do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-799/17: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — Scania and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Truck manufacturers market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Agreements and concerted practices in relation to the prices of trucks, the timing for the introduction of emission technologies and the passing on to customers of the costs relating to those technologies — ‘Hybrid’ procedure staggered over time — Presumption of innocence — Principle of impartiality — Charter of Fundamental Rights — Single and continuous infringement — Restriction of competition by object — Geographic scope of the infringement — Fine — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Unlimited jurisdiction)
Date: 2022-02-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: cartel, control of restrictive practices, equal treatment, large vehicle, motor vehicle industry, motor vehicle pollution, price agreement, principle of proportionality, rights of the defence, sanction (EU)








C_2022128EN.01001402.xml










21.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 128/14






Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — Scania and Others v Commission
(Case T-799/17) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Truck manufacturers market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Agreements and concerted practices in relation to the prices of trucks, the timing for the introduction of emission technologies and the passing on to customers of the costs relating to those technologies - ‘Hybrid’ procedure staggered over time - Presumption of innocence - Principle of impartiality - Charter of Fundamental Rights - Single and continuous infringement - Restriction of competition by object - Geographic scope of the infringement - Fine - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Unlimited jurisdiction)
(2022/C 128/19)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Scania AB (Södertälje, Sweden), Scania CV AB (Södertälje), Scania Deutschland GmbH (Koblenz, Germany) (represented by: D. Arts, F. Miotto, C. Pommiès, K. Schillemans, C. Langenius, L. Ulrichs, P. Hammarskiöld, S. Falkner and N. De Backer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Farley and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2017) 6467 final of 27 September 2017, relating to proceedings under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) (Case AT.39824 — Trucks) or, in the alternative, a reduction of the fines imposed on the applicants in that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Scania AB, Scania CV AB and Scania Deutschland GmbH to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 42, 5.2.2018.
Case T-694/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — Canisius v EUIPO — Beiersdorf (CCLABELLE VIENNA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark CCLABELLE VIENNA — Earlier EU word mark LABELLO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2022-02-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, toiletries, trade-mark law








C_2022128EN.01002201.xml










21.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 128/22






Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — Canisius v EUIPO — Beiersdorf (CCLABELLE VIENNA)
(Case T-694/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark CCLABELLE VIENNA - Earlier EU word mark LABELLO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2022/C 128/31)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Maria Alexandra Canisius (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: H. Asenbauer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Beiersdorf AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: J. Fuhrmann and V. von Bomhard, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 September 2020 (Case R 2233/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Beiersdorf and Ms Canisius.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ms Maria Alexandra Canisius to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.