do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-383/22: Action brought on 30 June 2022 — Good Services v EUIPO — ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)
Date: 2022-06-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, broadcasting, communications industry, gaming, registered trade mark, telecommunications, television, trade-mark law








C_2022340EN.01004701.xml










5.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/47






Action brought on 30 June 2022 — Good Services v EUIPO — ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)
(Case T-383/22)
(2022/C 340/65)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Good Services ltd. (Sliema, Malta) (represented by: L. Alonso Domingo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ITV Studios Global Distribution Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark EL ROSCO — EU trade mark No 13 265 483

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2022 in Case R 958/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and confirm the registration of EU trade mark No 13 265 483 for all the goods and services for which it was granted or, in the alternative, refer the case back to the Board of Appeal of EUIPO for further consideration following directions from the Court;










—


order the defendant to bear the costs of these proceedings and the previous proceedings before EUIPO.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of the case-law interpreting that article and the concept of bad faith, and the point at which bad faith is to be assessed.
Case C-63/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 June 2022 — Laure Camerin v European Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Former official — Sums deducted from retirement pension — Enforcement of a decision of a national court — Action for annulment and for damages)
Date: 2022-06-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European official, damages, enforcement of ruling, pension scheme, retired person, staff regulations (EU)








C_2022318EN.01000901.xml










22.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 318/9






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 June 2022 — Laure Camerin v European Commission
(Case C-63/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Former official - Sums deducted from retirement pension - Enforcement of a decision of a national court - Action for annulment and for damages)
(2022/C 318/11)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Laure Camerin (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: T. S. Bohr and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Laure Camerin to bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 228, 14.6.2021.
Case T-382/22: Action brought on 30 June 2022 — Good Services v EUIPO — ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)
Date: 2022-06-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, broadcasting, communications industry, gaming, registered trade mark, telecommunications, television, trade-mark law








C_2022340EN.01004601.xml










5.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/46






Action brought on 30 June 2022 — Good Services v EUIPO — ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)
(Case T-382/22)
(2022/C 340/64)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Good Services ltd. (Sliema, Malta) (represented by: L. Alonso Domingo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ITV Studios Global Distribution Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark EL ROSCO — EU trade mark No 13 265 021

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2022 in Case R 957/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and confirm the registration of EU trade mark No 13 265 021 for all the goods and services for which it was granted or, in the alternative, refer the case back to the Board of Appeal of EUIPO for further consideration following directions from the Court;










—


order the defendant to bear the costs of these proceedings and the previous proceedings before EUIPO.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of the case-law interpreting that article and the concept of bad faith, and the point at which bad faith is to be assessed.
Case C-652/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti — Romania) — HW, ZF, MZ v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Jurisdiction in insurance matters — Article 11(1)(b) — Action brought by the policyholder, the insured person or a beneficiary — Possibility of bringing proceedings against the insurer before a court of the place where the person bringing the claim is domiciled — Determination of the international and territorial jurisdiction of a court of a Member State — Article 13(2) — Direct action brought by the injured party against the insurer — Insurer domiciled in a Member State with an establishment in another Member State sued in the court of the place where that establishment is situated)
Date: 2022-06-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: claim, establishment, insurance company, insurance indemnity, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, legal domicile, private international law, territorial jurisdiction








C_2022318EN.01000401.xml










22.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 318/4






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti — Romania) — HW, ZF, MZ v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG
(Case C-652/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Jurisdiction in insurance matters - Article 11(1)(b) - Action brought by the policyholder, the insured person or a beneficiary - Possibility of bringing proceedings against the insurer before a court of the place where the person bringing the claim is domiciled - Determination of the international and territorial jurisdiction of a court of a Member State - Article 13(2) - Direct action brought by the injured party against the insurer - Insurer domiciled in a Member State with an establishment in another Member State sued in the court of the place where that establishment is situated)
(2022/C 318/04)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Bucureşti

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: HW, ZF, MZ

Defendant: Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG

Operative part of the judgment

Article 11(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that, where that provision is applicable, it determines both the international jurisdiction and the territorial jurisdiction of the court of a Member State within whose jurisdiction the person bringing the claim is domiciled.


