do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-563/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — ORLEN KolTrans sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rail transport — Directive 2001/14/EC — Article 4 — Setting of infrastructure charges by decision of the manager — Article 30(2) — Railway undertakings’ right to bring an administrative action — Article 30(6) — Judicial review of the decisions of the regulatory body)
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: charges for use of infrastructure, judicial review, rail transport, transport infrastructure








C_2022165EN.01001701.xml










19.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 165/17






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — ORLEN KolTrans sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego
(Case C-563/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Rail transport - Directive 2001/14/EC - Article 4 - Setting of infrastructure charges by decision of the manager - Article 30(2) - Railway undertakings’ right to bring an administrative action - Article 30(6) - Judicial review of the decisions of the regulatory body)
(2022/C 165/19)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: ORLEN KolTrans sp. z o.o.

Defendant: Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 30(2)(e) of Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification, as amended by Directive 2007/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007, must be interpreted as not governing the right of a railway undertaking, which uses or intends to use the railway infrastructure, to participate in any procedure conducted by the regulatory body for the purpose of adopting a decision approving or rejecting a draft unit rate for the basic charge for minimum access to infrastructure submitted by an infrastructure manager;










2.


Article 30(6) of Directive 2001/14, as amended by Directive 2007/58 must be interpreted as meaning that a railway undertaking which uses or intends to use the railway infrastructure must be able to challenge before the court having jurisdiction the decision of the regulatory body approving the unit rates of the basic charge for minimum access to infrastructure established by the infrastructure manager.






(1)  OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.
Case C-262/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit — Bulgaria) — VB v Glavna direktsia ‘Pozharna bezopasnost i zashtita na naselenieto’ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Organisation of working time — Directive 2003/88/EC — Article 8 — Article 12(a) — Articles 20 and 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Reduction of the normal length of night work in relation to day work — Public sector workers and private sector workers — Equal treatment)
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: arrangement of working time, equal treatment, fire protection, night work, police, private sector, public sector, public service employee, reduction of working time, social policy








C_2022165EN.01000701.xml










19.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 165/7






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit — Bulgaria) — VB v Glavna direktsia ‘Pozharna bezopasnost i zashtita na naselenieto’
(Case C-262/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Organisation of working time - Directive 2003/88/EC - Article 8 - Article 12(a) - Articles 20 and 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Reduction of the normal length of night work in relation to day work - Public sector workers and private sector workers - Equal treatment)
(2022/C 165/07)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Rayonen sad Lukovit

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: VB

Defendant: Glavna direktsia ‘Pozharna bezopasnost i zashtita na naselenieto’

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Articles 8 and 12(а) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as not requiring the adoption of national legislation providing that the normal length of night work for workers in the public sector, such as police officers and firefighters, is shorter than the normal length of day work laid down for them. Such workers should in any case benefit from other protective measures in terms of working hours, pay, allowances or similar benefits, in order to compensate for the particular hardship involved in the night work they perform.










2.


Articles 20 and 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union must be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude the normal length of night work of seven hours laid down in the legislation of a Member State for workers in the private sector from being applied to workers in the public sector, including police officers and firefighters, if such a difference in treatment is based on an objective and reasonable criterion, that is to say, it relates to a legally permitted aim pursued by that legislation, and is proportionate to that aim.






(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10582 – GAMALIFE / GOING CONCERN OF ZURICH INVESTMENTS LIFE SPA) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 154/02
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Portugal, economic concentration, insurance company, insurance contract, life assurance, merger control








C_2022154EN.01000201.xml










8.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 154/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10582 – GAMALIFE / GOING CONCERN OF ZURICH INVESTMENTS LIFE SPA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 154/02)
On 24 February 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10582. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-389/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 2 de Vigo — Spain) — CJ v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security — Directive 79/7/EEC — Article 4(1) — Prohibition of any discrimination on grounds of sex — Domestic workers — Protection against unemployment — Exclusion — Particular disadvantage to female workers — Legitimate social policy objectives — Proportionality)
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: equal treatment, gender equality, principle of proportionality, sexual discrimination, social security legislation, unemployment insurance








C_2022165EN.01001102.xml










19.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 165/11






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 2 de Vigo — Spain) — CJ v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS)
(Case C-389/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security - Directive 79/7/EEC - Article 4(1) - Prohibition of any discrimination on grounds of sex - Domestic workers - Protection against unemployment - Exclusion - Particular disadvantage to female workers - Legitimate social policy objectives - Proportionality)
(2022/C 165/12)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 2 de Vigo

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: CJ

Defendant: Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS)

Re:

Article 4(1) of Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security must be interpreted as precluding a national provision excluding unemployment benefits from the social security benefits granted to domestic workers by a statutory social security scheme, since that provision places female workers at a particular disadvantage as compared with male workers and is not justified by objective factors wholly unrelated to discrimination based on sex.


