do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Publication of an extract of a winding-up decision pursuant to Article 13 of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Bankruptcy of Amsterdam Trade Bank N.V. 2022/C 211/08
Date: 2022-05-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union, European Commission
Subjects: Netherlands, claim, financial institution, liquidation








C_2022211EN.01009601.xml










30.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/96






Publication of an extract of a winding-up decision pursuant to Article 13 of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Bankruptcy of Amsterdam Trade Bank N.V.
(2022/C 211/08)
The District Court of Amsterdam has declared Amsterdam Trade Bank N.V. (‘ATB’), also trading under the names ATBANK, ATBConnect, ATBSavings, FIBR and FIBR Bank, registered with the Chamber of Commerce under number 33260432, bankrupt on 22 April 2022 (F.13/22/77) pursuant to article 212h et seq. of the Dutch Bankruptcy Act. Amsterdam Trade Bank N.V. has its registered office at Strawinskylaan 1939 (1077XX) in Amsterdam. The court has appointed C.H. Rombouts as supervisory judge. A. van Hees and J.E.P.A. van Hooff, P.O. Box 75640 (1070 AP) Amsterdam, the Netherlands, have been appointed as bankruptcy trustees of Amsterdam Trade Bank N.V. Barring exceptions, Dutch law applies to the bankruptcy proceedings. De Nederlandsche Bank N.V. is the competent supervisor. The bankruptcy trustees will contact all known creditors. If you are a creditor of ATB and you have any other specific questions with regard to the bankruptcy, please contact the bankruptcy trustees’ information desk by email at infoatb@stibbe.com.
Case T-319/22: Action brought on 30 May 2022 — Krematorium am Waldfriedhof Schwäbisch Hall v EUIPO (aquamation)
Date: 2022-05-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, death, domestic animal, provision of services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022276EN.01002101.xml










18.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 276/21






Action brought on 30 May 2022 — Krematorium am Waldfriedhof Schwäbisch Hall v EUIPO (aquamation)
(Case T-319/22)
(2022/C 276/30)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Krematorium am Waldfriedhof Schwäbisch Hall GmbH & Co. KG (Schwäbisch Hall, Germany) (represented by: F. Dehn, L. Maritzen and C. Kleiner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU word mark ‘aquamation’ — Application No 18 453 264

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 March 2022 in Case R 2154/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10579 – PON HOLDING / AUTOHAUS ADELBERT MOLL / FLEXXDRIVE) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 225/01
Date: 2022-05-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Germany, commercial vehicle, dealer, economic concentration, machinery, merger control, motor car, motor vehicle industry, natural person, two-wheeled vehicle, vehicle rental








C_2022225EN.01000101.xml










9.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 225/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10579 – PON HOLDING / AUTOHAUS ADELBERT MOLL / FLEXXDRIVE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 225/01)
On 30 May 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10579. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-317/22: Action brought on 30 May 2022 — PF v Parliament
Date: 2022-05-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), equal treatment, linguistics








C_2022284EN.01005001.xml










25.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 284/50






Action brought on 30 May 2022 — PF v Parliament
(Case T-317/22)
(2022/C 284/68)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: PF (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the present action admissible and well founded;
and consequently,










—


annul the decision of 18 February 2022 rejecting the applicant’s request for review of the decision of the selection board for competition PE/AD/260/2021 of 20 December 2021 not to admit her to the oral tests and, in so far as necessary, annul the decision of 20 December 2021;










—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging breach of the obligation to state reasons.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging breach of the rules governing the proceedings of the selection board and the principles of impartiality and non-discrimination.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 25 May 2022 2022/C 211/03
Date: 2022-05-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022211EN.01000401.xml










30.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

25 May 2022
(2022/C 211/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0656 




JPY


Japanese yen


135,34 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4405 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85295 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5419 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0269 




ISK


Iceland króna


138,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,2704 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,648 




HUF


Hungarian forint


388,25 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6210 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9416 




TRY


Turkish lira


17,3954 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5126 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3720 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,3647 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6539 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4676 




KRW


South Korean won


1 354,61 




ZAR


South African rand


16,7628 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,1334 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5355 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 587,59 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6833 




PHP


Philippine peso


55,787 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,550 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,1736 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,2213 




INR


Indian rupee


82,6666 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-328/22: Action brought on 30 May 2022 — Korres v EUIPO — Naos (EST. KORRES 1996 HYDRA-BIOME)
Date: 2022-05-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022303EN.01005001.xml










8.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 303/50






Action brought on 30 May 2022 — Korres v EUIPO — Naos (EST. KORRES 1996 HYDRA-BIOME)
(Case T-328/22)
(2022/C 303/65)
Language in which the application was lodged: Greek

Parties


Applicant: Korres AE — Fysika Proionta (Metamorphosi, Attica, Greece) (represented by: S. Tsimikalis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Naos SAS (Aix-en-Provence, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark EST. KORRES 1996 HYDRA-BIOME — Application No 18 197 304

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 March 2022 in Case R 1410/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Incorrect interpretation and application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Withdrawal of Commission proposals 2022/C 211/06
Date: 2022-05-30
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: proposal (EU)








C_2022211EN.01000701.xml










30.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/7






Withdrawal of Commission proposals
(2022/C 211/06)

List of withdrawn proposals








Document


Inter-institutional procedure


Title





An economy that works for people





COM(2020) 446 final


2020/0109 (APP)


Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Council Regulation (EU, EURATOM) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020




COM(2020) 404 final


2020/0106 (COD)


Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2015/1017 as regards creation of a Solvency Support Instrument





A Stronger Europe in the World





COM(2020) 461 final


2020/0110 (COD)


Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) N° 1257/96 of 20 June 1996 concerning Humanitarian Aid




