do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
European Parliament decision of 7 June 2022 on the appointment of Margreet Fröberg to the selection panel set up under Article 14(3) of Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’) (2022/2043(INS))
Date: 2022-06-07
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: EU office or agency, appointment of members, enhanced cooperation, public prosecutor's department








C_2022493EN.01014801.xml










27.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 493/148






P9_TA(2022)0220
Appointment of a member to the selection panel for the European Public Prosecutor’s Office
European Parliament decision of 7 June 2022 on the appointment of Margreet Fröberg to the selection panel set up under Article 14(3) of Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’) (2022/2043(INS))
(2022/C 493/16)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to Article 14(3) of Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’) (1),










—


having regard to the proposal of its Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (B9-0290/2022),










—


having regard to its Rules of Procedure,










A.


whereas Margreet Fröberg meets the conditions laid down in Article 14(3) of Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939;












1.


Proposes that Margreet Fröberg be appointed to the selection panel;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission.






(1)  OJ L 283, 31.10.2017, p. 1.
Case T-336/22: Action brought on 7 June 2022 — PN v Court of Justice of the European Union
Date: 2022-06-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, staff assessment, staff regulations (EU)








C_2022284EN.01005501.xml










25.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 284/55






Action brought on 7 June 2022 — PN v Court of Justice of the European Union
(Case T-336/22)
(2022/C 284/75)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: PN (represented by: D. Giabbani, lawyer)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


accept the present application as formally correct;










—


find it materially justified and well-founded;










—


by way of variation, declare that the assessment in the 2019 staff appraisal procedure be maintained, namely B in Ability, C in Efficiency and B in Conduct in the service;










—


or, in the alternative, declare the 2019 appraisal procedure to be void.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging failure to give adequate reasons for the assessment of the applicant under each category.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the objective and spirit of the text of the General instructions on the preparation of staff reports.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 June 2022 on the draft Council decision on the extension of the Agreement on the promotion, provision and use of Galileo and GPS satellite-based navigation systems and related applications between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United States of America, of the other part (06531/2022 — C9-0147/2022 — 2022/0005(NLE))
Date: 2022-06-07
Institutions: Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, European Parliament
Subjects: United States, cooperation agreement (EU), international cooperation, renewal of an agreement, satellite communications, satellite navigation, technical cooperation








C_2022493EN.01014901.xml










27.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 493/149






P9_TA(2022)0221
Extension of the Agreement on the promotion, provision and use of Galileo and GPS satellite-based navigation systems and related applications ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 June 2022 on the draft Council decision on the extension of the Agreement on the promotion, provision and use of Galileo and GPS satellite-based navigation systems and related applications between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United States of America, of the other part (06531/2022 — C9-0147/2022 — 2022/0005(NLE))
(Consent)
(2022/C 493/17)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (06531/2022),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 189 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0147/2022),










—


having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4), and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A9-0153/2022),












1.


Gives its consent to the extension of the agreement;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the United States of America.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10700 – HY24 / ENAGAS / ENAGAS RENOVABLE) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 228/02
Date: 2022-06-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: carbon neutrality, economic concentration, energy transport, gas, gas pipeline, holding company, investment company, merger control, natural gas, renewable energy








C_2022228EN.01000201.xml










13.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 228/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10700 – HY24 / ENAGAS / ENAGAS RENOVABLE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 228/02)
On 7 June 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10700. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Notice for the attention of persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/881, and by Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/876, concerning restrictive measures against Belarus 2022/C 221/02
Date: 2022-06-07
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Belarus, EU restrictive measure, Russia, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law








C_2022221EN.01000201.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 221/2






Notice for the attention of persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/881, and by Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/876, concerning restrictive measures against Belarus
(2022/C 221/02)
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons who appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP (1), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/881 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/876 (4), concerning restrictive measures against Belarus.
The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons should be included on the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2012/642/CFSP and in Regulation (EC) No 765/2006. The grounds for the listing of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.
The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites referred to in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).
The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 30 November 2022, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered. Any such request should be sent to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu
Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review of the list of designated persons and entities, pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision 2012/642/CFSP and Article 8a(4) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006.


(1)  OJ L 285, 17.10.2012, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 153, 3.6.2022, p. 77.

(3)  OJ L 134, 20.5.2006, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 153, 3.6.2022, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 3 June 2022 2022/C 221/04
Date: 2022-06-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022221EN.01000401.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 221/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

3 June 2022
(2022/C 221/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0730 




JPY


Japanese yen


139,59 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4388 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85420 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,4589 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0296 




ISK


Iceland króna


137,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,1030 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,708 




HUF


Hungarian forint


394,78 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5955 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9428 




TRY


Turkish lira


17,7380 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4805 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3484 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4167 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6409 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4741 




KRW


South Korean won


1 337,40 




ZAR


South African rand


16,6153 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,1465 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5220 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 498,10 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7094 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,738 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,777 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,1643 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,9850 




INR


Indian rupee


83,2730 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/396 of 9 March 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (Official Journal of the European Union L 80 of 9 March 2022)
Date: 2022-06-07
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law








L_2022154EN.01007601.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 154/76







Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/396 of 9 March 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 80 of 9 March 2022
)


On page 21, in the Annex, in the table headed ‘Persons’, in entry 806 relating to Igor Nikolayevich MOROZOV, in the column headed ‘Identifying information’:
for:


                  ‘DOB: 13.10.1956
                  ’,

read:


