do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 168/14
Date: 2022-04-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Andalusia, Melilla, Spain, air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2022168EN.01001501.xml










22.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 168/15






Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 168/14)






Member State


Spain




Routes concerned


Melilla – Almeria/Granada/Sevilla




Date of entry into force of the public service obligations


1.1.2023




Address where the text and any information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained


Ministerio de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda Urbana





Dirección General de Aviación Civil




Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo




Paseo de la Castellana 67




28071 Madrid




ESPAÑA




Tel. +34 915977837
Fax +34 915978643
Email: osp.dgac@mitma.es




The routes subject to public service obligations may be operated on the basis of free competition access as from 1 January 2023. In the event that no air carrier submits a program of services compliant with the public service obligations imposed, access will be restricted from 1 January 2023 to 31 December 2023 to a single air carrier through the corresponding public tender procedure, in accordance with Article 16 (9) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008.
Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 168/12
Date: 2022-04-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Finland, Stockholm, Sweden, air transport, services of general interest, transport regulations, Åland








C_2022168EN.01001301.xml










22.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 168/13






Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 168/12)






Member State


Finland




Route concerned


Mariehamn – Stockholm Arlanda




Date of entry into force of the public service obligations


29 October 2022




Address where the text and any information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained


For further information please contact:
Ålands Landskapsregering
Address:
P.O.B. 1060 AX-22111 Mariehamn ÅLAND/FINLAND
Tel. +358 1825000
Email: registrator@regeringen.ax
Internet: https://www.e-avrop.com/portaler/Alandsportalen/Default.aspx
Case T-216/22: Action brought on 22 April 2022 — Shatrov v Council
Date: 2022-04-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belarus, EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2022222EN.01004001.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/40






Action brought on 22 April 2022 — Shatrov v Council
(Case T-216/22)
(2022/C 222/65)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Alexander Evgenevich Shatrov (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: G. Lansky and A. Egger, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/307 of 24 February 2022 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ 2022 L 46, p. 97) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/300 of 24 February 2022 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2022 L 46, p. 3), in so far as they concern the applicant;










—


pursuant to Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the argument that the contested measures are unlawful in so far as they concern the applicant, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging that the Council committed a manifest error of assessment and in particular infringed its examination obligations. In the applicant’s view, the Council failed to provide any concrete evidence to justify the validity of the applicant’s inclusion on the list in the contested measures.
Case T-219/22: Action brought on 22 April 2022 — Wallmax v EUIPO — Roxtec (Representation of a blue square containing eight concentric black circles)
Date: 2022-04-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electric cable, metal product, piping, plastics industry, registered trade mark, rubber industry, trade-mark law, tube








C_2022237EN.01006501.xml










20.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 237/65






Action brought on 22 April 2022 — Wallmax v EUIPO — Roxtec (Representation of a blue square containing eight concentric black circles)
(Case T-219/22)
(2022/C 237/84)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Wallmax Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: F. Ferrari, L. Goglia and G. Rapaccini, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Roxtec AB (Karlskrona, Sweden)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Representation of a blue square containing eight concentric black circles) — European Union trade mark No 7 376 023

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2022 in Case R 1093/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


partially annul the contested decision, in the part in which the Second Board of Appeal holds that the contested trademark is not invalid pursuant to Article 7(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council for the following goods: Class 6 — Cable and pipe penetration seals, made from metal; sealing frames made from metal; Class 17 — Sealing frames, made from plastic or rubber; Class 19 — Non-metallic rigid pipes for building; non-metallic sealing frames;










—


partially annul the contested decision, in the part in which the Second Board of Appeal annulled the Cancellation Division’s decision in relation to the decision on costs;










—


as a consequence of the above, uphold EUIPO’s Cancellation Division decision rendered on 23 April 2021;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-277/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 22 April 2022 — Global NRG Kereskedelmi és Tanácsadó Zrt. v Magyar Energetikai és Közmű-szabályozási Hivatal
Date: 2022-04-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: energy transport, gas pipeline, natural gas, provision of services, right to justice








C_2022257EN.01002701.xml










4.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 257/27






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 22 April 2022 — Global NRG Kereskedelmi és Tanácsadó Zrt. v Magyar Energetikai és Közmű-szabályozási Hivatal
(Case C-277/22)
(2022/C 257/35)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Global NRG Kereskedelmi és Tanácsadó Zrt.

