do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-194/22: Action brought on 14 April 2022 — Zelmotor v EUIPO — B&B Trends (zelmotor)
Date: 2022-04-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electrical equipment, electronic commerce, engine, household electrical appliance, measuring equipment, registered trade mark, retail selling, trade-mark law, wholesale selling








C_2022222EN.01003401.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/34






Action brought on 14 April 2022 — Zelmotor v EUIPO — B&B Trends (zelmotor)
(Case T-194/22)
(2022/C 222/56)
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Zelmotor sp. z o.o. (Rzeszów, Poland) (represented by: M. Rumak, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: B&B Trends, SL (Santa Perpetua de Mogoda, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark ‘zelmotor’ — EU trade mark No 10 980 225

Proceedings before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 February 2022 in Case R 927/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 February 2022 in Case R 927/2021-2 in part, in so far as it makes a declaration of invalidity in respect of the goods and services in Classes 7, 9 and 35, with the exception of stators and rotors in Class 7;










—


order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings to pay, in addition to their own costs, the costs incurred by the applicant.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-258/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 14 April 2022 — Finanzamt Hannover-Nord v H Lebensversicherung
Date: 2022-04-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: basis of tax assessment, business tax, company with share capital, foreign enterprise, free movement of capital, share, shareholder, tax law, tax relief








C_2022284EN.01001601.xml










25.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 284/16






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 14 April 2022 — Finanzamt Hannover-Nord v H Lebensversicherung
(Case C-258/22)
(2022/C 284/18)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings


Defendant and appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Finanzamt Hannover-Nord

Applicant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: H Lebensversicherung

Question referred

Is Article 56(1) of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (now Article 63(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) to be interpreted as precluding a provision of a Member State under which, when determining the taxable amount for a corporation’s trade tax, dividends that derive from holdings in foreign companies of less than 10 % (free-float holdings) are to be added back to the taxable amount if and to the extent that those dividends have been deducted from the taxable amount in a previous step of the calculation, whereas, with regard to such dividends that derive from free-float holdings in companies with registered office in the Member State concerned, no deduction and, consequently, no add-back of the dividends is to take place in the calculation of the taxable amount for trade tax?
Case C-257/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně (Czech Republic) lodged on 14 April 2022 — CD v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky
Date: 2022-04-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU migration policy, cruel and degrading treatment, foreign national, illegal migration, removal, return migration, right of asylum








C_2022266EN.01001401.xml










11.7.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 266/14






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně (Czech Republic) lodged on 14 April 2022 — CD v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky
(Case C-257/22)
(2022/C 266/17)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Krajský soud v Brně

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: CD

Defendant: Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky

Question referred

Should Article 4(2) and (3) and Article 5 in fine of Directive 2008/115/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals in conjunction with Article 2, Article 4, and Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as precluding the application, in assessing whether a return decision under Article 6 of Directive 2008/115/EC leads to a breach of the non-refoulement principle, of the concept of a safe country of origin under Articles 36 and 37 of Directive 2013/32/EU (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, in combination with the narrowed definition of the non-refoulement principle focused solely on the prohibition of ill treatment under Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms?


(1)  OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98.

(2)  OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60.
Case T-204/22: Action brought on 14 April 2022 — Rimini Street v EUIPO — (OTHER COMPANIES DO SOFTWARE WE DO SUPPORT)
Date: 2022-04-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, maintenance, provision of services, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2022222EN.01003801.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/38






Action brought on 14 April 2022 — Rimini Street v EUIPO — (OTHER COMPANIES DO SOFTWARE WE DO SUPPORT)
(Case T-204/22)
(2022/C 222/62)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Rimini Street, Inc. (Las Vegas, Nevada, United States) (represented by: E. Ratjen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark OTHER COMPANIES DO SOFTWARE WE DO SUPPORT — Application for registration No 1 559 651

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 February 2022 in Case R 1389/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) 207/2009 in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.