 2022 — Group of processors and producers of sheepmilk and goatmilk v EUIPO — Kolios (HALLOUMAKI)
(Case T-481/22)
(2022/C 368/47)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Group of processors and producers of sheepmilk and goatmilk (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister-at-Law and C. Milbradt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kolios AE Elliniki Viomichania Galaktos (Kilkis, Greece)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark HALLOUMAKI — Application for registration No 18 126 405

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 May 2022 in Case R 1941/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO (and the intervener, should it take part in the proceedings) to bear its own costs and pay the costs of the applicant for annulment before the General Court and before the Board of Appeal.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 13(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.): 0,00 % on 1 August 2022 Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 1 August 2022 2022/C 295/04
Date: 2022-08-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Central Bank, euro, exchange rate, financing, interest, money








C_2022295EN.01000401.xml










2.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/4






Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):
0,00 % on 1 August 2022
Euro exchange rates (2)

1 August 2022
(2022/C 295/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0233 




JPY


Japanese yen


135,38 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4457 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83700 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3668 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9717 




ISK


Iceland króna


138,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,8638 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,628 




HUF


Hungarian forint


401,35 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,7340 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9283 




TRY


Turkish lira


18,3475 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4535 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3076 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,0329 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6160 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4087 




KRW


South Korean won


1 333,30 




ZAR


South African rand


16,8613 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,9105 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5210 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 203,21 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5568 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,734 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,977 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,2723 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,7635 




INR


Indian rupee


80,9335 






(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-592/21: Order of the General Court of 2 August 2022 — Kakuzo v EUIPO — Rauch Fruchtsäfte (Kakuzo) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2022-08-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, beverage industry, coffee, honey, instant product, registered trade mark, sugar, tea, trade-mark law








C_2022398EN.01002401.xml










17.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/24






Order of the General Court of 2 August 2022 — Kakuzo v EUIPO — Rauch Fruchtsäfte (Kakuzo)
(Case T-592/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 398/27)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Kakuzo GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and D. Mienert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: I. Harrington and D. Gája, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Rauch Fruchtsäfte GmbH (Rankweil, Austria)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 July 2021 (Case R 356/2021-5)

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Kakuzo GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 502, 13.12.2021.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10784 – BAIN CAPITAL / BPEA / CITIUSTECH) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 333/01
Date: 2022-08-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: India, economic concentration, health care, health technology, holding company, investment company, merger control, outsourcing, provision of services, software








C_2022333EN.01000101.xml










1.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 333/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10784 – BAIN CAPITAL / BPEA / CITIUSTECH)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 333/01)
On 2 August 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10784. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2022/576 of 8 April 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (Official Journal of the European Union L 111 of 8 April 2022)
Date: 2022-08-02
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law, trade restriction








L_2022202EN.01005801.xml










2.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 202/58







Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2022/576 of 8 April 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 111 of 8 April 2022
)


On page 42, in Annex XXIII, under the column ‘CN code’:
for:


                  ‘
                  3920 20
                  ’,

read:


                  ‘
                  3920 10
                  ’.