do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Commission Decision (EU) 2022/220 of 15 February 2022 on the position to be taken by the European Union in the Joint Committee established under the Memorandum of Cooperation between the European Union and the International Civil Aviation Organization providing a framework for enhanced cooperation, on the adoption of a Working Arrangement regarding the cooperation in the area of accident and incident reporting in civil aviation, and appointing a chairperson of the European Union in the Joint Committee (Official Journal of the European Union L 37 of 18 February 2022)
Date: 2022-03-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: International Civil Aviation Organisation, air safety, air traffic, appointment of members, aviation security, civil aviation, cooperation agreement (EU), enhanced cooperation, joint committee (EU), transport accident








L_2022083EN.01006701.xml










10.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 83/67







Corrigendum to Commission Decision (EU) 2022/220 of 15 February 2022 on the position to be taken by the European Union in the Joint Committee established under the Memorandum of Cooperation between the European Union and the International Civil Aviation Organization providing a framework for enhanced cooperation, on the adoption of a Working Arrangement regarding the cooperation in the area of accident and incident reporting in civil aviation, and appointing a chairperson of the European Union in the Joint Committee

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 37 of 18 February 2022
)


On page 56, on top of the page:
for:


                  ‘ATACHMENT TO THE DECISION OF THE EU/ICAO JOINT COMMITTEE of XX 202X’,

read:


                  ‘ATTACHMENT TO THE DECISION OF THE EU/ICAO JOINT COMMITTEE of XX 202X’.
Case T-141/22: Action brought on 10 March 2022 — Sport1 v EUIPO — SFR (SFR SPORT1)
Date: 2022-03-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, broadcasting, business administration, cable distribution, provision of services, recording, registered trade mark, sporting event, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_2022191EN.01003501.xml










10.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/35






Action brought on 10 March 2022 — Sport1 v EUIPO — SFR (SFR SPORT1)
(Case T-141/22)
(2022/C 191/45)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Sport1 GmbH (Ismaning, Germany) (represented by: J. Krekel and C. Otto, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Société française du radiotelephone — SFR (Paris, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark SFR SPORT1 in red, white and black — Application for registration No 16 161 317

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 December 2021 in Case R 2329/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/436 of 10 March 2022 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Poivre de Penja’ (PGI))
Date: 2022-03-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Cameroon, aromatic plant, designation of origin, dried product, labelling, product designation








L_2022089EN.01000101.xml










17.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 89/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/436
of 10 March 2022
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Poivre de Penja’ (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Cameroon’s application to register the name ‘Poivre de Penja’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Poivre de Penja’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Poivre de Penja’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.8. Other products listed in Annex I to the Treaty (spices etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 10 March 2022.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 472, 23.11.2021, p. 17.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case C-183/21: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken — Germany) — Maxxus Group GmbH & Co. KG v Globus Holding GmbH & Co. KG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Trade marks — Directive (EU) 2015/2436 — Article 19 — Genuine use of a trade mark — Burden of proof — Application to revoke for non-use — National procedural rule obliging the applicant to carry out market research concerning use of the mark)
Date: 2022-03-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, approximation of laws, civil proceedings, proof, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022171EN.01001402.xml










25.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/14






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken — Germany) — Maxxus Group GmbH & Co. KG v Globus Holding GmbH & Co. KG
(Case C-183/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Trade marks - Directive (EU) 2015/2436 - Article 19 - Genuine use of a trade mark - Burden of proof - Application to revoke for non-use - National procedural rule obliging the applicant to carry out market research concerning use of the mark)
(2022/C 171/18)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Saarbrücken

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Maxxus Group GmbH & Co. KG

Defendant: Globus Holding GmbH & Co. KG

Operative part of the judgment

Article 19 of Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as precluding a procedural rule of a Member State which, in proceedings concerning an application for revocation of a trade mark for non-use, requires the applicant to carry out market research concerning the possible use of that mark by its proprietor and to make in that regard, to the extent possible, substantiated submissions in support of its application.


