Case C-186/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 9 March 2022 — Sad Trasporto Locale SpA v Provincia autonoma di Bolzano
Date: 2022-03-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, award of contract, carrier, control of State aid, provision of services, public transport, service concession, services of general interest








C_2022213EN.01003101.xml










30.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/31






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 9 March 2022 — Sad Trasporto Locale SpA v Provincia autonoma di Bolzano
(Case C-186/22)
(2022/C 213/42)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant and appellant: Sad Trasporto Locale SpA

Defendant and respondent: Provincia autonoma di Bolzano

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 (1) be interpreted as precluding the application of that regulation to the operation of national and international multimodal public passenger transport services, where, first, the public transport service is of a uniform nature for the purposes of the award and is performed by tramway, funicular railway and cableway, and second, track-based modes of transport account for more than 50 % of the service awarded in its entirety to the operator?










2.


If the first question is answered in the negative, where Regulation No 1370/2007 also applies to the operation of national and international multimodal public passenger transport services, in which, first, the public transport service is of a uniform nature for the purposes of the award and is provided by tramway, funicular railway and cableway, second, track-based modes of transport account for more than 50 % of the service awarded in its entirety to the operator, must Article 5(1) and (2) of Regulation No 1370/2007 be interpreted as requiring, particularly in relation to the direct award to an internal operator of a public service contract that includes the transport of passengers by tramway, verification of the legal form of the measure awarding the service, with the effect of excluding from the scope of Article 5(2) of that regulation measures that do not take the form of services concession contracts?










3.


If the second question is answered in the affirmative, must Article 5(1)(b) and the second subparagraph of Article 5(1) of Directive 2014/23/EU (2) be interpreted as meaning that the operating risk in exploiting those services must not be transferred to the contractor if the contract awarded: (a) is based on gross cost, with the contracting entity receiving the revenue; (b) only envisages as operating revenue for the operator a fee paid by the [contracting] entity, commensurate with the volume of services provided (and therefore excluding demand risk); (c) leaves the contracting entity with demand-side operating risk (reduction in fees due to a decline in service volumes below a predefined threshold), regulatory risk (resulting from legislative or regulatory changes and delay in the granting of authorisation and/or certification by the competent bodies), financial risk (non-payment or late payment of fees and failure to adjust fees), and risk of force majeure (resulting from an unforeseeable change in the service performance conditions); (d) transfers to the contractor supply side operating risk (changes in the costs of factors such as energy, raw materials and supplies that are beyond the operator’s control), industrial relations risk (resulting from changes in staff costs under a collective agreement), management risk (resulting from an increase in operating costs due to incorrect estimates), and socio-environmental risk (resulting from operating incidents involving assets needed to provide the service)?










4.


Must Articles 107(1) TFEU and 108(3) TFEU be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of a direct award of a public service contract for the transport of passengers by a competent local authority to an internal operator, public service compensation calculated on the basis of management costs that, although related to the anticipated service requirements, are, on the one hand, estimated taking into account the historical costs of the service provided by the incumbent operator, awarded a services concession which was extended for more than 10 years, and on the other hand, are based on costs or fees that relate to the previous award or at least involve standard market parameters applicable to all operators in the sector, constitutes State aid subject to prior control under Article 108(3) TFEU?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (OJ 2007 L 315, p. 1).

(2)  Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the award of concession contracts (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 1).