do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-111/22 P: Appeal brought on 17 February 2022 by Helene Hamers against the judgment delivered by the General Court (First Chamber) on 21 December 2021 in Case T-159/20 Hamers v Cedefop
Date: 2022-02-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Greece, award of contract, criminal proceedings, indemnification, rights of the defence, servant (EU), temporary employment, tendering








C_2022222EN.01001101.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/11






Appeal brought on 17 February 2022 by Helene Hamers against the judgment delivered by the General Court (First Chamber) on 21 December 2021 in Case T-159/20 Hamers v Cedefop
(Case C-111/22 P)
(2022/C 222/18)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Appellant: Helene Hamers (represented by: Vasileios Spiridon Christianos, Alexandros Politis and Michail Rodopoulos, dikigoroi)

Other party to the proceedings: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop)

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside in part the judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2021 in Case T-159/20, Hamers v Cedefop, EU:T:2021:913,










—


if need be, refer the case back to the General Court for judgment,










—


order Cedefop to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The subject matter of the judgment under appeal was the harm suffered by the appellant due to acts and omissions of Cedefop before, during and subsequent to national criminal proceedings before the Greek judicial authorities, which concerned the regularity and lawfulness of the award of public contracts by Cedefop to third parties from 2001 to 2005.
The appellant raises two grounds of appeal and claims that the judgment under appeal:






—



first, in paragraphs 55 to 61 and 83, contains an error of law in the interpretation of Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’), because, contrary to the General Court’s finding in those paragraphs, the appellant was not examined impartially by Cedefop and, moreover, the decision of the Cedefop Appeals Committee did not remedy the flaw in the decision of 3 July 2019. At the same time, on those grounds, the General Court gave inadequate reasons in the paragraphs referred to above.










—



second, in paragraph 65, paragraphs 68 to 75 and paragraph 83, contains an error of law in the interpretation of the presumption of innocence relied on by the appellant pursuant to Article 48(1) of the Charter, which was also compounded by breach of the principle of sincere cooperation within the meaning of Article 4(3) of the Treaty on European Union. At the same time, on those grounds, the General Court gave inadequate reasons in the paragraphs referred to above.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10480 – GOLDMAN SACHS / NN INVESTMENT PARTNERS HOLDING) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 104/02
Date: 2022-02-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: banking, economic concentration, insurance, investment, investment company, merger control, securities, subsidiary








C_2022104EN.01000201.xml










4.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10480 – GOLDMAN SACHS / NN INVESTMENT PARTNERS HOLDING)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 104/02)
On 17 February 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10480. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-158/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 17 February 2022 — TAP Portugal v Myflyright GmbH
Date: 2022-02-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, consumer protection, crew, death, indemnification, medical examination, traveller








C_2022222EN.01001401.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/14






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 17 February 2022 — TAP Portugal v Myflyright GmbH
(Case C-158/22)
(2022/C 222/24)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Stuttgart

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: TAP Portugal

Respondent: Myflyright GmbH

Question referred

Is Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that an extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of that provision exists where a flight departing from an airport outside the base of the operating air carrier is cancelled because a crew member deployed on that flight (in casu the co-pilot), who has passed the prescribed regular medical examinations without restriction, dies suddenly and in a way that the air carrier is unable to foresee shortly before the flight or falls so seriously ill that he or she cannot perform the flight?


(1)  Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).
Notice of open Competition 2022/C 76/05
Date: 2022-02-17
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: assistant, competition (EU), information technology, information technology profession, job vacancy, recruitment








C_2022076EN.01000501.xml










17.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 76/5






Notice of open Competition
(2022/C 76/05)
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:
EPSO/AST/151/22 – ASSISTANTS (AST 4) IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT)

1.   

ICT infrastructures, cloud, networks and middleware



2.   

Digital workplace, office automation and mobile computing



3.   