(1)  OJ C 423, 7.12.2020.
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2026 of 13 September 2021 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/592 as regards certain temporary derogations from Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council to address the market disturbance in the wine sector caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and their period of application (Official Journal of the European Union L 415 of 22 November 2021)
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: EU Member State, agricultural insurance, aid to agriculture, common organisation of markets, coronavirus disease, crop losses, derogation from EU law, epidemic, viticulture, wine




L_2022043EN.01009301.xml










24.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 43/93







Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2026 of 13 September 2021 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/592 as regards certain temporary derogations from Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council to address the market disturbance in the wine sector caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and their period of application

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 415 of 22 November 2021
)


On page 2, in Article 1(2):
for:


                  ‘in Article 10, the date “
                  15 October 2021
                  ” is replaced by “
                  15 October 2022
                  ”
                  ’,

read:


                  ‘Article 10 is replaced by the following:


“Article 10
Application of the temporarily increased Union contribution
Articles 5a, 6, 7(2) and 9 shall apply to operations selected by the competent authorities in the Member States as of the date of entry into force of this Regulation and not later than 15 October 2022.”’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10570 – ADVENT / PERMIRA / MCAFEE) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 115/03
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, information security, investment company, merger control, provision of services








C_2022115EN.01000301.xml










11.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 115/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10570 – ADVENT / PERMIRA / MCAFEE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 115/03)
On 24 February 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10570. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10301 – CVC / ETHNIKI) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 327/02
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, indemnity insurance, investment company, life assurance, merger control, reinsurance








C_2022327EN.01000201.xml










30.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 327/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10301 – CVC / ETHNIKI)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 327/02)
On 24 February 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10301. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Council Decision (EU) 2022/360 of 24 February 2022 appointing a member, proposed by the Kingdom of Spain, of the Committee of the Regions
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Spain, appointment of members, member of the Committee of the Regions








L_2022068EN.01001701.xml










3.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 68/17








            COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2022/360
of 24 February 2022
         
appointing a member, proposed by the Kingdom of Spain, of the Committee of the Regions


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision (EU) 2019/852 of 21 May 2019 determining the composition of the Committee of the Regions (1),


Having regard to the proposal of the Spanish Government,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 300(3) of the Treaty, the Committee of the Regions is to consist of representatives of regional and local bodies who either hold a regional or local authority electoral mandate or are politically accountable to an elected assembly.












(2)


On 10 December 2019, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2019/2157 (2), appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2020 to 25 January 2025.












(3)


A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the mandate on the basis of which Mr Francisco IGEA ARISQUETA was proposed for appointment.












(4)


The Spanish Government has proposed Mr Alfonso FERNÁNDEZ MAÑUECO, representative of a regional body who holds a regional authority electoral mandate, Presidente de la Junta de Castilla y León (President of the regional government of Castilla and León), as a member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2025,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Mr Alfonso FERNÁNDEZ MAÑUECO, representative of a regional body who holds a regional authority electoral mandate, Presidente de la Junta de Castilla y León (President of the regional government of Castilla and León), is hereby appointed as a member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2025.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 24 February 2022.


For the Council


The President

A. PANNIER-RUNACHER
            





(1)  
            OJ L 139, 27.5.2019, p. 13.

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2019/2157 of 10 December 2019 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2020 to 25 January 2025 (OJ L 327, 17.12.2019, p. 78).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10512 – LEAR CORPORATION / INTERIOR COMFORT SYSTEMS BUSINESS OF KONGSBERG AUTOMOTIVE GROUP) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 129/04
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, motor vehicle industry, vehicle parts








C_2022129EN.01001301.xml










22.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 129/13






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10512 – LEAR CORPORATION / INTERIOR COMFORT SYSTEMS BUSINESS OF KONGSBERG AUTOMOTIVE GROUP)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 129/04)
On 24 February 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10512. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Notice for the attention of Mr Yevgeniy Viktorovich PRIGOZHIN subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya 2022/C 88 I/03
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Libya, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law








CI2022088EN.01000501.xml










24.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CI 88/5






Notice for the attention of Mr Yevgeniy Viktorovich PRIGOZHIN subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya
(2022/C 88 I/03)
The following information is brought to the attention of Mr. Yevgeniy Viktorovich PRIGOZHIN, subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 (1) and in Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 (2) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya.
The Council intends to include the abovementioned person in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (3) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
The person concerned is hereby informed that he may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statement of reasons for his designation, by 3 March 2022, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIËc




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu


(1)  OJ L 206, 1.8.2015, p. 34.

(2)  OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(4)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.