do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 28 January 2022 2022/C 48/01
Date: 2022-01-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022048EN.01000101.xml










31.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 48/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

28 January 2022
(2022/C 48/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1138 




JPY


Japanese yen


128,68 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4432 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83178 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5520 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0378 




ISK


Iceland króna


144,00 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,0260 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,443 




HUF


Hungarian forint


358,42 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5755 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9463 




TRY


Turkish lira


15,1424 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5971 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4239 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6810 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7031 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5109 




KRW


South Korean won


1 349,47 




ZAR


South African rand


17,3844 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,0857 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5290 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 047,76 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6668 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,028 




RUB


Russian rouble


86,6113 




THB


Thai baht


37,229 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,0147 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,1854 




INR


Indian rupee


83,6015 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-58/22: Action brought on 31 January 2022 — Labaš v EUIPO (FRESH)
Date: 2022-01-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, business management, foodstuff, marketing, packaging, registered trade mark, retail trade, storage, trade-mark law, wholesale trade








C_2022138EN.01002801.xml










28.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/28






Action brought on 31 January 2022 — Labaš v EUIPO (FRESH)
(Case T-58/22)
(2022/C 138/32)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Miroslav Labaš (Košice, Slovakia) (represented by: M. Vasiľ, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark FRESH — Application for registration No 18 311 155

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 November 2021 in Case R 610/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in its entirety;










—


or alternatively, annul part of the contested decision with regards to the Classes 35 and 39 specified in the contested application;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of the applicant.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Lack of the definition of the direct link between the sign FRESH and its inadmissibility to be registered for goods and services in Classes 35 and 39.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10539 – SOUTH32 / KGHM / SIERRA GORDA) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 63/03
Date: 2022-01-31
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, metals, mineral resources, mining industry








C_2022063EN.01000301.xml










7.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10539 – SOUTH32 / KGHM / SIERRA GORDA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 63/03)
On 31 January 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10539. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-28/21: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 31 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi — Poland) — TM v EJ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles — Directive 2009/103/EC — Article 3 — Compulsory cover of damage to property — Scope — Legislation of a Member State excluding loss of earnings from cover by compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles)
Date: 2022-01-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: compulsory insurance, damage, damages, insurance law, motor vehicle insurance, third-party insurance








C_2022222EN.01000401.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/4






Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 31 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi — Poland) — TM v EJ
(Case C-28/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles - Directive 2009/103/EC - Article 3 - Compulsory cover of damage to property - Scope - Legislation of a Member State excluding loss of earnings from cover by compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles)
(2022/C 222/05)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: TM

Defendant: EJ

Operative part of the order

Must the first paragraph of Article 3 of Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability be interpreted as not precluding a provision of national law under which compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles does not cover damage consisting of loss of earnings, on condition that that limitation of cover applies without any difference in treatment depending on the Member State of residence of the injured party or of the owner or holder of the damaged vehicle.


(1)  OJ C 182, 10.5.2021.
Case T-61/22: Action brought on 31 January 2022 — OD v Eurojust
Date: 2022-01-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: abuse of power, conflict of interest, damages, rights of the defence, staff regulations (EU), work contract








C_2022119EN.01005702.xml










14.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 119/57






Action brought on 31 January 2022 — OD v Eurojust
(Case T-61/22)
(2022/C 119/81)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: OD (represented by: N de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of 17 June 2021;










—


annul, in so far as necessary, inasmuch as it provides an additional statement of reasons, the decision of 21 October 2021;










—


order the Agency to provide the applicant with compensation in the sum of EUR 35 000ex aequo et bono for psychological, material and non-material harm;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action against the transfer decision, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of confidentiality connected with the request for assistance and a lack of appearance of impartiality as regards the treatment of the applicant’s file by Eurojust.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging a lack of competence to take the contested decision on the part of the Administrative Director, based on his having a conflict of interest, his lack of impartiality towards the applicant, or at least a lack of appearance of impartiality on his part, and infringement of the rules for replacing an authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment in the event of inability to intervene.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging abuse of process and misuse of powers by the Administrative Director.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging that the transfer of the applicant in the alleged interest of the service was carried out in breach of the duty to have regard for the welfare of staff, without taking into consideration either the interest of the member of staff or the interest of the service and without observance of the right to be heard and the need to state the reasons for the decision affecting the interests of the member of staff concerned.
Recommendation No 1/2022 of the EU-PLO Joint Committee of 31 January 2022 approving the extension of the EU-PA Action Plan [2022/253]
Date: 2022-01-31
Institutions: European Union, Joint Committee, Palestine Liberation Organisation
Subjects: Mediterranean region (EU), Palestine, Palestine Liberation Organisation, Union for the Mediterranean, action programme, association agreement (EU), cooperation agreement (EU), interim agreement (EU), trade agreement, trade agreement (EU)








