do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-364/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 February 2022 — Ernests Bernis, Oļegs Fiļs, OF Holding SIA, Cassandra Holding Company SIA v Single Resolution Board, European Central Bank (Appeal — Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms — Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 — Article 18 — Resolution procedure — Declaration by the European Central Bank (ECB) that an entity is failing or is likely to fail — Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) not to adopt a resolution scheme — Lack of public interest — Winding up in accordance with national law — Shareholders — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU banking union, European Central Bank, Latvia, Luxembourg, admissibility, bank, bank resolution, credit institution, liquidation, national law








C_2022165EN.01001101.xml










19.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 165/11






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 February 2022 — Ernests Bernis, Oļegs Fiļs, OF Holding SIA, Cassandra Holding Company SIA v Single Resolution Board, European Central Bank
(Case C-364/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Article 18 - Resolution procedure - Declaration by the European Central Bank (ECB) that an entity is failing or is likely to fail - Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) not to adopt a resolution scheme - Lack of public interest - Winding up in accordance with national law - Shareholders - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 165/11)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Ernests Bernis, Oļegs Fiļs, OF Holding SIA, Cassandra Holding Company SIA (represented by: O. Behrends, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: Single Resolution Board (represented: initially by H. Ehlers, A. Valavanidou and E. Muratori, and subsequently by H. Ehlers and E. Muratori, acting as Agents, and by B. Heenan, Solicitor, J. Rivas Andrés and A. Manzaneque Valverde, abogados), European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: E. Koupepidou and G. Marafioti, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr Ernests Bernis and Mr Oļegs Fiļs, OF Holding SIA and Cassandra Holding Company SIA to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board;










3.


Orders the European Central Bank to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10589 – ADT / FORD NEXT / SNTNL) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 122/09
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, motor vehicle, motor vehicle industry, provision of services, safety device, smart technology








C_2022122EN.01003201.xml










17.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 122/32






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10589 – ADT / FORD NEXT / SNTNL)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 122/09)
On 24 February 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10589. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/299 of 24 February 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








L_2022046EN.01000101.xml










25.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 46/1








            COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/299
of 24 February 2022
         
implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 of 18 January 2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria and repealing Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 (1), and in particular Article 32(1) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 18 January 2012, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 36/2012.












(2)


The entry for one deceased person should be deleted.












(3)


Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.





This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 24 February 2022.


For the Council


The President

A. PANNIER-RUNACHER
            





(1)  
            OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.




ANNEX
The following entry is deleted from the list set out in Section A (Persons) of Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012:






32.


Mohammed Makhlouf.
Case C-452/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — PJ v Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli — Ufficio dei monopoli per la Toscana, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Directive 2014/40/EU — Article 23(3) — World Health Organisation Framework Convention on Tobacco Control — Prohibition on selling tobacco products to minors — Rules on penalties — Effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties — Obligation on sellers of tobacco products to verify the buyer’s age when selling those products — Fine — Operation of a tobacconist’s shop — Suspension of trading licence for a period of 15 days — Principle of proportionality — Precautionary principle)
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: World Health Organisation, administrative sanction, international convention, market approval, precautionary principle, principle of proportionality, sale, smoking, tobacco industry, trade licence, young person








C_2022165EN.01001301.xml










19.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 165/13






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — PJ v Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli — Ufficio dei monopoli per la Toscana, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze
(Case C-452/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Directive 2014/40/EU - Article 23(3) - World Health Organisation Framework Convention on Tobacco Control - Prohibition on selling tobacco products to minors - Rules on penalties - Effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties - Obligation on sellers of tobacco products to verify the buyer’s age when selling those products - Fine - Operation of a tobacconist’s shop - Suspension of trading licence for a period of 15 days - Principle of proportionality - Precautionary principle)
(2022/C 165/14)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: PJ

Respondents: Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli — Ufficio dei monopoli per la Toscana, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze

Operative part of the judgment

The principle of proportionality must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which, in the case of a first infringement of the prohibition on the sale of tobacco products to minors, provides, in addition to the imposition of an administrative fine, for the suspension, for a period of 15 days, of the trading licence authorising the economic operator who has infringed that prohibition to sell such products, provided that such legislation does not exceed the limits of what is appropriate and necessary in order to attain the objective of protecting human health and reducing, in particular, smoking prevalence among young people.


