do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10610 – ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND SINGAPORE / CLYDE INVESTMENTS) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 153/05
Date: 2022-03-21
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Singapore, bioprocess, economic concentration, food industry, investment company, merger control, nutrition








C_2022153EN.01001101.xml










7.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 153/11






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10610 – ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND SINGAPORE / CLYDE INVESTMENTS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 153/05)
On 21 March 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10610. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 18 March 2022 2022/C 126/05
Date: 2022-03-21
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022126EN.01000801.xml










21.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 126/8






Euro exchange rates (1)

18 March 2022
(2022/C 126/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1008 




JPY


Japanese yen


131,40 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4423 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83925 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,4303 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0314 




ISK


Iceland króna


142,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,6940 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,837 




HUF


Hungarian forint


375,33 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,7135 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9483 




TRY


Turkish lira


16,3054 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4945 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3911 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6101 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6026 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4952 




KRW


South Korean won


1 337,31 




ZAR


South African rand


16,5347 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,0031 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5685 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 782,11 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6157 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,622 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,745 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,5784 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,5905 




INR


Indian rupee


83,7825 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10613 – PORSCHE AUSTRIA / WOLFGANG DENZEL AUTO / SAUBERMACHER DIENSTLEISTUNG / JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 145/01
Date: 2022-03-21
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, electricity storage device, electronic waste, import, merger control, motor vehicle industry, waste management, wholesale trade








C_2022145EN.01000101.xml










1.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 145/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10613 – PORSCHE AUSTRIA / WOLFGANG DENZEL AUTO / SAUBERMACHER DIENSTLEISTUNG / JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 145/01)
On 21 March 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10613. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-153/22: Action brought on 21 March 2022 — Volkswagen v EUIPO — XTG (XTG)
Date: 2022-03-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer equipment, electricity storage device, electronic device, mobile communication, mobile phone, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law, wholesale trade








C_2022198EN.01006001.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/60






Action brought on 21 March 2022 — Volkswagen v EUIPO — XTG (XTG)
(Case T-153/22)
(2022/C 198/86)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Machei and G. Orsoni, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: XTG S.A. (Wrocław, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark XTG — Application for registration No 18 120 223

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 December 2021 in Case R 1387/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and, as the case may be, the intervener to bear the costs of the proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-154/22: Action brought on 21 March 2022 — Volkswagen v EUIPO — XTG (XTG)
Date: 2022-03-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer equipment, electricity storage device, electronic device, mobile communication, mobile phone, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law, wholesale trade








C_2022198EN.01006101.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/61






Action brought on 21 March 2022 — Volkswagen v EUIPO — XTG (XTG)
(Case T-154/22)
(2022/C 198/87)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Machei and G. Orsoni, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: XTG S.A. (Wrocław, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark XTG — Application for registration No 18 120 217

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 December 2021 in Case R 1385/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and, as the case may be, the intervener to bear the costs of the proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/2148 of 8 October 2020 amending Regulation (EU) No 139/2014 as regards runway safety and aeronautical data (Official Journal of the European Union L 428 of 18 December 2020)
Date: 2022-03-21
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: air safety, aircraft, airport, ground staff, professional qualifications, safety standard, technical specification, transport accident, vocational training








L_2022092EN.01009801.xml










21.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 92/98







Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/2148 of 8 October 2020 amending Regulation (EU) No 139/2014 as regards runway safety and aeronautical data

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 428 of 18 December 2020
)


On page 26, in the Annex, point (3)(j), in the amendment to point ADR.OPS.B.016(c) of Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 139/2014:
for:






‘(c)


collect and analyse data and information to identify FOD sources and trends, and implement corrective or preventive measures, or both, to improve the effectiveness of the programme.’,




read:






‘(4)


collect and analyse data and information to identify FOD sources and trends, and implement corrective or preventive measures, or both, to improve the effectiveness of the programme.’.
Case T-150/22: Action brought on 21 March 2022 — Lilly Drogerie v EUIPO — Lillydoo (LILLYDOO kids)
Date: 2022-03-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, baby food, cosmetic product, food supplement, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022198EN.01005901.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/59






Action brought on 21 March 2022 — Lilly Drogerie v EUIPO — Lillydoo (LILLYDOO kids)
(Case T-150/22)
(2022/C 198/84)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Lilly Drogerie d.o.o. Belgrade (Stari Grad) (Belgrade, Serbia) (represented by: E. Bojinova-Miller, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lillydoo GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark LILLYDOO kids — International registration designating the European Union No. 1 495 352

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 January 2022 in Joined Cases R 903/2021-2 and R 1298/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in relation to the present action.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates applicable as from 1 April 2022 (Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1)) 2022/C 126/06
Date: 2022-03-21
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, State aid, interest, reimbursement of aid








C_2022126EN.01000901.xml










21.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 126/9






Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates applicable as from 1 April 2022


(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 (1)
)


(2022/C 126/06)
Base rates calculated in accordance with the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6.). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basispoints has to be added. The Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basispoints to the base rate.
Modified rates are indicated in bold.
Previous table published in OJ C 76, 17.2.2022, p. 4.


































From


To


AT


BE


BG


CY


CZ


DE


DK


EE


EL


ES


FI


FR


HR


HU


IE


IT


LT


LU


LV


MT


NL


PL


PT


RO


SE


SI


SK


UK




1.4.2022


…


-0,49 


-0,49 


0,00 


-0,49 


4,00 


-0,49 



0,00 



-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


0,26 



4,66 



-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 



3,42 



-0,49 



3,38 




-0,01 



-0,49 


-0,49 


0,66 




1.3.2022


31.3.2022


-0,49 


-0,49 


0,00 


-0,49 



4,00 



-0,49 


-0,03 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


0,26 



4,02 



-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 



2,85 



-0,49 


2,74 



-0,04 



-0,49 


-0,49 


0,66 




1.2.2022


28.2.2022


-0,49 


-0,49 


0,00 


-0,49 



3,29 



-0,49 



-0,03 



-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


0,26 



3,17 



-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 


-0,49 



2,04 



-0,49 



2,74 




-0,05 



-0,49 


-0,49 



0,66 





1.1.2022


31.1.2022



-0,49 




-0,49 




0,00 




-0,49 




2,49 




-0,49 




-0,01 




-0,49 




-0,49 




-0,49 




-0,49 




-0,49 




0,26 




2,38 




-0,49 




-0,49 




-0,49 




-0,49 




-0,49 




-0,49 




-0,49 




1,21 




-0,49 




2,27 




-0,03 




-0,49 




-0,49 




0,51 







(1)  OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1
Case T-550/21: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2022 — Kalypso Media Group v EUIPO (COMMANDOS) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2022-03-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cultural event, electronic game, registered trade mark, software, toy library, trade-mark law








C_2022207EN.01004202.xml










23.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 207/42






Order of the General Court of 21 March 2022 — Kalypso Media Group v EUIPO (COMMANDOS)
(Case T-550/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 207/57)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Kalypso Media Group GmbH (Worms, Germany) (represented by: T. Boddien, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 July 2021 (Case R 1864/2020-2) relating to an application for registration of the word sign COMMANDOS as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Kalypso Media Group GmbH.






(1)  OJ C 431, 25.10.2021.