do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10301 – CVC / ETHNIKI) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 44/11
Date: 2022-01-28
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, indemnity insurance, investment company, life assurance, merger control, reinsurance








C_2022044EN.01002601.xml










28.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/26






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10301 – CVC / ETHNIKI)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 44/11)

1.   
On 20 January 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


CVC Capital Partners SICAV FIS S.A. (‘CVC’, Luxemburg)










—


The Ethniki Hellenic General Insurance Company S.A. (‘Ethniki’, Greece)




CVC acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Ethniki.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned:






—


CVC, its subsidiaries and affiliated companies are privately owned entities whose activities include providing investment advice to and/or managing investments on behalf of certain investment funds and platforms. One of CVC’s portfolio companies is the Hellenic Healthcare Group (‘HHG’), which operates six private hospitals in Greece.










—


Ethniki is a composite insurer predominantly focused on Greece, with limited activities in Cyprus and Romania. Its activities include a range of life and non-life insurance products, insurance distribution and, to a de minimis extent, reinsurance. The Target is currently owned by the National Bank of Greece and is being sold pursuant to the NBG’s restructuring plan entered into with the Commission.






3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10301 – CVC / ETHNIKI
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Case T-60/22: Action brought on 28 January 2022 — Chambre de commerce et d’industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne v EUIPO — Ambrosetti Group Ltd (TEHA)
Date: 2022-01-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, business management, business tourism, computer equipment, consultancy, financial services, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law, updating of skills








C_2022128EN.01003101.xml










21.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 128/31






Action brought on 28 January 2022 — Chambre de commerce et d’industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne v EUIPO — Ambrosetti Group Ltd (TEHA)
(Case T-60/22)
(2022/C 128/43)
Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties


Applicant: Chambre de commerce et d’industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne (Châlons-en-Champagne, France) (represented by: T. de Haan, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ambrosetti Group Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union of figurative mark TEHA — International registration designating the European Union No 1 404 100

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 November 2021 in Case R 839/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant’s legal predecessor for the purposes of the proceedings before the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-53/22: Action brought on 28 January 2022 — Collard v Parliament and ID
Date: 2022-01-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, appointment of members, disciplinary proceedings, political group (EP), powers of the institutions (EU)








C_2022158EN.01001001.xml










11.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 158/10






Action brought on 28 January 2022 — Collard v Parliament and ID
(Case T-53/22)
(2022/C 158/11)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Gilbert Collard (Vauvert, France) (represented by: B. Kuchukian, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament and the political group Identity and Democracy (ID)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul, first, the provisional suspensory decision of 22 January 2022 and, second, the expulsion decision of 25 January 2022;










—


order the immediate suspension of both decisions.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action seeking the annulment, first, of the decision of 22 January 2022 of the bureau of the political group Identity and Democracy (ID) suspending him from the group for a period of two months and, second, of the decision of 25 January 2022 of the political group Identity and Democracy (ID) expelling him from that group, the applicant complains that, as to form, those decisions do not comply with the basic disciplinary process and, as to substance, they have no valid basis.
Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products on 28 January 2022 (Published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 136, 30.4.2004, p. 1.)) 2022/C 43 I/01
Date: 2022-01-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, coronavirus disease, drug surveillance, market approval, marketing standard, medicinal product








CI2022043EN.01000101.xml










28.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CI 43/1






Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products on 28 January 2022


(Published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1))

(2022/C 43 I/01)






—



Issuing of a marketing authorisation (Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council): Accepted













Date of the decision


Name of the medicinal product


INN (International Non-Proprietary Name)


Holder of the marketing authorisation


Number of the entry in the Community Register


Pharmaceutical form


ATC code (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Code)


Date of notification




28.1.2022


Paxlovid


(1R,2S,5S)-N-((1S)-1-Cyano-2-((3S)-2-oxopyrrolidin-3-yl)ethyl)-3-((2S)-3,3-dimethyl-2-(2,2,2-trifluoroacetamido)butanoyl)-6,6-dimethyl-3-azabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-2-carboxamide / ritonavir