(1)  OJ C 88, 15.3.2021.
Case T-381/22: Action brought on 30 June 2022 — Good Services v EUIPO — ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)
Date: 2022-06-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer equipment, measuring equipment, recording equipment, registered trade mark, scientific apparatus, software, trade-mark law








C_2022340EN.01004501.xml










5.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/45






Action brought on 30 June 2022 — Good Services v EUIPO — ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)
(Case T-381/22)
(2022/C 340/63)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Good Services ltd. (Sliema, Malta) (represented by: L. Alonso Domingo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ITV Studios Global Distribution Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark EL ROSCO — EU trade mark No 17 907 312

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2022 in Case R 959/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and confirm the registration of EU trade mark No 17 907 312 for all the goods and services for which it was granted or, in the alternative, refer the case back to the Board of Appeal of EUIPO for further consideration following directions from the Court;










—


order the defendant to bear the costs of these proceedings and the previous proceedings before EUIPO.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of the case-law interpreting that article and the concept of bad faith, and the point at which bad faith is to be assessed.
Case C-704/21: Order of the President of the Court of 30 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa — Juízo Local Cível de Lisboa — Portugal) — DS, CF, DT, CL v Orbest, SA (Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Compensation and assistance to passengers — Cancellation or long delay of flights — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Extraordinary circumstances — Collision of a catering vehicle with an aircraft parked at the airport)
Date: 2022-06-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, indemnification, transport accident, traveller








C_2022318EN.01001901.xml










22.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 318/19






Order of the President of the Court of 30 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa — Juízo Local Cível de Lisboa — Portugal) — DS, CF, DT, CL v Orbest, SA
(Case C-704/21) (1)

(Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Compensation and assistance to passengers - Cancellation or long delay of flights - Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation - Extraordinary circumstances - Collision of a catering vehicle with an aircraft parked at the airport)
(2022/C 318/26)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa — Juízo Local Cível de Lisboa

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: DS, CF, DT, CL

Defendant: Orbest, SA

Operative part of the order

Case C-704/21 is removed from the Register of the Court.


(1)  Date of filing: 23.11.2021.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10748 – MACQUARIE / BCI / NATIONAL GRID / NATIONAL GRID GAS) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 298/03
Date: 2022-06-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: United Kingdom, economic concentration, electricity supply, energy transport, gas industry, gas supply, investment company, merger control, provision of services, public sector








C_2022298EN.01005701.xml










5.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 298/57






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10748 – MACQUARIE / BCI / NATIONAL GRID / NATIONAL GRID GAS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 298/03)
On 30 June 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10748. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-12/22: Order of the President of the Court of 30 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov — Slovakia) — UR v 365.bank a.s.
Date: 2022-06-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer credit, consumer information, contract terms, cost of borrowing, limitation of legal proceedings








C_2022368EN.01002101.xml










26.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 368/21






Order of the President of the Court of 30 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov — Slovakia) — UR v 365.bank a.s.
(Case C-12/22) (1)

(2022/C 368/36)
Language of the case: Slovak
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 148, 4.4.2022.
Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 248/06
Date: 2022-06-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France, Ile-de-France, air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2022248EN.01010501.xml










30.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 248/105






Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 248/06)






Member State


France




Route concerned


Aurillac – Paris (Orly)




Original date of entry into force of the public service obligation


1 June 2011




Date of entry into force of the changes


1 June 2023




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained


Order of 1 June 2022 amending the public service obligation imposed on scheduled air services between Aurillac and Paris (Orly)
NOR: TREA2215683A
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
For further information please contact:





Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile




DTA/SDS1




50 rue Henry Farman




75720 Paris Cedex 15




FRANCE




Tel. +33 158094321