do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Decision (EU) 2022/447 of the European Central Bank of 8 March 2022 amending Decision 2011/15/EU concerning the opening of accounts for the processing of payments in connection with EFSF loans to Member States whose currency is the euro (ECB/2022/10)
Date: 2022-03-08
Institutions: European Central Bank
Subjects: EU banking union, bank deposit, central bank, financial legislation, interest, loan, participating country (euro area)




L_2022090EN.01019701.xml










18.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 90/197








            DECISION (EU) 2022/447 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
         
of 8 March 2022
         
amending Decision 2011/15/EU concerning the opening of accounts for the processing of payments in connection with EFSF loans to Member States whose currency is the euro (ECB/2022/10)


THE EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Articles 17 and 21 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Deposits held with the European Central Bank (ECB) as provided for in Decision 2011/15/EU of the European Central Bank (ECB/2010/31) (1) should be remunerated in accordance with the provisions of Article 2(1) of Decision (EU) 2019/1743 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2019/31) (2) in order to ensure consistency in the remuneration of comparable deposits across the Eurosystem.












(2)


Therefore, Decision 2011/15/EU (ECB/2010/31) should be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1

Amendment

Article 5 of Decision 2011/15/EU (ECB/2010/31) is replaced by the following:


‘Article 5
Remuneration
The NCB cash account shall be remunerated in accordance with the provisions of Article 2(1) of Decision (EU) 2019/1743 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2019/31) (*1).




Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the fifth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Frankfurt am Main, 8 March 2022.


The President of the ECB

Christine LAGARDE
            





(1)  Decision 2011/15/EU of the European Central Bank of 20 December 2010 concerning the opening of accounts for the processing of payments in connection with EFSF loans to Member States whose currency is the euro (ECB/2010/31) (OJ L 10, 14.1.2011, p. 7).

(2)  Decision (EU) 2019/1743 of the European Central Bank of 15 October 2019 on the remuneration of holdings of excess reserves and of certain deposits (ECB/2019/31) (OJ L 267, 21.10.2019, p. 12).
Notice amending the addendum to the notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/382/20 – Administrators (AD 5/AD 7) in the field of external relations (OJ C 300 A, 10.9.2020) (OJ C 444 A, 22.12.2020)
Date: 2022-03-08
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: EU relations, European External Action Service, administrator, competition (EU), coronavirus disease, disease prevention, epidemic, recruitment








CA2022111EN.01000601.xml










8.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 111/6






Notice amending the addendum to the notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/382/20 – Administrators (AD 5/AD 7) in the field of external relations (
OJ C 300 A, 10.9.2020
)

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 444 A of 22 December 2020
)
(2022/C 111 A/05)
On page 10, Section 6 is deleted.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 7 March 2022 2022/C 111/02
Date: 2022-03-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022111EN.01000201.xml










8.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 111/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

7 March 2022
(2022/C 111/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0895 




JPY


Japanese yen


125,55 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4406 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,82625 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,8573 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0069 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,80 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,8325 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,584 




HUF


Hungarian forint


393,25 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,9525 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9494 




TRY


Turkish lira


15,6577 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4751 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3864 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5154 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5861 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4831 




KRW


South Korean won


1 338,45 




ZAR


South African rand


16,6951 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,8846 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5600 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 685,76 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5426 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,832 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


35,866 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,5065 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,0249 




INR


Indian rupee


83,8125 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Notice amending the notice of open competition – EPSO/AST-SC/10/20 – Secretaries (SC 1/SC 2) (OJ C 211 A, 25.6.2020)
Date: 2022-03-08
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: assistant, competition (EU), secretarial staff








CA2022111EN.01000101.xml










8.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 111/1






Notice amending the notice of open competition – EPSO/AST-SC/10/20 – Secretaries (SC 1/SC 2)
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 211 A of 25 June 2020
)
(2022/C 111 A/01)
On page 5, Section 5 ‘Assessment phase’ should read:

‘(5)   
Assessment phase




A maximum of 2 times
 the number of successful candidates sought for each grade will be invited to this phase. If you meet the eligibility requirements according to the data in your online application and if you scored one of the 
highest overall marks
 for the Microsoft Office Word skills test, you will be invited to the assessment phase.
Seven general competencies, each marked out of 10, and the field-related competencies required for this competition will be tested during the assessment phase through 
two tests
 held in your language 2, as described in the following matrices:






Competency


Tests










1.


Analysis and problem solving






Field-related interview










2.


Communication






Field-related interview










3.


Delivering quality and results






Role-play










4.


Learning and development






Role-play










5.


Prioritising and organising






Role play










6.


Resilience






Field-related interview










7.


Working with others






Role play





Pass mark: 35/70 in total.







Competency


Test


Pass marks




Field-related competencies


Field-related interview


35/70




Unless instructed otherwise, candidates will have to upload — to their EPSO account — scanned copies of the documents supporting the declarations made in their application form. Further details and instructions will be provided by EPSO.’
Case C-174/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 8 March 2022 — Criminal proceedings against EV
Date: 2022-03-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: criminal law, criminal proceedings, drug traffic, hydrocarbon, narcotic, penalty








C_2022191EN.01002401.xml










10.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/24






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 8 March 2022 — Criminal proceedings against EV
(Case C-174/22)
(2022/C 191/30)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven kasatsionen sad

Party to the main proceedings

EV

Question referred

Do the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004, which supplement the blanket provision of Article 354a of the Nakazatelen kodeks (Criminal Code) in conjunction with Article 3(4) of the Zakon za kontrol varhu narkotichnite veshtestva i prekursorite (Law on the control of narcotic substances and drug precursors), allow a person to be found guilty of possession of a category 3 substance as per Annex I, namely toluene in a quantity of two litres?


