do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Special report 12/2022 ‘Durability in rural development – Most projects remain operational for the period required, but there are opportunities to achieve longer lasting results’ 2022/C 238/06
Date: 2022-06-21
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EAFRD, EU investment, EU regional policy, investment project, job creation, regional farm policy, rural development, rural region, sustainable development, tourist infrastructure








C_2022238EN.01000801.xml










21.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 238/8






Special report 12/2022
‘Durability in rural development – Most projects remain operational for the period required, but there are opportunities to achieve longer lasting results’
(2022/C 238/06)
The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 12/2022: ‘Durability in rural development – Most projects remain operational for the period required, but there are opportunities to achieve longer lasting results’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=61262
Case C-411/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 21 June 2022 — Thermalhotel Fontana Hotelbetriebsgesellschaft m.b.H.
Date: 2022-06-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: coronavirus disease, disease prevention, epidemic, health insurance, indemnification, labour relations, remuneration of work, residence








C_2022359EN.01004002.xml










19.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 359/40






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 21 June 2022 — Thermalhotel Fontana Hotelbetriebsgesellschaft m.b.H.
(Case C-411/22)
(2022/C 359/46)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: Thermalhotel Fontana Hotelbetriebsgesellschaft m.b.H.

Respondent authority: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Südoststeiermark

Questions referred







1.


Does compensation which is due to workers during their isolation as persons infected with, suspected of being infected with, or suspected of being contagious with COVID-19 for the pecuniary disadvantages caused by the impediment to their employment, and which is initially payable to the workers by their employer, with the entitlement to compensation vis-à-vis the Austrian Federal Government then being transferred to the employer at the time of payment, constitute a sickness benefit within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004? (1)

If Question 1 is answered in the negative:










2.


Must Article 45 TFEU and Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 (2) be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which the granting of compensation for loss of earnings suffered by workers as a result of isolation ordered by the health authorities in the case of a positive COVID-19 test result (with the compensation being initially payable to the workers by their employer, and the entitlement to compensation vis-à-vis the Austrian Federal Government then being transferred to the employer to that extent) is subject to the condition that the isolation is ordered by an Austrian authority on the basis of provisions of national law relating to epidemics, with the result that such compensation is not paid to workers who, as frontier workers, are resident in another Member State and whose isolation (‘quarantine’) is ordered by the health authorities of their Member State of residence?






(1)  Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1).

(2)  Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1).
Case C-412/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 21 June 2022 — Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira v NT
Date: 2022-06-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: China, Malaysia, anti-dumping duty, bolt and screw industry, import (EU), metal product, originating product, steel








C_2022359EN.01004101.xml










19.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 359/41






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 21 June 2022 — Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira v NT
(Case C-412/22)
(2022/C 359/47)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Respondent: NT

Questions referred







1.


Can Article 2 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/278 (1) of 26 February 2016 be interpreted as meaning that the repeal of the anti-dumping duties, apart from taking effect for the future from 28 February 2016, also affects imports of fasteners subject to those duties which took place up to 27 February 2016, but were assessed (for anti-dumping duties and other duties) on a date after 28 February 2016 (post-clearance recovery)?










2.


Will the answer to the first question be different it is considered that the post-clearance recovery has its origin in a transcript made, pursuant to a decision of 21 April 2017, of a criminal investigation initiated on the basis of evidence provided by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), within the framework of OLAF investigation CASE OF/2010/0697, AAA 2010/016-(2012)S01, in which it was concluded that the goods exported to the European Community in containers (…) and (…) on 3 April 2010 and in containers (…) and (…) on 24 April 2010 were of Chinese non-preferential origin?