(1)  OJ C 423, 7.12.2020.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 23 February 2022 2022/C 88/02
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022088EN.01002301.xml










24.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 88/23






Euro exchange rates (1)

23 February 2022
(2022/C 88/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1344 




JPY


Japanese yen


130,58 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4388 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83463 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5658 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0431 




ISK


Iceland króna


141,20 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,0335 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,473 




HUF


Hungarian forint


357,25 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5481 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9468 




TRY


Turkish lira


15,6871 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5592 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4394 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8529 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6679 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5253 




KRW


South Korean won


1 350,23 




ZAR


South African rand


17,0508 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,1669 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5362 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 270,12 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7480 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,980 




RUB


Russian rouble


90,8791 




THB


Thai baht


36,601 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,6808 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,9079 




INR


Indian rupee


84,6135 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-283/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — CO and Others v MJ, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS), Council of the European Union, Eulex Kosovo (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) — European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) — Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP — Article 8(3) and (5), Article 9(3) and Article 10(3) — Status of employer of the mission staff — Article 16(5) — Subrogation)
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU police mission, Kosovo, civilian personnel, employer, rule of law








C_2022165EN.01000801.xml










19.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 165/8






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — CO and Others v MJ, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS), Council of the European Union, Eulex Kosovo
(Case C-283/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) - European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) - Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP - Article 8(3) and (5), Article 9(3) and Article 10(3) - Status of employer of the mission staff - Article 16(5) - Subrogation)
(2022/C 165/08)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: CO and Others

Defendants: MJ, European Commission, European External Action Service, Council of the European Union, Eulex Kosovo

Operative part of the judgment

Article 16(5) of Council Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP of 4 February 2008 on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, Eulex Kosovo, as amended by Council Decision 2014/349/CFSP of 12 June 2014, must be interpreted as meaning that, starting from 15 June 2014, it designates the Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, known as ‘Eulex Kosovo’, referred to in Article 1 of that joint action, as responsible and therefore as defendant in any action relating to the consequences of the implementation of the mission entrusted to it, irrespective of whether the facts underlying such an action occurred before 12 June 2014, the date when Decision 2014/349 entered into force.


(1)  OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.
Notice amending Innovative Health Initiative Joint Undertaking (IHI JU) – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Executive Director of the Innovative Health Initiative Joint Undertaking (IHI JU) (Temporary Agent – Grade AD 14) – COM/2022/20075 (OJ C 48 A, 31.1.2022)
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU initiative, European Joint Undertaking, administrator, competition (EU), health policy, innovation, job vacancy, managing director, recruitment, servant (EU)








CA2022088EN.01000101.xml










24.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 88/1






Notice amending Innovative Health Initiative Joint Undertaking (IHI JU) – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Executive Director of the Innovative Health Initiative Joint Undertaking (IHI JU) (Temporary Agent – Grade AD 14) – COM/2022/20075
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 48 A of 31 January 2022
)
(2022/C 88 A/01)
On page 5, ‘Closing date’, first paragraph:







for:




‘The closing date for registration is 28 February 2022, 12.00 noon Brussels time, following which registration is no longer possible.’,












read:




‘The closing date for registration is 14 March 2022, 12.00 noon Brussels time, following which registration is no longer possible.’.
Case C-150/22 P: Appeal brought on 24 February 2022 by HG against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 15 December 2021 in Case T-693/16 P RENV-RX, HG v Commission
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European official, administrative sanction, damages, disciplinary proceedings, family, housing, pay scale, posted worker








C_2022311EN.01000202.xml










16.8.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/2






Appeal brought on 24 February 2022 by HG against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 15 December 2021 in Case T-693/16 P RENV-RX, HG v Commission
(Case C-150/22 P)
(2022/C 311/03)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: HG (represented by: L. Levi, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
By order of 30 June 2022, the Court (Tenth Chamber) dismissed the appeal for manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court and ordered the appellant to bear his own costs.
Case C-129/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt (Germany) lodged on 24 February 2022 — EF v Stadt Offenbach am Main
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, foreign national, residence permit








C_2022237EN.01002701.xml










20.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 237/27






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt (Germany) lodged on 24 February 2022 — EF v Stadt Offenbach am Main
(Case C-129/22)
(2022/C 237/35)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: EF

Defendant: Stadt Offenbach am Main

Questions referred







1.


