do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-207/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 17 March 2022 — Lineas — Concessões de Transportes SGPS, S.A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira
Date: 2022-03-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: financial institution, financial supervision, holding company, shareholding, transport infrastructure








C_2022318EN.01002001.xml










22.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 318/20






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 17 March 2022 — Lineas — Concessões de Transportes SGPS, S.A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira
(Case C-207/22)
(2022/C 318/28)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Lineas — Concessões de Transportes SGPS, S.A.

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Question referred

May a holding company which has as its sole object the management of shareholdings in other companies, as an indirect means of pursuing economic activities, and which, in that context, acquires and holds on a long-term basis such shareholdings, which, in general, are at least 10 % of the share capital of the companies in which it has a shareholding, where the activity of those companies comes within the category of transport infrastructure management, including the design, construction and management of roads and/or motorways, be regarded as a ‘financial institution’ within the meaning of Directive 2013/36/EU (1) and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013? (2)



(1)  Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC (OJ 2013 L 176, p. 338).

(2)  Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ 2013 L 176, p. 1).
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 16 March 2022 2022/C 122/11
Date: 2022-03-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022122EN.01003501.xml










17.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 122/35






Euro exchange rates (1)

16 March 2022
(2022/C 122/11)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0994 




JPY


Japanese yen


130,05 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4412 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83988 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,4205 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0336 




ISK


Iceland króna


143,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,7988 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,687 




HUF


Hungarian forint


371,18 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6765 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9473 




TRY


Turkish lira


16,1783 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5165 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3967 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5996 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6168 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4966 




KRW


South Korean won


1 353,77 




ZAR


South African rand


16,5574 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,9817 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5725 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 690,36 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6147 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,433 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,681 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,6523 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,8540 




INR


Indian rupee


83,7805 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/195 of 11 February 2022 amending and correcting Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/683 as regards the information document, the vehicle approval certificates, the test result sheet and the certificates of conformity in paper format (Official Journal of the European Union L 31 of 14 February 2022)
Date: 2022-03-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EC conformity marking, approval, market supervision, motor vehicle, technical specification, technical standard, vehicle parts








L_2022089EN.01001001.xml










17.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 89/10







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/195 of 11 February 2022 amending and correcting Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/683 as regards the information document, the vehicle approval certificates, the test result sheet and the certificates of conformity in paper format

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 31 of 14 February 2022
)


On page 36, point ‘(9) Part 2 (vehicle category N3) is corrected as follow:’, in point ‘(1) Point 7 is replaced by the following:’:
for:






‘“7.


Height: … mm”’,




read:






‘“7.


Height: … mm (179)”’.
Case C-545/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2022 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — AllianzGI-Fonds AEVN v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 63 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Taxation of dividends paid to undertakings for collective investment (UCIs) — Resident and non-resident UCIs — Difference in treatment — Withholding tax imposed solely on dividends paid to non-resident UCIs — Comparability of the situations — Assessment — Account to be taken of the tax regime applicable to shareholders or unitholders in UCIs and of whether resident undertakings are subject to other taxes — None)
Date: 2022-03-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: basis of tax assessment, capital gains tax, equal treatment, free movement of capital, investment company, nationality of legal persons, tax collection, tax exemption








C_2022191EN.01000201.xml










10.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/2






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2022 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — AllianzGI-Fonds AEVN v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira
(Case C-545/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 63 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Taxation of dividends paid to undertakings for collective investment (UCIs) - Resident and non-resident UCIs - Difference in treatment - Withholding tax imposed solely on dividends paid to non-resident UCIs - Comparability of the situations - Assessment - Account to be taken of the tax regime applicable to shareholders or unitholders in UCIs and of whether resident undertakings are subject to other taxes - None)
(2022/C 191/02)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: AllianzGI-Fonds AEVN

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Operative part of the judgment

Article 63 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which dividends distributed by resident companies to a non-resident undertaking for collective investment (UCI) are subject to withholding tax, whereas dividends distributed to a resident UCI are exempt from such withholding tax.