Pfizer Europe MA EEIG Boulevard de la Plaine 17, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgique/ Pleinlaan 17, 1050 Brussel, België


EU/1/22/1625


Film-coated tablet


Pending


28.1.2022




Anyone wishing to consult the public assessment report on the medicinal products in question and the decisions relating thereto is invited to contact:





European Medicines Agency




Domenico Scarlattilaan 6




1083 HS Amsterdam




NETHERLANDS










(1)  OJ L 136, 30.4.2004, p. 1.
Special report No 3/2022 5G roll-out in the EU: delays in deployment of networks with security issues remaining unresolved 2022/C 44/08
Date: 2022-01-28
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: 5G, critical infrastructure security, digital single market, digital technology, information security, information technology, new technology, regulation of telecommunications, trans-European network, transmission network








C_2022044EN.01002301.xml










28.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/23






Special report No 3/2022
5G roll-out in the EU: delays in deployment of networks with security issues remaining unresolved
(2022/C 44/08)
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that special report No 3/2022 ‘5G roll-out in the EU: delays in deployment of networks with security issues remaining unresolved’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ Internet: http://eca.europa.eu.
Case T-57/22: Action brought on 28 January 2022 — Hungary v Commission
Date: 2022-01-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, eligibility criteria








C_2022119EN.01005701.xml










14.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 119/57






Action brought on 28 January 2022 — Hungary v Commission
(Case T-57/22)
(2022/C 119/80)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties


Applicant: Hungary (represented by: M. Z. Fehér and G. Koós, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/2014 of 8 November 2017 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), (1) in so far as it relates to Hungary and excludes from European Union financing the financial assistance established for the financial year 2018-2019 in relation to the deficiencies in the functioning of the key controls ‘checks to establish the access to the aid claimed’ and ‘correct calculation of the aid including administrative reductions and penalties’;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The Hungarian Government maintains that Hungary has not infringed the provisions relating to checks to establish the access to the aid claimed and that the value of the marketed production of each producer organisation was not incorrectly calculated. The practice followed by Hungary is in accordance with Articles 42 and 50(7) of Regulation 543/2011. (2) Similarly, there are no deficiencies in relation to the checks to establish the eligibility of operational programmes and the Hungarian authorities acted in accordance with Article 104(2) of Regulation 543/2011.
Hungary has implemented adequate corrective measures in relation to the findings concerning the second deficiency in the functioning of the key control (‘correct calculation of the aid including administrative reductions and penalties’) and, for that reason, the application of the financial correction is not justified in respect of the expenditure relating to the financial years 2018 and 2019.


(1)  OJ 2021 L 413, p. 10.

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (OJ 2011 L 157, p. 1).
Case T-54/22: Action brought on 28 January 2022 — Rivière v Parliament and ID
Date: 2022-01-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, appointment of members, disciplinary proceedings, political group (EP), powers of the institutions (EU)








C_2022158EN.01001002.xml










11.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 158/10






Action brought on 28 January 2022 — Rivière v Parliament and ID
(Case T-54/22)
(2022/C 158/12)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Jérôme Rivière (Paris, France) (represented by: B. Kuchukian, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament and the political group Identity and Democracy (ID)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul first, the provisional suspensory decision of 21 January 2022 and, second, the expulsion decision of 25 January 2022;










—


order the immediate suspension of both decisions.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action seeking the annulment, first, of the decision of 21 January 2022 of the bureau of the political group Identity and Democracy (ID) suspending him from the group for a period of two months and, second, of the decision of 25 January 2022 of the political group Identity and Democracy (ID) expelling him from that group, the applicant complains that, as to form, those decisions fail to comply with the basic disciplinary process and, as to substance, they have no valid basis.