do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Council Recommendation (EU) 2022/108 of 25 January 2022 amending Recommendation (EU) 2020/1632 as regards a coordinated approach to facilitate safe travel during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Schengen area (Official Journal of the European Union L 18 of 27 January 2022)
Date: 2022-02-10
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Schengen Agreement, area of freedom, security and justice, border control, coronavirus disease, disease prevention, epidemic, internal border of the EU, public health, traveller








L_2022029EN.01004401.xml










10.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 29/44







Corrigendum to Council Recommendation (EU) 2022/108 of 25 January 2022 amending Recommendation (EU) 2020/1632 as regards a coordinated approach to facilitate safe travel during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Schengen area

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 18 of 27 January 2022
)








1.


On pages 124 and 125, recitals 6 and 7:




for:







‘(6)


In order to take account of developments in the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic since the adoption of Recommendation (EU) 2020/1475, the Council has, on the basis of a proposal by the Commission, replaced that Recommendation with Recommendation (EU) 2022/108.










(7)


In order to ensure that the common criteria, thresholds and framework of measures applied by Member States to facilitate safe travel within the area without controls at internal borders during the COVID-19 pandemic remain up-to-date and fully aligned with the common approach intended to facilitate the freedom of movement as laid down in Recommendation (EU) 2022/108, the reference in Council Recommendation (EU) 2020/1632 to Recommendation (EU) 2020/1475 should be replaced by a reference to Recommendation (EU) 2022/108.’,





read:







‘(6)


In order to take account of developments in the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic since the adoption of Recommendation (EU) 2020/1475, the Council has, on the basis of a proposal by the Commission, replaced that Recommendation with Recommendation (EU) 2022/107.










(7)


In order to ensure that the common criteria, thresholds and framework of measures applied by Member States to facilitate safe travel within the area without controls at internal borders during the COVID-19 pandemic remain up-to-date and fully aligned with the common approach intended to facilitate the freedom of movement as laid down in Recommendation (EU) 2022/107, the reference in Council Recommendation (EU) 2020/1632 to Recommendation (EU) 2020/1475 should be replaced by a reference to Recommendation (EU) 2022/107.’.











2.


On page 126:




for:


                  ‘In the sole recommendation, “Council Recommendation (EU) 2020/1475” is replaced by “Council Recommendation (EU) 2022/108”.’,

read:


                  ‘In the sole recommendation, “Council Recommendation (EU) 2020/1475” is replaced by “Council Recommendation (EU) 2022/107”.’
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2268 of 6 September 2021 amending the regulatory technical standards laid down in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/653 as regards the underpinning methodology and presentation of performance scenarios, the presentation of costs and the methodology for the calculation of summary cost indicators, the presentation and content of information on past performance and the presentation of costs by packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs) offering a range of options for investment and alignment of the transitional arrangement for PRIIP manufacturers offering units of funds referred to in Article 32 of Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as underlying investment options with the prolonged transitional arrangement laid down in that Article (Official Journal of the European Union L 455 I of 20 December 2021)
Date: 2022-02-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union, European Commission
Subjects: consumer information, disclosure of information, financial legislation, financial services, insurance, investment company, regulation of investments, technical standard








L_2022029EN.01004601.xml










10.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 29/46







Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2268 of 6 September 2021 amending the regulatory technical standards laid down in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/653 as regards the underpinning methodology and presentation of performance scenarios, the presentation of costs and the methodology for the calculation of summary cost indicators, the presentation and content of information on past performance and the presentation of costs by packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs) offering a range of options for investment and alignment of the transitional arrangement for PRIIP manufacturers offering units of funds referred to in Article 32 of Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as underlying investment options with the prolonged transitional arrangement laid down in that Article

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 455 I of 20 December 2021
)


On page 41, in Annex VI, in points (25) and (26) of the amendments to Annex VI to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/653:
for:






‘(25)


after point 75, the following heading is inserted:

                                 “
                                 Specific requirements for PRIIPs with a recommended holding period of less than one year
                                 ”;










(26)


after point 76, heading ‘Calculation of ratios’ is deleted;’,




read:






‘(25)


after point 76, heading ‘Calculation of ratios’ is replaced by the following heading: “Specific requirements for PRIIPs with a recommended holding period of less than 1 year”;’.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/183 of 10 February 2022 implementing Article 21(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya
Date: 2022-02-10
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Libya, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








L_2022030EN.01000101.xml










11.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 30/1








            COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/183
of 10 February 2022
         
implementing Article 21(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 of 18 January 2016 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya and repealing Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 (1), and in particular Article 21(5) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 18 January 2016, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2016/44.












(2)


On 28 January 2022, the United Nations Security Council (‘UNSC’) Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1970 (2011) amended the listing for one person subject to restrictive measures.












(3)


Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 10 February 2022.


For the Council


The President

J.-Y. LE DRIAN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.




