do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-432/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien — Austria) — ZK (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Immigration policy — Directive 2003/109/EC — Article 9(1)(c) — Loss of the status of long-term resident third-country national — Absence from the territory of the European Union for a period of 12 consecutive months — Interruption of that period of absence — Irregular and short-term stays in the territory of the European Union)
Date: 2022-01-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU migration policy, area of freedom, security and justice, foreign national, residence permit








C_2022119EN.01001301.xml










14.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 119/13






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien — Austria) — ZK
(Case C-432/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Immigration policy - Directive 2003/109/EC - Article 9(1)(c) - Loss of the status of long-term resident third-country national - Absence from the territory of the European Union for a period of 12 consecutive months - Interruption of that period of absence - Irregular and short-term stays in the territory of the European Union)
(2022/C 119/17)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: ZK

Intervener: Landeshauptmann von Wien

Operative part of the judgment

Article 9(1)(c) of Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents must be interpreted as meaning that any physical presence of a long-term resident in the territory of the European Union during a period of 12 consecutive months, even if such a presence does not exceed, during that period, a total duration of only a few days, is sufficient to prevent the loss, by that resident, of his or her right to long-term resident status under that provision.


(1)  OJ C 390, 16.11.2020.
Case C-594/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 January 2022 — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v European Commission, Land Rheinland-Pfalz (Appeal — State aid — Aid for airports and airlines — Decision classifying the measures in favour of Frankfurt Hahn airport as State aid compatible with the internal market and finding no State aid in favour of airlines using that airport — Inadmissibility of an action for annulment — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Natural or legal person not directly and individually concerned by the decision at issue — Effective judicial protection)
Date: 2022-01-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Germany, Hesse, State aid, admissibility, aid to undertakings, airline, airport, control of State aid, loan, right to justice








C_2022119EN.01000201.xml










14.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 119/2






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 January 2022 — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v European Commission, Land Rheinland-Pfalz
(Case C-594/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Aid for airports and airlines - Decision classifying the measures in favour of Frankfurt Hahn airport as State aid compatible with the internal market and finding no State aid in favour of airlines using that airport - Inadmissibility of an action for annulment - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Natural or legal person not directly and individually concerned by the decision at issue - Effective judicial protection)
(2022/C 119/02)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG (represented by: A. Martin-Ehlers, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and S. Noë, acting as Agents), Land Rheinland-Pfalz (represented by: Professor C. Koenig)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Deutsche Lufthansa AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and by Land Rheinland-Pfalz.






(1)  OJ C 319, 23.9.2019.
European Parliament decision of 20 January 2022 on the nomination of Mihails Kozlovs as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0407/2021 — 2021/0804(NLE))
Date: 2022-01-20
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, European Parliament
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the Court of Auditors (EU)








C_2022336EN.01003901.xml










2.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 336/39






P9_TA(2022)0004
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Mihails Kozlovs
European Parliament decision of 20 January 2022 on the nomination of Mihails Kozlovs as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0407/2021 — 2021/0804(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2022/C 336/08)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0407/2021),










—


having regard to Rule 129 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0003/2022),










A.


whereas, by letter of 5 November 2021, the Council consulted Parliament on the nomination of Mihails Kozlovs as a Member of the Court of Auditors;










B.


whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control then proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;










C.


whereas the committee subsequently held a hearing with the nominee on 10 January 2022, at which the nominee made an opening statement and then answered questions put by the members of the committee;












1.


Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Mihails Kozlovs as a Member of the Court of Auditors;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2021/1058 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 on the European Regional Development Fund and on the Cohesion Fund (Official Journal of the European Union L 231 of 30 June 2021)
Date: 2022-01-20
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: Cohesion Fund, EU regional policy, European Regional Development Fund, economic growth, eligibility criteria, employment aid, less-favoured region, regional aid, regional development, regional disparity




L_2022013EN.01007401.xml










20.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 13/74







Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2021/1058 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 on the European Regional Development Fund and on the Cohesion Fund

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 231 of 30 June 2021
)


On page 81, in Article 14(4):
for:


‘4.   By way of derogation from point (c) of Article 5(1), the ERDF may support productive investments in enterprises in the outermost regions, irrespective of the size of those enterprises.’,


read:


‘4.   By way of derogation from point (d) of Article 5(1), the ERDF may support productive investments in enterprises in the outermost regions, irrespective of the size of those enterprises.’.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 19 January 2022 2022/C 30/01
Date: 2022-01-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022030EN.01000101.xml