COM(2020) 407 final


2020/0107 (COD)


Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1601 establishing the European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD), the EFSD Guarantee and the EFSD Guarantee Fund




COM(2019) 125 final


2019/0070 (COD)


Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism





Promoting our European way of life





COM(2014) 340 final


2014/0173 (COD)


Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 as regards the establishment of a Controller of procedural guarantees
Case T-331/21: Order of the General Court of 30 May 2022 — mBank v EUIPO — European Merchant Bank (EMBANK European Merchant Bank) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2022-05-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, bank, banking, economic value, financial services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022284EN.01003401.xml










25.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 284/34






Order of the General Court of 30 May 2022 — mBank v EUIPO — European Merchant Bank (EMBANK European Merchant Bank)
(Case T-331/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 284/44)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: mBank S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: E. Skrzydło-Tefelska and K. Gajek, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: European Merchant Bank UAB (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: G. Pranevičius, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, mBank S.A., seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 March 2021 (Case R 1845/2020-5) relating to invalidity proceedings between itself and the intervener, European Merchant Bank (‘the contested decision’).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action










2.


The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.
Case T-452/21: Order of the General Court of 30 May 2022 — Thomas Henry v EUIPO (MATE MATE) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2022-05-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, beverage, carriage of goods, clothing, hotel industry, marketing, packaging, registered trade mark, storage, trade-mark law








C_2022284EN.01003501.xml










25.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 284/35






Order of the General Court of 30 May 2022 — Thomas Henry v EUIPO (MATE MATE)
(Case T-452/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 284/46)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Thomas Henry GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and N. Willich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 May 2021 (Case R 406/2021-1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Thomas Henry GmbH.






(1)  OJ C 368, 13.9.2021.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 26 May 2022 2022/C 211/04
Date: 2022-05-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022211EN.01000501.xml










30.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/5






Euro exchange rates (1)

26 May 2022
(2022/C 211/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0697 




JPY


Japanese yen


135,95 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4409 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85073 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5983 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0283 




ISK


Iceland króna


138,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,2715 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,676 




HUF


Hungarian forint


391,72 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6083 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9423 




TRY


Turkish lira


17,5588 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5110 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3715 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,3970 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6541 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4709 




KRW


South Korean won


1 352,69 




ZAR


South African rand


16,9312 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,2024 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5355 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 628,91 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7045 




PHP


Philippine peso


55,975 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,589 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,1741 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,1935 




INR


Indian rupee


83,0065 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 27 May 2022 2022/C 211/05
Date: 2022-05-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022211EN.01000601.xml










30.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/6






Euro exchange rates (1)

27 May 2022
(2022/C 211/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0722 




JPY


Japanese yen


136,05 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4392 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84875 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5293 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0258 




ISK


Iceland króna


137,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,1790 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,700 




HUF


Hungarian forint


392,83 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5858 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9427 




TRY


Turkish lira


17,5820 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4995 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3661 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4165 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6426 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4679 




KRW


South Korean won


1 343,63 




ZAR


South African rand


16,7460 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,1831 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5379 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 583,97 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6952 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,020 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,589 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,0959 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,1360 




INR


Indian rupee


83,1915 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-322/22: Action brought on 30 May 2022 — Unsa Énergie v Commission
Date: 2022-05-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, case-law (EU), control of State aid, right to justice, trade union








C_2022284EN.01005101.xml










25.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 284/51






Action brought on 30 May 2022 — Unsa Énergie v Commission
(Case T-322/22)
(2022/C 284/70)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Unsa Énergie (Bagnolet, France) (represented by: M.-P. Ogel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the letter of the European Commission COMP B.2/NP/mm *comp(2022)2975325 of 8 April 2022, by which the Commission rejects the complaint as inadmissible,










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 1(h) of Regulation 2015/1589, (1) on the ground that the Commission misconstrued the concept of interested party. The applicant submits that the Commission disregards the case-law according to which a trade union could be categorised as having the status of interested party where it is shown that that trade union’s interests might be affected by the granting of State aid.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 24 of Regulation 2015/1589 and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. According to the applicant, the Commission failed to examine its complaint or request it to provide details as regards that complaint, in breach of Article 24 of Regulation 2015/1589 which confers various rights on interested parties.






(1)  Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ 2015 L 248, p. 9).
Corrigendum to Rules of Procedure of the European Economic and Social Committee – May 2022 (Official Journal of the European Union L 140 of 19 May 2022)
Date: 2022-05-30
Institutions: European Economic and Social Committee
Subjects: operation of the Institutions, rules of procedure








L_2022147EN.01005301.xml










30.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 147/53







Corrigendum to Rules of Procedure of the European Economic and Social Committee – May 2022

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 140 of 19 May 2022
)


This publication should be considered null and void.
Case T-325/22: Action brought on 30 May 2022 — Nurel v EUIPO — FKuR Property (Terylene)
Date: 2022-05-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, plastics, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022284EN.01005202.xml










25.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 284/52






Action brought on 30 May 2022 — Nurel v EUIPO — FKuR Property (Terylene)
(Case T-325/22)
(2022/C 284/72)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Nurel, SA (Zaragoza, Spain) (represented by: M. Anadón Giménez and J. Learte Álvarez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: FKuR Property GmbH (Willich, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark Terylene — Application for registration No 18 088 348

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 March 2022 in Case R 1544/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


The proof of use submitted by the opponent during the appeal proceedings should have never been admitted, and therefore, the contested decision should have considered only the proof of use submitted during oppositions proceedings;










—


The proof of use submitted by the opponent is not sufficient to prove genuine use for all the earlier goods ‘unprocessed plastics’ in Class 1 on which the opposition is based, and therefore, the opposition should have been rejected.