ANNEX
In Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2016/44, entry 15 is replaced by the following:

‘15.   Name: 1: SAADI 2: QADHAFI 3: na 4: na


Title: na Designation: Commander Special Forces DOB: a)
               27 May 1973
               b)
               1 Jan. 1975
               POB: Tripoli, Libya Good quality a.k.a.: na Low quality a.k.a.: na Nationality: na Passport no: a) 014797 b) 524521 c) Libya number AA862825, issued on 19 May 2021, issued in Tripoli (expires 18 May 2029) National identification no: na Address: Libya (in custody) Listed on:
               26 Feb. 2011 (amended on 28 Jan. 2022, 26 Mar. 2015, 2 Apr. 2012, 14 Mar. 2012) Other information: Listed pursuant to paragraph 15 of resolution 1970 (Travel Ban). Listed on 17 March 2011 pursuant to paragraph 17 of resolution 1970 (Asset Freeze).’
Case T-434/21: Order of the General Court of 10 February 2022 — TO v EEA (Civil service — Compliance with a judgment of the General Court — Decision which was not contested in time — Res judicata — Conditional undertaking given by the AECC in the context of a favourable out-of-court settlement — Settlement offer not accepted by the applicant — No act adversely affecting the applicant — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2022-02-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: allowances and expenses, alternative dispute resolution, damages, data protection, disclosure of information, personal data, servant (EU), severance pay








C_2022165EN.01003401.xml










19.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 165/34






Order of the General Court of 10 February 2022 — TO v EEA
(Case T-434/21) (1)

(Civil service - Compliance with a judgment of the General Court - Decision which was not contested in time - Res judicata - Conditional undertaking given by the AECC in the context of a favourable out-of-court settlement - Settlement offer not accepted by the applicant - No act adversely affecting the applicant - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 165/43)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: TO (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Environment Agency (represented by: O. Cornu, acting as Agent, supported by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking, in the first place, annulment of the decision of 21 September 2020 by which the EEA, (i) refused to comply with the judgment of the Court of 11 June 2019, TO v EEA (T-462/17, not published, EU:T:2019:397) and (ii) rejected the requests made by the applicant on 16 September 2020 and, in the second place, an order requiring the EEA to pay the applicant, (i) the sum corresponding to the compensation in lieu of notice and the installation allowance, together with interest as from 22 September 2016, (ii) the sum of EUR 20 000 in compensation for the alleged non-material damage suffered on account of the disclosure of her personal data to third parties and (iii) the sum of EUR 20 000 in compensation for the alleged non-material damage suffered on account of the refusal to disclose to her the correspondence exchanged with her previous counsel both before and after the delivery of that judgment.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Orders TO to pay, in addition to her own costs, those incurred by the European Environment Agency (EEA).






(1)  OJ C 349 of 30.8.2021.
Case C-90/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 10 February 2022 — ‘Gjensidige’ ADB
Date: 2022-02-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: international convention, international road transport, international transport, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction, public order








C_2022237EN.01002402.xml










20.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 237/24






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 10 February 2022 — ‘Gjensidige’ ADB
(Case C-90/22)
(2022/C 237/32)
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant in cassation:‘Gjensidige’ ADB

Other parties:‘Rhenus Logistics’ UAB, ‘ACC Distribution’ UAB

Questions referred







1.


Can Article 71 of Regulation No 1215/2012, (1) having regard to Articles 25, 29 and 31 and recitals 21 and 22 thereof, be interpreted as permitting the application of Article 31 of the CMR Convention also in cases where a dispute falling within the scope of both those legal instruments is the subject of an agreement conferring jurisdiction?










2.


Having regard to the legislature’s intention to strengthen the protection of agreements conferring jurisdiction in the European Union, can Article 45(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation No 1215/2012 be interpreted more broadly, as covering not only Section 6 of Chapter II of that regulation but also Section 7 thereof?










3.


After assessment of the specific features of the situation and the resulting legal consequences, can the term ‘public policy’ used in Regulation No 1215/2012 be interpreted as covering the ground for deciding not to recognise a judgment of another Member State where the application of a specialised convention, such as the CMR Convention, creates a legal situation in which both the agreement conferring jurisdiction and the agreement on the applicable law are not observed in the same case?






(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1).
Case C-499/20: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias — Greece) — DIMCO Dimovasili M.I.K.E. v Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Directive 97/23/EC — Pressure equipment — CE marking — Placing on the market and putting into service — Restrictions aimed at ensuring the protection of persons — Articles 34 and 36 TFEU — National legislation imposing restrictions on the method of installation of gas pipes)
Date: 2022-02-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EC conformity marking, approximation of laws, earthquake, gas pipeline, market approval, natural gas, pressure equipment, safety standard, technical standard








C_2022148EN.01000501.xml










4.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/5






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias — Greece) — DIMCO Dimovasili M.I.K.E. v Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias
(Case C-499/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Directive 97/23/EC - Pressure equipment - CE marking - Placing on the market and putting into service - Restrictions aimed at ensuring the protection of persons - Articles 34 and 36 TFEU - National legislation imposing restrictions on the method of installation of gas pipes)
(2022/C 148/06)
Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Symvoulio tis Epikrateias

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: DIMCO Dimovasili M.I.K.E.

