do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-297/22: Action brought on 20 May 2022 — BB Services v EUIPO — Lego Juris (Shape of a toy figure with a protrusion on the head)
Date: 2022-05-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, decorative item, electronic game, footwear industry, registered trade mark, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2022257EN.01004901.xml










4.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 257/49






Action brought on 20 May 2022 — BB Services v EUIPO — Lego Juris (Shape of a toy figure with a protrusion on the head)
(Case T-297/22)
(2022/C 257/64)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: BB Services GmbH (Flörsheim am Main, Germany) (represented by: M. Krogmann, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lego Juris A/S (Billund, Denmark)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU three-dimensional mark (Shape of a toy figure with a protrusion on the head) — EU trade mark No 50 450

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 March 2022 in Case R 1355/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and declare EU trade mark No 50 450 invalid;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-333/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 20 May 2022 — Ligue des droits humains ASBL, BA v L’organe de contrôle de l’information policière
Date: 2022-05-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: data protection, data-processing law, judicial review, personal data, right to justice, supervisory body








C_2022326EN.01000702.xml










29.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 326/7






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 20 May 2022 — Ligue des droits humains ASBL, BA v L’organe de contrôle de l’information policière
(Case C-333/22)
(2022/C 326/11)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants: Ligue des droits humains ASBL, BA

Respondent: L’organe de contrôle de l’information policière

Questions referred







1.


Do Articles 47 and 8(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union require provision to be made for a judicial remedy against an independent supervisory authority such as the Supervisory Body for Police Information where it exercises the rights of the data subject vis-à-vis the controller?










2.


Does Article 17 of Directive 2016/680 (1) comply with Articles 47 and 8(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as interpreted by the Court of Justice, in that it obliges the supervisory authority — which exercises the rights of the data subject vis-à-vis the controller — only to inform the data subject ‘that all necessary verifications or a review by the supervisory authority have taken place’ and ‘of his or her right to seek a judicial remedy’, when such information does not enable any a posteriori review to be conducted as regards the action taken and assessment made by the supervisory authority in the light of the data of the data subject and the obligations of the controller?






(1)  Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 89).
Case C-233/21 P: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 May 2022 — Germann Avocats LLC v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — European Union public contracts — Tendering procedure — Award of contracts — Decision to reject a tender and award the contract to another tenderer — Award criteria — Quality control — Distortion of the facts and evidence — Misuse of powers — Obligation to state reasons — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Date: 2022-05-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: abuse of power, comparative study, cultural pluralism, damages, equal treatment, qualitative analysis, rights of the defence, tendering, trade union, transparency in decision-making








C_2022368EN.01000502.xml










26.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 368/5






Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 May 2022 — Germann Avocats LLC v European Commission
(Case C-233/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - European Union public contracts - Tendering procedure - Award of contracts - Decision to reject a tender and award the contract to another tenderer - Award criteria - Quality control - Distortion of the facts and evidence - Misuse of powers - Obligation to state reasons - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
(2022/C 368/07)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Germann Avocats LLC (represented by: N. Scandamis, dikigoros)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Araujo Arce and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.










2.


Germann Avocats LLC is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 19 May 2022 2022/C 203/02
Date: 2022-05-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022203EN.01000201.xml










20.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 203/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

19 May 2022
(2022/C 203/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0525 




JPY


Japanese yen


134,46 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4423 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84728 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5098 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0265 




ISK


Iceland króna


139,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,3102 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,700 




HUF


Hungarian forint


385,83 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6423 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9474 




TRY


Turkish lira


16,8037 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5036 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3490 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,2594 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6551 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4576 




KRW


South Korean won


1 343,21 




ZAR


South African rand


16,8315 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,1028 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5395 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 416,76 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6363 




PHP


Philippine peso


55,140 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,343 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,2094 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,0043 




INR


Indian rupee


81,7115 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-693/21: Order of the General Court of 20 May 2022 — NJ v Commission
Date: 2022-05-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, control of State aid, infringement procedure (EU), operation of the Institutions








C_2022284EN.01006001.xml










25.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 284/60






Order of the General Court of 20 May 2022 — NJ v Commission
(Case T-693/21) (1)

(2022/C 284/81)
Language of the case: English
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 37, 24.1.2022.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/827 of 20 May 2022 correcting the Danish language version of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842 laying down rules for the application of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards further arrangements for the adjustments to free allocation of emission allowances due to activity level changes
Date: 2022-05-20
Institutions: Directorate-General for Translation, European Commission
Subjects: EU Emissions Trading Scheme, EU emission allowance, EU environmental policy, air quality, auction sale, greenhouse gas, reduction of gas emissions, tradeable emission permit








L_2022147EN.01002501.xml










30.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 147/25








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/827
of 20 May 2022
         
correcting the Danish language version of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842 laying down rules for the application of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards further arrangements for the adjustments to free allocation of emission allowances due to activity level changes


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (1), and in particular Article 10a(21) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Danish language version of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842 (2) contains errors in Article 6(1) and (2) that alter the meaning of the provisions.












