do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-164/20: Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court, acting as President of the Ninth Chamber of 4 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg — Austria) — Airhelp Limited v Austrian Airlines AG
Date: 2022-03-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, illness, indemnification, traveller








C_2022222EN.01002402.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/24






Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court, acting as President of the Ninth Chamber of 4 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg — Austria) — Airhelp Limited v Austrian Airlines AG
(Case C-164/20) (1)

(2022/C 222/35)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 230, 13.7.2020.
Case C-194/22 P: Appeal brought on 4 March 2022 by Magic Box Int. Toys SLU against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 21 December 2021 in Case T-549/20, Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO — KMA Concepts
Date: 2022-03-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, decorative item, office supplies, online game, paperboard, registered trade mark, sports equipment, teaching materials, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2022340EN.01001401.xml










5.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/14






Appeal brought on 4 March 2022 by Magic Box Int. Toys SLU against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 21 December 2021 in Case T-549/20, Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO — KMA Concepts
(Case C-194/22 P)
(2022/C 340/16)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Magic Box Int. Toys SLU (represented by: J. L. Rivas Zurdo, abogado)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, KMA Concepts Ltd.
By order of 7 June 2022, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) did not allow the appeal and ordered Magic Box Int. Toys to bear its own costs.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 3 March 2022 2022/C 104/06
Date: 2022-03-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022104EN.01000901.xml










4.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/9






Euro exchange rates (1)

3 March 2022
(2022/C 104/06)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1076 




JPY


Japanese yen


128,18 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4399 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,82773 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,7688 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0192 




ISK


Iceland króna


143,40 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,8418 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,634 




HUF


Hungarian forint


378,64 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,7691 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9496 




TRY


Turkish lira


15,6897 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5139 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3992 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6547 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6329 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5042 




KRW


South Korean won


1 334,20 




ZAR


South African rand


16,8798 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,9996 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5700 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 934,42 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6370 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,293 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,063 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,6041 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,8945 




INR


Indian rupee


84,1740 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10607 – LONE-STAR FUNDS / SPX FLOW) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 159/02
Date: 2022-03-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, industrial equipment, investment company, maintenance, merger control








C_2022159EN.01000201.xml










12.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 159/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10607 – LONE-STAR FUNDS / SPX FLOW)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 159/02)
On 4 March 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10607. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-338/20: Order of the General Court of 4 March 2022 — KI v eu-LISA (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Internal reorganisation of the services of eu-LISA — Filling posts by reassignment — Interests of the service — Correspondence between the grade and the post — No act adversely affecting the applicant — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2022-03-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: damages, pay scale, reassignment, servant (EU), temporary employment








C_2022198EN.01004701.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/47






Order of the General Court of 4 March 2022 — KI v eu-LISA
(Case T-338/20) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Internal reorganisation of the services of eu-LISA - Filling posts by reassignment - Interests of the service - Correspondence between the grade and the post - No act adversely affecting the applicant - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 198/68)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: KI (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA) (represented by: K. Czekalowski and M. Chiodi, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of eu-LISA of 15 July 2019 to reassign the applicant following the internal reorganisation of the services of that agency, and second, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


KI shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.
Case C-195/22 P: Appeal brought on 4 March 2022 by Plataforma de Trabajador@s Temporales del Ayuntamiento de Zaragoza (PTTAZ) against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 27 January 2022 in Case T-736/21, PTTAZ v Commission
Date: 2022-03-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Spain, framework agreement, infringement procedure (EU), national implementing measure, public sector, temporary employment








C_2022408EN.01002601.xml










24.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 408/26






Appeal brought on 4 March 2022 by Plataforma de Trabajador@s Temporales del Ayuntamiento de Zaragoza (PTTAZ) against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 27 January 2022 in Case T-736/21, PTTAZ v Commission
(Case C-195/22 P)
(2022/C 408/34)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Plataforma de Trabajador@s Temporales del Ayuntamiento de Zaragoza (PTTAZ) (represented by: B. González González, abogada)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
By order of 6 September 2022, the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly unfounded and ordered the appellants to bear their own costs.
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections
Date: 2022-03-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Austria, State aid, control of State aid








C_2022106EN.01001201.xml










4.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 106/12






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
(2022/C 106/02)






Date of adoption of the decision


21.1.2022




Aid number


SA.61753




Member State


Austria




Region


Austria




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Qualitätsprogramme und das AMA-Biosiegel und das AMA-Gütesiegel (N589/2008, SA.36782(2013/N) und SA.37715(2013/N).




