do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-277/22: Action brought on 17 May 2022 — Groz-Beckert v EUIPO (Position mark consisting of the colours red and white on cuboid packaging)
Date: 2022-05-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, textile industry, trade-mark law








C_2022257EN.01004501.xml










4.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 257/45






Action brought on 17 May 2022 — Groz-Beckert v EUIPO (Position mark consisting of the colours red and white on cuboid packaging)
(Case T-277/22)
(2022/C 257/58)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Groz-Beckert KG (Albstadt, Germany) (represented by: M. Nielen and U. Kaufmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for the position mark consisting of the colours red and white on cuboid packaging — Application No 18 243 038

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 March 2022 in Case R 1444/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of the first sentence of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-276/22: Action brought on 17 May 2022 — Groz-Beckert v EUIPO (Position mark consisting of the colours white, medium red and dark green on cuboid packaging)
Date: 2022-05-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, textile industry, trade-mark law








C_2022257EN.01004401.xml










4.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 257/44






Action brought on 17 May 2022 — Groz-Beckert v EUIPO (Position mark consisting of the colours white, medium red and dark green on cuboid packaging)
(Case T-276/22)
(2022/C 257/57)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Groz-Beckert KG (Albstadt, Germany) (represented by: M. Nielen and U. Kaufmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for the position mark consisting of the colours white, medium red and dark green on cuboid packaging — Application No 18 243 039

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 March 2022 in Case R 1447/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of the first sentence of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Notice for the attention of the person to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/740, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/755 , and Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/748 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in South Sudan apply 2022/C 199/03
Date: 2022-05-17
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, South Sudan, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2022199EN.01000301.xml










17.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 199/3






Notice for the attention of the person to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/740, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/755 , and Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/748 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in South Sudan apply
(2022/C 199/03)
The following information is brought to the attention of the person that appears in Annex II to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/740 (1), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/755 (2), and Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 (3) , as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/748 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of the situation in South Sudan.
The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons designated in the above-mentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2015/740 and in Regulation (EU) 2015/735 should continue to apply to that person.
The attention of the person concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites listed in Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2015/735, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 6 of the Regulation).
The person concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include that person on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, by 30 November 2022, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu


(1)  OJ L 117, 8.5.2015, p. 52.

(2)  OJ L 138, 17.5.2022, p. 17


(3)  OJ L 117, 8.5.2015, p. 13.

(4)  OJ L 138, 17.5.2022, p. 1
Case C-787/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Estaleiros Navais de Peniche SA v Município de Aveiro, Navaltagus — Reparação e Construção Naval SA, Navalrocha — Sociedade de Construção e Reparações Navais SA (Request for a preliminary reference — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Review procedures in respect of the award of public supply and public works contracts — Directive 89/665/EEC — Article 1(3) — Interest in bringing proceedings — Access to the review procedures — Tenderer excluded by a decision of the contracting authority which has become final, as a result of failing to challenge all the grounds for rejection of its tender — No interest in bringing proceedings)
Date: 2022-05-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, public procurement, supplies contract, tendering, works contract








C_2022257EN.01001401.xml










4.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 257/14






Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Estaleiros Navais de Peniche SA v Município de Aveiro, Navaltagus — Reparação e Construção Naval SA, Navalrocha — Sociedade de Construção e Reparações Navais SA
(Case C-787/21) (1)

(Request for a preliminary reference - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Review procedures in respect of the award of public supply and public works contracts - Directive 89/665/EEC - Article 1(3) - Interest in bringing proceedings - Access to the review procedures - Tenderer excluded by a decision of the contracting authority which has become final, as a result of failing to challenge all the grounds for rejection of its tender - No interest in bringing proceedings)
(2022/C 257/19)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Estaleiros Navais de Peniche SA

Defendants: Município de Aveiro, Navaltagus — Reparação e Construção Naval SA, Navalrocha — Sociedade de Construção e Reparações Navais SA

Operative part of the order

Article 1(3) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts, as amended by Directive 2007/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007, must be interpreted as precluding a tenderer who was eliminated from a public procurement procedure by a decision of the contracting authority which has become final from contesting the decision to award that contract. In that regard, it is irrelevant that the unsuccessful tenderer submits that it could potentially be awarded the contract in the case if, following the annulment of that decision, the contracting authority were to decide to launch a new award procedure.


(1)  Date of filing: 16.12.2021.
Case T-278/22: Action brought on 17 May 2022 — Biogen Netherlands v Commission
Date: 2022-05-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: data protection, drug surveillance, generic drug, market approval








C_2022284EN.01004501.xml










25.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 284/45






Action brought on 17 May 2022 — Biogen Netherlands v Commission
(Case T-278/22)
(2022/C 284/62)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Biogen Netherlands BV (Badhoevedorp, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the European Commission of 13 May 2022 C(2022) 3254 (final) granting marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (1) for ‘Dimethyl fumarate Neuraxpharm — dimethyl fumarate’, a medicinal product for human use; and










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging failure to observe the system of Directive 2001/83/EC (2) in relation to the rules on regulatory data protection, including Article 6(1) of that Directive, and the obligations of generic applicants under Article 10(1) of that Directive.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging failure to recognize the consequences of the Opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of 11 November 2021 for the question whether the marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Fumaderm was capable of commencing a global marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Tecfidera in accordance with Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Directive 2001/83/EC.






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency (OJ 2004, L 136, p. 1).

(2)  Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2001, L 311, p. 67).
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10667 – VESA / POSTNL) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 199/09
Date: 2022-05-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, merger control, postal service, universal service








C_2022199EN.01001001.xml










17.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 199/10






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10667 – VESA / POSTNL)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 199/09)

1.   
On 6 May 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Vesa Equity Investment S.à.r.l. (‘Vesa’, Luxembourg),










—


PostNL N.V. (‘PostNL’, Netherlands).




Vesa will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of PostNL.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


Vesa: an investment vehicle controlled by Mr. Daniel Křetínsky, a national of the Czech Republic. Mr. Křetínský holds interests in companies active in the energy, utilities, media, and e-commerce sectors,










—


PostNL: a public limited liability company listed on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange. PostNL’s core business activities are to collect, sort and deliver mail, parcels and other goods in the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg and the United Kingdom. It is the designated provider of the universal service obligation (USO) in the Netherlands.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10667 – VESA / POSTNL
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.