L_2022041EN.01003601.xml










22.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 41/36








            RECOMMENDATION No 1/2022 OF THE EU-PLO JOINT COMMITTEE
         
of 31 January 2022
         
approving the extension of the EU-PA Action Plan [2022/253]


THE EU-PLO JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement on trade and cooperation between the European Community, of the one part, and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) for the benefit of the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, of the other part (1),

Whereas:







(1)


The Euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement on trade and cooperation between the European Community, of the one part, and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) for the benefit of the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, of the other part (the ‘Interim Association Agreement’) was signed on 24 February 1997 and entered into force on 1 July 1997.












(2)


Pursuant to Article 63 of the Interim Association Agreement, the Joint Committee has the power to take decisions and make appropriate recommendations.












(3)


Article 10 of the Rules of Procedure of the Joint Committee provides for the possibility of taking decisions by written procedure between sessions if both Parties so agree.












(4)


The extension of the EU-PA Action Plan for three years will give the Parties the opportunity to take forward their cooperation for the coming years, including through the possible negotiation of partnership priorities,





HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RECOMENDATION:



Article 1
The Joint Committee, acting by written procedure, recommends that the EU-PA Action Plan be extended for three years as of the date of the adoption of this Recommendation.


Article 2
This Recommendation shall take effect on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 31 January 2022.


For the EU-PLO Joint Committee


The Chairperson

Estephan SALAMEH
            





(1)  
            OJ L 187, 16.7.1997, p. 3.
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1 of 20 October 2021 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of dual-use items (Official Journal of the European Union L 3 of 6 January 2022)
Date: 2022-01-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: customs regulations, dual-use good, export (EU), export monitoring, non-proliferation of arms, trade restriction, transit




L_2022020EN.01028201.xml










31.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 20/282







Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1 of 20 October 2021 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of dual-use items

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 3 of 6 January 2022
)


On page 142, in the Annex, point 3B001.f is replaced as follows:






‘f.


Lithography equipment as follows:






1.


Align and expose step and repeat (direct step on wafer) or step and scan (scanner) equipment for wafer processing using photo-optical or X-ray methods and having any of the following:






a.


A light source wavelength shorter than 193 nm; or











b.


Capable of producing a pattern with a 'Minimum Resolvable Feature size' (MRF) of 45 nm or less;


Technical Note:



The 'Minimum Resolvable Feature size' (MRF) is calculated by the following formula:







where the K factor = 0,35















2.


Imprint lithography equipment capable of producing features of 45 nm or less;








Note:





3B001.f.2. includes:







—



Micro contact printing tools











—



Hot embossing tools











—



Nano-imprint lithography tools











—



Step and flash imprint lithography (S-FIL) tools



















3.


Equipment specially designed for mask making having all of the following:






a.


A deflected focussed electron beam, ion beam or "laser" beam; and











b.


Having any of the following:






1.


A full-width half-maximum (FWHM) spot size smaller than 65 nm and an image placement less than 17 nm (mean + 3 sigma); or











2.


Not used;










3.


A second-layer overlay error of less than 23 nm (mean + 3 sigma) on the mask;


















4.


Equipment designed for device processing using direct writing methods, having all of the following:






a.


A deflected focused electron beam; and











b.


Having any of the following:






1.


A minimum beam size equal to or smaller than 15 nm; or











2.


An overlay error less than 27 nm (mean + 3 sigma);’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10509 – MIRA / OTPP / PGGM / BCI / OMERS / AIMCO / PUGET) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 63/01
Date: 2022-01-31
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy production, energy transport, gas supply, investment, investment company, merger control, natural gas








C_2022063EN.01000101.xml










7.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10509 – MIRA / OTPP / PGGM / BCI / OMERS / AIMCO / PUGET)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 63/01)
On 31 January 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10509. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.