do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-485/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — XXXX v HR Rail SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2000/78/EC — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of disability — Dismissal of a worker who had become permanently incapable of performing the essential functions of the post — Staff member completing training as part of recruitment — Article 5 — Reasonable accommodation for people with disabilities — Requirement to reassign to another post — Obligation subject to it not being a disproportionate burden for the employer)
Date: 2022-02-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: discrimination based on disability, dismissal, equal treatment, labour law, probationary period, reassignment, worker with disabilities








C_2022148EN.01000302.xml










4.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/3






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — XXXX v HR Rail SA
(Case C-485/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 2000/78/EC - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of disability - Dismissal of a worker who had become permanently incapable of performing the essential functions of the post - Staff member completing training as part of recruitment - Article 5 - Reasonable accommodation for people with disabilities - Requirement to reassign to another post - Obligation subject to it not being a disproportionate burden for the employer)
(2022/C 148/04)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: XXXX

Defendant: HR Rail SA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5 of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘reasonable accommodation’ for disabled persons, within the meaning of that article requires that a worker, including someone undertaking a traineeship following his or her recruitment, who, owing to his or her disability, has been declared incapable of performing the essential functions of the post that he or she occupies, be assigned to another position for which he or she has the necessary competence, capability and availability, unless that measure imposes a disproportionate burden on the employer.


(1)  OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.
Case C-595/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — UE v ShareWood Switzerland AG, VF (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Law applicable to contractual obligations — Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) — Consumer contracts — Choice of applicable law — Article 6(4)(c) — Exclusion of contracts relating to a right in rem in immovable property or to a tenancy of immovable property — Contract of sale, including a lease agreement and a service agreement, relating to trees planted for the sole purpose of being harvested for profits)
Date: 2022-02-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: commercial contract, consumer protection, farm lease, harvest, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, private international law, sale, transfer of property, tree








C_2022148EN.01000701.xml










4.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/7






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — UE v ShareWood Switzerland AG, VF
(Case C-595/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Law applicable to contractual obligations - Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) - Consumer contracts - Choice of applicable law - Article 6(4)(c) - Exclusion of contracts relating to a right in rem in immovable property or to a tenancy of immovable property - Contract of sale, including a lease agreement and a service agreement, relating to trees planted for the sole purpose of being harvested for profits)
(2022/C 148/09)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: UE

Defendants: ShareWood Switzerland AG, VF

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(4)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (‘Rome I’) must be interpreted as meaning that a contract of sale, including a lease agreement and a service agreement, relating to trees planted on leased land for the sole purpose of being harvested for profit, does not constitute a ‘contract relating to a right in rem in immovable property or a tenancy of immovable property’ within the meaning of that provision.


(1)  OJ C 35, 1.2.2021.
Case C-9/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Grundstücksgemeinschaft Kollaustraße 136 v Finanzamt Hamburg-Oberalster (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 66 — Chargeability of VAT — The time the payment is received — Article 167 — Origin and scope of the right of input VAT deduction — Article 167a — Derogation — Cash accounting — Letting and subletting of a property used for industrial or commercial purposes)
Date: 2022-02-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, accounting, business lease, hiring, payment, tax relief








C_2022148EN.01000201.xml










4.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/2






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Grundstücksgemeinschaft Kollaustraße 136 v Finanzamt Hamburg-Oberalster
(Case C-9/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 66 - Chargeability of VAT - The time the payment is received - Article 167 - Origin and scope of the right of input VAT deduction - Article 167a - Derogation - Cash accounting - Letting and subletting of a property used for industrial or commercial purposes)
(2022/C 148/02)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Grundstücksgemeinschaft Kollaustraße 136

Defendant: Finanzamt Hamburg-Oberalster

Operative part of the judgment

Article 167 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of valued added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2010/45/EU of 13 July 2010, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which provides that the right of input tax deduction arises at the time the transaction takes place if, pursuant to a national derogation under point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 66 of Directive 2006/112, such as amended by Directive 2010/45, the tax becomes chargeable to the supplier of goods or services only when the remuneration is received and has not yet been paid.


(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.
Calls for proposals and related activities under the EIC Work Programme 2022 under Horizon Europe - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) 2022/C 69/10
Date: 2022-02-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European Commission
Subjects: EU office or agency, Framework Programme for Research and Development, action programme, innovation, invitation to tender, research and development








C_2022069EN.01001001.xml










10.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 69/10






Calls for proposals and related activities under the EIC Work Programme 2022 under Horizon Europe - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027)
(2022/C 69/10)
Notice is hereby given of the launch of calls for proposals and related activities under the EIC Work Programme 2022 under Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027).
The Commission has adopted the EIC Work Programme 2022 by Decision C(2022) 701 of 7 February 2022.
Proposals are invited for these calls. The EIC Work Programme 2022, including deadlines and budgets, is available through the Funding & Tender opportunities website along with information on the modalities of the calls and related activities and the information for applicants on how to submit proposals:
https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/home
Case C-191/21: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Lyon — France) — Ministre de l’Economie, des Finances et de la Relance v Les Anges d’Eux SARL, Echo 5 SARL, Cletimmo SAS (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 392 — Margin taxation scheme — Scope — Supply of buildings and building land purchased for the purpose of resale — Taxable person for whom the VAT on the purchase of buildings was not deductible — Resale subject to VAT — Concept of ‘building land’)
Date: 2022-02-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, building, building plot, purchase, real property, sale, supply, tax on income, tax relief, taxpayer








C_2022138EN.01000401.xml










28.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/4






Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Lyon — France) — Ministre de l’Economie, des Finances et de la Relance v Les Anges d’Eux SARL, Echo 5 SARL, Cletimmo SAS
(Case C-191/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 392 - Margin taxation scheme - Scope - Supply of buildings and building land purchased for the purpose of resale - Taxable person for whom the VAT on the purchase of buildings was not deductible - Resale subject to VAT - Concept of ‘building land’)
(2022/C 138/04)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour administrative d’appel de Lyon

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Ministre de l’Economie, des Finances et de la Relance

Respondents: Les Anges d’Eux SARL, Echo 5 SARL, Cletimmo SAS

Operative part of the order

Article 392 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax is to be interpreted as precluding the application of the margin taxation scheme to transactions involving the supply of building land where that purchased land which has been built on has become, between the time of its purchase and the time at which it is resold by the taxable person, building land; however, it is to be interpreted as not precluding the application of that scheme to transactions involving the supply of building land where that land has been subject, between the time of its purchase and the time at which it is resold by the taxable person, to alterations such as its partitioning into lots.


(1)  Date of filing: 25.3.2021.