do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-627/21: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia — Romania) — SH v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Sibiu, Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Braşov (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Deduction of input tax paid in relation to the purchase, building and alteration of immovable property — Ex officio revocation of a taxable person’s identification for VAT purposes — Adjustment of the initial deduction — Reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law)
Date: 2022-05-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, capital goods, economic activity, tax law, tax relief, taxpayer








C_2022368EN.01001002.xml










26.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 368/10






Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia — Romania) — SH v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Sibiu, Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Braşov
(Case C-627/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Harmonisation of fiscal legislation - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Deduction of input tax paid in relation to the purchase, building and alteration of immovable property - Ex officio revocation of a taxable person’s identification for VAT purposes - Adjustment of the initial deduction - Reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law)
(2022/C 368/14)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: S.H.

Respondents: Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Sibiu, Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Braşov

Operative part of the order

Articles 16, 184, 186 to 188 and 192 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as precluding national rules and practice requiring a taxable person, whose identification for value added tax (VAT) purposes was revoked for a given period on account of there being no taxable transactions shown in that person’s VAT returns filed during six consecutive months, to adjust the input VAT deducted in relation to the purchase of capital goods without that taxable person being entitled to adduce evidence that the substantive conditions for benefitting from the right to deduct are satisfied, on the ground that there is an irrebuttable presumption that the taxable person used those goods for purposes other than economic activities.


(1)  OJ C 191, 10.5.2022.
Case C-13/22: Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 2 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Piteşti — Romania) — EF, GH, IJ v KL
Date: 2022-05-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: constitutional court, disciplinary proceedings, independence of the judiciary, judge, judgment of the Court (EU), primacy of EU law, right to justice, ruling








C_2022368EN.01002102.xml










26.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 368/21






Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 2 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Piteşti — Romania) — EF, GH, IJ v KL
(Case C-13/22) (1)

(2022/C 368/37)
Language of the case: Romanian
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 191, 10.5.2022.
Case T-241/22: Action brought on 2 May 2022 — Juvin v Parliament
Date: 2022-05-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, appointment of members, disciplinary proceedings, election, election monitoring, elective office, equal treatment








C_2022244EN.01004002.xml










27.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/40






Action brought on 2 May 2022 — Juvin v Parliament
(Case T-241/22)
(2022/C 244/55)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Hervé Juvin (Paris, France) (represented by: F.-P. Vos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul decision D-301936 of the Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group of 3 March 2022 excluding Mr Hervé Juvin from taking part in election observation delegations of the European Parliament until the end of his parliamentary mandate (2019-2024);










—


order the European Parliament to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 3 000, on the basis of Articles 87 et seq. of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law which are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-196/22, Mariani v Parliament.
Case T-328/21: Order of the General Court of 2 May 2022 — Airoldi Metalli v Commission (Action for annulment — Dumping — Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China — Act imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty — Importer — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Act not of individual concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2022-05-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, admissibility, aluminium, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), non-flat product, originating product








C_2022284EN.01003302.xml










25.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 284/33






Order of the General Court of 2 May 2022 — Airoldi Metalli v Commission
(Case T-328/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Dumping - Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China - Act imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty - Importer - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Act not of individual concern - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 284/43)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Airoldi Metalli SpA (Molteno, Italy) (represented by: M. Campa, M. Pirovano, D. Rovetta, G. Pandey, P. Gjørtler and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/546 of 29 March 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of aluminium extrusions originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2021 L 109, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Airoldi Metalli SpA shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10695 – APOLLO MANAGEMENT / BANK AND ACQUIRERS INTERNATIONAL HOLDING) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 179/04
Date: 2022-05-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electronic money, holding company, investment company, merger control, payment system, software








C_2022179EN.01000501.xml










2.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/5






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10695 – APOLLO MANAGEMENT / BANK AND ACQUIRERS INTERNATIONAL HOLDING)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 179/04)

1.   
On 25 April 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Apollo Management, L.P. (‘Apollo’, US),










—


Bank and Acquirers International Holding S.A.S. (‘BAI’, France), controlled by Worldline SA (‘Wordline’, France).