                  ‘DOB: 10.12.1956
                  ’;

on page 30, in the Annex, in the table headed ‘Persons’, in entry 872 relating to Alexandra Gennadyevna ZHUKOVA, in the column headed ‘Name’:
for:


                  ‘Alexandra Gennadyevna ZHUKOVA’,

read:


                  ‘Anastasia Gennadyevna ZHUKOVA’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10662 – ATLANTIA / YUNEX) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 228/03
Date: 2022-06-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: airport, economic concentration, merger control, provision of services, road transport, toll, transport infrastructure, urban transport








C_2022228EN.01000301.xml










13.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 228/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10662 – ATLANTIA / YUNEX)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 228/03)
On 7 June 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10662. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-509/20: Order of the General Court of 7 June 2022 — Daimler v Commission (Environment — Regulation (EU) 2019/631 — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1153 — Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1035 — Carbon dioxide emissions — Testing methodology — Passenger cars — Amendment of the contested decision as regards the applicant — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2022-06-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: approval, environmental standard, innovation, light-duty vehicle, motor car, motor vehicle pollution, pollution control measures, reduction of gas emissions, rights of the defence, technical standard








C_2022303EN.01004501.xml










8.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 303/45






Order of the General Court of 7 June 2022 — Daimler v Commission
(Case T-509/20) (1)

(Environment - Regulation (EU) 2019/631 - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1153 - Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1035 - Carbon dioxide emissions - Testing methodology - Passenger cars - Amendment of the contested decision as regards the applicant - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 303/57)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Daimler AG (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: N. Wimmer, C. Arhold and G. Ollinger, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Hermes and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)

Re:

By application lodged at the General Court Registry on 14 August 2020, the applicant brought the present action under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1035 of 3 June 2020 confirming or amending the provisional calculation of the average specific emissions of CO2 and specific emissions targets for manufacturers of passenger cars and light commercial vehicles for the calendar year 2018 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2020 L 227, p. 37).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Daimler AG.






(1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10722 – CHEVRON / RENEWABLE ENERGY GROUP) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 240/02
Date: 2022-06-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: United States, adjuvant, biofuel, economic concentration, energy industry, merger control, natural gas, oil industry, petrochemicals








C_2022240EN.01001101.xml










22.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 240/11






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10722 – CHEVRON / RENEWABLE ENERGY GROUP)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 240/02)
On 7 June 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10722. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10782 – PLD / NBIM / SANT BOI DE LLOBREGAT ASSET) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 221/08
Date: 2022-06-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Catalonia, Spain, economic concentration, industrial building, investment company, logistics, merger control, property development, real property








C_2022221EN.01001001.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 221/10






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10782 – PLD / NBIM / SANT BOI DE LLOBREGAT ASSET)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 221/08)

1.   
On 30 May 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Prologis, L.P. (‘PLD’, United States of America),










—


Norges Bank Investment Management (‘NBIM’, Norway),










—


Target Asset (Spain).




PLD and NBIM will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of the Target Asset.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of assets.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


PLD owns, operates and develops real estate properties, mainly for industrial purposes, in the Americas, Europe and Asia,










—


NBIM provides institutional investment for the Government Pension Fund Global on behalf of the Norwegian Ministry of Finance, focusing on worldwide investments including real estate investments in North America, Europe and Japan,










—


The Target Asset is a real estate property located in 26 Madre de Deu de Núria Street in Sant Boi de Llobregat near Barcelona in Spain, which is primarily used as a logistics facility.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10782 – PLD / NBIM / SANT BOI DE LLOBREGAT ASSET
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case C-364/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Minden (Germany) lodged on 7 June 2022 — J.B., S.B. and F.B. v Federal Republic of Germany
Date: 2022-06-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: foreign national, international protection, removal








C_2022340EN.01001901.xml










5.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/19






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Minden (Germany) lodged on 7 June 2022 — J.B., S.B. and F.B. v Federal Republic of Germany
(Case C-364/22)
(2022/C 340/24)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Minden

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: J.B., S.B., F.B.

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 33(2)(d) of Directive 2013/32/EU (1) be interpreted as precluding a national rule under which a further application for international protection must be refused as inadmissible irrespective of whether the applicant concerned returned to his or her country of origin after an application for international protection was rejected and before a further application for international protection was made?










2.


In the context of the answer to Question 1, does it make any difference whether the applicant concerned was removed to his or her country of origin or returned there voluntarily?










3.


Must Article 33(2)(d) of Directive 2013/32/EU be interpreted as precluding a Member State from refusing a further application for international protection as inadmissible where, although a decision on the granting of subsidiary protection status was not taken by way of the decision on the earlier application, grounds preventing removal were examined, and that examination is comparable in substance to the examination as to the granting of subsidiary protection status?










4.

Are the examination of grounds preventing removal and the examination as to the granting of subsidiary protection status comparable where, in the examination of grounds preventing removal, it was necessary cumulatively to examine whether, in the country to which the applicant concerned is to be removed, he or she faces





(a)


a real risk of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;










(b)


a risk of being subjected to the death penalty or execution;










(c)


a risk of being the subject of an infringement of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights — ECHR); or










(d)


a real and significant threat to his or her life and limb or freedom;
or whether he or she










(e)


is exposed, as a member of the civilian population, to a significant individual threat to life or limb in the context of an international or internal armed conflict?










(1)  Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).