do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 11 July 2022 2022/C 267/03
Date: 2022-07-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022267EN.01000301.xml










12.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 267/3






Euro exchange rates (1)

11 July 2022
(2022/C 267/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0098 




JPY


Japanese yen


138,77 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4414 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84540 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,6943 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9908 




ISK


Iceland króna


139,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,2990 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,592 




HUF


Hungarian forint


408,22 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,7968 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9430 




TRY


Turkish lira


17,5447 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4910 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3140 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


7,9265 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6466 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4178 




KRW


South Korean won


1 320,36 




ZAR


South African rand


17,1634 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,7793 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5180 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 131,92 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,4704 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,574 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,585 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,3673 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,7845 




INR


Indian rupee


80,2435 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Council Decision of 12 July 2022 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for Italy 2022/C 271/04
Date: 2022-07-12
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Italy, advisory committee (EU), appointment of members, occupational safety




C_2022271EN.01000401.xml










14.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/4






COUNCIL DECISION
of 12 July 2022
appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for Italy
(2022/C 271/04)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to the Council Decision of 22 July 2003 setting up an Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work (1), and in particular Article 3 thereof,
Having regard to the lists of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States,
Whereas:






(1)


By means of its Decision of 24 February 2022 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period from 1 March 2022 to 28 February 2025.










(2)


The Government of Italy has submitted further nominations for several posts to be filled,




HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The following are hereby appointed as members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 28 February 2025:






I.


GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES







Member State


Members


Alternate members




Italy


Mr Antonio VALENTI


Ms Laura TOMASSINI














II.


TRADE-UNION REPRESENTATIVES







Member State


Members


Alternate members




Italy


Mr Fabio DURANTE


Ms Cinzia FRASCHERI
Ms Susanna COSTA














III.


EMPLOYERS’ REPRESENTATIVES







Member State


Members


Alternate members




Italy


Ms Fabiola LEUZZI


Mr Fabrizio MONACO
Mr Pier Paolo MASCIOCCHI










Article 2
The Council shall appoint the members and alternate members not yet nominated at a later date.


Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.


Done at Brussels, 12 July 2022.


For the Council


The President

Z. STANJURA




(1)  OJ C 218, 13.9.2003, p. 1.

(2)  Council Decision of 24 February 2022 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work (OJ C 92, 25.2.2022, p. 1).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10785 – ICG / KONECTA / COMDATA) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 319/01
Date: 2022-07-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, merger control, outsourcing, provision of services








C_2022319EN.01000101.xml










23.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 319/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10785 – ICG / KONECTA / COMDATA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 319/01)
On 12 July 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10785. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-228/22: Order of the President of the Court of 12 July 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — flightright GmbH v Eurowings GmbH
Date: 2022-07-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, bad weather, carriage of passengers, carrier, indemnification, traveller








C_2022368EN.01002202.xml










26.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 368/22






Order of the President of the Court of 12 July 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — flightright GmbH v Eurowings GmbH
(Case C-228/22) (1)

(2022/C 368/41)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 237, 20.6.2022.
Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1207 of 12 July 2022 amending Regulation (EC) No 974/98 as regards the introduction of the euro in Croatia
Date: 2022-07-12
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Croatia, Economic and Monetary Union, Euro Group (euro area), economic convergence, euro, monetary union, participating country (euro area)








L_2022187EN.01001601.xml










14.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 187/16








            COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) 2022/1207
of 12 July 2022
         
amending Regulation (EC) No 974/98 as regards the introduction of the euro in Croatia


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 140(3) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,


Having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank (1),

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EC) No 974/98 (2) provides for the substitution of the euro for the currencies of the Member States which fulfilled the necessary conditions for the adoption of the euro at the time when the Community entered the third stage of economic and monetary union.












(2)


According to Article 5 of the 2012 Act of Accession, Croatia is a Member State with a derogation, as defined in Article 139(1) of the Treaty.












(3)


Pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2022/1211 (3), Croatia fulfils the necessary conditions for the adoption of the euro and the derogation regarding Croatia is to be abrogated with effect from 1 January 2023.












(4)


The introduction of the euro in Croatia requires the extension to Croatia of the existing provisions on the introduction of the euro that are set out in Regulation (EC) No 974/98.












(5)


Croatia’s National Euro Changeover Plan specifies that euro banknotes and coins should become legal tender in that Member State on the day of the introduction of the euro as its currency. Consequently, the euro adoption date and the cash changeover date should be 1 January 2023. No ‘phasing-out’ period should apply.












