do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-439/22: Action brought on 14 July 2022 — Rada Perfumery v EUIPO — Prada (RADA PERFUMES)
Date: 2022-07-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, consultancy, cosmetic product, electronic commerce, market research, merchandising, registered trade mark, sales promotion, trade-mark law








C_2022326EN.01002901.xml










29.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 326/29






Action brought on 14 July 2022 — Rada Perfumery v EUIPO — Prada (RADA PERFUMES)
(Case T-439/22)
(2022/C 326/40)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Rada Perfumery SRL (Cluj-Napoca, Romania) (represented by: E.-M. Dicu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Prada SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark RADA PERFUMES — Application for registration No 18 186 386

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 April 2022 in Case R 1610/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and, as a consequence, reject the opposition and, consequently, admit the registration of the European Union trade mark No 18 186 386.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-159/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 July 2022 — European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 — Quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs — Article 13 — Use of the protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Feta’ to designate cheese produced in Denmark and intended for export to third countries — Article 4(3) TEU — Principle of sincere cooperation)
Date: 2022-07-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: cheese, designation of origin, export (EU), infringement of EU law, product designation, quality control of agricultural products








C_2022340EN.01000901.xml










5.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/9






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 July 2022 — European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark
(Case C-159/20) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 - Quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs - Article 13 - Use of the protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Feta’ to designate cheese produced in Denmark and intended for export to third countries - Article 4(3) TEU - Principle of sincere cooperation)
(2022/C 340/09)
Language of the case: Danish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Konstantinidis, I. Naglis and U. Nielsen, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: M.P. Brøchner Jespersen, J. Nymann-Lindegren, V. Pasternak Jørgensen, M. Søndahl Wolff and L. Teilgård, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E.-E. Krompa, E. Leftheriotou, E. Tsaousi and A.-E. Vasilopoulou, acting as Agents), Republic of Cyprus (represented by: V. Christoforou and E. Zachariadou, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing to prevent or stop the use by Danish dairy producers of the protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Feta’ to designate cheese which does not comply with the product specification for that PDO, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the Kingdom of Denmark to bear its own costs and to pay four fifths of the costs of the European Commission;










4.


Orders the European Commission to bear one fifth of its costs;










5.


Orders the Hellenic Republic and the Republic of Cyprus each to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1176 of 14 July 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the indicative maps of the trans-European transport network (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2022-07-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Ukraine, inland waterway, international cooperation, rail network, road network, sustainable mobility, trans-European network, transport infrastructure, transport network, transport planning




L_2023156EN.01000101.xml










19.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 156/1








            COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2023/1176
of 14 July 2022
         
amending Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the indicative maps of the trans-European transport network
(Text with EEA relevance)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU (1), and in particular Article 49(6) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 provides for the possibility to adapt the indicative maps of the trans-European transport network (TEN-T) of specific neighbouring countries, or add new ones, based on high-level agreements on transport infrastructure networks between the Union and the neighbouring countries concerned.












(2)


A high-level agreement as referred to in Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 was signed between the Union and Ukraine on 29 June 2022. The agreement on the changes to the indicative TEN-T maps concerns the railway lines, roads, and the inclusion of inland waterways. The changes to the indicative maps should allow the Union to better target its cooperation with Ukraine.












(3)


Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 14 July 2022.


For the Commission


The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 348, 20.12.2013, p. 1.




ANNEX
Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 is amended as follows:






(1)


maps 16.7 and 16.8 are replaced by the following:




















(2)


the following map 16.9 is added:
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 13 July 2022 2022/C 271/05
Date: 2022-07-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022271EN.01000601.xml










14.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/6






Euro exchange rates (1)

13 July 2022
(2022/C 271/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0067 




JPY


Japanese yen


138,02 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4416 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84371 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,6020 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9829 




ISK


Iceland króna


138,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,2428 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,397 




HUF


Hungarian forint


409,35 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,8240 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9414 




TRY


Turkish lira


17,5629 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4802 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3073 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


7,9025 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6350 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4134 




KRW


South Korean won


1 311,40 




ZAR


South African rand


17,0527 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,7722 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5155 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 117,08 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,4667 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,669 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,377 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,4533 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,9029 




INR


Indian rupee


80,1285 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-25/22: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht — Austria) — CM v Finanzamt Österreich (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2022-07-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: admissibility, family benefit, foreign national, international organisation, social security legislation, wage earner








