do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 March 2022 on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Italy (14836/2021 — C9-0002/2022 — 2021/0806(CNS))
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: DNA, Italy, cross-frontier data flow, data protection, exchange of information, information system, personal data








C_2022361EN.01003801.xml










20.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 361/38






P9_TA(2022)0092
Automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Italy *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 March 2022 on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Italy (14836/2021 — C9-0002/2022 — 2021/0806(CNS))
(Consultation)
(2022/C 361/12)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Council draft (14836/2021),










—


having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0002/2022),










—


having regard to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (1), and in particular Article 33 thereof,










—


having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0046/2022),












1.


Approves the Council draft;












2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;












3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;












4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.






(1)  OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1.
Case C-245/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Midden-Nederland — Netherlands) — X, Z v Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Competence of the supervisory authority — Article 55(3) — Processing operations of courts acting in their judicial capacity — Concept — Making available to a journalist of documents arising from court proceedings containing personal data)
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: data protection, data-processing law, disclosure of information, judicial proceedings, personal data, press








C_2022198EN.01000501.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/5






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Midden-Nederland — Netherlands) — X, Z v Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
(Case C-245/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - Competence of the supervisory authority - Article 55(3) - Processing operations of courts acting in their judicial capacity - Concept - Making available to a journalist of documents arising from court proceedings containing personal data)
(2022/C 198/06)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Midden-Nederland

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: X, Z

Defendant: Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens

Operative part of the judgment

Article 55(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) must be interpreted as meaning that the fact that a court makes temporarily available to journalists documents from court proceedings containing personal data in order to enable them better to report on the course of those proceedings falls within the exercise, by that court, of its ‘judicial capacity’, within the meaning of that provision.


(1)  OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.
Case C-723/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Galapagos BidCo. Sàrl v DE, in its capacity as liquidator of Galapagos SA, Hauck Aufhäuser Fund Services SA, Prime Capital SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) 2015/848 — Insolvency proceedings — Article 3(1) — International jurisdiction — Moving of the centre of a debtor’s main interests to another Member State after a request to open main insolvency proceedings has been lodged)
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: financial solvency, head office, jurisdiction








C_2022198EN.01000902.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/9






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Galapagos BidCo. Sàrl v DE, in its capacity as liquidator of Galapagos SA, Hauck Aufhäuser Fund Services SA, Prime Capital SA
(Case C-723/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EU) 2015/848 - Insolvency proceedings - Article 3(1) - International jurisdiction - Moving of the centre of a debtor’s main interests to another Member State after a request to open main insolvency proceedings has been lodged)
(2022/C 198/13)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Galapagos BidCo. Sàrl

Defendants: DE, in its capacity as liquidator of Galapagos SA, Hauck Aufhäuser Fund Services SA, Prime Capital SA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on insolvency proceedings must be interpreted as meaning that the court of a Member State with which a request to open main insolvency proceedings has been lodged retains exclusive jurisdiction to open such proceedings where the centre of the debtor’s main interests is moved to another Member State after that request has been lodged, but before that court has delivered a decision on it. Consequently, in so far as that regulation is still applicable to that request, the court of another Member State with which another request is lodged subsequently for the same purpose cannot, in principle, declare that it has jurisdiction to open main insolvency proceedings until the first court has delivered its decision and declined jurisdiction.


(1)  OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 March 2022 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil amending the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports (13445/2018 — C9-0415/2021 — 2018/0086(NLE))
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: Brazil, EU visa policy, Schengen Agreement, agreement (EU), diplomatic profession, external border of the EU, foreign national, ratification of an agreement, revision of an agreement








C_2022361EN.01004301.xml










20.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 361/43






P9_TA(2022)0097
EU-Brazil Agreement on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 March 2022 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil amending the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports (13445/2018 — C9-0415/2021 — 2018/0086(NLE))
(Consent)
(2022/C 361/17)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (13445/2018),










—


having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil amending the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports (13446/2018),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2), point (a), and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0415/2021),










—


having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4), and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0030/2022),












1.


Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Federative Republic of Brazil.
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2106 of 28 September 2021 on supplementing Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility by setting out the common indicators and the detailed elements of the recovery and resilience scoreboard (Official Journal of the European Union L 429 of 1 December 2021)
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: EU aid, EU financial instrument, EU financing arrangements, coronavirus disease, economic and social cohesion, economic recovery, economic reform, epidemic, investment, structural adjustment








L_2022096EN.01004701.xml










24.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 96/47







Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2106 of 28 September 2021 on supplementing Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility by setting out the common indicators and the detailed elements of the recovery and resilience scoreboard

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 429 of 1 December 2021
)


In the Annex, on page 90, in the description of indicator 10 ‘Number of participants in education or training’:
for:


                  ‘The indicator shall take into account the number of participants to education (ISCED 0-6, adult learning) and training (off-the-job/in-the-job training, continuous vocational education and training, etc.) activities supported by measures under the Facility, including participants to digital skills trainings’,

read:


                  ‘The indicator shall take into account the number of participants to education (ISCED 0-8, adult learning) and training (off-the-job/in-the-job training, continuous vocational education and training, etc.) activities supported by measures under the Facility, including participants to digital skills trainings’;

on page 91, in the description of indicator 13 ‘Classroom capacity of new or modernised childcare and education facilities’:
for:


