do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-751/21: Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg — Austria) — PJ v Eurowings GmbH
Date: 2022-03-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, indemnification, traveller








C_2022222EN.01002601.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/26






Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg — Austria) — PJ v Eurowings GmbH
(Case C-751/21) (1)

(2022/C 222/41)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 95, 28.2.2022.
Case T-143/22: Action brought on 11 March 2022 — OP v Parliament
Date: 2022-03-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: age discrimination, discrimination based on disability, equal treatment, staff regulations (EU), survivor's benefit








C_2022191EN.01003601.xml










10.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/36






Action brought on 11 March 2022 — OP v Parliament
(Case T-143/22)
(2022/C 191/46)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: OP (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decisions of 7 June 2021 and 10 January 2022, or declare them null and void;










—


accordingly, acknowledge that the applicant is entitled to receive a survivor’s pension as defined by the first paragraph of Article 79 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;










—


accordingly, acknowledge that Mr [confidential] (1) is entitled to receive an orphan’s pension as defined in Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations. Otherwise, in so far as necessary, grant Mr [confidential] the orphan’s pension provided for in the first paragraph of Article 80 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;










—


in any event, order the Parliament to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, raising a plea of illegality in respect of Articles 18 and 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’) resulting from a breach of the principle of equal treatment and discrimination on grounds of age.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging an error of law in the application of Articles 18 and 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment resulting from the failure to take into account the applicant’s particular situation.










4.


Fourth plea in law, raising a plea of illegality in respect of Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations based on discrimination on grounds of disability.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging an error of law in the application of Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations.










6.


Sixth plea in law, raised in the alternative, alleging breach of the administration’s duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.






(1)  Confidential data omitted.
Case C-57/20: Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2022 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany
Date: 2022-03-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, farmer, flat-rate tax, small business, tax exemption, tax harmonisation








C_2022222EN.01002401.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/24






Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2022 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany
(Case C-57/20) (1)

(2022/C 222/34)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.
Case C-191/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 11 March 2022 — ME v État belge
Date: 2022-03-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: age of majority, equal treatment, family migration, family reunification, refugee, right of asylum, young person








C_2022213EN.01003201.xml










30.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/32






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 11 March 2022 — ME v État belge
(Case C-191/22)
(2022/C 213/43)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: ME

Defendant: État belge

Question referred

Must Articles 7 and 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and [Article 4(1)(c)] of Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification (1) and the principles of equal treatment and legal certainty be interpreted as requiring Member States to take into account the age of a child for whom family reunification is sought not at the date of the application for family reunification but at the date when the sponsor, who has been recognised as a refugee, submitted his or her application for international protection and to regard that child as a minor within the meaning of Article 4[(1)(c)] of Directive 2003/86/EC where that child was a minor at the time that the sponsor submitted his or her application for asylum but attained majority before the sponsor obtained refugee status and before the application for family reunification was lodged?


(1)  OJ 2003 L 251, p. 12.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10600 – EDFI / MUBADALA / EMERGE JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 123/03
Date: 2022-03-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: clean technology, economic concentration, energy distribution, energy efficiency, energy industry, energy supply, lighting, merger control, renewable energy, solar energy








C_2022123EN.01003801.xml










18.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 123/38






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10600 – EDFI / MUBADALA / EMERGE JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 123/03)
On 11 March 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10600. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/923 of 11 March 2022 correcting the Swedish language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1189 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the production and marketing of plant reproductive material of organic heterogeneous material of particular genera or species (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2022-03-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Translation, European Commission
Subjects: consumer protection, labelling, market approval, marketing standard, organic farming, organic product, plant propagation, plant variety right, seed, seedling








L_2022160EN.01002801.xml










15.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 160/28








            COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2022/923
of 11 March 2022
         
correcting the Swedish language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1189 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the production and marketing of plant reproductive material of organic heterogeneous material of particular genera or species
(Text with EEA relevance)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Swedish language version of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1189 (2) contains an error in Article 6(3), point (b), as regards the applicable provisions for the production and marketing of plant reproductive material of organic heterogeneous material of cereal species.












(2)


The Swedish language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1189 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

(Does not concern the English language.)



Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 11 March 2022.


For the Commission


The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 150, 14.6.2018, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1189 of 7 May 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the production and marketing of plant reproductive material of organic heterogeneous material of particular genera or species (OJ L 258, 20.7.2021, p. 18).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10543 – BISCUIT HOLDING / CONTINENTAL BAKERIES HOLDING) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 459/01
Date: 2022-03-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: bread-making, cereal product, cereal substitute, confectionery, economic concentration, merger control








C_2022459EN.01000101.xml










2.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 459/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10543 – BISCUIT HOLDING / CONTINENTAL BAKERIES HOLDING)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 459/01)
On 11 March 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10543. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-89/22: Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Passengers friend GmbH v British Airways plc (Air transport — Compensation of air passengers in the event of long delay of flights — Connecting flight consisting of two legs — Significant delay to final destination on the second leg operated by a non-European airline — Compensation claim against the European airline that operated the first leg)
Date: 2022-03-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, consumer protection, indemnification, ticket, traveller








C_2022207EN.01000901.xml










23.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 207/9






Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Passengers friend GmbH v British Airways plc
(Case C-89/22) (1)

(Air transport - Compensation of air passengers in the event of long delay of flights - Connecting flight consisting of two legs - Significant delay to final destination on the second leg operated by a non-European airline - Compensation claim against the European airline that operated the first leg)
(2022/C 207/12)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Passengers friend GmbH

Defendant: British Airways plc

Operative part of the order

Case C-89/22 is removed from the Register of the Court.