(6)


Regulation (EC) No 974/98 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
In the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 974/98, the following entry is inserted between the entry for France and the entry for Ireland:









‘Croatia


1 January 2023


1 January 2023


No’







Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2023.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 12 July 2022.


For the Council


The President

Z. STANJURA
            





(1)  Opinion of 4 July 2022 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 974/98 of 3 May 1998 on the introduction of the euro (OJ L 139, 11.5.1998, p. 1).

(3)  Council Decision (EU) 2022/1211 of 12 July 2022 on the adoption by Croatia of the euro on 1 January 2023 (see page 31 of this Official Journal).
Case T-437/22: Action brought on 12 July 2022 — Vanhove v EUIPO — Aldi Einkauf (bistro Régent)
Date: 2022-07-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, wine








C_2022326EN.01002802.xml










29.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 326/28






Action brought on 12 July 2022 — Vanhove v EUIPO — Aldi Einkauf (bistro Régent)
(Case T-437/22)
(2022/C 326/39)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Vanhove (Bordeaux, France) (represented by: N. Castagnon, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aldi Einkauf SE & Co. OHG (Essen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark bistro Régent — Application for registration No 18 136 358

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 May 2022 in Case R 1113/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


grant the European Union trade mark registration in respect of the designated ‘wines’ in Class 33;










—


order EUIPO and, in case of an intervention, also the intervener to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-467/22 P: Appeal brought on 12 July 2022 by Airoldi Metalli SpA against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 2 May 2022 in Case T-328/21, Airoldi Metalli v Commission
Date: 2022-07-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: China, aluminium, anti-dumping duty, evidence, import (EU), non-flat product, originating product








C_2022326EN.01001701.xml










29.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 326/17






Appeal brought on 12 July 2022 by Airoldi Metalli SpA against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 2 May 2022 in Case T-328/21, Airoldi Metalli v Commission
(Case C-467/22 P)
(2022/C 326/25)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Airoldi Metalli SpA (represented by: M. Campa, M. Pirovano, V. Villante, D. Rovetta, avvocati, and P. Gjørtler, advokat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside the order under appeal and declare the action brought by Airoldi Metalli SpA admissible;










—


refer the case back to the General Court for examining the substance of Airoldi Metalli SpA’s action;










—


order the Commission to bear the costs of the present appeal and of the proceedings before the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant relies on two main grounds of appeal.
First ground of appeal. Error in law in interpreting the final limb of Article 263 (4) TFEU and the requisite and notion of regulatory act which does not entail implementing measures. Wrong qualification of facts and distortion of evidence.
Second ground of appeal. Error in law in interpreting the Article 263 (4) TFEU and in particular the requisite of ‘direct and individual concern’. Wrong qualification of facts.
Case T-728/21: Order of the General Court of 12 July 2022 — LW v Commission (Civil service — Applicant who has ceased to reply to the Court’s requests — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2022-07-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, indemnification, reassignment, staff regulations (EU)








C_2022340EN.01004201.xml










5.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/42






Order of the General Court of 12 July 2022 — LW v Commission
(Case T-728/21) (1)

(Civil service - Applicant who has ceased to reply to the Court’s requests - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 340/58)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: LW (represented by: L. Levi and N. Flandin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Hohenecker and T. Lilamand, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 8 January 2021 by which she was reassigned to another post within the same unit and, in so far as necessary, annulment of the Commission’s decision of 29 July 2021 rejecting the complaint lodged under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union against that decision and, second, compensation for the non-material damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


LW shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 11, 10.1.2022.
Case T-436/22: Action brought on 12 July 2022 — Machková v EUIPO — Aceites Almenara (ALMARA SOAP)
Date: 2022-07-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022340EN.01005202.xml










5.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/52






Action brought on 12 July 2022 — Machková v EUIPO — Aceites Almenara (ALMARA SOAP)
(Case T-436/22)
(2022/C 340/71)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Veronika Machková (Šestajovice, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Balcar, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aceites Almenara, SL (Puebla de Almenara, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark ALMARA SOAP — Application for registration No 18 198 833

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 April 2022 in Case R 1613/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


reject the contested decision for all the contested goods;










—


in the alternative, return the case to EUIPO for a new assessment;










—


order that the European Union trade mark application No 18 198 833 is recorded in the Register in accordance with the provisions of Article 51, paragraph 1 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


order Aceites Almenara, SL to bear the costs of the opposition, fixed at EUR 620;