(1)  OJ C 228, 14.6.2021.
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1297 of 4 August 2021 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards perfluorocarboxylic acids containing 9 to 14 carbon atoms in the chain (C9-C14 PFCAs), their salts and C9-C14 PFCA-related substances (Official Journal of the European Union L 282 of 5 August 2021)
Date: 2022-03-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: acid, chemical product, environmental protection, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, product safety, toxic substance








L_2022083EN.01006401.xml










10.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 83/64







Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1297 of 4 August 2021 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards perfluorocarboxylic acids containing 9 to 14 carbon atoms in the chain (C9-C14 PFCAs), their salts and C9-C14 PFCA-related substances

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 282 of 5 August 2021
)


On page 32, in the first paragraph of the Annex:
for:


                  ‘In Annex XVII, entry 68 is replaced by the following:’,

read:


                  ‘In Annex XVII, the following entry is added:’;

on page 33, in paragraph 10 of the table in the Annex:
for:


                  ‘Until 25 August 2024, the concentration limit referred to in paragraph 2 shall be 2 000 ppb for the sum of C9-C14 PFCAs in fluoroplastics and fluoroelastomers that contain perfluoroalkoxy groups. From 25 August 2024, the concentration limit shall be 100 ppb for the sum of C9-C14 PFCAs, in fluoroplastics and fluoroelastomers that contain perfluoroalkoxy groups.’,

read:


                  ‘Until 25 August 2024, the concentration limit referred to in paragraph 2 shall be 2 000 ppb for the sum of C9-C14 PFCAs in fluoroplastics and fluoroelastomers that contain perfluoroalkoxy groups. From 26 August 2024, the concentration limit shall be 100 ppb for the sum of C9-C14 PFCAs in fluoroplastics and fluoroelastomers that contain perfluoroalkoxy groups.’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10515 – ILIAD / UPC POLSKA) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 228/04
Date: 2022-03-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Poland, economic concentration, merger control, parent company, provision of services, telecommunications








C_2022228EN.01000401.xml










13.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 228/4






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10515 – ILIAD / UPC POLSKA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 228/04)
On 10 March 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10515. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10632 – WATERLAND / DUVENBECK) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 114/07
Date: 2022-03-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: carriage for hire or reward, carrier, digitisation, economic concentration, investment company, leisure, logistics, luxury products industry, merger control, outsourcing








C_2022114EN.01001001.xml










10.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 114/10






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10632 – WATERLAND / DUVENBECK)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 114/07)

1.   
On 2 March 2022 the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Waterland Private Equity Investment B.V. (‘Waterland’, the Netherlands),










—


Duvenbeck Group (‘Duvenbeck’), currently controlled by Thomas Duvenbeck Holding GmbH (both Germany).




Waterland acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Duvenbeck.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for Waterland: Independent private equity investment group, focused on outsourcing & digitalization, leisure & luxury, sustainability and ageing population. Waterland is mainly active in Europe, in particular Benelux, Germany and the United Kingdom.










—


for Duvenbeck: Logistics provider offering third party logistics, including conceptual and lead logistics services, contract logistics, freight forwarding and light assembly. Duvenbeck is mainly active in Germany, Austria Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Spain.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10632 – WATERLAND / DUVENBECK
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case T-133/22: Action brought on 10 March 2022 — Katjes Fassin v EUIPO (THE FUTURE IS PLANT-BASED)
Date: 2022-03-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, beverage industry, confectionery, flavouring, food supplement, foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022171EN.01004501.xml










25.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/45






Action brought on 10 March 2022 — Katjes Fassin v EUIPO (THE FUTURE IS PLANT-BASED)
(Case T-133/22)
(2022/C 171/62)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG (Emmerich am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmitz and S. Stolzenburg-Wiemer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark THE FUTURE IS PLANT-BASED — Application No 18 310 582

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 December 2021 in Case R 1023/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, read in conjunction with Article 7(2) thereof.