do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-261/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 19 April 2022 — Criminal proceedings against GN
Date: 2022-04-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European arrest warrant, children's rights, custody, family relationship, protection of privacy, young person








C_2022276EN.01000402.xml










18.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 276/4






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 19 April 2022 — Criminal proceedings against GN
(Case C-261/22)
(2022/C 276/06)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Procuratore generale presso la Corte di appello di Bologna; GN

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 1(2) and (3) and Articles 3 and 4 of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA (1) be interpreted as meaning that they do not permit the executing judicial authority to refuse or in any case defer the surrender of a mother who has minor children living with her?










2.


If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, are Article 1(2) and (3) and Articles 3 and 4 of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA compatible with Articles 7 and 24(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, also considering the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights in relation to Article 8 of the [Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms] and the constitutional traditions common to the Member States, in so far as they require the surrender of the mother, thus severing ties with minor children living with her without considering the best interest of the child?






(1)  Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1.)) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 163/05
Date: 2022-04-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical compound, chemical product, disease prevention, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, pharmaceutical industry








C_2022163EN.01000501.xml










19.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 163/5






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 163/05)

Decision granting an authorisation













Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Reasons for the decision




C(2022) 2191


11 April 2022


4-(1,1,3,3-Tetra methylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated
(4-tert-OPnEO)
EC No: -, CAS No:-


Hospira Zagreb d.o.o., a Pfizer company, Prudnicka cesta 60, 10291 Prigorje Brdovecko, Croatia


REACH/22/23/0


As a surfactant in the manufacture of one biopharmaceutical protein, a biosimilar product, used to prevent infection and neutropenic fevers


4 January 2033


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies






(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu)
to Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/397 of 9 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (Official Journal of the European Union L 80 of 9 March 2022)
Date: 2022-04-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law








L_2022117EN.01011801.xml










19.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 117/118







to Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/397 of 9 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 80 of 9 March 2022
)


On page 47, in the Annex, in the table, in entry 776, in the ‘Name’ column
for:


                  ‘Sergey Borisovich IVANOV
(Сергей Борисович ИВАНОВ)’
               

read:


                  ‘Sergey Pavlovich IVANOV
(Сергей Павлович ИВАНОВ)’
Case T-208/22: Action brought on 19 April 2022 — Makhlouf v Council
Date: 2022-04-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, damages, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, principle of proportionality, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2022237EN.01006101.xml










20.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 237/61






Action brought on 19 April 2022 — Makhlouf v Council
(Case T-208/22)
(2022/C 237/79)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Kinda Makhlouf (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: G. Karouni and K. Assogba, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should






—


annul, in so far as those acts concern the applicant,






—


Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/242 of 21 February 2022 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria and its Annex I;










—


Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/237 of 21 February 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria and its Annex II;














—


order the Council to pay the sum of EUR 50 000 in damages to compensate all forms of loss;




Under Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the unsuccessful party is ordered to pay the costs. Ms Kinda Makhlouf requests that the Council be ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by her, of which supporting evidence can be shown during proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law which are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-206/22, Makhlouf v Council.
Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria 2022/C 163/01
Date: 2022-04-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person








C_2022163EN.01000101.xml










19.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 163/1






Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria
(2022/C 163/01)
The following information is brought to the attention of Ali MAMLUK (n° 3), Ayman JABIR (n° 33), Ghassan BELAL (No 59), Emad Abdul Ghani SABOUNI (n° 114), Faysal al-Abbas (n° 122), Major General Hussam LUQA (n° 139), Emad HAMSHO (n° 204), Muhammad Yousef HASOURI (n° 245), Jayyiz Rayyan AL MUSA (n° 247), Hussam AL QATIRJI (No 287), Khodr Ali TAHER (n° 294), Adel Anwar al-Olabi (n° 295), Al Qatarji Company (n° 77), Damascus Cham Holding Company, (a.k.a. Damascus Cham Private Joint Stock Company (n° 78), persons and entities appearing in Annex I to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP (1) and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (2) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria.
The Council intends to maintain the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons and entities with amended statements of reasons or additional evidence. Those persons and entities are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the proposed amended statement of reasons for maintaining their designation, by 25 April 2022, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu
The persons and entities concerned may submit at any time a request to the Council, together with any supporting documentation, that the decision to maintain them on the list should be reconsidered, to the address or e-mail address provided above. Such requests will be considered when they are received.


(1)  OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14.

(2)  OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.
Case T-207/22: Action brought on 19 April 2022 — Mhana v Council
Date: 2022-04-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, damages, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, principle of proportionality, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2022237EN.01006001.xml










20.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 237/60






Action brought on 19 April 2022 — Mhana v Council
(Case T-207/22)
(2022/C 237/78)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Ghada Mhana (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: G. Karouni and K. Assogba, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul, in so far as those acts concern the applicant,






—


Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/242 of 21 February 2022 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria and its Annex I;










—


Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/237 of 21 February 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria and its Annex II;














—


order the Council to pay the sum of EUR 10 000 in damages to compensate all forms of loss;










—


under Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the unsuccessful party is ordered to pay the costs. Ms Ghada Mhana requests that the Council be ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by her, of which supporting evidence can be shown during the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law which are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-206/22, Makhlouf v Council.
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/396 of 9 March 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (Official Journal of the European Union L 80 of 9 March 2022)
Date: 2022-04-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law








