do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 13 January 2022 2022/C 18/01
Date: 2022-01-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022018EN.01000101.xml










14.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 18/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

13 January 2022
(2022/C 18/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1463 




JPY


Japanese yen


130,98 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4409 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83545 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,2380 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0453 




ISK


Iceland króna


147,00 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,9333 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,458 




HUF


Hungarian forint


355,24 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5361 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9440 




TRY


Turkish lira


15,5744 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5709 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4304 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,9289 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6676 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5427 




KRW


South Korean won


1 359,24 




ZAR


South African rand


17,6381 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,2913 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5202 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 379,02 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7875 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,572 




RUB


Russian rouble


86,6030 




THB


Thai baht


38,080 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3518 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,3894 




INR


Indian rupee


84,7170 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Public holidays 2022 2022/C 21/04
Date: 2022-01-14
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: EU Member State, public holiday








C_2022021EN.01000401.xml










14.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 21/4






Public holidays 2022
(2022/C 21/04)






Belgique.België


15.4, 18.4, 26.5, 27.5, 6.6, 11.7, 21.7, 15.8, 27.9, 1.11, 2.11, 15.11, 26.12, 27.12, 28.12, 29.12, 30.12




България


1.1, 3.3, 22.4, 23.4, 24.4, 1.5, 6.5, 24.5, 6.9, 22.9, 1.11, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12




Česká republika


1.1, 15.4, 18.4, 1.5, 8.5, 5.7, 6.7, 28.9, 28.10, 17.11, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12




Danmark


1.1, 10.4, 14.4, 15.4, 17.4, 18.4, 13.5, 26.5, 5.6, 6.6, 25.12, 26.12




Deutschland


1.1, 8.3, 15.4, 18.4, 1.5, 26.5, 6.6, 3.10, 25.12, 26.12




Eesti


1.1, 24.2, 15.4, 17.4, 1.5, 5.6, 24.6, 20.8, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12




Éire.Ireland


1.1, 17.3, 18.4, 2.5, 6.6, 1.8, 31.10, 25.12, 26.12




Ελλάδα


1.1, 6.1, 7.3, 25.3, 22.4, 25.4, 1.5, 13.6, 15.8, 28.10, 25.12, 26.12




España


1.1, 6.1, 15.4, 15.8, 12.10, 1.11, 6.12, 8.12




France


1.1, 18.4, 1.5, 8.5, 26.5, 6.6, 14.7, 15.8, 1.11, 11.11, 25.12




Hrvatska


1.1, 6.1, 17.4, 18.4, 1.5, 30.5, 16.6, 22.6, 5.8, 15.8, 1.11, 18.11, 25.12, 26.12




Italia


1.1, 6.1, 18.4, 25.4, 1.5, 2.6, 15.8, 1.11, 8.12, 25.12, 26.12




Κύπρος.Kıbrıs


1.1, 6.1, 7.3, 25.3, 1.4, 22.4, 24.4, 25.4, 1.5, 13.6, 15.8, 1.10, 28.10, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12




Latvija


15.4, 18.4, 4.5, 23.6, 24.6, 18.11, 26.12




Lietuva


1.1, 16.2, 11.3, 17.4, 18.4, 1.5, 24.6, 6.7, 15.8, 1.11, 2.11, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12




Luxembourg


18.4, 9.5, 26.5, 6.6, 23.6, 15.8, 1.11, 26.12




Magyarország


1.1, 15.3, 15.4, 18.4, 1.5, 6.6, 20.8, 23.10, 1.11, 25.12, 26.12




Malta


1.1, 10.2, 19.3, 31.3, 15.4, 1.5, 7.6, 29.6, 15.8, 8.9, 21.9, 8.12, 13.12, 25.12




Nederland


1.1, 15.4, 17.4, 18.4, 27.4, 5.5, 26.5, 27.5, 5.6, 6.6, 25.12, 26.12




Österreich


1.1, 6.1, 18.4, 1.5, 26.5, 6.6, 16.6, 15.8, 26.10, 1.11, 08.12, 25.12, 26.12




Polska


1.1, 6.1, 17.4, 18.4, 1.5, 3.5, 16.6, 15.8, 1.11, 11.11, 25.12, 26.12




Portugal


1.1, 15.4, 17.4, 25.4, 1.5, 10.6, 16.6, 15.8, 5.10, 1.11, 1.12, 8.12, 25.12




România


1.1, 2.1, 24.1, 22.4, 24.4, 25.4, 1.5, 1.6, 12.6, 13.6, 15.8, 30.11, 1.12, 25.12, 26.12




