do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-368/21: Order of the General Court of 24 March 2022 — Di Taranto v EPPO (Action for annulment — Law governing the institutions — Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office — Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 — Appointment of the European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office — Derived unlawfulness — Candidates nominated by the Italian Republic — Nomination disputed before the national court — Inadmissability)
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, appointment of members, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, public prosecutor's department








C_2022213EN.01003902.xml










30.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/39






Order of the General Court of 24 March 2022 — Di Taranto v EPPO
(Case T-368/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Law governing the institutions - Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 - Appointment of the European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Derived unlawfulness - Candidates nominated by the Italian Republic - Nomination disputed before the national court - Inadmissability)
(2022/C 213/54)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Alessandro Di Taranto (Rome, Italy) (represented by: G. Pellegrino, lawyer)

Defendant: European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) (represented by: L. De Matteis and T. Gut, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Decision No 34/2021 of the College of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office of 3 May 2021 on the appointment of fifteen European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office in the Italian Republic.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Mr Alessandro Di Taranto shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 368, 13.9.2021.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 March 2022 on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Italy (14838/2021 — C9-0004/2022 — 2021/0808(CNS))
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: Italy, cross-frontier data flow, data protection, exchange of information, information system, personal data, vehicle registration








C_2022361EN.01004001.xml










20.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 361/40






P9_TA(2022)0094
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Italy *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 March 2022 on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Italy (14838/2021 — C9-0004/2022 — 2021/0808(CNS))
(Consultation)
(2022/C 361/14)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Council draft (14838/2021),










—


having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0004/2022),










—


having regard to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (1), and in particular Article 33 thereof,










—


having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0047/2022),












1.


Approves the Council draft;












2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;












3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;












4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.






(1)  OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1.
Case C-218/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Lecce (Italy) lodged on 24 March 2022 — BU v Comune di Copertino
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: austerity policy, labour law, paid leave, public service employee, termination of employment








C_2022237EN.01003602.xml










20.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 237/36






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Lecce (Italy) lodged on 24 March 2022 — BU v Comune di Copertino
(Case C-218/22)
(2022/C 237/46)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Lecce

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: BU

Defendant: Comune di Copertino

Questions referred







1.


Should Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (1) and Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings (namely Article 5(8) of decreto-legge 6 luglio 2012, n. 95, Disposizioni urgenti per la revisione della spesa pubblica con invarianza dei servizi ai cittadini nonché misure di rafforzamento patrimoniale delle imprese del settore bancario (Decree-Law No 95 of 6 July 2012 on urgent provisions for the revision of public expenditure with no change in services to citizens and measures to strengthen the capital base of companies in the banking sector), converted, with amendments, by Article 1(1) of legge 7 agosto 2012, n. 135 (Law No 135 of 7 August 2012)), which, for reasons of public expenditure containment and organisational requirements of the public sector as employer, does not permit the monetisation of leave in the event that an employee in the public service resigns?
Further,










2.


if the answer to the question above is in the affirmative, must Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time and Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as requiring the employee in the public service to demonstrate that it was impossible for him/her to take the leave concerned in the course of the employment relationship?






(1)  OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9.
Case C-126/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2022 — European Commission v Ireland (Action for failure to fulfil obligations — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Mutual recognition of decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention — Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA — Failure to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the framework decision — Failure to notify to the European Commission)
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: alternative sentence, criminal law, enforcement of ruling, infringement of EU law, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, judicial proceedings, national law, restriction of liberty








C_2022198EN.01001102.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/11






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2022 — European Commission v Ireland
(Case C-126/21) (1)

(Action for failure to fulfil obligations - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Mutual recognition of decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention - Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA - Failure to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the framework decision - Failure to notify to the European Commission)
(2022/C 198/16)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Tomkin and S. Grünheid, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Ireland (represented by: M. Browne, M. Lane and J. Quaney, acting as Agents, and by M. Gray, Senior Counsel)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA of 23 October 2009 on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention and by failing to notify the text of such provisions to the European Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 27 of that framework decision;










2.