Development/configuration, testing, operation and maintenance of IT applications and off-the-shelf solutions; Data management, data analytics and artificial intelligence



4.   
ICT security
The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal of the European Union C … A of 17 February 2022.
Further information can be found on the EPSO Internet: https://epso.europa.eu/
Case C-156/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 17 February 2022 — TAP Portugal v flightright GmbH
Date: 2022-02-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, consumer protection, crew, death, indemnification, medical examination, traveller








C_2022222EN.01001301.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/13






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 17 February 2022 — TAP Portugal v flightright GmbH
(Case C-156/22)
(2022/C 222/22)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Stuttgart

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: TAP Portugal

Respondent: flightright GmbH

Question referred

Is Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that an extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of that provision exists where a flight departing from an airport outside the base of the operating air carrier is cancelled because a crew member deployed on that flight (in casu the co-pilot), who has passed the prescribed regular medical examinations without restriction, dies suddenly and in a way that the air carrier is unable to foresee shortly before the flight or falls so seriously ill that he or she cannot perform the flight?


(1)  Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10605 – MACQUARIE REAL ESTATE / CPG VAN OOSTROM BEHEER / EDGE) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 76/07
Date: 2022-02-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, real estate business, real property, shareholder








C_2022076EN.01000701.xml










17.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 76/7






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10605 – MACQUARIE REAL ESTATE / CPG VAN OOSTROM BEHEER / EDGE)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 76/07)

1.   
On 9 February 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Macquarie Real Estate Management (Australia) Limited (‘Macquarie’, Australia), belonging to Macquarie Group,










—


C.P.G. van Oostrom Beheer B.V. (‘CPG’, the Netherlands),










—


EDGE Real Estate B.V. (‘EDGE’, the Netherlands), controlled by CPG.




Macquarie and CPG will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of EDGE.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for Macquarie: real estate asset managements. Macquarie belongs to the Macquarie Group, a global investment, banking and financial services provider,










—


for CPG: besides its shareholding in EDGE, CPG has no additional relevant economic activities,










—


for EDGE: real estate developer. EDGE is also active in the offering of (i) flexible workspaces and related services in EDGE-developed buildings and (ii) software as a service solution to optimise building performance.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10605 – MACQUARIE REAL ESTATE / CPG VAN OOSTROM BEHEER / EDGE
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2325 of 16 December 2021 establishing, pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council, the list of third countries and the list of control authorities and control bodies that have been recognised under Article 33(2) and (3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 for the purpose of importing organic products into the Union (Official Journal of the European Union L 465 of 29 December 2021)
Date: 2022-02-17
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: consumer protection, food inspection, import (EU), organic certification, organic farming, organic product, quality control of agricultural products, third country








L_2022035EN.01002301.xml










17.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 35/23







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2325 of 16 December 2021 establishing, pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council, the list of third countries and the list of control authorities and control bodies that have been recognised under Article 33(2) and (3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 for the purpose of importing organic products into the Union

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 465 of 29 December 2021
)


On page 37, in Annex II, in the entry for ‘BAȘAK Ekolojik Ürünler Kontrol ve Sertifikasyon Hizmetleri Tic. Ltd’, in the third row of the first column of the table in point 3:
for:


                  ‘TU-BIO-175’,

read:


                  ‘TR-BIO-175’.

On page 64, in Annex II, in the entry for ‘Food Safety SA’, regarding the digits in the code numbers in all rows of the first column of the table in point 3:
for:


                  ‘197’,

read:


                  ‘198’.
Case C-118/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 17 February 2022 — NG v Direktor na Glavna direktsia ‘Natsionalna politsia’ pri MVR — Sofia
Date: 2022-02-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: data protection, data-processing law, fight against crime, personal data, prevention of delinquency








C_2022191EN.01001801.xml










10.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/18






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 17 February 2022 — NG v Direktor na Glavna direktsia ‘Natsionalna politsia’ pri MVR — Sofia
(Case C-118/22)
(2022/C 191/23)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven administrativen sad

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: NG

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Direktor na Glavna direktsia ‘Natsionalna politsia’ pri MVR — Sofia

Question referred

Does the interpretation of Article 5 in conjunction with Article 13(2)(b) and (3) of Directive (EU) 2016/680 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA permit national legislative measures which lead to a virtually unrestricted right of competent authorities to process personal data for the purposes of prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and/or to the elimination of the data subject’s right to have the processing of his or her data restricted or to have them erased or destroyed?


