do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-434/22: Action brought on 11 July 2022 — Topas v EUIPO — Tarczyński (VEGE STORY)
Date: 2022-07-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, confectionery product, eating habits, food fat, food substitute, prepared foodstuff, processed foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vegetable product








C_2022326EN.01002701.xml










29.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 326/27






Action brought on 11 July 2022 — Topas v EUIPO — Tarczyński (VEGE STORY)
(Case T-434/22)
(2022/C 326/37)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Topas GmbH (Mössingen, Germany) (represented by: S. Hofmann and W. Göpfert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tarczyński S.A. (Trzebnica, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark VEGE STORY — Application for registration No 18 213 582

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 May 2022 in Case R 1977/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision insofar as the opposition decision of 29 September 2021 has been annulled and the opposition has been rejected in its entirety;










—


order the opponent to bear the costs of the appeal and opposition proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-425/22: Action brought on 11 July 2022 — Kalypso Media Group v EUIPO (COMMANDOS)
Date: 2022-07-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cultural event, electronic game, registered trade mark, software, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2022318EN.01004901.xml










22.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 318/49






Action brought on 11 July 2022 — Kalypso Media Group v EUIPO (COMMANDOS)
(Case T-425/22)
(2022/C 318/63)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Kalypso Media Group GmbH (Worms, Germany) (represented by: T. Boddien, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark COMMANDOS — Application No 18 062 634

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 April 2022 in Case R 1864/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-427/22: Action brought on 11 July 2022 — Coljnar v EUIPO — Barbarian Sports Wear (Barbarian Fashion)
Date: 2022-07-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022326EN.01002402.xml










29.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 326/24






Action brought on 11 July 2022 — Coljnar v EUIPO — Barbarian Sports Wear (Barbarian Fashion)
(Case T-427/22)
(2022/C 326/33)
Language in which the application was lodged: Slovenian

Parties


Applicant: Nataly Coljnar (Maribor, Slovenia) (represented by: A. Pregelj, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Barbarian Sports Wear Inc. (Kitchener, Ontario, Canada)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark Barbarian fashion — Application for registration No 18 180 380

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 May 2022 in Case R 1953/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and the company Barbarian Sports Wear Inc. to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-460/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 11 July 2022 — DIGI Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság
Date: 2022-07-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: auction sale, competition policy, provision of services, regulation of telecommunications, right to justice, transmission network








C_2022432EN.01000602.xml










14.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 432/6






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 11 July 2022 — DIGI Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság
(Case C-460/22)
(2022/C 432/08)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: DIGI Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft.

Defendant: Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság

Questions referred

Is an undertaking which provides electronic communications services on the relevant market, but which did not participate in a given auction procedure (‘the auction procedure’) because it did not meet the requirements for participation established in the specifications laying down the detailed rules governing the auction procedure (‘the specifications’), as a result of which the decision of the national regulatory authority recording the outcome of the auction does not contain any provision relating to that undertaking, an undertaking affected by a decision of a national regulatory authority for the purposes of Article 4(1) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) (1) and, in consequence, an undertaking entitled to exercise the right to an effective remedy enshrined in Article 47 of the [Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union] against that decision?


(1)  OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10656 – FLUTTER ENTERTAINMENT / SISAL) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 265/06
Date: 2022-07-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, gaming, merger control, sport








C_2022265EN.01001301.xml










11.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 265/13






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10656 – FLUTTER ENTERTAINMENT / SISAL)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 265/06)

1.   
On 4 July 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Flutter Entertainment plc (‘Flutter’, Ireland),










—


Sisal S.p.A. (‘Sisal’, Italy).




Flutter will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Sisal.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned:






—


Flutter: global sports betting, gaming and entertainment operator,










—


Sisal: betting, gaming and lottery operator.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10656 – FLUTTER ENTERTAINMENT / SISAL
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10391 – RTL GROUP / TALPA NETWORK) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 272/01
Date: 2022-07-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Luxembourg, Netherlands, audiovisual industry, economic concentration, mass media, merger control, subsidiary








C_2022272EN.01000101.xml










15.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 272/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10391 – RTL GROUP / TALPA NETWORK)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 272/01)
On 11 July 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10391. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-462/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 11 July 2022 — BM v LO
Date: 2022-07-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: divorce, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction, private international law, residence








C_2022359EN.01005001.xml










19.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 359/50






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 11 July 2022 — BM v LO
(Case C-462/22)
(2022/C 359/59)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: BM

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: LO

Question referred

Does the waiting period of one year or six months under the fifth and sixth indents, respectively, of Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (1) begin to run with respect to the applicant only upon establishment of his or her habitual residence in the Member State of the court seised, or is it sufficient if, at the beginning of the relevant waiting period, the applicant initially has mere de facto residence in the Member State of the court seised, and his or her residence becomes established as habitual residence only subsequently, in the period before the application was made?


(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10618 – WACKER NEUSON / PORR / UMDASCH GROUP / SEQUELLO JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 271/02
Date: 2022-07-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: agricultural machinery, building industry, consultancy, economic concentration, innovation, logistics, maintenance, merger control, provision of services, telematics, used goods








C_2022271EN.01000201.xml










14.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10618 – WACKER NEUSON / PORR / UMDASCH GROUP / SEQUELLO JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 271/02)
On 11 July 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10618. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Special report 10/2022 ‘LEADER and community-led local development facilitates local engagement but additional benefits still not sufficiently demonstrated’ 2022/C 265/04
Date: 2022-07-11
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU aid, EU programme, EU regional policy, less-favoured region, regional development, rural community, rural development, rural region








C_2022265EN.01001001.xml










11.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 265/10






Special report 10/2022
‘LEADER and community-led local development facilitates local engagement but additional benefits still not sufficiently demonstrated’
(2022/C 265/04)
The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 10/2022: ‘LEADER and community-led local development facilitates local engagement but additional benefits still not sufficiently demonstrated’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=61355
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 8 July 2022 2022/C 265/03
Date: 2022-07-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022265EN.01000901.xml










11.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 265/9






Euro exchange rates (1)

8 July 2022
(2022/C 265/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0163 




JPY


Japanese yen


138,05 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4424 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84585 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,6665 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9913 




ISK


Iceland króna


139,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,2630 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,614 




HUF


Hungarian forint


402,45 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,7630 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9431 




TRY


Turkish lira


17,6026 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4871 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3201 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


7,9769 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6464 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4228 




KRW


South Korean won


1 321,61 




ZAR


South African rand


17,1922 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,8095 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5190 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 210,73 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,4992 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,882 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,602 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,4345 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,8477 




INR


Indian rupee


80,5280 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10764 – SAGARD / BPIFRANCE / ADIT JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 278/02
Date: 2022-07-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, investment company, merger control








C_2022278EN.01000201.xml










20.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10764 – SAGARD / BPIFRANCE / ADIT JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 278/02)
On 11 July 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10764. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.10560 – SIKA / MBCC GROUP) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 265/02
Date: 2022-07-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: building materials, chemical industry, economic concentration, merger control








C_2022265EN.01000801.xml










11.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 265/8






Withdrawal of notification of a concentration
(Case M.10560 – SIKA / MBCC GROUP)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 265/02)
On 7 June 2022, the European Commission received notification (1) of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) (‘Merger Regulation’).
On 4 July 2022, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification.


(1)  OJ C 234, 17.6.2022, p. 5.

(2)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.