do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.)) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 130/11
Date: 2022-03-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical product, coal, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, petroleum product








C_2022130EN.01001301.xml










23.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/13






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 130/11)

Decision partially granting an authorisation













Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Reasons for the decision




C(2022) 1511


16 March 2022


Pitch, coal tar, high-temp. (‘CTPht’)
EC No: 266-028-2, CAS No: 65996-93-2


Koppers Denmark ApS, Avernakke, 5800 Nyborg, Denmark


REACH/22/11/0


Use of CTPht in formulation of mixtures exclusively for industrial uses that are outside the scope of the authorisation requirement set out in Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006


4 October 2032


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the uses of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.




Anthracene oil (‘AO’)
EC No: 292-602-7, CAS No: 90640-80-5


REACH/22/11/1


Use of AO in formulation of mixtures exclusively for industrial uses that are outside the scope of the authorisation requirement set out in Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006






(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).
Case T-252/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — Hrebenyuk v EUIPO (Shape of a stand-up collar) (EU trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a stand-up collar — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2022-03-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, registered trade mark, sports equipment, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2022198EN.01004402.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/44






Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — Hrebenyuk v EUIPO (Shape of a stand-up collar)
(Case T-252/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark - Shape of a stand-up collar - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2022/C 198/63)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Anna Hrebenyuk (Griesheim, Germany) (represented by: H.-J. Ruhl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 February 2021 (Case R 1902/2020-5), concerning an application for registration of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the shape of a stand-up collar as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ms Anna Hrebenyuk to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 263, 5.7.2021.
Case C-215/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 23 March 2022 — Research Consorzio Stabile Scarl, acting on its own account and as agent of the association of undertakings to be constituted (Research-Cisa) and Others v Invitalia — Agenzia Nazionale per l’Attrazione degli Investimenti e lo Sviluppo di Impresa and Others
Date: 2022-03-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, award of contract, freedom to provide services, national law, public procurement, right of establishment, subcontracting, tendering








C_2022244EN.01001701.xml










27.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/17






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 23 March 2022 — Research Consorzio Stabile Scarl, acting on its own account and as agent of the association of undertakings to be constituted (Research-Cisa) and Others v Invitalia — Agenzia Nazionale per l’Attrazione degli Investimenti e lo Sviluppo di Impresa and Others
(Case C-215/22)
(2022/C 244/21)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Research Consorzio Stabile Scarl, acting on its own account and as agent of the association of undertakings to be constituted (Research-Cisa); C.I.S.A. SpA, acting on its own account and as agent of the association of undertakings to be constituted (Research-Cisa); Debar Costruzioni SpA, acting on its own account and as agent of the association to be constituted with Consorzio Stabile COM Scarl, C.N. Costruzioni Generali SpA and Edil.Co. Srl; Invitalia — Agenzia Nazionale per l’Attrazione degli Investimenti e lo Sviluppo di Impresa

Defendants: Invitalia — Agenzia Nazionale per l’Attrazione degli Investimenti e lo Sviluppo di Impresa; Debar Costruzioni SpA, acting on its own account and as agent of the association to be constituted with Consorzio Stabile COM Scarl, C.N. Costruzioni Generali SpA and Edil.Co. Srl; Consorzio Stabile Scarl, acting on its own account and as agent of the association of undertakings to be constituted (Research-Cisa); C.I.S.A. SpA, acting on its own account and as agent of the association to be constituted (Research-Cisa)

Question referred

Do Articles 63 and 71 of Directive 2014/24 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014, (1) together with the principles of freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services laid down in Articles 49 and 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (FEU Treaty), preclude an interpretation of national Italian law on necessary subcontracting under which a tenderer which does not have the mandatory qualification in one or more secondary sub-categories cannot satisfy the non-fulfilled requirement by having recourse to several subcontracting undertakings or by aggregating the amounts for which those undertakings are qualified?


(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).
Case T-730/20: Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — ON v Commission (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Retroactive refusal — Recovery of undue payments — Article 85 of the Staff Regulations — Action for annulment and for damages)
Date: 2022-03-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: allowances and expenses, contract staff, expatriate worker, indemnification, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU)








C_2022198EN.01003802.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/38






Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — ON v Commission
(Case T-730/20) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Retroactive refusal - Recovery of undue payments - Article 85 of the Staff Regulations - Action for annulment and for damages)
(2022/C 198/54)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ON (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and A.-C. Simon, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 12 March 2020 obliging him to repay an amount of EUR 38 897,39 by way of recovery of undue payments on account of the incorrect payment of an expatriation allowance since his recruitment and, second, compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered because of the late adjustment by the Commission of that incorrect payment.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders TA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.
Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (Text with EEA Relevance) 2022/C 130/15
Date: 2022-03-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Andalusia, Spain, air transport, inland transport, invitation to tender, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2022130EN.01001701.xml