Defendant: Magyar Energetikai és Közmű-szabályozási Hivatal

Other party intervening in support of the defendant: FGSZ Földgázszállító Zrt.

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 41(17) of Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 2003/55/EC (‘the Directive’) (1) be interpreted, in the light of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as meaning that it precludes national legislation according to which, in the procedures by which the regulatory authority of that Member State sets system usage charges, remuneration for any services provided by system operators under a special tariff and connection fees, only the system operator is recognised as a party directly affected and, as such, the only party having a right of appeal against a decision made in that procedure?










2.


If the Court answers the first question in the affirmative, must Article 41(17) of the Directive be interpreted, in the light of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as meaning that where that article is applied to a case such as that in the main proceedings, an actor in the natural gas market in a situation such as that of the applicant, which, under a decision by the regulatory authority of the Member State setting the system usage charges, remuneration for any services provided by system operators under a special tariff and connection fees, is charged a tariff by the system manager for a service that can be provided under a special tariff, must be found to be a party affected by that decision and, as such, to have a right of appeal against it?






(1)  Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 2003/55/EC (OJ 2009 L 211, p. 94).
Case C-276/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 22 April 2022 — Edil Work 2 S.r.l., S.T. S.r.l. v STE S.a.r.l.
Date: 2022-04-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: application of the law, head office, incorporation, national law, nationality of legal persons, private limited company, right of establishment








C_2022266EN.01001601.xml










11.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 266/16






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 22 April 2022 — Edil Work 2 S.r.l., S.T. S.r.l. v STE S.a.r.l.
(Case C-276/22)
(2022/C 266/19)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Edil Work 2 S.r.l., S.T. S.r.l.

Cross-appellant: STE S.a.r.l.

Question referred

Do Articles 49 and 54 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union preclude a situation where a Member State in which a (limited liability) company was originally incorporated applies to that company the provisions of national law relating to the operation and management of the company where the company, having transferred its registered office and reincorporated the company under the laws of the Member State of destination, maintains its principal place of business in the Member State of origin and the management act in question has a decisive effect on the company’s activities?
Case T-215/22: Action brought on 22 April 2022 — Synesis v Council
Date: 2022-04-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belarus, EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person








C_2022222EN.01003902.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/39






Action brought on 22 April 2022 — Synesis v Council
(Case T-215/22)
(2022/C 222/64)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Synesis TAA (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: G. Lansky and A. Egger, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/307 of 24 February 2022 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ 2022 L 46, p. 97) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/300 of 24 February 2022 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2022 L 46, p. 3), in so far as they concern the applicant;










—


pursuant to Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the argument that the contested measures are unlawful in so far as they concern the applicant, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging that the Council committed a manifest error of assessment and in particular infringed its examination obligations. In the applicant’s view, the Council failed to provide any concrete evidence to justify the validity of the applicant’s inclusion on the list in the contested measures.
Application date of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/467providing for exceptional adjustment aid to producers in the agricultural sectors 2022/C 168/01
Date: 2022-04-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, EU agricultural market, EU aid, agricultural production, aid to agriculture, common organisation of markets, financial aid, food security, market stabilisation








C_2022168EN.01000101.xml










22.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 168/1






Application date of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/467providing for exceptional adjustment aid to producers in the agricultural sectors
(2022/C 168/01)
Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2022/467 (1) provides that the Regulation shall apply from the day of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of a communication of the Commission stating that the transfer from the crisis reserve to the budget line financing the exceptional measure was made in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 (2).
The transfer took place on 20 April 2022 and therefore Regulation (EU) 2022/467 is applicable as of the day of publication of this notice.