(1)  OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.
Decision (EU) 2022/485 of the European Central Bank of 17 March 2022 amending Decision 2010/624/EU concerning the administration of the borrowing and lending operations concluded by the Union under the European financial stabilisation mechanism (ECB/2022/11)
Date: 2022-03-17
Institutions: European Central Bank
Subjects: Community loan, EU borrowing, Eurosystem, bank deposit, financial management, financial stability, interest, monetary policy




L_2022098EN.01010801.xml










25.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 98/108








            DECISION (EU) 2022/485 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
         
of 17 March 2022
         
amending Decision 2010/624/EU concerning the administration of the borrowing and lending operations concluded by the Union under the European financial stabilisation mechanism
(ECB/2022/11)


THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 122(2) and 132(1) thereof,


Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Articles 17 and 21 and Article 34.1 thereof,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 of 11 May 2010 establishing a European financial stabilisation mechanism (1), and in particular Article 8 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Deposits held with the European Central Bank (ECB) as provided for in Decision 2010/624/EU of the European Central Bank (ECB/2010/17) (2) should be remunerated in accordance with the provisions of Article 2(1) of Decision (EU) 2019/1743 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2019/31) (3) in order to ensure consistency in the remuneration of comparable deposits across the Eurosystem.












(2)


Therefore, Decision 2010/624/EU (ECB/2010/17) should be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1

Amendment

Article 4 of Decision 2010/624/EU (ECB/2010/17) is replaced by the following:


‘Article 4
The accounts referred to in Article 2 shall be remunerated in accordance with the provisions of Article 2(1) of Decision (EU) 2019/1743 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2019/31) (*1).




Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the fifth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Frankfurt am Main, 17 March 2022.


The President of the ECB

Christine LAGARDE
            





(1)  
            OJ L 118, 12.5.2010, p. 1.

(2)  Decision 2010/624/EU of the European Central Bank of 14 October 2010 concerning the administration of the borrowing and lending operations concluded by the Union under the European financial stabilisation mechanism (ECB/2010/17) (OJ L 275, 20.10.2010, p. 10).

(3)  Decision (EU) 2019/1743 of the European Central Bank of 15 October 2019 on the remuneration of holdings of excess reserves and of certain deposits (ECB/2019/31) (OJ L 267, 21.10.2019, p. 12).
Case T-740/21: Order of the General Court of 17 March 2022 — Alcogroup and Alcodis v Commission
Date: 2022-03-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU competition policy, alternative dispute resolution, biofuel, cartel, ethanol, rights of the defence








C_2022198EN.01006502.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/65






Order of the General Court of 17 March 2022 — Alcogroup and Alcodis v Commission
(Case T-740/21) (1)

(2022/C 198/94)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 24, 17.1.2022.
Case C-206/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Ludwigshafen am Rhein (Germany) lodged on 17 March 2022 — TF v Sparkasse Südpfalz
Date: 2022-03-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: labour law, paid leave, working conditions








C_2022237EN.01003601.xml










20.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 237/36






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Ludwigshafen am Rhein (Germany) lodged on 17 March 2022 — TF v Sparkasse Südpfalz
(Case C-206/22)
(2022/C 237/45)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Arbeitsgericht Ludwigshafen am Rhein

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: TF

Defendant: Sparkasse Südpfalz

Question referred

Must Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC (1) and the right to an annual period of paid leave set out in Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as precluding national legislation or practice on the granting of annual leave to workers under which the obligation to grant an entitlement to leave is fulfilled even if the worker is affected by an unforeseeable event during an authorised period of leave, such as, in the present case, government-ordered quarantine, and is therefore prevented from exercising that entitlement in full?


(1)  Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9).
Case T-145/22: Action brought on 17 March 2022 — CEDC International v EUIPO — Underberg (Shape of a blade of grass in a bottle)
Date: 2022-03-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, liqueur, registered trade mark, spirits, trade-mark law








C_2022198EN.01005601.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/56






Action brought on 17 March 2022 — CEDC International v EUIPO — Underberg (Shape of a blade of grass in a bottle)
(Case T-145/22)
(2022/C 198/80)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: CEDC International sp. z o.o. (Oborniki Wielkopolskie, Poland) (represented by: M. Fijałkowski, radca prawny)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Underberg AG (Dietlikon, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union tridimensional mark (Shape of a blade of grass in a bottle) — Application for registration No 33 266

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 December 2021 in Case R 1954/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in part in respect of the grounds of opposition under Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


order EUIPO and the other party before the Board of Appeal to bear the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the General Court and the Board of Appeal.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Articles 94(1) and 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in connection with Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009.