Can a third-country national who has been granted long-term resident status under Directive 2003/109/EC (1) by a first Member State (in casu, Italy) require the second Member State (in casu, Germany) to renew a residence permit issued to him or her in implementation of Article 14 et seq. of Directive 2003/109/EC without providing evidence of the continuing existence of long-term resident status?
If that question is answered in the negative:










2.


Must long-term resident status be presumed to continue to exist in the second Member State for the sole reason that the third-country national holds a long-term resident’s EU residence permit issued by the first Member State for an unlimited period, even though he or she has not resided for six years in the territory of the Member State which granted him or her that status?
If that question is answered in the negative:










3.


Is the second Member State empowered, in the context of the renewal of the residence permit, to assess whether long-term resident status has been lost in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 9(4) of Directive 2003/109/EC and to refuse renewal where appropriate, or is the first Member State competent to determine the subsequent loss of that status?
If that question is answered in the affirmative:










4.


In that case, does the examination of the ground for loss of status under the second subparagraph of Article 9(4) of Directive 2003/109/EC need to be transposed into national law in such a way that the constituent facts leading to loss of long-term resident status in the first Member State are specified, or is it sufficient for national law to provide, without referring specifically to the directive, that the second Member State may refuse the residence permit ‘if the foreign national loses his or her long-term resident status in another Member State of the European Union’?






(1)  Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (OJ 2004 L 16, p. 44).
Case C-226/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022 — Eurofer, European Steel Association, AISBL v European Commission, HBIS Group Serbia Iron & Steel LLC Belgrade (Appeal — Dumping — Imports of hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Brazil, Iran, Russia, Serbia and Ukraine — Termination of the proceedings against imports originating in Serbia — Determination of injury — Cumulative assessment of the effects of imports from more than one third country — Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Article 3(4) — Termination of the proceedings without measures — Article 9(2) — ‘Negligible’ imports — De minimis threshold — European Commission’s discretion)
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Serbia, anti-dumping duty, flat product, import (EU), iron, originating product, steel








C_2022165EN.01000601.xml










19.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 165/6






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022 — Eurofer, European Steel Association, AISBL v European Commission, HBIS Group Serbia Iron & Steel LLC Belgrade
(Case C-226/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Dumping - Imports of hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Brazil, Iran, Russia, Serbia and Ukraine - Termination of the proceedings against imports originating in Serbia - Determination of injury - Cumulative assessment of the effects of imports from more than one third country - Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Article 3(4) - Termination of the proceedings without measures - Article 9(2) - ‘Negligible’ imports - De minimis threshold - European Commission’s discretion)
(2022/C 165/05)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Eurofer, European Steel Association, AISBL (represented by: J. Killick and G. Forwood, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented: initially by T. Maxian Rusche and by A. Demeneix, and subsequently by T. Maxian Rusche and G. Luengo, acting as Agents), HBIS Group Serbia Iron & Steel LLC Belgrade (represented by: R. Luff, avocat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Eurofer, European Steel Association, AISBL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and HBIS Group Serbia Iron & Steel LLC Belgrade.






(1)  OJ C 313, 21.9.2020.
Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/306 of 24 February 2022 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria
Date: 2022-02-24
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








L_2022046EN.01009501.xml










25.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 46/95








            COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (CFSP) 2022/306
of 24 February 2022
         
implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP of 31 May 2013 concerning restrictive measures against Syria (1), and in particular Article 30(1) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 31 May 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/255/CFSP.












(2)


The entry for one deceased person should be deleted.












(3)


Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 24 February 2022.


For the Council


The President

A. PANNIER-RUNACHER
            





(1)  
            OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14.




ANNEX
The following entry is deleted from the list set out in Section A (Persons) of Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP:






32.


Mohammed Makhlouf.