C_2022340EN.01001302.xml










5.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/13






Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht — Austria) — CM v Finanzamt Österreich
(Case C-25/22) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2022/C 340/15)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: CM

Defendant: Finanzamt Österreich

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Bundesfinanzgericht (Federal Finance Court, Austria), by decision of 31 December 2021, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  Date of filing: 10.1.2022.
Case T-203/21: Order of the General Court of 14 July 2022 — IN.PRO.DI v EUIPO — Aiello (CAPRI) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2022-07-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing industry, cosmetic product, footwear industry, leather, optical industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022340EN.01004102.xml










5.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/41






Order of the General Court of 14 July 2022 — IN.PRO.DI v EUIPO — Aiello (CAPRI)
(Case T-203/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 340/57)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: IN.PRO.DI — Inghirami produzione distribuzione SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: V. Piccarreta, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Antonino Aiello (Naples, Italy) (represented by: L. Manna, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 February 2021 (Case R 49/2020-1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.
State aid – Decision to raise no objections 2022/C 271/06
Date: 2022-07-14
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Internet, Norway, State aid, VAT, control of State aid, mass media, pluralism in the media, programmes industry, tax relief








C_2022271EN.01000701.xml










14.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/7






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(2022/C 271/06)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


23 February 2022




Case No


88118




Decision No


052/22/COL




EFTA State


Norway




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Prolongation of a zero VAT rate for certain electronic news services




Legal basis


Act on Value Added Tax of 19 June 2009, No 58; and Regulation concerning Value Added Tax of 15 December 2009, No 1540




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


Support the demand and consumption of news and current affairs content among consumers; and to promote media pluralism and diversity




Form of aid


Zero VAT rate




Budget


Approx. NOK 500 million/year




Duration


Until 1 Mars 2028




Economic sectors


Broadcasting and on-demand news services mainly containing audio or audio-visual content




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministry of Finance




P.O. Box 8008 Dep.




N-0030 Oslo




NORWAY








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Internet: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/
Case C-207/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 July 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Poland and Others (Appeal — Annulment of Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1442 — Article 16(4) and (5) TEU — Article 3(2) and (3) of Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions — Application ratione temporis — Council’s voting rules — Qualified majority)
Date: 2022-07-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: atmospheric pollutant, industrial pollution, machinery, majority voting system, pollution control, prevention of pollution, qualified majority, reduction of gas emissions, technological change, transitional period (EU)








C_2022359EN.01000601.xml










19.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 359/6






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 July 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Poland and Others
(Case C-207/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Annulment of Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1442 - Article 16(4) and (5) TEU - Article 3(2) and (3) of Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions - Application ratione temporis - Council’s voting rules - Qualified majority)
(2022/C 359/06)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: Ł. Habiak, K. Herrmann, R. Tricot and C. Valero, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent), Kingdom of Belgium, Republic of Bulgaria, French Republic, Hungary, Kingdom of Sweden (represented initially by H. Eklinder, J. Lundberg, C. Meyer-Seitz, A. Runeskjöld, M. Salborn Hodgson, R. Shahsavan Eriksson, H. Shev and O. Simonsson, and subsequently by H. Eklinder, C. Meyer-Seitz, A. Runeskjöld, M. Salborn Hodgson, R. Shahsavan Eriksson, H. Shev and O. Simonsson, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Republic of Poland.






(1)  OJ C 206, 31.5.2021.
Joined Cases C-59/18 and C-182/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2022 — Italian Republic, Comune di Milano v Council of the European Union (Action for annulment — Law governing the institutions — EU bodies, offices and agencies — European Medicines Agency (EMA) — Competence to determine the location of the seat — Article 341 TFEU — Scope — Decision adopted by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States in the margins of a Council meeting — Jurisdiction of the Court under Article 263 TFEU — Author and legal nature of the act — Absence of binding effects in the EU legal order)
Date: 2022-07-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Medicines Agency, Lombardy, Netherlands, North Holland, powers of the institutions (EU), seat of institution