Slovenija


8.2, 18.4, 27.4, 2.5, 15.8, 31.10, 1.11, 26.12




Slovensko


1.1, 6.1, 15.4, 18.4, 1.5, 8.5, 5.7, 29.8, 1.9, 15.9, 1.11, 17.11, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12




Suomi.Finland


1.1, 6.1, 15.4, 17.4, 18.4, 1.5, 26.5, 5.6, 25.6, 5.11, 6.12, 25.12, 26.12




Sverige


1.1, 6.1, 15.4, 17.4, 18.4, 1.5, 26.5, 5.6, 6.6, 24.6, 25.6, 5.11, 25.12, 26.12
Case T-24/22: Action brought on 14 January 2022 — Bensoussan v EUIPO — Lulu’s Fashion Lounge (LOULOU STUDIO)
Date: 2022-01-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, electronic commerce, footwear industry, leather, registered trade mark, retail trade, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_2022138EN.01002301.xml










28.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/23






Action brought on 14 January 2022 — Bensoussan v EUIPO — Lulu’s Fashion Lounge (LOULOU STUDIO)
(Case T-24/22)
(2022/C 138/26)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Ugo Bensoussan (Paris, France) (represented by: V. Bouchara and A. Maier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lulu’s Fashion Lounge LLC (Chico, California, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark LOULOU STUDIO — Application for registration No 18 048 245

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 November 2021 in Case R 480/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


uphold the appeal;










—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and the company LULU’S FASHION LOUNGE LLC to bear their own costs of the proceedings and to jointly pay those incurred by Mr. Ugo Bensoussan, including the costs incurred for the proceedings before the EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10539 – SOUTH32 / KGHM / SIERRA GORDA) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 21/05
Date: 2022-01-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, metals, mineral resources, mining industry








C_2022021EN.01000501.xml










14.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 21/5






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10539 – SOUTH32 / KGHM / SIERRA GORDA)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 21/05)

1.   
On 6 January 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


South32 Limited (‘South32’, Australia);










—


KGHM Polska Miedz S.A. (‘KGHM’, Poland);










—


Sierra Gorda SCM (‘Sierra Gorda’, Chile).




South32 and KGHM acquire within the meaning of Articles 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Sierra Gorda. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for South32: the production of bauxite, alumina, aluminium, metallurgical coal, manganese, nickel, silver, lead and zinc from sites located in Australia, Southern Africa and South America;










—


for KGHM: the production of valuable commodities, predominantly metals, including copper, silver, gold, molybdenum, nickel, rhenium and lead from a number of sites worldwide;










—


for Sierra Gorda: the production of copper concentrate and molybdenum concentrate (which can be further processed into molybdennym oxide) from its mine located in Chile. Sierra Gorda’s copper concentrate also contains limited quantities of silver and gold.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10539 – SOUTH32 / KGHM / SIERRA GORDA
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10542 – MITSUBISHI / CHUBU ELECTRIC POWER MIRAIZ / MCRE) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 72/04
Date: 2022-01-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy production, merger control, retail trade








C_2022072EN.01000401.xml










14.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 72/4






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10542 – MITSUBISHI / CHUBU ELECTRIC POWER MIRAIZ / MCRE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 72/04)
On 14 January 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10542. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-37/22 P: Appeal brought on 14 January 2022 by GZ and Others(*) against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 24 November 2021 in Case T-687/21, GZ and Others(*) v Commission
Date: 2022-01-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Spain, framework agreement, infringement procedure (EU), national implementing measure, public sector, temporary employment




C_2022408EN.01002402.xml










24.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 408/24






Appeal brought on 14 January 2022 by GZ and Others (*1) against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 24 November 2021 in Case T-687/21, GZ and Others (*1) v Commission
(Case C-37/22 P)
(2022/C 408/30)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellants: GZ (*1), FK (*1), AT (*1), DH (*1), ML (*1), ZX (*1), FO (*1), RT (*1), JC (*1) (represented by: B. González González, abogada)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
By order of 6 September 2022, the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly unfounded and ordered the appellants to bear their own costs.