Orders Ireland to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 148, 26.4.2021.
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1)) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 131/05
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: adjuvant, chemical compound, chemical product, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, polymer








C_2022131EN.01000501.xml










24.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 131/5






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 131/05)

Decision granting an authorisation













Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Reasons for the decision




C(2022)1525


27 March 2022


4-Nonylphenol, branched and linear, ethoxylated (4-NPnEO)
EC No: -, CAS No:-


Sekisui S-lec BV Roermond, Metaalweg 5, 6045 JB Roermond, the Netherlands


REACH/22/7/0


Industrial use as polymer additive of 4-NPnEO in the manufacture of interlayer polymer films for laminated safety glass


4 January 2028


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the uses of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.






(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1


(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1)) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 131/07
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical product, coal, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, petroleum product








C_2022131EN.01000701.xml










24.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 131/7






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 131/07)

Decision partially granting an authorisation













Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Reasons for the decision




C(2022)1513


17 March 2022


Pitch, coal tar, high-temp. (‘CTPht’)
EC No: 266-028-2, CAS No: 65996-93-2


Rain Carbon Germany GmbH, Kekulestr. 30, 44579 Castrop-Rauxel, Germany


REACH/22/13/0


Use of CTPht in formulation of mixtures exclusively for industrial uses that are outside the scope of the authorisation requirement set out in Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006


4 October 2032


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the uses of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.




Anthracene oil (‘AO’)
EC No: 292-602-7, CAS No: 90640-80-5


REACH/22/13/1


Use of AO in formulation of mixtures exclusively for industrial uses that are outside the scope of the authorisation requirement set out in Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006






(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1


(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).
European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 March 2022 on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Italy (14837/2021 — C9-0003/2022 — 2021/0807(CNS))
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: Italy, biometrics, cross-frontier data flow, data protection, exchange of information, information system, personal data








C_2022361EN.01003901.xml










20.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 361/39






P9_TA(2022)0093
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Italy *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 March 2022 on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Italy (14837/2021 — C9-0003/2022 — 2021/0807(CNS))
(Consultation)
(2022/C 361/13)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Council draft (14837/2021),










—


having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0003/2022),










—


having regard to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (1), and in particular Article 33 thereof,










—


having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0050/2022),












1.


Approves the Council draft;












2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;












3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;












4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.






(1)  OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1.
Joined Cases C-529/18 P and C-531/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 March 2022 — PJ v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Erdmann & Rossi GmbH (C-529/18 P), PC v PJ, European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Erdmann & Rossi GmbH (C-531/18 P) (Appeal — Principles of EU law — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Representation of parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union — Lawyer representing the applicant as a third party — Requirement of independence — Lawyer working as an associate in a law firm — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, general mechanical engineering, lawyer, motor car, motor vehicle, registered trade mark, right to justice, trade-mark law








C_2022198EN.01000201.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/2






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 March 2022 — PJ v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Erdmann & Rossi GmbH (C-529/18 P), PC v PJ, European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Erdmann & Rossi GmbH (C-531/18 P)
(Joined Cases C-529/18 P and C-531/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Principles of EU law - Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Representation of parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union - Lawyer representing the applicant as a third party - Requirement of independence - Lawyer working as an associate in a law firm - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
(2022/C 198/02)
Language of the case: German

Parties


(Case C-529/18 P)


Appellant: PJ (represented by: J. Lipinsky and C. von Donat, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Botis and A. Söder, agents), Erdmann & Rossi GmbH (represented by: H. Kunz-Hallstein and R. Kunz-Hallstein, Rechtsanwälte)

(Case C-531/18 P)


Appellant: PC (represented by: J. Lipinsky and C. von Donat, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: PJ (represented by: J. Lipinsky and C. von Donat, Rechtsanwälte), European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Botis and A. Söder, agents), Erdmann & Rossi GmbH (represented by: H. Kunz-Hallstein and R. Kunz-Hallstein, Rechtsanwälte)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeals;










2.