(2)


The Danish language version of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected.












(3)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Climate Change Committee,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

(Does not concern the English language.)



Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 20 May 2022.


For the Commission


The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32.

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842 of 31 October 2019 laying down rules for the application of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards further arrangements for the adjustments to free allocation of emission allowances due to activity level changes (OJ L 282, 4.11.2019, p. 20).
Case T-534/21: Order of the General Court of 20 May 2022 — VP v Cedefop (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — Temporary staff — Request for renewal of a contract for an indefinite period — Decision not to renew — Action for annulment and for damages — Actionable measure — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2022-05-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: admissibility, full-time employment, indemnification, servant (EU), termination of employment, work contract








C_2022284EN.01003701.xml










25.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 284/37






Order of the General Court of 20 May 2022 — VP v Cedefop
(Case T-534/21) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Temporary staff - Request for renewal of a contract for an indefinite period - Decision not to renew - Action for annulment and for damages - Actionable measure - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2022/C 284/49)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: VP (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (represented by: A. Guillerme, T. Bontinck, L. Burguin and T. Payan, lawyers)

Re:

By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant, VP, seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) of 2 March 2021 and, secondly, compensation for the damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


VP shall bear her own costs as well as the costs incurred by European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop), including the costs of the proceedings for interim measures.






(1)  OJ C 431, 25.10.2021.
Case T-295/22: Action brought on 20 May 2022 — Crush Series Publishing v EUIPO — Mediaproduccion (The Crush Series)
Date: 2022-05-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, decorative item, publishing, registered trade mark, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2022257EN.01004802.xml










4.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 257/48






Action brought on 20 May 2022 — Crush Series Publishing v EUIPO — Mediaproduccion (The Crush Series)
(Case T-295/22)
(2022/C 257/63)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Crush Series Publishing s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: D.-M. Belciu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mediaproduccion SLU (Barcelona, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark The Crush Series — Application for registration No 18 119 385

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 March 2022 in Case R 1303/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


reject the opposition and allow the European Union trade mark application ‘The Crush Series’, No 18 119 385 to proceed to registration;










—


order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs incurred in the present proceedings and in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.










—


Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-131/22: Order of the President of the Court of 20 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — flightright GmbH v Swiss International Air Lines AG
Date: 2022-05-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, bad weather, carriage of passengers, carrier, indemnification, traveller








C_2022368EN.01002104.xml










26.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 368/21






Order of the President of the Court of 20 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — flightright GmbH v Swiss International Air Lines AG
(Case C-131/22) (1)

(2022/C 368/39)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 191, 10.5.2022.
Case T-298/22: Action brought on 20 May 2022 — BB Services v EUIPO — Lego Juris (Shape of a toy figure)
Date: 2022-05-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, decorative item, electronic game, footwear industry, registered trade mark, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2022257EN.01005001.xml










4.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 257/50






Action brought on 20 May 2022 — BB Services v EUIPO — Lego Juris (Shape of a toy figure)
(Case T-298/22)
(2022/C 257/65)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: BB Services GmbH (Flörsheim am Main, Germany) (represented by: M. Krogmann, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lego Juris A/S (Billund, Denmark)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU three-dimensional mark (Shape of a toy figure) — EU trade mark No 50 518

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 March 2022 in Case R 1354/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and declare EU trade mark No 50 518 invalid;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-296/22: Action brought on 20 May 2022 — Flowbird v EUIPO — Apcoa Parking Holdings (FLOWBIRD)
Date: 2022-05-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electric machinery, electrical equipment, maintenance, parking area, parking charge, registered trade mark, software, ticket, trade-mark law








C_2022276EN.01001301.xml










18.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 276/13






Action brought on 20 May 2022 — Flowbird v EUIPO — Apcoa Parking Holdings (FLOWBIRD)
(Case T-296/22)
(2022/C 276/19)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Flowbird (Neuilly-sur-Seine, France) (represented by: C. Pecnard, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Apcoa Parking Holdings GmbH (Stuttgart, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark FLOWBIRD — International registration designating the European Union No 1 478 123

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 March 2022 in Case R 748/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court;










—


order Apcoa Parking Holdings to pay the costs of the proceedings before the EUIPO.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-208/22: Order of the President of the Court of 20 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats's-Hertogenbosch — Netherlands) — F v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid
Date: 2022-05-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, foreign national, fundamental rights, infringement of EU law, return migration, right of asylum, right to justice, third country








C_2022368EN.01002201.xml










26.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 368/22






Order of the President of the Court of 20 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats's-Hertogenbosch — Netherlands) — F v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid
(Case C-208/22) (1)

(2022/C 368/40)
Language of the case: Dutch
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 257, 4.7.2022.