C_2022340EN.01000201.xml










5.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/2






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2022 — Italian Republic, Comune di Milano v Council of the European Union
(Joined Cases C-59/18 and C-182/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Law governing the institutions - EU bodies, offices and agencies - European Medicines Agency (EMA) - Competence to determine the location of the seat - Article 341 TFEU - Scope - Decision adopted by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States in the margins of a Council meeting - Jurisdiction of the Court under Article 263 TFEU - Author and legal nature of the act - Absence of binding effects in the EU legal order)
(2022/C 340/02)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicants: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, Agent, and by C. Colelli, S. Fiorentino and G. Galluzzo, avvocati dello Stato), Comune di Milano (represented by: M. Condinanzi, A. Neri and F. Sciaudone, avvocati)

Intervener in support of the Comune di Milano: Regione Lombardia (represented by: M. Tamborino, avvocato)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer, J. Bauerschmidt, F. Florindo Gijón and E. Rebasti, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M.K. Bulterman and J. Langer, Agents), European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann, M. Konstantinidis and D. Nardi, Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the actions;










2.


Orders the Italian Republic, the Comune di Milano and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs;










3.


Orders the Regione Lombardia, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the European Commission to bear their own costs






(1)  OJ C 94, 12.3.2018.
Case C-657/20: Order of the President of the Court of 14 July 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 1 de Cazalla de la Sierra — Spain) — Caixabank S.A. v ZN, SD, AH
Date: 2022-07-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer credit, consumer protection, real estate credit, redemption, unfair terms of contract








C_2022368EN.01001903.xml










26.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 368/19






Order of the President of the Court of 14 July 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 1 de Cazalla de la Sierra — Spain) — Caixabank S.A. v ZN, SD, AH
(Case C-657/20) (1)

(2022/C 368/30)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 88, 15.3.2021.
Case T-170/22 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 14 July 2022 — Telefónica de España v Commission (Interim relief — Public contracts for services — Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations (TESTA) — Application for interim measures — Lack of urgency)
Date: 2022-07-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: award of contract, invitation to tender, provision of services, public procurement, services contract, telematics, tendering, trans-European network








C_2022340EN.01004302.xml










5.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/43






Order of the President of the General Court of 14 July 2022 — Telefónica de España v Commission
(Case T-170/22 R)
(Interim relief - Public contracts for services - Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations (TESTA) - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency)
(2022/C 340/61)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Telefónica de España, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: F. González Díaz, J. Blanco Carol, lawyers, and P. Stuart, Barrister)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. André and M. Ilkova, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, suspension of the operation of the decision of the European Commission of 21 January 2022 relating to the Call for Tenders DIGIT/A 3/PR/2019/010, entitled ‘Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations (TESTA)’, informing the applicant that its tender was not successful in the procurement procedure and announcing the imminent signing of the contract with the successful tenderer and, secondly, an order requiring the Commission to suspend the signing of that contract.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The order of 1 April 2022, Telefónica de España v Commission (T-170/22 R), is cancelled.










3.


There is no longer any need to rule on the application to intervene lodged by the company BT Global Services Belgium BV.










4.


The costs are reserved, with the exception of those incurred by the company BT Global Services Belgium BV. It shall bear the costs in connection with its application to intervene.
Case C-110/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 July 2022 — Universität Bremen v European Research Executive Agency (REA) (Appeal — Action for annulment — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Representation of non-privileged parties in a direct action before the Courts of the European Union — University teacher — University teacher teaching at the university represented in that action and performing duties as coordinator and head of the project that is the subject matter of the dispute — Condition of independence — Existence of a direct and personal interest in the outcome of the dispute)
Date: 2022-07-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU financing, Framework Programme for Research and Development, financial aid, invitation to tender, judicial proceedings, legal expenses, public legal official, teacher, university








C_2022340EN.01001202.xml










5.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/12






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 July 2022 — Universität Bremen v European Research Executive Agency (REA)
(Case C-110/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Action for annulment - Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Representation of non-privileged parties in a direct action before the Courts of the European Union - University teacher - University teacher teaching at the university represented in that action and performing duties as coordinator and head of the project that is the subject matter of the dispute - Condition of independence - Existence of a direct and personal interest in the outcome of the dispute)
(2022/C 340/13)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Universität Bremen (represented by: C. Schmid)

Other party to the proceedings: European Research Executive Agency (REA) (represented by: V. Canetti and S. Payan Lagrou, Agents, and by R. van der Hout, advocaat, and C. Wagner, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 16 December 2020, Universität Bremen v REA (T-660/19, not published, EU:T:2020:633);










2.


Refers Case T-660/19 back to the General Court of the European Union;










3.


Reserves the costs.






(1)  OJ C 182, 10.5.2021.