L_2022117EN.01011701.xml










19.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 117/117







Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/396 of 9 March 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 80 of 9 March 2022
)


On page 17, in the Annex, in the table, in entry 776, in the ‘Name’ column
for:


                  ‘Sergey Borisovich IVANOV
(Сергей Борисович ИВАНОВ)’
               

read:


                  ‘Sergey Pavlovich IVANOV
(Сергей Павлович ИВАНОВ)’
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 14 April 2022 2022/C 163/03
Date: 2022-04-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022163EN.01000301.xml










19.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 163/3






Euro exchange rates (1)

14 April 2022
(2022/C 163/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0878 




JPY


Japanese yen


136,32 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4389 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,82908 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3008 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0189 




ISK


Iceland króna


140,40 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,5313 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,420 




HUF


Hungarian forint


376,57 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6478 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9459 




TRY


Turkish lira


15,9046 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4612 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3663 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5298 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5957 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4732 




KRW


South Korean won


1 334,71 




ZAR


South African rand


15,9331 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,9320 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5587 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 621,30 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6030 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,759 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,615 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,1226 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,5941 




INR


Indian rupee


82,8140 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10679 – TELEFONICA / PONTEGADEA / TELXIUS) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 173/01
Date: 2022-04-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, real estate business, telecommunications, textile industry








C_2022173EN.01000101.xml










27.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 173/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10679 – TELEFONICA / PONTEGADEA / TELXIUS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 173/01)
On 19 April 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10679. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.)) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 163/04
Date: 2022-04-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical compound, chemical product, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, medical device








C_2022163EN.01000401.xml










19.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 163/4






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 163/04)

Decision granting an authorisation













Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Reasons for the decision




C(2022) 2178


11 April 2022


4-(1,1,3,3-Tetra methylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated
(4-tert-OPnEO)
EC No: -, CAS No:-


DIAGAST, Parc Eurasante 251, avenue Eugène Avinée, 59120 Loos, France


REACH/22/21/0


Industrial use of 4-tert-OPnEO for its amphiphilic, surfactant and non-haemolytic properties to create controlled hydrophilic spots on porous hydrophobic membranes (solid form) for in vitro diagnostic kits for blood testing via antigen or antibody reaction in the following product range: control cards, manual pads and automated ONYX


4 January 2033


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.






(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).
Case C-260/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Erfurt (Germany) lodged on 19 April 2022 — Seven.One Entertainment Group GmbH v Corint Media GmbH
Date: 2022-04-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: broadcasting, copyright, film production, reprography








C_2022284EN.01001701.xml










25.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 284/17






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Erfurt (Germany) lodged on 19 April 2022 — Seven.One Entertainment Group GmbH v Corint Media GmbH
(Case C-260/22)
(2022/C 284/19)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Erfurt

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Seven.One Entertainment Group GmbH

Defendant: Corint Media GmbH

Questions referred







1.


Must Directive 2001/29/EC (1) be interpreted as meaning that broadcasting organisations are entitled, directly and originally, to the right to the fair compensation provided for under the ‘private copying’ exception, in accordance with Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC?










2.


Having regard to their right under Article 2(e) of Directive 2001/29/EC, can broadcasting organisations be excluded from the right to fair compensation under Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC because they may also be entitled to fair compensation in their capacity as film producers under that provision?










3.


If Question 2 is answered in the affirmative:




Is the general exclusion of broadcasting organisations permissible even though, depending on their specific programming, they sometimes acquire film producers’ rights only to a very small extent (in particular in the case of television channels with a high proportion of programmes licensed from third parties) and they sometimes acquire no film producers’ rights at all (in particular in the case of radio broadcasters)?


(1)  Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10).
Case T-209/22: Action brought on 19 April 2022 — Makhlouf v Council
Date: 2022-04-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, damages, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, principle of proportionality, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2022237EN.01006201.xml










20.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 237/62






Action brought on 19 April 2022 — Makhlouf v Council
(Case T-209/22)
(2022/C 237/80)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Shahla Makhlouf (Fairfax, Virginia, United States) (represented by: G. Karouni and K. Assogba, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should






—


annul, in so far as those acts concern the applicant,






—


Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/242 of 21 February 2022 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria and its Annex I;










—


Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/237 of 21 February 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria and its Annex II;














—


order the Council to pay the sum of EUR 30 000 in damages to compensate all forms of loss;










—


under Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the unsuccessful party is ordered to pay the costs. Ms Shahla Makhlouf requests that the Council be ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by her, of which supporting evidence can be shown during the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law which are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-206/22, Makhlouf v Council.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 13 April 2022 2022/C 163/02
Date: 2022-04-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022163EN.01000201.xml










19.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 163/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

13 April 2022
(2022/C 163/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0826 




JPY


Japanese yen


136,26 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4377 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83280 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3323 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0116 




ISK


Iceland króna


140,20 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,5693 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,450 




HUF


Hungarian forint


378,45 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6453 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9415 




TRY


Turkish lira


15,7992 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4603 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3700 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4867 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5991 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4769 




KRW


South Korean won


1 328,47 




ZAR


South African rand


15,6820 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,8939 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5538 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 549,10 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5799 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,446 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,305 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,0449 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,4170 




INR


Indian rupee


82,4780 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.