do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10716 – PLD / NBIM / TARGET ASSET BLEISWIJK) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 189/05
Date: 2022-05-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Netherlands, economic concentration, industrial building, investment company, merger control, real estate business








C_2022189EN.01007201.xml










10.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 189/72






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10716 – PLD / NBIM / TARGET ASSET BLEISWIJK)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 189/05)
On 3 May 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10716. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-287/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 3 May 2022 — YQ, RJ v Getin Noble Bank S.A.
Date: 2022-05-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil proceedings, consumer protection, preliminary issue, principle of proportionality, unfair terms of contract








C_2022318EN.01002302.xml










22.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 318/23






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 3 May 2022 — YQ, RJ v Getin Noble Bank S.A.
(Case C-287/22)
(2022/C 318/33)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: YQ, RJ

Defendant: Getin Noble Bank S.A.

Question referred

In the light of the principles of effectiveness and proportionality, do Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) of Directive 93/13 (1) preclude an interpretation of national legislation or of national case-law according to which a national court may, in particular because of a consumer’s obligations to settle payments with a seller or supplier or the sound financial situation of the seller or supplier, dismiss a consumer’s application for an interim measure (securing of the action) to suspend, during the course of the proceedings, the performance of a contract which is likely to be declared invalid as a result of the removal of the unfair terms from it?


(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).
Case T-244/22: Action brought on 3 May 2022 — Pšonka v Council
Date: 2022-05-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2022244EN.01004201.xml










27.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/42






Action brought on 3 May 2022 — Pšonka v Council
(Case T-244/22)
(2022/C 244/57)
Language of the case: Czech

Parties


Applicant: Viktor Pavlovyč Pšonka (Kiev, Ukraine) (represented by: M. Mleziva, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/376 of 3 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/375 of 3 March 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, to the extent to which they relate to the applicant;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to sound administration.






—


The applicant claims in support of his action, inter alia, that the Council of the European Union did not act with due care and attention in the adoption of the contested decision, since before the adoption of the contested decision it did not address the applicant’s arguments and the evidence he had adduced, which supports his case, and it primarily based its decision on information provided by the Ukrainian institutions and did not request any supplementary information on the course of the investigations in the Ukraine.














2.


Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the applicant’s right to property.






—


The applicant claims in this connection that the restrictions adopted against him are disproportionate, go beyond what is necessary and amount to an infringement of guarantees under international law of protection of the applicant’s right to property.














3.


Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the applicant’s fundamental rights guaranteed under the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.






—


The applicant claims in this connection that in the adoption of the restrictive measures against him, his right to a fair trial and to the presumption of innocence were infringed, as were his rights of the defence and his right to the protection of private property.
Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.): 0,00 % on 1 May 2022 Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 2 May 2022 2022/C 180/03
Date: 2022-05-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Central Bank, euro, exchange rate, financing, interest, money








C_2022180EN.01000301.xml










3.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 180/3






Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):
0,00 % on 1 May 2022
Euro exchange rates (2)

2 May 2022
(2022/C 180/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0524 




JPY


Japanese yen


136,63 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4391 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83810 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,4035 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0253 




ISK


Iceland króna


137,20 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,9248 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,671 




HUF


Hungarian forint


378,51 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6850 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9478 




TRY


Turkish lira


15,6697 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4913 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3560 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,2581 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6362 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4585 




KRW


South Korean won


1 333,71 




ZAR


South African rand


16,7383 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,9548 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5610 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 293,41 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5816 




PHP


Philippine peso


55,229 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,208 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,2480 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,4758 




INR


Indian rupee


80,4970 






(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
European Parliament decision of 3 May 2022 on the nomination of George Marius Hyzler as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0043/2022 — 2022/0803(NLE))
Date: 2022-05-03
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, European Parliament
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the Court of Auditors (EU)








C_2022465EN.01021201.xml










6.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 465/212






P9_TA(2022)0134
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — George Marius Hyzler
European Parliament decision of 3 May 2022 on the nomination of George Marius Hyzler as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0043/2022 — 2022/0803(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2022/C 465/22)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0043/2022),










—


having regard to Rule 129 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0130/2022),










A.


whereas, by letter of 10 February 2022, the Council consulted Parliament on the nomination of George Marius Hyzler as a Member of the Court of Auditors;










B.


whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control then proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; whereas in carrying out that evaluation, the committee received a curriculum vitae from the nominee as well as the nominee’s replies to the written questionnaire that he had been sent;










C.


whereas the committee subsequently held a hearing with the nominee on 21 April 2022, at which the nominee made an opening statement and then answered questions put by the members of the committee;












1.


Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of George Marius Hyzler as a Member of the Court of Auditors;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, to the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.