do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-130/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2022 — Lukáš Wagenknecht v European Commission (Appeal — Protection of the European Union’s financial interests — Combating fraud — Multiannual Financial Framework — Alleged conflict of interest of the Prime Minister of the Czech Republic — Request to prevent the latter from meeting with the College of European Commissioners — Request to stop direct payments in the EU budget in favour of certain agri-food groups — Action for failure to act — Alleged failure to act by the European Commission — Composition of the General Court of the European Union — Alleged lack of impartiality — Application inadmissible — Definition of position — Locus standi — Interest in bringing proceedings)
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Czechia, EU direct payments, European Commissioner, agri-foodstuffs, aid to agriculture, conflict of interest, fraud against the EU, head of government, independence of the judiciary, multiannual financial framework








C_2022198EN.01001201.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/12






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2022 — Lukáš Wagenknecht v European Commission
(Case C-130/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - Combating fraud - Multiannual Financial Framework - Alleged conflict of interest of the Prime Minister of the Czech Republic - Request to prevent the latter from meeting with the College of European Commissioners - Request to stop direct payments in the EU budget in favour of certain agri-food groups - Action for failure to act - Alleged failure to act by the European Commission - Composition of the General Court of the European Union - Alleged lack of impartiality - Application inadmissible - Definition of position - Locus standi - Interest in bringing proceedings)
(2022/C 198/17)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Lukáš Wagenknecht (represented by: A. Koller, advokátka)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and M. Salyková, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr Lukáš Wagenknecht to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 182, 10.5.2021.
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1)) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 131/06
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical compound, chemical product, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, technological process








C_2022131EN.01000601.xml










24.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 131/6






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 131/06)

Decision granting an authorisation













Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Reasons for the decision




C(2022)1528


17 March 2022


4-Nonylphenol, branched and linear, ethoxylated (4-NPnEO)
EC No: -, CAS No:-


SEBIA, Parc Technologique Léonard de Vinci, 91090, Lisses, France


REACH/22/8/0


Industrial use of 4-NPnEO for its detergent properties in the production of buffers and reagents in view of ensuring the positioning of specific proteins necessary for the interpretation of gel electrophoresis in vitro diagnostic tests results based on the determination of isoenzymes


4 January 2028


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the uses of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.






(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1


(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).
State aid – Decision to raise no objections 2022/C 131/10
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Norway, State aid, carbon neutrality, control of State aid, investment aid, vessel








C_2022131EN.01001001.xml










24.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 131/10






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(2022/C 131/10)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


30 November 2021




Case No


87748




Decision No


268/21/COL




EFTA State


Norway




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Investment aid in favour of Topeka for the acquisition of two zero emission vessels (the Topeka Nattruten project)




Legal basis


The full scale innovative energy and climate technology programme, which has its basis in the Eco-Inn scheme




Type of measure


Individual aid




Objective


Promotion of zero emission technologies and development of hydrogen supply chain




Form of aid


Grant




Budget


NOK 219 million




Intensity


46.5 %




Duration


2021 – 2023




Economic sectors


C – Manufacturing
D – Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply (technology providing)
H – Transporting and storage




Name and address of the granting authority







Enova




Brattørkaia 17A




7010 Trondheim, Norway








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Internet:
http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/.
Case C-656/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022 — Hermann Albers eK v European Commission, Federal Republic of Germany, Land Niedersachsen (Germany) (Appeal — State aid — Concept of ‘aid’ — Public transport of passengers — Offsetting of costs involved in the performance of public service obligations — Transfer of financial resources between public authorities — Obligation for municipal authorities that organise transport to guarantee reduced tariffs for students and apprentices — Lack of an advantage granted by the State to an undertaking — Obligation to notify)
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Germany, Lower Saxony, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, passenger tariff, public transport, reduced price, services of general interest, ticket








C_2022198EN.01000701.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/7






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022 — Hermann Albers eK v European Commission, Federal Republic of Germany, Land Niedersachsen (Germany)
(Case C-656/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Concept of ‘aid’ - Public transport of passengers - Offsetting of costs involved in the performance of public service obligations - Transfer of financial resources between public authorities - Obligation for municipal authorities that organise transport to guarantee reduced tariffs for students and apprentices - Lack of an advantage granted by the State to an undertaking - Obligation to notify)
(2022/C 198/09)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Hermann Albers eK (represented by: S. Roling, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Tomat and K. Blanck, acting as Agents), Federal Republic of Germany, Land Niedersachsen (Germany) (represented by: S. Barth and H. Gading, Rechtsanwältinen)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Hermann Albers eK to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders Land Niedersachsen (Germany) to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.