20.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 30/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

19 January 2022
(2022/C 30/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1345 




JPY


Japanese yen


129,86 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4419 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83168 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3428 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0383 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,20 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,9368 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,313 




HUF


Hungarian forint


355,88 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5229 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9449 




TRY


Turkish lira


15,4207 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5709 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4144 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8392 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6684 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5293 




KRW


South Korean won


1 347,10 




ZAR


South African rand


17,3889 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,2003 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5238 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 283,78 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7570 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,429 




RUB


Russian rouble


86,4800 




THB


Thai baht


37,467 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,2657 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,0922 




INR


Indian rupee


84,4135 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2306 of 21 October 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council with rules on the official controls in respect of consignments of organic products and in-conversion products intended for import into the Union and on the certificate of inspection (Official Journal of the European Union L 461 of 27 December 2021)
Date: 2022-01-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: consumer protection, food inspection, import (EU), organic farming, organic product, originating product, quality control of agricultural products, third country








L_2022013EN.01007601.xml










20.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 13/76







Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2306 of 21 October 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council with rules on the official controls in respect of consignments of organic products and in-conversion products intended for import into the Union and on the certificate of inspection

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 461 of 27 December 2021
)








1.


On page 25, point 26 is replaced with the following:






‘26.


For transfer from the border control post to a control point:’














2.


On page 25, point 28 is replaced with the following:






‘28.


Means of transport from the border control post to a control point’
Case T-34/22: Action brought on 20 January 2022 — Cunsorziu di i Salamaghji Corsi — Consortium des Charcutiers Corses and Others v Commission
Date: 2022-01-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Corsica, France, abuse of power, consumer information, designation of origin, labelling, meat product, pigmeat, product designation, quality control of agricultural products








C_2022109EN.01003301.xml










7.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 109/33






Action brought on 20 January 2022 — Cunsorziu di i Salamaghji Corsi — Consortium des Charcutiers Corses and Others v Commission
(Case T-34/22)
(2022/C 109/43)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Cunsorziu di i Salamaghji Corsi — Consortium des Charcutiers Corses (Borgo, France) and nine other applicants (represented by: T. de Haan and V. Le Meur-Baudry, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


Annul Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1879 of 26 October 2021 rejecting three applications for protection of a geographical indication in accordance with Article 52(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council ‘Jambon sec de l’Île de Beauté’ (PGI), ‘Lonzo de l’Île de Beauté’ (PGI), ‘Coppa de l’Île de Beauté’ (PGI); (1)











—


Order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging, first, infringement of Articles 49, 50 and 52 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ 2012 L 343, p. 1) and, second, infringement of the general legal principle of the force of res judicata, in that the Commission exceeded the limits of the powers conferred on it by that regulation.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Articles 7 and 13 of Regulation No 1151/2012, in that the Commission erred in its application of the above provisions.






(1)  OJ 2021 L 383, p. 1.
European Parliament decision of 20 January 2022 on the nomination of Jan Gregor as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0405/2021 — 2021/0802(NLE))
Date: 2022-01-20
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, European Parliament
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the Court of Auditors (EU)








C_2022336EN.01003701.xml










2.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 336/37






P9_TA(2022)0002
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Jan Gregor
European Parliament decision of 20 January 2022 on the nomination of Jan Gregor as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0405/2021 — 2021/0802(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2022/C 336/06)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0405/2021),










—


having regard to Rule 129 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0002/2022),










A.


whereas, by letter of 5 November 2021, the Council consulted Parliament on the nomination of Jan Gregor as a Member of the Court of Auditors;










B.


whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control then proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;










C.


whereas the committee subsequently held a hearing with the nominee on 10 January 2022, at which the nominee made an opening statement and then answered questions put by the members of the committee;












1.


Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Jan Gregor as a Member of the Court of Auditors;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.
European Parliament decision of 20 January 2022 on the numerical strength of the standing committees (2021/3026(RSO))
Date: 2022-01-20
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: EP Committee, standing committee (EU)








C_2022336EN.01003501.xml










2.9.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 336/35






P9_TA(2022)0001
Numerical strength of the standing committees
European Parliament decision of 20 January 2022 on the numerical strength of the standing committees (2021/3026(RSO))
(2022/C 336/05)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the proposal from the Conference of Presidents,










—


having regard to its decision of 15 January 2014 on the powers and responsibilities of the standing committees (1) and its decision of 18 June 2020 on setting up a subcommittee on tax matters (2),










—


having regard to Rule 206 of its Rules of Procedure,












1.