Apollo will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of BAI.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


Apollo is a global alternative asset manager headquartered in New York City,










—


BAI is part of Worldline and is the sub-holding company of a group of companies active in the manufacturing and supply of point of sales terminals (POS terminals) and related software services mostly to merchant acquirers (banks and payment service providers), acquirers and distributors.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10695 – APOLLO MANAGEMENT / BANK AND ACQUIRERS INTERNATIONAL HOLDING
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case T-240/22: Action brought on 2 May 2022 — Lacapelle v Parliament
Date: 2022-05-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, appointment of members, disciplinary proceedings, election, election monitoring, elective office, equal treatment








C_2022244EN.01004001.xml










27.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/40






Action brought on 2 May 2022 — Lacapelle v Parliament
(Case T-240/22)
(2022/C 244/54)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Jean-Lin Lacapelle (Paris, France) (represented by: F.-P. Vos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul decision D-301937 of the Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group of 3 March 2022 excluding Mr Jean-Lin Lacapelle from taking part in election observation delegations of the European Parliament until the end of his parliamentary mandate (2019-2024);










—


order the European Parliament to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 3 000, on the basis of Articles 87 et seq. of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law which are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-196/22, Mariani v Parliament.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10691 – CDP GROUP / FOMAS GROUP / PUNCH GROUP / JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 185/02
Date: 2022-05-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: 3D printing, consultancy, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, metal product








C_2022185EN.01004601.xml










6.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 185/46






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10691 – CDP GROUP / FOMAS GROUP / PUNCH GROUP / JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 185/02)
On 2 May 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in Italian language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10691. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Joined Cases C-221/21 and C-222/21: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1 — Czech Republic) — Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s., PKP Cargo International a.s., PDV Railway a.s., KŽC Doprava, s.r.o. (C-221/21), and České dráhy a.s. v Univerzita Pardubice and Others (C-222/21) (References for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Rail transport — Directive 2012/34/EU — Decisions of the regulatory body — Article 56(10) — Judicial review — National law providing for the jurisdiction of the civil courts — Rules governing the action — Compatibility with Directive 2012/34 — Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
Date: 2022-05-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil code, common transport policy, intra-EU transport, judicial review, national law, rail transport








C_2022368EN.01000501.xml










26.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 368/5






Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1 — Czech Republic) — Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s., PKP Cargo International a.s., PDV Railway a.s., KŽC Doprava, s.r.o. (C-221/21), and České dráhy a.s. v Univerzita Pardubice and Others (C-222/21)
(Joined Cases C-221/21 and C-222/21) (1)

(References for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Rail transport - Directive 2012/34/EU - Decisions of the regulatory body - Article 56(10) - Judicial review - National law providing for the jurisdiction of the civil courts - Rules governing the action - Compatibility with Directive 2012/34 - Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
(2022/C 368/06)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Správa železnic, státní organizasse (C-221/21), České dráhy a.s. (C-222/21)

Defendants: České dráhy a.s., PKP Cargo International a.s., PDV Railway a.s., KŽC Doprava s.r.o. (C-221/21), Univerzita Pardubice and Others (C-222/21)

Operative part of the order

The requests for a preliminary ruling made by the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1 (District Court, Prague 1, Czech Republic), by decisions of 22 September 2020 and 1 October 2020, are manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C 242, 21.6.2021.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10643 – ORACLE / CERNER) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 179/03
Date: 2022-05-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, health care, information technology industry, medical data, merger control








C_2022179EN.01000301.xml










2.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/3






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10643 – ORACLE / CERNER)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 179/03)

1.   
On 22 April 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Oracle Corporation (‘Oracle’, USA);










—


Cerner Corporation (‘Cerner’, USA).




Oracle will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Cerner.
The concentration is accomplished by way of public bid, through a tender offer to purchase all issued and outstanding shares of Cerner.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


Oracle is active worldwide in the development, production, marketing, and distribution of IT solutions, including enterprise applications and infrastructure software and services.










—


Cerner is a global supplier of healthcare provider software and services that support the clinical, financial and operational needs of healthcare provider organisations of all sizes, including providing software and services for electronic health records.






3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10643 – ORACLE / CERNER
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 29 April 2022 2022/C 179/02
Date: 2022-05-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022179EN.01000201.xml










2.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

29 April 2022
(2022/C 179/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0540 




JPY


Japanese yen


137,01 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4415 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83908 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,2958 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0229 




ISK


Iceland króna


137,80 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,7525 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,605 




HUF


Hungarian forint


378,71 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6780 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9479 




TRY


Turkish lira


15,6385 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4699 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3426 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,2703 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6119 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4545 




KRW


South Korean won


1 326,71 




ZAR


South African rand


16,6473 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,9441 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5667 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 301,52 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5886 




PHP


Philippine peso


55,200 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,026 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,1608 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,4181 




INR


Indian rupee


80,6380 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.