Legal basis


AMA-Gesetz 1992 (BGBl. Nr. 376/1992); § 21a AMA-Gesetz 1992 in Verbindung mit der AMB-Verordnung 2015 (www.ama.at)




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


Aid for promotion measures in favour of agricultural products




Form of aid


Subsidised services, Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 68 530 000  EUR
Annual budget: 0 EUR




Intensity


100 %




Duration


Until 31.12.2027




Economic sectors


AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING




Name and address of the granting authority







Agrarmarkt Austria




Dresdner Straße 70, 1200 Wien








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures 2022/C 104/07
Date: 2022-03-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, hoisting equipment, import (EU), originating product








C_2022104EN.01001001.xml










4.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/10






Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(2022/C 104/07)
1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may submit a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Hand pallet trucks


The People’s Republic of China
Thailand


Anti-dumping duty


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2206 of 29 November 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
(OJ L 314, 30.11.2017, p. 12)


1.12.2022






(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight (00:00) of the day mentioned in this column.
Case C-167/22: Action brought on 4 March 2022 — European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark
Date: 2022-03-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: carriage of goods, carrier, driving period, freedom to provide services, international road transport, motorway, parking area, provision of services, rest period, road cabotage








C_2022191EN.01002301.xml










10.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/23






Action brought on 4 March 2022 — European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark
(Case C-167/22)
(2022/C 191/29)
Language of the case: Danish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Grønfeldt and P. Messina, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Denmark

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that, by limiting to 25 hours the maximum period during which it is possible to park at State-owned rest areas along the motorway network in Denmark, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under the provisions on the freedom to provide transport services, as laid down in Articles 1, 8 and 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council; (1)











—


order the Kingdom of Denmark to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission submits that the 25-hour rule, although it does not amount to direct discrimination, nevertheless constitutes an obstacle to the freedom to provide services, since the rule does not affect Danish hauliers and non-Danish hauliers in the same way. Drivers working for non-Danish hauliers will find it more difficult to comply with their driving and rest time obligations arising from EU law, in particular from Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, (2) than will drivers working for Danish hauliers, which have operating centres in Denmark to which the drivers can return and park during their rest periods.
According to the Commission, the rule cannot be justified by the objectives, relied on by Denmark, of (i) providing greater capacity for drivers to take their breaks and short rest periods, (ii) eliminating illegal and dangerous parking on motorway lay-bys, (iii) ensuring orderly conditions at rest areas by countering the negative effects caused by long-term parking, and (iv) improving the drivers’ environmental and working conditions, since that rule is not suitable for attaining those objectives and, moreover, goes beyond what is necessary to attain them.


(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (OJ 2009 L 300, p. 72).

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 (OJ 2006 L 102, p. 1).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10541 – GOLDMAN SACHS / GRUPO VISABEIRA / CONSTRUCTEL VISABEIRA) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 123/04
Date: 2022-03-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: banking, building industry, economic concentration, energy grid, energy industry, hotel industry, household article, investment, merger control, provision of services, securities, telecommunications








C_2022123EN.01003901.xml










18.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 123/39






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10541 – GOLDMAN SACHS / GRUPO VISABEIRA / CONSTRUCTEL VISABEIRA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 123/04)
On 4 March 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10541. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10566 – P66 / H2 EE / JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 118/03
Date: 2022-03-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Austria, Denmark, Germany, economic concentration, energy production, fuel, hydrogen, merger control, renewable resources, subsidiary








C_2022118EN.01000501.xml










14.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/5






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10566 – P66 / H2 EE / JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 118/03)
On 4 March 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10566. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10605 – MACQUARIE REAL ESTATE / CPG VAN OOSTROM BEHEER / EDGE) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 115/02
Date: 2022-03-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, real estate business, real property, shareholder








C_2022115EN.01000201.xml










11.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 115/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10605 – MACQUARIE REAL ESTATE / CPG VAN OOSTROM BEHEER / EDGE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 115/02)
On 4 March 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10605. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.