Orders PJ to pay the costs incurred in Case C-529/18 P in both the present appeal and the proceedings before the General Court;










3.


Orders PC is to pay the costs incurred in Case C-531/18 P in both the present appeal and the proceedings before the General Court.






(1)  OJ C 103, 30.3.2020.
State aid – Decision to raise no objections 2022/C 131/11
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Norway, State aid, control of State aid, tax exemption, workers' stock ownership








C_2022131EN.01001101.xml










24.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 131/11






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(2022/C 131/11)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


1 December 2021




Case No


87755




Decision No


267/21/COL




EFTA State


Norway




Region


All




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Employee share options 2022–2031




Legal basis


Norwegian Tax Act, Section 5-14




Type of measure


Aid scheme




Objective


To enhance start-up and growth companies’ ability to recruit and retain key employees




Form of aid


Tax exemption




Budget


NOK 20 million annually on average during the duration of the scheme




Intensity


 




Duration


2022–2031




Economic sectors


 




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministry of Finance




P.O Box 8008 Dep




0030 Oslo




Norway








Other information


 




The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:
http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/.
Case C-666/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022 — Gesamtverband Verkehrsgewerbe Niedersachsen eV (GVN) v European Commission, Federal Republic of Germany, Land Niedersachsen (Germany) (Appeal — State aid — Concept of ‘aid’ — Public passenger transport — Compensating the costs related to the performance of public service obligations — Transfer of financial resources between public authorities — Obligation for the municipal transport authorities to determine reduced tariffs for students and apprentices — No advantage granted by the State to an undertaking — Concept of ‘undertaking’)
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Germany, Lower Saxony, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, passenger tariff, public transport, reduced price, services of general interest, ticket








C_2022198EN.01000702.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/7






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022 — Gesamtverband Verkehrsgewerbe Niedersachsen eV (GVN) v European Commission, Federal Republic of Germany, Land Niedersachsen (Germany)
(Case C-666/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Concept of ‘aid’ - Public passenger transport - Compensating the costs related to the performance of public service obligations - Transfer of financial resources between public authorities - Obligation for the municipal transport authorities to determine reduced tariffs for students and apprentices - No advantage granted by the State to an undertaking - Concept of ‘undertaking’)
(2022/C 198/10)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Gesamtverband Verkehrsgewerbe Niedersachsen eV (GVN) (represented by: C. Antweiler, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Tomat and K. Blanck, agents), Federal Republic of Germany, Land Niedersachsen (Germany) (represented by: S. Barth and H. Gading, Rechtsanwältinnen)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Gesamtverband Verkehrsgewerbe Niedersachsen eV (GVN) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders Land Niedersachsen (Germany) to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.
European Council Decision (EU) 2022/492 of 24 March 2022 electing the President of the European Council
Date: 2022-03-24
Institutions: European Council
Subjects: President of the European Council, appointment of members








L_2022100EN.01005401.xml










28.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 100/54








            EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2022/492
of 24 March 2022
         
electing the President of the European Council


THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 15(5) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


On 2 July 2019, by European Council Decision (EU) 2019/1135 (1), Mr Charles MICHEL was elected President of the European Council for the period from 1 December 2019 until 31 May 2022.












(2)


In accordance with the Treaty on European Union, the holder of the office of President of the European Council may be re-elected once,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Mr Charles MICHEL is hereby re-elected President of the European Council for the period from 1 June 2022 until 30 November 2024.


Article 2
This Decision shall be notified to Mr Charles MICHEL by the Secretary-General of the Council.


Article 3
This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 24 March 2022.


For the Council


The President

C. MICHEL
            





(1)  European Council Decision (EU) 2019/1135 of 2 July 2019 electing the President of the European Council (OJ L 179 I, 3.7.2019, p. 1).