—


order Aceites Almenara to bear the costs of the appeal, fixed at EUR 720;










—


order Aceites Almenara to bear the costs of this action.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 10(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;










—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-435/22: Action brought on 12 July 2022 — Pascoe pharmazeutische Präparate v EUIPO — Novartis Pharma (PASCELMO)
Date: 2022-07-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022326EN.01002801.xml










29.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 326/28






Action brought on 12 July 2022 — Pascoe pharmazeutische Präparate v EUIPO — Novartis Pharma (PASCELMO)
(Case T-435/22)
(2022/C 326/38)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Pascoe pharmazeutische Präparate GmbH (Gießen, Germany) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, S. Brandstätter and S. Clotten, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Novartis Pharma AG (Basel, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark PASCELMO — International registration designating the European Union No 1 516 387

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 May 2022 in Case R 1890/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant and by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal if it joins as intervener.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1208 of 12 July 2022 amending Regulation (EC) No 2866/98 as regards the conversion rate to the euro for Croatia
Date: 2022-07-12
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Croatia, Euro Group (euro area), conversion rate, economic convergence, euro, national currency








L_2022187EN.01001801.xml










14.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 187/18








            COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) 2022/1208
of 12 July 2022
         
amending Regulation (EC) No 2866/98 as regards the conversion rate to the euro for Croatia


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 140(3) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,


Having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank (1),

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EC) No 2866/98 (2) determines the conversion rates between the euro and the currencies of the Member States adopting the euro as from 1 January 1999.












(2)


According to Article 5 of the 2012 Act of Accession, Croatia is a Member State with a derogation within the meaning of Article 139(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.












(3)


Pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2022/1211 (3) regarding the adoption on 1 January 2023 of the euro by Croatia, Croatia fulfils the necessary conditions for the adoption of the euro and the derogation of Croatia is abrogated with effect from 1 January 2023.












(4)


The introduction of the euro in Croatia requires the adoption of the conversion rate between the euro and the Croatian kuna. This conversion rate should be set at 7,53450 kuna per 1 euro, which corresponds to the current central rate of the kuna in the exchange rate mechanism (ERM II).












(5)


Regulation (EC) No 2866/98 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
In Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 2866/98, the following line is inserted between the conversion rates applicable to the French franc and the Irish pound:


                  ‘= 7,53450 Croatian kuna’.



Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2023.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 12 July 2022.


For the Council


The President

Z. STANJURA
            





(1)  Opinion of 4 July 2022 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2866/98 of 31 December 1998 on the conversion rates between the euro and the currencies of the Member States adopting the euro (OJ L 359, 31.12.1998, p. 1).

(3)  Council Decision (EU) 2022/1211 of 12 July 2022 on the adoption by Croatia of the euro on 1 January 2023 (see page 31 of this Official Journal.
Case C-461/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 12 July 2022 — MK v WB
Date: 2022-07-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: data protection, data-processing law, guardianship, mental illness, personal data








C_2022398EN.01001103.xml










17.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/11






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 12 July 2022 — MK v WB
(Case C-461/22)
(2022/C 398/14)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: MK

Respondent: WB

Questions referred

Is a legally appointed curator who performs that activity in a professional capacity a controller within the meaning of Article 4(7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation — ‘the GDPR’)?
Is he or she required to provide information in accordance with Article 15 of the GDPR?


(1)  OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1.
Case T-443/22: Action brought on 12 July 2022 — PV v European Public Prosecutor’s Office
Date: 2022-07-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: abuse of power, appointment of members, equal treatment, indemnification, principle of legal certainty, public prosecutor's department, rights of the defence








C_2022380EN.01001701.xml










3.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 380/17






Action brought on 12 July 2022 — PV v European Public Prosecutor’s Office
(Case T-443/22)
(2022/C 380/20)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: PV (represented by: P. Giatagantzidis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Public Prosecutor’s Office

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decisions, namely (a) Decision 015/2022 of 23 March 2022 of the College of the defendant rejecting the complaint of 3 December 2021 against Decision 090/2021 of 8 September 2021 of the College of the defendant, (b) Decision 090/2021 of 8 September 2021 of the College of the defendant, (c) Decision 021/2022 of 30 May 2022 of the College of the defendant and (d) any other related action or omission of the organs of the defendant,










—


order the defendant to pay the total amount of EUR 100 000 by way of compensation for the non-material harm suffered, and










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of her action, the applicant raises the same pleas as those relied on in Case T-442/22, PU v European Public Prosecutor’s Office.