(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.
Case C-36/22 P: Appeal brought on 14 January 2022 by Silvia González Sordo and Others against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 24 November 2021 in Case T-642/21, Gonzáles Sordo and Others v Commission
Date: 2022-01-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Spain, framework agreement, infringement procedure (EU), national implementing measure, public sector, temporary employment








C_2022408EN.01002401.xml










24.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 408/24






Appeal brought on 14 January 2022 by Silvia González Sordo and Others against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 24 November 2021 in Case T-642/21, Gonzáles Sordo and Others v Commission
(Case C-36/22 P)
(2022/C 408/29)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellants: Silvia González Sordo, Marta Calzado Melida, Evangelina Camino Nates, María José Canoura González, Félix Fernández Gascón, María Isabel Martínez de Lecea, José Antonio Pardo Cuesta, Natalia Ruisanchez Cáceres, María Ángeles Sáez Díaz, Mónica Ruiz Maccione, Ignacio Serrulla Rech, Celia Baños Olavarri, David Buitrago Cobo, Ana María Pardo García, Adriana Castillo Jiménez, José Manuel Salazar Castillo, María Lorena Tresgallo Salmón, Luis Alfredo Barroso Prados, Ana Isabel Alegre Rubio, Emilio-Joaquín Barrio Fernández de la Pradilla, Zulema Alexandra Lemolt García-Lago (represented by: B. González González, abogada)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
By order of 6 September 2022, the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly unfounded and ordered the appellants to bear their own costs.
Case C-33/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 14 January 2022 — Datenschutzbehörde (Austria)
Date: 2022-01-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: committee of inquiry, competence of the institution, data protection, data-processing law, personal data, supervisory body








C_2022138EN.01001901.xml










28.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/19






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 14 January 2022 — Datenschutzbehörde (Austria)
(Case C-33/22)
(2022/C 138/22)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: Datenschutzbehörde (Austria)

Other parties to the proceedings: WK; President of the Nationalrat

Questions referred







1.


Do activities of a committee of inquiry set up by a Parliament of a Member State in the exercise of its right to scrutinise the executive fall within the scope of EU law within the meaning of the first sentence of Article 16(2) TFEU, irrespective of the subject matter of the inquiry, with the result that Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, (General Data Protection Regulation; ‘the GDPR’) is applicable to the processing of personal data by a parliamentary committee of inquiry of a Member State?




If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative:






2.


Do activities of a committee of inquiry which has been set up by a Parliament of a Member State in the exercise of its right to scrutinise the executive and which has as the subject matter of its inquiry the activities of a police State-protection authority, that is to say, activities concerning the protection of national security within the meaning of recital 16 of the GDPR, come within the scope of the exception set out in Article 2(2)(a) of the GDPR?




If Question 2 is answered in the negative:






3.


If — as in the present case — a Member State has established only one single supervisory authority in accordance with Article 51(1) of the GDPR, does the competence of that authority in respect of complaints within the meaning of Article 77(1) of the GDPR, in conjunction with Article 55(1) thereof, already arise directly from the GDPR?






(1)  Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1).
Case T-418/21: Order of the General Court of 14 January 2022 — Alauzun and Others v Commission and EMA (Action for annulment — Medicinal products for human use — Amendment to the conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Comirnaty — Act not open to challenge — Preparatory act — No interest in bringing proceedings — No direct concern — Act not of individual concern — Non-regulatory act — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2022-01-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: admissibility, coronavirus disease, epidemic, fundamental rights, market approval, public health, vaccine








C_2022128EN.01002502.xml










21.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 128/25






Order of the General Court of 14 January 2022 — Alauzun and Others v Commission and EMA
(Case T-418/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Amendment to the conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Comirnaty - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - No interest in bringing proceedings - No direct concern - Act not of individual concern - Non-regulatory act - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 128/37)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Virginie Alauzun (Saint-Cannat, France) and 774 other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: F. Di Vizio, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet, L. Haasbeek and K. Mifsud-Bonnicci, acting as Agents), European Medicines Agency (represented by: S. Drosos, C. Schultheiss and S. Marino, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment, first, of Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 4034 final of 31 May 2021 amending the conditional marketing authorisation granted by Implementing Decision C(2020) 9598 final for ‘Comirnaty — COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (nucleoside modified)’, a medicinal product for human use, and, second, of the EMA’s opinion of 28 May 2021.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Ms Virginie Alauzun and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 338, 23.8.2021.