Case C-134/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Eisenstadt — Austria) — IR v Volkswagen AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 — Approval of motor vehicles — Article 3(10) — Article 5(1) and (2) — Defeat device — Motor vehicles — Diesel engines — Pollutant emissions — Emission control system — Software installed in the electronic engine controller — Exhaust gas recirculation valve (‘EGR valve’) — Reduction in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions limited by a ‘temperature window’ — Prohibition on the use of defeat devices that reduce the effectiveness of emission control systems — Article 5(2)(a) — Exception to that prohibition — Directive 1999/44/EC — Sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees — Article 3(2) — Device installed during the repair of a vehicle)
Date: 2022-07-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: anti-pollution device, approval, approximation of laws, combustion gases, diesel engine, motor vehicle pollution, pollution control, reduction of gas emissions, software, vehicle parts








C_2022340EN.01000701.xml










5.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/7






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Eisenstadt — Austria) — IR v Volkswagen AG
(Case C-134/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 - Approval of motor vehicles - Article 3(10) - Article 5(1) and (2) - Defeat device - Motor vehicles - Diesel engines - Pollutant emissions - Emission control system - Software installed in the electronic engine controller - Exhaust gas recirculation valve (‘EGR valve’) - Reduction in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions limited by a ‘temperature window’ - Prohibition on the use of defeat devices that reduce the effectiveness of emission control systems - Article 5(2)(a) - Exception to that prohibition - Directive 1999/44/EC - Sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees - Article 3(2) - Device installed during the repair of a vehicle)
(2022/C 340/07)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesgericht Eisenstadt

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: IR

Defendant: Volkswagen AG

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 3(10) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information, read in conjunction with Article 5(1) of that regulation, must be interpreted as meaning that a device which ensures compliance with the emission limits laid down by that regulation only when the outside temperature is between 15 and 33 oC and the driving altitude is below 1 000 metres constitutes a ‘defeat device’ within the meaning of Article 3(10) of that regulation.










2.


Article 5(2)(a) of Regulation No 715/2007 must be interpreted as meaning that a defeat device, which guarantees compliance with the emission limits laid down by that regulation only where the outside temperature is between 15 and 33 oC, and the driving altitude is less than 1 000 metres, cannot fall within the exception to the prohibition on the use of such devices, laid down in that provision, solely because that device is intended to protect the exhaust gas recirculation valve, unless it is established that that device strictly meets the need to avoid immediate risks of damage or accident to the engine, caused by a malfunction of that part, of such a serious nature as to give rise to a specific hazard when a vehicle fitted with that device is driven. In any event, a defeat device which, under normal driving conditions, operated during most of the year in order to protect the engine from damage or accident and ensure the safe operation of the vehicle could not fall within the exception provided for in Article 5(2)(a) of Regulation No 715/2007.










3.


Article 5(1) and (2) of Regulation No 715/2007, read in conjunction with Article 3(10) of that regulation, must be interpreted as meaning that the fact that a defeat device, within the meaning of that provision, was installed after a vehicle was put into service, in the course of a repair, within the meaning of Article 3(2) of Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees, is irrelevant for the purposes of assessing whether the use of that device is prohibited under Article 5(2) of that directive.






(1)  OJ C 271, 17.8.2020.