do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-103/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Boshab v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)
Date: 2022-04-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, EU restrictive measure, arms control, arms trade, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, rights of the defence








C_2022244EN.01002801.xml










27.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/28






Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Boshab v Council
(Case T-103/21) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States - Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered - Right to be heard - Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded - Manifest error of assessment - Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)
(2022/C 244/36)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Évariste Boshab (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Lejeune, acting as Agent)

Re:

By his action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/2033 of 10 December 2020 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2020 L 419, p. 30) and, second, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2021 of 10 December 2020 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2020 L 419, p. 5) in so far as those acts concern him.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Évariste Boshab to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.
Case T-242/19: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan v Commission (Dumping — Imports of cycles, with pedal assistance, with an auxiliary electric motor, originating in China — Definitive anti-dumping duties — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/73 — Determination of injury — Article 3(2), (3) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Price undercutting calculation — Causal link)
Date: 2022-04-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, electric vehicle, import (EU), originating product, two-wheeled vehicle








C_2022244EN.01002301.xml










27.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/23






Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan v Commission
(Case T-242/19) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of cycles, with pedal assistance, with an auxiliary electric motor, originating in China - Definitive anti-dumping duties - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/73 - Determination of injury - Article 3(2), (3) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Price undercutting calculation - Causal link)
(2022/C 244/28)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan Co. Ltd (Kunshan, China) (represented by: P. De Baere and J. Redelbach, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/73 of 17 January 2019 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of electric bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2019 L 16, p. 108, and corrigendum OJ 2019 L 16 I, p. 1) in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/73 of 17 January 2019 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of electric bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China in so far as it concerns Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan Co. Ltd;










2.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan.






(1)  OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.
Case T-243/19: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan v Commission (Subsidies — Imports of cycles, with pedal assistance, with an auxiliary electric motor, originating in China — Definitive countervailing duties — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/72 — Determination of injury — Article 8(1), (2) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 — Price undercutting calculation — Causal link)
Date: 2022-04-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, countervailing charge, electric vehicle, import (EU), originating product, two-wheeled vehicle








C_2022244EN.01002302.xml










27.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/23






Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan v Commission
(Case T-243/19) (1)

(Subsidies - Imports of cycles, with pedal assistance, with an auxiliary electric motor, originating in China - Definitive countervailing duties - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/72 - Determination of injury - Article 8(1), (2) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 - Price undercutting calculation - Causal link)
(2022/C 244/29)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan Co. Ltd (Kunshan, China) (represented by: P. De Baere and J. Redelbach, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/72 of 17 January 2019 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of electric bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2019 L 16, p. 5) in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/72 of 17 January 2019 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of electric bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China in so far as it concerns the applicant;










2.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan.






(1)  OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.
Case T-4/20: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz — Port Polski Ośrodek Rozwoju Technologii v Commission (Arbitration clause — Grant agreement concluded in the context of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Eligible costs — Request for reimbursement — Financial audit — OLAF investigation — Conflict of interest on account of family or emotional ties — Principle of good faith — Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of marital status — Legitimate expectations — Action for annulment — Debit notes — Acts inseparable from the contract — Act not open to challenge — Right to effective judicial review — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2022-04-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Anti-fraud Office, audit, conflict of interest, debt, eligibility criteria, equal treatment, financial aid, judicial review, marital status, reimbursement of aid








C_2022244EN.01002401.xml










27.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/24






Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz — Port Polski Ośrodek Rozwoju Technologii v Commission
(Case T-4/20) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Grant agreement concluded in the context of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Eligible costs - Request for reimbursement - Financial audit - OLAF investigation - Conflict of interest on account of family or emotional ties - Principle of good faith - Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of marital status - Legitimate expectations - Action for annulment - Debit notes - Acts inseparable from the contract - Act not open to challenge - Right to effective judicial review - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 244/30)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz — Port Polski Ośrodek Rozwoju Technologii (Wrocław, Poland) (represented by: Ł. Stępkowski, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Araujo Arce and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action, the applicant seeks, primarily, on the basis of Article 272 TFEU, a declaration that the contractual claim of the European Commission set out in six debit notes issued on 13 November 2019 for an aggregate amount of EUR 180 893,90, comprising a principal amount of EUR 164 449 and damages of EUR 16 444,90, is non-existent, and an order that the Commission repay the amounts contained in those debit notes, and, in the alternative, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, annulment of the Commission’s letter of 12 November 2019, which was addressed to the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz — Port Polski Ośrodek Rozwoju Technologii to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.
Case T-109/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Mutondo v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)
Date: 2022-04-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, EU restrictive measure, arms control, arms trade, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, rights of the defence








C_2022244EN.01003201.xml










27.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/32






Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Mutondo v Council
(Case T-109/21) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States - Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered - Right to be heard - Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded - Manifest error of assessment - Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)
(2022/C 244/42)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Kalev Mutondo (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck. P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and H. Marcos Fraile, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/2033 of 10 December 2020 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2020 L 419, p. 30) and, second, of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2021 of 10 December 2020 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2020 L 419, p. 5), in so far as those acts concern him.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Kalev Mutondo to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.
Case T-181/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — LG Electronics v EUIPO — Anferlux-Electrodomésticos (SmartThinQ) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark SmartThinQ — Earlier national figurative mark SMARTTHING — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Translation of the list of goods covered by the earlier mark into the language of the proceedings — Genuine use of the earlier mark)
Date: 2022-04-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Internet of Things, air conditioning, computer equipment, household electrical appliance, lighting, medical device, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2022244EN.01003502.xml










27.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/35






Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — LG Electronics v EUIPO — Anferlux-Electrodomésticos (SmartThinQ)
(Case T-181/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark SmartThinQ - Earlier national figurative mark SMARTTHING - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Translation of the list of goods covered by the earlier mark into the language of the proceedings - Genuine use of the earlier mark)
(2022/C 244/47)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Anferlux-Electrodomésticos, Lda (Vila Nova de Monsarros, Portugal)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 February 2021 (Case R 1657/2020-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Anferlux-Electrodomésticos and LG Electronics.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders LG Electronics, Inc., to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.
Case T-107/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Amisi Kumba v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)
Date: 2022-04-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, EU restrictive measure, arms control, arms trade, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, rights of the defence








C_2022244EN.01003101.xml










27.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/31






Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Amisi Kumba v Council
(Case T-107/21) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States - Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered - Right to be heard - Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded - Manifest error of assessment - Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)
(2022/C 244/40)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Gabriel Amisi Kumba (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and H. Marcos Fraile, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/2033 of 10 December 2020 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2020 L 419, p. 30) and, second, of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2021 of 10 December 2020 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2020 L 419, p. 5), in so far as those acts concern him.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Dismisses the action;











2.



Orders Mr Gabriel Amisi Kumba to pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.
Case T-119/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Ramazazni Shadary v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)
Date: 2022-04-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, EU restrictive measure, arms control, arms trade, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, rights of the defence








C_2022244EN.01003401.xml










27.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/34






Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Ramazazni Shadary v Council
(Case T-119/21) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States - Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered - Right to be heard - Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded - Manifest error of assessment - Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)
(2022/C 244/45)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Emmanuel Ramazazni Shadary (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Lejeune, acting as Agent)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/2033 of 10 December 2020 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2020 L 419, p. 30) and, second, of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2021 of 10 December 2020 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2020 L 419, p. 5), in so far as those acts concern him.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Emmanuel Ramazani to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.