Decides that the numerical strength of the standing committees and subcommittees shall be as follows:






I.


Committee on Foreign Affairs: 79 members,










II.


Committee on Development: 26 members,










III.


Committee on International Trade: 43 members,










IV.


Committee on Budgets: 41 members,










V.


Committee on Budgetary Control: 30 members,










VI.


Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs: 61 members,










VII.


Committee on Employment and Social Affairs: 55 members,










VIII.


Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety: 88 members,










IX.


Committee on Industry, Research and Energy: 78 members,










X.


Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection: 45 members,










XI.


Committee on Transport and Tourism: 49 members,










XII.


Committee on Regional Development: 43 members,










XIII.


Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development: 48 members,










XIV.


Committee on Fisheries: 28 members,










XV.


Committee on Culture and Education: 31 members,










XVI.


Committee on Legal Affairs: 25 members,










XVII.


Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs: 69 members,










XVIII.


Committee on Constitutional Affairs: 28 members,










XIX.


Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality: 37 members,










XX.


Committee on Petitions: 35 members,
Subcommittee on Human Rights: 30 members,
Subcommittee on Security and Defence: 30 members,
Subcommittee on Tax Matters: 30 members;
















2.


Decides, with reference to the decisions of the Conference of Presidents of 30 June 2019 and 9 January 2020 relating to the composition of committee bureaux, that the committee bureaux may consist of up to four vice-chairs;












3.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information.






(1)  OJ C 482, 23.12.2016, p. 160.

(2)  OJ C 362, 8.9.2021, p. 181.
Case C-90/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret — Denmark) — Apcoa Parking Danmark A/S v Skatteministeriet (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 2(1)(c) — Scope — Taxable transactions — Activities carried out by a company incorporated under private law — Operation of car parks on private land — Control fees levied by that company in the event of failure by the motorists to comply with the general terms and conditions for use of those car parks — Characterisation — Economic and commercial realities of the transactions)
Date: 2022-01-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, parking area, provision of services, tax law








C_2022119EN.01000601.xml










14.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 119/6






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret — Denmark) — Apcoa Parking Danmark A/S v Skatteministeriet
(Case C-90/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 2(1)(c) - Scope - Taxable transactions - Activities carried out by a company incorporated under private law - Operation of car parks on private land - Control fees levied by that company in the event of failure by the motorists to comply with the general terms and conditions for use of those car parks - Characterisation - Economic and commercial realities of the transactions)
(2022/C 119/08)
Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Højesteret

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Apcoa Parking Danmark A/S

Defendant: Skatteministeriet

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1)(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that the control fees levied by a company incorporated under private law, tasked with the operation of private car parks, in the event of failure by the motorists to comply with the general terms and conditions for use of those car parks must be regarded as consideration for a supply of services within the meaning of that provision and, as such, subject to value added tax (VAT).


(1)  OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Case T-35/22: Action brought on 20 January 2022 — Kaminski v EUIPO — Polfarmex (SYRENA)
Date: 2022-01-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022119EN.01005301.xml










14.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 119/53






Action brought on 20 January 2022 — Kaminski v EUIPO — Polfarmex (SYRENA)
(Case T-35/22)
(2022/C 119/75)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Arkadiusz Kaminski (Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada) (represented by: W. Trybowski, E. Pijewska and M. Mazurek, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Polfarmex S.A. (Kutno, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark SYRENA — European Union trade mark (EUTM) No 9 262 767

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 October 2021 in jointed Cases R 1952/2020-1 and R 1953/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


alter the contested decision in its part concerning the appeal in case R 1952/2020-1, that is, with regard to points 2, 3, 4 and 6 of the sentence (operative part) of the contested decision, by: dismissal of the appeal in case R 1952/2020-1, declaration that the trade mark ‘SYRENA’ (EUTM 9 262 767) remains registered for ‘cars’ in Class 12 and ordering Polfarmex S.A. to bear the applicant’s costs in the appeal proceedings in case R 1952/2020-1;










—


order that the costs of the proceedings are to be paid by EUIPO and by Polfarmex;




alternatively:






—


annul the contested decision in the above mentioned part, i.e. to the extent that the Board of Appeal revoked the registration of the trade mark ‘SYRENA’ (EUTM 9 262 767) in respect of ‘cars’ other than ‘racing cars’ in Class 12;










—


order that the costs of the proceedings are to be paid by EUIPO and by Polfarmex.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Articles 18(1), 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Articles 18(1), 58(1)(a) and (2) and 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.