(1)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/278 of 26 February 2016 repealing the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China, as extended to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not (OJ 2016 L 52, p. 24).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10664 – XLCEE / DEROT / BLACK RED WHITE) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 252/02
Date: 2022-06-21
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electronic commerce, furniture industry, holding company, household article, investment company, merger control, retail selling








C_2022252EN.01000201.xml










1.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10664 – XLCEE / DEROT / BLACK RED WHITE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 252/02)
On 21 June 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10664. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Council Decision (EU) 2022/1015 of 21 June 2022 appointing an alternate member, proposed by the Czech Republic, of the Committee of the Regions
Date: 2022-06-21
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Czechia, appointment of members, member of the Committee of the Regions








L_2022170EN.01007201.xml










28.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 170/72








            COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2022/1015
of 21 June 2022
         
appointing an alternate member, proposed by the Czech Republic, of the Committee of the Regions


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision (EU) 2019/852 of 21 May 2019 determining the composition of the Committee of the Regions (1),


Having regard to the proposal of the Czech Government,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 300(3) of the Treaty, the Committee of the Regions is to consist of representatives of regional and local bodies who either hold a regional or local authority electoral mandate or are politically accountable to an elected assembly.












(2)


On 10 December 2019, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2019/2157 (2), appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2020 to 25 January 2025.












(3)


An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Petr HÝBLER.












(4)


The Czech Government has proposed Mr Jan GROLICH, representative of a regional body who holds a regional authority electoral mandate, Zastupitel Jihomoravského kraje (Member of the Regional Assembly of the South Moravian Region), as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2025,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Mr Jan GROLICH, representative of a regional body who holds an electoral mandate, Zastupitel Jihomoravského kraje (Member of the Regional Assembly of the South Moravian Region), is hereby appointed as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2025.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Luxembourg, 21 June 2022.


For the Council


The President

C. BEAUNE
            





(1)  
            OJ L 139, 27.5.2019, p. 13.

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2019/2157 of 10 December 2019 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2020 to 25 January 2025 (OJ L 327, 17.12.2019, p. 78).
Case T-375/22: Action brought on 21 June 2022 — Izuzquiza and Others v Parliament
Date: 2022-06-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information








C_2022326EN.01002101.xml










29.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 326/21






Action brought on 21 June 2022 — Izuzquiza and Others v Parliament
(Case T-375/22)
(2022/C 326/28)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Luisa Izuzquiza (Berlin, Germany), Arne Semsrott (Berlin), Stefan Wehrmeyer (Berlin) (represented by: J. Pobjoy, Barrister-at-Law)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


annul, pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, the final decision of the European Parliament, reference A(2021)10718C, dated 8 April 2022, insofar as the European Parliament concluded that it was entitled to rely upon (i) Article 4(1)(b) and/or (ii) Article 4(6) of Regulation No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1),to justify full and/or partial non-disclosure of the documents requested by the applicants in their confirmatory application dated 28 February 2022; and










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the European Parliament has infringed Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation No 1049/2001.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the European Parliament has infringed Article 4(6) of Regulation No 1049/2001.






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).
Council Decision (EU) 2022/999 of 21 June 2022 appointing an alternate member, proposed by the Republic of Latvia, of the Committee of the Regions
Date: 2022-06-21
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Latvia, appointment of members, member of the Committee of the Regions








L_2022168EN.01007701.xml










27.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 168/77








            COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2022/999
of 21 June 2022
         
appointing an alternate member, proposed by the Republic of Latvia, of the Committee of the Regions


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision (EU) 2019/852 of 21 May 2019 determining the composition of the Committee of the Regions (1),


Having regard to the proposal of the Latvian Government,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 300(3) of the Treaty, the Committee of the Regions is to consist of representatives of regional and local bodies who either hold a regional or local authority electoral mandate or are politically accountable to an elected assembly.












(2)


On 10 December 2019, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2019/2157 (2), appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2020 to 25 January 2025.












(3)


An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the national mandate on the basis of which Ms Olga VEIDIŅA was proposed for appointment.












(4)


The Latvian Government has proposed Ms Justīne PANTEĻĒJEVA, representative of a local body who holds a local authority electoral mandate, Deputāte, Rīgas dome (Member, Riga City Council), as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2025,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Ms Justīne PANTEĻĒJEVA, representative of a local body who holds an electoral mandate, Deputāte, Rīgas dome (Member, Riga City Council), is hereby appointed as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2025.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Luxembourg, 21 June 2022.


For the Council


The President

C. BEAUNE
            





(1)  
            OJ L 139, 27.5.2019, p. 13.