(1)  Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on drug precursors (OJ 2004 L 47, p. 1).
Case C-178/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bolzano (Italy) lodged on 8 March 2022 — Criminal proceedings against Unknown individuals
Date: 2022-03-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: data protection, imprisonment, offence, personal data, protection of communications








C_2022237EN.01002901.xml










20.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 237/29






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bolzano (Italy) lodged on 8 March 2022 — Criminal proceedings against Unknown individuals
(Case C-178/22)
(2022/C 237/38)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Bolzano

Party to the main proceedings

Unknown individuals

Question referred

Does Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 (1) preclude a provision of national law such as that contained in Article 132 of Legislative Decree No 196 of 30 June 2003 (the Privacy Code), paragraph 3 of which was amended by Decree-Law No 132 of 30 September 2021, converted, with amendments, into Law No 178 of 23 November 2021 and, in its current version, provides:






3.


Within the retention period laid down by law, if there is sufficient evidence of the commission of an offence for which the law prescribes the penalty of life imprisonment or a maximum term of imprisonment of at least three years, determined in accordance with Article 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, or of an offence of threatening and harassing or disturbing persons by means of the telephone, where the threat or disturbance is serious, the data may, if relevant to establishing the facts, be acquired with the prior authorisation of the court, by way of reasoned order, at the request of the Public Prosecutor or upon an application by the legal representative of the accused, of the person under investigation, of the injured party or of any other private party’






(1)  Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) (OJ 2002 L 201, p. 37).
Case C-175/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 8 March 2022 — Criminal proceedings against BK
Date: 2022-03-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: criminal procedure, criminal proceedings, offence, penal code, right to justice, rights of the defence, ruling








C_2022191EN.01002402.xml










10.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/24






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 8 March 2022 — Criminal proceedings against BK
(Case C-175/22)
(2022/C 191/31)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad

Party to the main proceedings

BK

Questions referred

Does Article 6(3) and (4) of Directive 2012/13/EU (1) preclude an interpretation of national legal provisions — Article 301(1)(2), in conjunction with Article 287(1), of the Nakazatelno protsesualen kodeks (Code of Criminal Procedure, Bulgaria; ‘the NPK’) — in the case-law according to which the court may, in its judgment, give a legal classification of the offence that differs from that set out in the bill of indictment, provided that it is not classified as an offence attracting a more severe penalty, on the ground that the accused person was not properly informed of the new, different legal classification before the delivery of the judgment and was unable to defend himself against it?
If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative: Does the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter prohibit the court from informing the accused person that it could base its decision on the merits on a different legal classification of the offence, and also from giving him the opportunity to prepare his defence against that classification, because the initiative for this different legal classification did not come from the public prosecutor’s office?


(1)  Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings (OJ 2012 L 142, p. 1).
Case C-205/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — NE v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom to provide services — Posting of workers — Directive 2014/67/EU — Article 20 — Penalties — Proportionality — Direct effect — Principle of primacy of EU law)
Date: 2022-03-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative formalities, administrative sanction, direct applicability, freedom to provide services, national implementing measure, posted worker, primacy of EU law, principle of proportionality








C_2022171EN.01000602.xml










25.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/6






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — NE v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld
(Case C-205/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom to provide services - Posting of workers - Directive 2014/67/EU - Article 20 - Penalties - Proportionality - Direct effect - Principle of primacy of EU law)
(2022/C 171/08)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: NE

Defendant: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld

Intervener: Finanzpolizei Team 91

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 20 of Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’), in so far as it requires the penalties provided for therein to be proportionate, has direct effect and may thus be relied on by individuals before national courts against a Member State which has transposed it incorrectly.










2.


The principle of the primacy of EU law must be interpreted as imposing on national authorities the obligation to disapply national legislation of which a part is contrary to the requirement of proportionality of penalties laid down in Article 20 of Directive 2014/67 only to the extent necessary to enable the imposition of proportionate penalties.






(1)  OJ C 348, 19.10.2020.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 8 March 2022 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 138/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards regional economic accounts for agriculture (COM(2021)0054 — C9-0020/2021 — 2021/0031(COD))
Date: 2022-03-08
Institutions: Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: EU statistics, European accounting system, agricultural statistics, common agricultural policy, data collection, disclosure of information, economic accounts for agriculture, statistical method








C_2022347EN.01022301.xml










9.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 347/223






P9_TA(2022)0053
Regional economic accounts for agriculture ***I
European Parliament legislative resolution of 8 March 2022 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 138/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards regional economic accounts for agriculture (COM(2021)0054 — C9-0020/2021 — 2021/0031(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
(2022/C 347/21)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2021)0054),










—


having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 338(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C9-0020/2021),










—


having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to the provisional agreement approved by the committee responsible under Rule 74(4) of its Rules of Procedure and the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 10 December 2021 to approve Parliament’s position, in accordance with Article 294(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A9-0282/2021),












1.


Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;












2.


Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;












3.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.