(1)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/467 of 23 March 2022 providing for exceptional adjustment aid to producers in the agricultural sectors (OJ L 96, 24.3.2022, p. 4).

(2)  Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1).
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 21 April 2022 2022/C 168/11
Date: 2022-04-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022168EN.01001201.xml










22.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 168/12






Euro exchange rates (1)

21 April 2022
(2022/C 168/11)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0887 




JPY


Japanese yen


139,61 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4403 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83523 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,2553 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0335 




ISK


Iceland króna


139,00 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,5788 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,380 




HUF


Hungarian forint


370,60 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6300 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9450 




TRY


Turkish lira


15,9983 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4653 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3600 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5406 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6053 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4820 




KRW


South Korean won


1 348,33 




ZAR


South African rand


16,5996 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,0228 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5635 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 624,02 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6716 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,081 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,891 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,0324 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,8836 




INR


Indian rupee


82,9650 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 168/13
Date: 2022-04-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Finland, Stockholm, Sweden, air transport, intra-EU transport, invitation to tender, services of general interest, transport regulations, Åland








C_2022168EN.01001401.xml










22.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 168/14






Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 168/13)






Member State


Finland




Concerned route


Mariehamn – Stockholm Arlanda




Period of validity of the contract


29.10.2022-30.9.2024




Deadline for submission of tenders


28 June 2022




Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained


For further information please contact:
Ålands Landskapsregering
Address:





P.O.B. 1060




AX-22111Mariehamn




ÅLAND/FINLAND




Tel. +358 1825000
Email: registrator@regeringen.ax
Internet:
https://www.e-avrop.com/portaler/Alandsportalen/Default.aspx
Case C-278/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Zagrebu (Croatia) lodged on 22 April 2022 — ANTERA d.o.o. v Hrvatska agencija za nadzor financijskih usluga
Date: 2022-04-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: financial institution, financial supervision, hire purchase, provision of services, rental business, subsidiary, vehicle rental








C_2022244EN.01002002.xml










27.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/20






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Zagrebu (Croatia) lodged on 22 April 2022 — ANTERA d.o.o. v Hrvatska agencija za nadzor financijskih usluga
(Case C-278/22)
(2022/C 244/26)
Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Upravni sud u Zagrebu

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: ANTERA d.o.o.

Defendant: Hrvatska agencija za nadzor financijskih usluga

Questions referred







1.


Do operating leasing and/or long-term car rental services fall within the scope of Directive 2006/123/EC (the Services Directive), (1) as indicated in the Handbook on implementation of the Services Directive of 13 March 2008 issued by the Directorate-General for the Internal Market and Services? Should an entity that engages in operating leasing (but not financial leasing) and/or long-term car rental be considered a financial institution within the meaning of Article 4(1)(26) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013? (2)











2.


If the answer to the first question above is in the affirmative and the answer to the second question is in the negative, is granting the Hrvatska agencija za nadzor financijskih usluga (Croatian Agency for the Supervision of Financial Services) (HANFA) the power to supervise the provision of operating leasing and/or long-term car rental services pursuant to Article 6(1) of the Leasing Law, and to impose additional requirements and restrictions on undertakings that engage in such activities, compatible with Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, read in conjunction with Articles 9 to 13 of Directive 2006/123/EC?










3.


Must Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Articles 9 to 13 of Directive 2006/123/EC, in circumstances such as those at issue in the present dispute, in which a parent company from one Member State wishes to provide in another Member State, through a subsidiary, services of the same type as those which it provides in the original Member State, be interpreted as permitting a national law (the Leasing Law) to impose additional requirements and restrictions on the subsidiary and thereby hinder or render less attractive engaging in the activity in question?






(1)  Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (OJ 2006 L 376, p. 36).

(2)  Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ 2013 L 176, p. 1).