23.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/17






Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(Text with EEA Relevance)
(2022/C 130/15)






Member State


Spain




Concerned route


Almeria – Seville




Period of validity of the contract


2 years following the start of the operations, plus two additional years (2) if extension needed




Deadline for submission of tenders


Not before 2 months following the date of publication of this notice




Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained







Ministerio de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda Urbana




Dirección General de Aviación Civil




Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo




Paseo de la Castellana 67




28071 Madrid




España




E-mail: osp.dgac@mitma.es
Case T-146/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — Vetpharma Animal Health v EUIPO — Deltavit (DELTATIC) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark DELTATIC — Earlier EU word mark DELTA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character)
Date: 2022-03-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, veterinary medicinal product








C_2022198EN.01004201.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/42






Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — Vetpharma Animal Health v EUIPO — Deltavit (DELTATIC)
(Case T-146/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark DELTATIC - Earlier EU word mark DELTA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character)
(2022/C 198/59)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Vetpharma Animal Health, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: M. Escudero Pérez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Deltavit (Janzé, France) (represented by: G. Barbaut, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 December 2020 (Case R 776/2020-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Deltavit and Vetpharma Animal Health.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Vetpharma Animal Health, SL, to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);










3.


Orders Deltavit to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 182, 10.5.2021.
Case T-465/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — Ionfarma v EUIPO — LG Electronics (AION) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark AION — Earlier national figurative mark ION and earlier word mark IONFARMA — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2022-03-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, air conditioning, electrical engineering, electronic device, information technology industry, mobile phone, registered trade mark, robotics, trade-mark law, water treatment








C_2022198EN.01004602.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/46






Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — Ionfarma v EUIPO — LG Electronics (AION)
(Case T-465/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark AION - Earlier national figurative mark ION and earlier word mark IONFARMA - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2022/C 198/67)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ionfarma, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: S. Correa Rodríguez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Lapinskaite and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 May 2021 (Case R 2223/2020-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Ionfarma and LG Electronics.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ionfarma, SL to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 382, 20.9.2021.
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.)) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 130/10
Date: 2022-03-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical product, coronavirus disease, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, medical device, medical diagnosis








C_2022130EN.01001201.xml










23.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/12






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 130/10)

Decision granting an authorisation













Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Reasons for the decision




C(2022) 1499


16 March 2022


4-(1,1,3,3-Tetra methylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated
(4-tert-OPnEO)
EC No: -, CAS No:-


Sanquin Reagents B.V., Plesmanlaan 125, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands


REACH/22/18/0


In formulation of mixtures for IVD kits


4 January 2028


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.






(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1.)) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 130/05
Date: 2022-03-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical product, coal, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, petroleum product








C_2022130EN.01000701.xml










23.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/7






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 130/05)

Decision refusing an authorisation











Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Applicant for authorisation


Refused use


Reasons for the decision




C(2022) 1512


16 March 2022


Pitch, coal tar, high temperature
EC No 266-028-2; CAS No 65996-93-2


Bilbaina de Alquitranes S.A., Obispo Olaechea 49, 48903, Luchana-Barancaldo Vizcaya, Spain


As a binder in the production of clay targets


The application did not demonstrate that the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and that there are no suitable alternatives, in accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.






(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1.)) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 130/06
Date: 2022-03-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical product, coal, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, petroleum product








C_2022130EN.01000801.xml










23.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/8






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 130/06)

Decision refusing an authorisation











Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Applicant for authorisation


Refused use


Reasons for the decision




C(2022) 1510


16 March 2022


Pitch, coal tar, high temperature
EC No 266-028-2; CAS No 65996-93-2


DEZA a.s., Masarykova 753, 75701, Valasske Mezirici, Czech Republic


As a binder in the production of clay targets


The application did not demonstrate that the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and that there are no suitable alternatives, in accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.






(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).
Case T-113/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — Team Beverage v EUIPO (Beverage Analytics) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Beverage Analytics — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2022-03-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, business data processing, business management, consultancy, management information system, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2022198EN.01004001.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/40






Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — Team Beverage v EUIPO (Beverage Analytics)
(Case T-113/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Beverage Analytics - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2022/C 198/57)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Team Beverage AG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and N. Willich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 December 2020 (Case R 727/2020-5), regarding an application for registration of the word sign Beverage Analytics as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 11 December 2020 (Case R 727/2020-5) in so far as it refuses registration of the word sign Beverage Analytics as an EU trade mark for ‘Website development software’ and ‘Computer operating programs, recorded’ in Class 9 of the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended, and for the services of ‘Creating and maintaining web sites for others’, ‘Transfer of data or documents from physical to electronic data carriers’, ‘Monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning’, ‘Web site design consultancy’, ‘Digitization of documents’, ‘Duplication of computer programs’, ‘Quality control’, ‘Recovery of computer data’ and ‘Testing and research relating to machines, apparatus and instruments’ in Class 42;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.