(1)  OJ 2016 L 119, p. 89.
Notice of open competition 2022/C 76/06
Date: 2022-02-17
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), information technology, information technology profession, job vacancy, recruitment








C_2022076EN.01000601.xml










17.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 76/6






NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION
(2022/C 76/06)
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:
EPSO/AD/398/22 – INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) EXPERTS (AD 7/AD 8)






1.


ICT infrastructures, cloud, networks and middleware (AD 7)










2.


Digital workplace, office automation and mobile computing (AD 7)










3.


IT and data governance, programme/portfolio and project management, project management office (PMO), business and enterprise architecture (AD 7)










4.


Design, development/configuration, testing, operation and maintenance of IT applications and off-the-shelf solutions; Data management, data analytics and artificial intelligence (AD 7)










5.


ICT security (AD 8)




The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal of the European Union C … A of 17 February 2022.
Further information can be found on the EPSO Internet: https://epso.europa.eu/
Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2160 of 6 December 2021 amending Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses (Official Journal of the European Union L 436 of 7 December 2021)
Date: 2022-02-17
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: China, EU restrictive measure, Libya, North Korea, Russia, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, natural person








L_2022035EN.01002101.xml










17.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 35/21







Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2160 of 6 December 2021 amending Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 436 of 7 December 2021
)


On page 44, Annex, entry 12 in the table concerning Abderrahim AL-KANI, third column headed ‘Names’:
for:


                  ‘الرحيم الكاني عبد (Arabic spelling)’,

read:


                  ‘عبد الرحيم الكاني (Arabic spelling)’.
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2151 of 6 December 2021 implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1998 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses (Official Journal of the European Union L 436 of 7 December 2021)
Date: 2022-02-17
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: China, EU restrictive measure, Libya, North Korea, Russia, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, natural person








L_2022035EN.01002201.xml










17.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 35/22







Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2151 of 6 December 2021 implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1998 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 436 of 7 December 2021
)


On page 5, Annex, entry 12 in the table concerning Abderrahim AL-KANI, third column headed ‘Names’:
for:


                  ‘الرحيم الكاني عبد (Arabic spelling)’,

read:


                  ‘عبد الرحيم الكاني (Arabic spelling)’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10577 – FSN CAPITAL VI / OPTIGROUP / HYGAS / BFG / TPC) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 89/01
Date: 2022-02-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, intermediate goods, investment company, merger control, packaging, wholesale trade








C_2022089EN.01000101.xml










25.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 89/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10577 – FSN CAPITAL VI / OPTIGROUP / HYGAS / BFG / TPC)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 89/01)
On 17 February 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10577. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 16 February 2022 2022/C 76/03
Date: 2022-02-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022076EN.01000301.xml










17.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 76/3






Euro exchange rates (1)

16 February 2022
(2022/C 76/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1372 




JPY


Japanese yen


131,56 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4410 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83940 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5363 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0516 




ISK


Iceland króna


141,40 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,1095 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,365 




HUF


Hungarian forint


355,65 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4961 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9436 




TRY


Turkish lira


15,4810 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5859 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4416 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8712 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7108 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5291 




KRW


South Korean won


1 361,31 




ZAR


South African rand


17,2140 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,2101 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5295 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 232,55 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7595 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,346 




RUB


Russian rouble


85,3679 




THB


Thai baht


36,771 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,8765 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,1718 




INR


Indian rupee


85,3885 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-157/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 17 February 2022 — TAP Portugal v Myflyright GmbH
Date: 2022-02-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, consumer protection, crew, death, indemnification, medical examination, traveller








C_2022222EN.01001302.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/13






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 17 February 2022 — TAP Portugal v Myflyright GmbH
(Case C-157/22)
(2022/C 222/23)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Stuttgart

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: TAP Portugal

Respondent: Myflyright GmbH

Question referred

Is Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that an extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of that provision exists where a flight departing from an airport outside the base of the operating air carrier is cancelled because a crew member deployed on that flight (in casu the co-pilot), who has passed the prescribed regular medical examinations without restriction, dies suddenly and in a way that the air carrier is unable to foresee shortly before the flight or falls so seriously ill that he or she cannot perform the flight?


(1)  Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).