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2019/2157 of 10 December 2019 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2020 to 25 January 2025 (OJ L 327, 17.12.2019, p. 78).
Case T-773/19: Order of the General Court of 21 June 2022 — BAE Systems v Commission
Date: 2022-06-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, United Kingdom, control of State aid, corporation tax, foreign enterprise, free movement of capital, group of companies, reimbursement of aid, right of establishment, tax exemption








C_2022303EN.01005702.xml










8.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 303/57






Order of the General Court of 21 June 2022 — BAE Systems v Commission
(Case T-773/19) (1)

(2022/C 303/74)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 20 June 2022 2022/C 238/05
Date: 2022-06-21
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022238EN.01000701.xml










21.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 238/7






Euro exchange rates (1)

20 June 2022
(2022/C 238/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0517 




JPY


Japanese yen


141,94 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4387 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85748 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,6375 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0162 




ISK


Iceland króna


137,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,4085 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,728 




HUF


Hungarian forint


397,85 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6520 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9453 




TRY


Turkish lira


18,2239 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5061 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3662 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,2558 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6549 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4589 




KRW


South Korean won


1 357,54 




ZAR


South African rand


16,8603 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,0346 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5175 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 589,89 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6291 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,872 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,157 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,4117 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,3016 




INR


Indian rupee


81,9940 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10739 – FORD OTOSAN / FORD ROMANIA) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 263/01
Date: 2022-06-21
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Romania, Türkiye, economic concentration, merger control, motor vehicle industry








C_2022263EN.01000101.xml










8.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 263/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10739 – FORD OTOSAN / FORD ROMANIA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 263/01)
On 21 June 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10739. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Council Decision (EU) 2022/1016 of 21 June 2022 appointing a member, proposed by the Republic of Estonia, of the Committee of the Regions
Date: 2022-06-21
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Estonia, appointment of members, member of the Committee of the Regions








L_2022170EN.01007301.xml










28.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 170/73








            COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2022/1016
of 21 June 2022
         
appointing a member, proposed by the Republic of Estonia, of the Committee of the Regions


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision (EU) 2019/852 of 21 May 2019 determining the composition of the Committee of the Regions (1),


Having regard to the proposal of the Estonian Government,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 300(3) of the Treaty, the Committee of the Regions is to consist of representatives of regional and local bodies who either hold a regional or local authority electoral mandate or are politically accountable to an elected assembly.












(2)


On 10 December 2019, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2019/2157 (2), appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2020 to 25 January 2025.












(3)


A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the national mandate on the basis of which Mr Tiit TERIK was proposed for appointment.












(4)


The Estonian Government has proposed Mr Jevgeni OSSINOVSKI, representative of a local body who holds a local authority electoral mandate, Tallinna Linnavolikogu liige (Member of Tallinn City Council), as a member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2025,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Mr Jevgeni OSSINOVSKI, representative of a local body who holds an electoral mandate, Tallinna Linnavolikogu liige (Member of Tallinn City Council), is hereby appointed as a member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2025.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Luxembourg, 21 June 2022.


For the Council


The President

C. BEAUNE
            





(1)  
            OJ L 139, 27.5.2019, p. 13.

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2019/2157 of 10 December 2019 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2020 to 25 January 2025 (OJ L 327, 17.12.2019, p. 78).
Case C-414/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 21 June 2022 — DocLX Travel Events GmbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation
Date: 2022-06-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: package travel, termination of a contract, traveller








C_2022359EN.01004201.xml










19.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 359/42






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 21 June 2022 — DocLX Travel Events GmbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation
(Case C-414/22)
(2022/C 359/48)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: DocLX Travel Events GmbH

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Verein für Konsumenteninformation

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 12(2) of Directive (EU) 2015/2302 (1) be interpreted as meaning that the traveller — irrespective of the time of his or her declaration of termination — is in any event entitled to terminate a package free of charge if the unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances significantly affecting the package did in fact occur at the time of the (scheduled) start of the package?










2.


Must Article 12(2) of Directive 2015/2302 be interpreted as meaning that the traveller is already entitled to terminate a package free of charge if the occurrence of unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances was to be expected at the time of the declaration of termination?






(1)  Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements, amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC (OJ 2015 L 326, p. 1).