(1)  Date lodged: 10 February 2022
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 10 March 2022 2022/C 115/08
Date: 2022-03-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022115EN.01001501.xml










11.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 115/15






Euro exchange rates (1)

10 March 2022
(2022/C 115/08)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1084 




JPY


Japanese yen


128,54 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4401 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84175 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,7073 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0270 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,9190 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,316 




HUF


Hungarian forint


381,63 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,8239 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9491 




TRY


Turkish lira


16,5740 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5109 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4189 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6688 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6185 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5058 




KRW


South Korean won


1 360,48 




ZAR


South African rand


16,7264 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,0063 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5665 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 824,95 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6414 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,825 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,710 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,5958 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,3153 




INR


Indian rupee


84,6070 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-193/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 11 March 2022 — TR, UQ v FTI Touristik GmbH
Date: 2022-03-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, package travel, provision of services, termination of a contract, traveller








C_2022237EN.01003501.xml










20.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 237/35






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 11 March 2022 — TR, UQ v FTI Touristik GmbH
(Case C-193/22)
(2022/C 237/44)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: TR, UQ

Defendant: FTI Touristik GmbH

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 12(2) of Directive (EU) 2015/2302 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements to be interpreted






(a)


as meaning that the assessment of the justification of the termination must be based solely on such unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances as have already occurred at the time of termination,










(b)


or as meaning that it is also necessary to take into account extraordinary circumstances that actually occur after the termination but before the planned start of the journey (being the latest possible date of termination)?




If (a) is answered in the affirmative:






(aa)


: Is Article 12(2) of the directive to be interpreted as meaning that, in the course of legal proceedings on the justification of termination, travellers may also rely on such unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances as had already occurred at the time of termination but of which they only became aware later?














2.


Is Article 12(2) of the directive to be interpreted as meaning that the right to terminate without incurring any fees is not available where the circumstances on which the traveller relies already existed at the time of booking and were known to the traveller?






(1)  Directive (EU) 2015/2302 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements, amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC (OJ 2015 L 326, p. 1).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10606 – MUBADALA / NATIONALE-NEDERLANDEN / HEALTHCARE ACTIVOS MANAGEMENT / HAY / HAISA ENTITIES / SQA) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 334/02
Date: 2022-03-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Portugal, Spain, economic concentration, financial services, investment company, management, medical institution, merger control, property leasing, provision of services, social facilities








C_2023334EN.01000201.xml










22.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 334/2







Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10606 – MUBADALA / NATIONALE-NEDERLANDEN / HEALTHCARE ACTIVOS MANAGEMENT / HAY / HAISA ENTITIES / SQA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 334/02)

On 11 March 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10606. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-192/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 11 March 2022 — FI v Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Date: 2022-03-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Germany, illness, incapacity for work, labour law, national law, paid leave, retirement conditions, temporary employment, work contract








C_2022222EN.01001701.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/17






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 11 March 2022 — FI v Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
(Case C-192/22)
(2022/C 222/28)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: FI

Respondent: Bayerische Motoren Werke AG

Questions referred







1.


Do Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC (1) or Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union preclude an interpretation of a rule of national law such as Paragraph 7(3) of the German Bundesurlaubsgesetz (Federal Law on Leave; ‘the BUrIG’) according to which a worker’s entitlement to paid annual leave acquired during the work phase of a progressive retirement relationship but as yet unexercised is forfeited in the release phase at the end of the holiday year or at a later time?
Should the Court of Justice answer Question 1 in the negative:










2.


Do Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC or Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union preclude an interpretation of a rule of national law such as Paragraph 7(3) BUrlG according to which the as yet unexercised entitlement to paid annual leave of a worker who, in the course of the holiday year, moves from the work phase to the release phase is forfeited at the end of the holiday year or at a later time if the employer — without having previously fulfilled its obligations to cooperate in the realisation of the leave entitlement — has granted the worker the entire annual leave in line with his or her application for a period immediately prior to the start of the release phase, but the leave entitlement could not be fulfilled — at least in part — because the worker became unfit for work due to illness after the leave was granted?






(1)  Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9).
Case T-135/22: Action brought on 11 March 2022 — Deckers Outdoor v EUIPO — Chunxian (TULEUGG)
Date: 2022-03-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022198EN.01005101.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/51






Action brought on 11 March 2022 — Deckers Outdoor v EUIPO — Chunxian (TULEUGG)
(Case T-135/22)
(2022/C 198/75)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Deckers Outdoor Corp. (Goleta, California, United States) (represented by: A. Improda and C. Brega, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Guo Chunxian (Mengzhou, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark TULEUGG — Application for registration No 18 156 704

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 December 2021 in Case R 412/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul and overturn the contested decision;










—


as a consequence, reject the application for registration no. 18 156 704 for the trademark TULEUGG;










—


order EUIPO and/or Mr Chunxian to pay the legal fees related to the present proceedings, as well as the ones related to the previous proceedings held before the Opposition Division and the Fifth Board of Appeal.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-504/21: Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Stade — Germany) — Applicant 1, Applicant 2, Antragsteller 3, Applicant 4, Applicant 5 v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Date: 2022-03-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: appeal, asylum seeker, child protection, family migration, family reunification, right of asylum, right to justice








C_2022222EN.01002503.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/25






Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Stade — Germany) — Applicant 1, Applicant 2, Antragsteller 3, Applicant 4, Applicant 5 v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
(Case C-504/21) (1)

(2022/C 222/39)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 490, 6.12.2021.