do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10789 – GOLDMAN SACHS / SOJITZ / JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 269/02
Date: 2022-07-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: banking, economic concentration, goods and services, investment, investment company, merger control, provision of services, real property, securities








C_2022269EN.01002401.xml










13.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 269/24






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10789 – GOLDMAN SACHS / SOJITZ / JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 269/02)
On 4 July 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10789. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1182 of 4 July 2022 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Derecske alma’ (PGI)
Date: 2022-07-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Hungary, Northern Alföld, designation of origin, labelling, pip fruit, product designation








L_2022184EN.01000501.xml










11.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 184/5








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/1182
of 4 July 2022
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Derecske alma’ (PGI)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Derecske alma’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Derecske alma’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Derecske alma’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 4 July 2022.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 115, 11.3.2022, p. 18.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10829 – KKR / HITACHI TRANSPORT SYSTEM) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 255/07
Date: 2022-07-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Japan, capital market, carrier, economic concentration, insurance, investment company, logistics, merger control, provision of services, sponsorship








C_2022255EN.01000701.xml










4.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 255/7






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10829 – KKR / HITACHI TRANSPORT SYSTEM)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 255/07)

1.   
On 24 June 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


KKR & Co. Inc. (U.S.),










—


Hitachi Transport System, Ltd. (Japan).




KKR & Co. Inc. will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Hitachi Transport System.
The concentration is accomplished by way of public bid announced on 28 April 2022.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


KKR & Co. is a global investment firm that offers alternative asset management as well as capital markets and insurance solutions. KKR sponsors investment funds that invest in private equity, credit and real assets and has strategic partners that manage hedge funds,










—


Hitachi Transport System is a Japan-based company active in the provision of general contract logistics services and freight forwarding services.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10829 – KKR / HITACHI TRANSPORT SYSTEM
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Opinion on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 4 July 2022 concerning a draft decision in case AT.40305 - Network sharing - Czech Republic Rapporteur: Italy (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 452/03
Date: 2022-07-04
Institutions: Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
Subjects: Czechia, EU competition policy, competition, control of restrictive practices, horizontal agreement, innovation, mobile communication, restriction on competition, transmission network








C_2022452EN.01001601.xml










29.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 452/16






Opinion on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 4 July 2022 concerning a draft decision in case AT.40305 - Network sharing - Czech Republic
Rapporteur: Italy
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 452/03)

(1)   

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) shares the Commission’s concerns expressed in its draft Decision under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.



(2)   

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the proceedings can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, as described in the draft Decision.



(3)   

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the offered commitments are suitable, necessary and proportionate and should be made legally binding, as set out in the draft Decision. 11 Member States voted in favour. 1 Member State abstained.



(4)   

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s draft Decision that, in light of the offered commitments, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission, without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. 11 Member States voted in favour. 1 Member State abstained.



(5)   

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Case T-410/22: Action brought on 4 July 2022 — Crédit agricole and Others v SRB
Date: 2022-07-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank resolution, credit institution, equal treatment, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU), principle of proportionality








C_2022311EN.01002301.xml










16.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/23






Action brought on 4 July 2022 — Crédit agricole and Others v SRB
(Case T-410/22)
(2022/C 311/27)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Crédit agricole SA (Montrouge, France) and the 48 other applicants (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Decision SRB/ES/2022/18 of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of 2022 ex-ante contributions to the SRF in so far as it concerns the applicants;










—


pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the SRM Regulation, (1) the Implementing Regulation (2) and the Delegated Regulation (3) inapplicable:






—


Articles 69(1), 69(2), 70(1) and 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation;










—


Articles 4(2), 5,6, 7 and 20 of the Delegated Regulation, and Annex I thereto;










—


Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation;














—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on eight pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-391/22, Société générale and Others v SRB.



(1)  Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 255, p. 1).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 of 19 December 2014 specifying uniform conditions of application of Regulation No 806/2014 with regard to ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (OJ 2015 L 15, p. 1).

(3)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 of 21 October 2014 supplementing Directive 2014/59 with regard to ex ante contributions to resolution financing arrangements (OJ 2015 L 11, p. 44).