Defendant: Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(1)(1.1) of, and Annex I to, Directive 97/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 May 1997 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning pressure equipment, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 September 2003, read in conjunction with Article 2(2) of Directive 97/23, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which, in order to ensure the safety of persons, in particular against earthquakes, lays down certain methods of installation for pressure equipment, such as pipes for the transport of gas, including those with the CE marking, provided that that legislation does not lead to any modification of that equipment and does not constitute an obstacle prohibited by Articles 34 and 36 TFEU.


(1)  OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2021/2116 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 (Official Journal of the European Union L 435 of 6 December 2021)
Date: 2022-02-10
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, EU financing arrangements, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, common agricultural policy, rural development








L_2022029EN.01004501.xml










10.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 29/45







Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2021/2116 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 435 of 6 December 2021
)








1.


On page 256, Article 104(1), second subparagraph, point (a)(iii):




for:






‘(iii)


for the aid schemes referred to in Article 5(6), first subparagraph, point (c), and Article 5(7) of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council (36) in relation to expenditure incurred and payments made for operations implemented pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 after 31 December 2022 and until the end of those aid schemes; and’,




read:






‘(iii)


for the aid schemes referred to in Article 5(6), first subparagraph, point (c), and Article 5(7) of Regulation (EU) 2021/2117 of the European Parliament and of the Council (36) in relation to expenditure incurred and payments made for operations implemented pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 after 31 December 2022 and until the end of those aid schemes; and’.










2.


On page 256, footnote 36:




for:







‘(36)


Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021 amending Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products, (EU) No 1151/2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs, (EU) No 251/2014 on the definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of aromatised wine products and (EU) No 228/2013 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union (see page 1 of this Official Journal).’,





read:







‘(36)


Regulation (EU) 2021/2117 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021 amending Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products, (EU) No 1151/2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs, (EU) No 251/2014 on the definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of aromatised wine products and (EU) No 228/2013 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union (see page 262 of this Official Journal).’.
Case C-101/22 P: Appeal brought on 10 February 2022 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 1 December 2021 in Case T-546/20, Sopra Steria Benelux and Unisys Belgium v Commission
Date: 2022-02-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, information technology industry, public procurement, services contract, tendering








C_2022207EN.01001401.xml










23.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 207/14






Appeal brought on 10 February 2022 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 1 December 2021 in Case T-546/20, Sopra Steria Benelux and Unisys Belgium v Commission
(Case C-101/22 P)
(2022/C 207/19)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: L. André, M. Ilkova, O. Verheecke, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Sopra Steria Benelux, Unisys Belgium

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside paragraphs 52 to 57, 60, 61, 66, 68 and 69 of the judgment under appeal;










—


dismiss the action for annulment;










—


order Sopra Steria Benelux and Unisys Belgium to pay the costs of the present proceedings before the Court of Justice and of the proceedings before the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In its appeal, the Commission raises three grounds of appeal.
The first ground alleges that the General Court erred in law by qualifying the letter of the applicants at first instance of 10 July 2020 as an ‘express request’ for the reasons which led the contracting authority not to consider the successful tender as appearing to be abnormally low.
The second ground alleges a distortion of the facts, by incorrectly assessing the content of the Commission’s reply of 20 July 2020.
The third ground alleges failure to have regard to the scope of the contracting authority’s obligation to state reasons under Article 296 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 170(3) of the Financial Regulation where the contracting authority considers that the successful tender does not appear to be abnormally low.
Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/189 of 10 February 2022 implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya
Date: 2022-02-10
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Libya, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








L_2022030EN.01011501.xml










11.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 30/115








            COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (CFSP) 2022/189
of 10 February 2022
         
implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 of 31 July 2015 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya, and repealing Decision 2011/137/CFSP (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 31 July 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333.












(2)


On 28 January 2022, the United Nations Security Council (‘UNSC’) Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1970 (2011) amended the listing for one person subject to restrictive measures.












(3)


Annexes I and III to Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Annexes I and III to Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 are hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 10 February 2022.


For the Council


The President

J.-Y. LE DRIAN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 206, 1.8.2015, p. 34.




ANNEX
In Annex I and Annex III to Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333, entry 15 is replaced by the following:

‘15.   Name: 1: SAADI 2: QADHAFI 3: na 4: na


Title: na Designation: Commander Special Forces DOB: a)
               27 May 1973
               b)
               1 Jan. 1975
               POB: Tripoli, Libya Good quality a.k.a.: na Low quality a.k.a.: na Nationality: na Passport no: a) 014797 b) 524521 c) Libya number AA862825, issued on 19 May 2021, issued in Tripoli (expires 18 May 2029) National identification no: na Address: Libya (in custody) Listed on:
               26 Feb. 2011 (amended on 28 Jan. 2022, 26 Mar. 2015, 2 Apr. 2012, 14 Mar. 2012) Other information: Listed pursuant to paragraph 15 of resolution 1970 (Travel Ban). Listed on 17 March 2011 pursuant to paragraph 17 of resolution 1970 (Asset Freeze).’