                  ‘Classroom capacity in terms of the maximum number of places in the new or modernised early childhood education and care and education facilities (ISCED 0-6) due to support by measures under the Facility.’,

read:


                  ‘Classroom capacity in terms of the maximum number of places in the new or modernised early childhood education and care and education facilities (ISCED 0-8) due to support by measures under the Facility.’;

for:


                  ‘Education facilities shall include schools (ISCED 1-3, ISCED 4) and higher education (ISCED 5-6).’,

read:


                  ‘Education facilities shall include schools (ISCED 1-3, ISCED 4) and higher education (ISCED 5-8).’.
Case C-125/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2022 — European Commission v Ireland (Action for failure to fulfil obligations — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union — Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA — Failure to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the framework decision — Failure to notify to the European Commission)
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: carrying out of sentence, enforcement of ruling, imprisonment, infringement of EU law, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU








C_2022198EN.01001101.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/11






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2022 — European Commission v Ireland
(Case C-125/21) (1)

(Action for failure to fulfil obligations - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union - Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA - Failure to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the framework decision - Failure to notify to the European Commission)
(2022/C 198/15)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Tomkin and S. Grünheid, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Ireland (represented by: M. Browne, M. Lane and J. Quaney, acting as Agents, and by M. Gray, Senior Counsel)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union and by failing to notify the text of such provisions to the European Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 29(1) and (2) of that framework decision;










2.


Orders Ireland to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 148, 26.4.2021.
Case C-533/20: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Somogy Megyei Kormányhivatal v Upfield Hungary Kft. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 — Provision of food information to consumers — Labelling — Mandatory particulars — List of ingredients — Specific name of those ingredients — Addition of a vitamin to a food — Obligation to indicate the specific name of that vitamin — No obligation to indicate the vitamin formulation used)
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer information, foodstuff, labelling, vitamin








C_2022198EN.01000601.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/6






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Somogy Megyei Kormányhivatal v Upfield Hungary Kft.
(Case C-533/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 - Provision of food information to consumers - Labelling - Mandatory particulars - List of ingredients - Specific name of those ingredients - Addition of a vitamin to a food - Obligation to indicate the specific name of that vitamin - No obligation to indicate the vitamin formulation used)
(2022/C 198/08)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Kúria

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Somogy Megyei Kormányhivatal

Defendant: Upfield Hungary Kft.

Operative part of the judgment

Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004, must be interpreted, having regard specifically to Article 18(2), as meaning that, where a vitamin has been added to a food, the list of the ingredients of that food does not have to include, in addition to the name of that vitamin, the name of the vitamin formulation used.


(1)  OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 March 2022 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Moldova (07202/2022 — C9-0120/2022 — 2022/0087(NLE))
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: European cooperation, Frontex, Moldova, agreement (EU), border control, external border of the EU, migration control, operation of the Institutions, ratification of an agreement








C_2022361EN.01003201.xml










20.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 361/32






P9_TA(2022)0085
Status Agreement between the EU and Moldova on Frontex operational activities***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 March 2022 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Moldova (07202/2022 — C9-0120/2022 — 2022/0087(NLE))
(Consent)
(2022/C 361/07)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (07202/2022),










—


having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Moldova (07204/2022),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2)(b) and (d), Article 79(2)(c) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0120/2022),










—


having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4), Rule 114(7) and Rule 163 of its Rules of Procedure,












1.


Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Moldova.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 March 2022 on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Greece (14839/2021 — C9-0005/2022 — 2021/0809(CNS))
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: Greece, cross-frontier data flow, data protection, exchange of information, information system, personal data, vehicle registration








C_2022361EN.01004101.xml










20.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 361/41






P9_TA(2022)0095
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Greece *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 March 2022 on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Greece (14839/2021 — C9-0005/2022 — 2021/0809(CNS))
(Consultation)
(2022/C 361/15)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Council draft (14839/2021),










—


having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0005/2022),










—


having regard to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (1), and in particular Article 33 thereof,










—


having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0049/2022),












1.


Approves the Council draft;












2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;












3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;












4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.






(1)  OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1.
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1)) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 131/03
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical compound, chemical product, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, paints and varnishes, solvent








C_2022131EN.01000301.xml










24.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 131/3






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 131/03)

Decision refusing an authorisation











Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Applicant for authorisation


Refused uses


Reasons for the decision




C(2022)1514



17 March 2022



Lead sulfochromate yellow
EC No 215-693-7, CAS No 1344-37-2
Lead chromate molybdate sulfate red
EC No 235-759-9, CAS No 12656-85-8


DCL Corporation (NL) B.V. OR, Sortieweg 39, 6219 NT Maastricht, Netherlands


Distribution and mixing of pigment powder in an industrial environment into solvent-based paints for non-consumer use
Industrial application of paints on metal surfaces (such as machines vehicles, structures, signs, road furniture, coil coating, etc.)
Distribution and mixing of pigment powder in an industrial environment into liquid or solid premix to colour plastic/plasticised articles for non-consumer use
Industrial use of solid or liquid colour premixes and pre-compounds containing pigment to colour plastic or plasticised articles for non-consumer use


The application did not demonstrate that there are no suitable alternatives in accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.






(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1


(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).