do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-287/20: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — EL, CP v Ryanair DAC (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Strike by cabin crew and pilots — Circumstances that are ‘internal’ and ‘external’ to the operating air carrier’s activity — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 12 and 28 — Articles 12 and 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — No infringement of the workers’ freedom of assembly and association and the air carrier’s right of negotiation)
Date: 2022-01-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, freedom of assembly, freedom of association, indemnification, strike, trade union, traveller








C_2022207EN.01000701.xml










23.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 207/7






Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — EL, CP v Ryanair DAC
(Case C-287/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 5(3) - Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights - Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation - Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ - Strike by cabin crew and pilots - Circumstances that are ‘internal’ and ‘external’ to the operating air carrier’s activity - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 12 and 28 - Articles 12 and 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - No infringement of the workers’ freedom of assembly and association and the air carrier’s right of negotiation)
(2022/C 207/09)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: EL, CP

Defendant: Ryanair DAC

Operative part of the order

Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, must be interpreted as meaning that strike action which is entered into upon a call by a trade union of the cabin crew and pilots of an operating air carrier and which is intended to assert the demands of those workers does not come within the concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ within the meaning of that provision, any prior negotiations with the workers’ representatives being irrelevant in that regard.


(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 7 January 2022 2022/C 10/01
Date: 2022-01-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022010EN.01000101.xml










10.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 10/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

7 January 2022
(2022/C 10/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1298 




JPY


Japanese yen


130,90 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4380 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83430 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,2839 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0422 




ISK


Iceland króna


146,00 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,0288 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,439 




HUF


Hungarian forint


358,68 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5496 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9451 




TRY


Turkish lira


15,7206 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5804 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4374 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8133 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6748 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5356 




KRW


South Korean won


1 359,96 




ZAR


South African rand


17,6701 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,2060 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5214 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 188,43 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7553 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,046 




RUB


Russian rouble


85,2980 




THB


Thai baht


38,074 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,4343 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,1109 




INR


Indian rupee


83,9780 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-437/20: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 January 2022 — (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Parma — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against ZI, TQ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Games of chance — Licences for the activity of collecting bets — Extension of existing licences — Regularisation of data transmission centres (DTC) engaged in collecting bets without the necessary licence and police authorisation — Short deadline — Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
Date: 2022-01-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, admissibility, cartel, data transmission, freedom to provide services, game of chance, public procurement, right of establishment, service concession, tendering








C_2022165EN.01002201.xml










19.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 165/22






Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 January 2022 — (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Parma — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against ZI, TQ
(Case C-437/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Games of chance - Licences for the activity of collecting bets - Extension of existing licences - Regularisation of data transmission centres (DTC) engaged in collecting bets without the necessary licence and police authorisation - Short deadline - Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
(2022/C 165/26)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Parma

Parties in the main criminal proceedings

ZI, TQ

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunale di Parma (Parma District Court, Italy), by decision of 8 November 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  Date lodged: 17/09/2020.
Case C-400/21: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Arad — Romania) — Asociaţia Naţională de Terapii Complementare din România (ANATECOR) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Interpretation of national law — National insolvency proceedings — Possibility for the insolvency judge to determine his or her substantive jurisdiction and the claim — Purely internal dispute — Lack of connection with EU law — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
Date: 2022-01-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, claim, financial solvency, interpretation of the law, jurisdiction, national law








C_2022084EN.01002102.xml










21.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 84/21






Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Arad — Romania) — Asociaţia Naţională de Terapii Complementare din România (ANATECOR)
(Case C-400/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Interpretation of national law - National insolvency proceedings - Possibility for the insolvency judge to determine his or her substantive jurisdiction and the claim - Purely internal dispute - Lack of connection with EU law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
(2022/C 84/26)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Arad

Parties to the main proceedings


Insolvency debtor: Asociaţia Naţională de Terapii Complementare din România (ANATECOR)

Intervening parties: Primăria Municipiului Arad — Direcția Venituri, Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Timișoara — Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Arad

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Tribunalul Arad (Regional Court, Arad, Romania) by decision of 31 May 2021.


(1)  Date lodged: 28.6.2021.
Case T-18/22: Action brought on 10 January 2022 — Nemport Liman İşletmeleri Ve Özel Antrepo Nakliye Ticaret v EUIPO — Newport Europe (NEMPORT LİMAN İŞLETMELERİ)
Date: 2022-01-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, carriage of goods, logistics, packaging, registered trade mark, storage, trade-mark law, transport company, travel, vehicle rental








C_2022084EN.01005302.xml










21.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 84/53






Action brought on 10 January 2022 — Nemport Liman İşletmeleri Ve Özel Antrepo Nakliye Ticaret v EUIPO — Newport Europe (NEMPORT LİMAN İŞLETMELERİ)
(Case T-18/22)
(2022/C 84/75)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Nemport Liman İşletmeleri Ve Özel Antrepo Nakliye Ticaret AŞ (Izmir, Turkey) (represented by: V. Martín Santos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Newport Europe BV (Moerdijk, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark NEMPORT LİMAN İŞLETMELERİ — Application for registration No 18 101 775

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 November 2021 in Case R 562/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision so that the trade mark at issue is granted in its entirety;










—


order the applicant/intervener and/or the EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in connection with this appeal, and all procedural costs generated by EUIPO decisions.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10551 – AMALFI INVEST OPPORTUNITIES / LA DORIA) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 23/03
Date: 2022-01-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: agri-foodstuffs, beverage industry, economic concentration, foodstuff, investment company, merger control, non-alcoholic beverage








C_2022023EN.01000301.xml










17.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 23/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10551 – AMALFI INVEST OPPORTUNITIES / LA DORIA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 23/03)
On 10 January 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10551. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-20/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 10 January 2022 — Syndicat Les Entreprises du Médicament (LEEM) v Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé
Date: 2022-01-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: health insurance, medicinal product, pharmaceutical legislation, price freeze, pricing of medicines








C_2022119EN.01002901.xml










14.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 119/29






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 10 January 2022 — Syndicat Les Entreprises du Médicament (LEEM) v Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé
(Case C-20/22)
(2022/C 119/38)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Syndicat Les Entreprises du Médicament (LEEM)

Defendant: Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé

Question referred

Must Article 4 of Council Directive 89/105/EEC of 21 December 1988 relating to the transparency of measures regulating the pricing of medicinal products for human use and their inclusion in the scope of national health insurance systems (1) be interpreted as meaning that the concept of a ‘price freeze […] on all medicinal products or on certain categories of medicinal products’ applies to a measure whose purpose is to control the prices of medicinal products but which concerns only certain medicinal products, on an individual basis, and is not intended to apply to all medicinal products or even to certain categories of them, when the safeguards which that article attaches to the existence of such a price-freezing measure as defined by that article appear, for such a measure, meaningless and pointless?


(1)  OJ 1989 L 40, p. 8.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries 2022/C 9/02
Date: 2022-01-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, France, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing








C_2022009EN.01000201.xml










10.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 9/2






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2022/C 9/02)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


8.12.2021




Duration


8.12.2021 - 31.12.2021




Member State


France




Stock or Group of stocks


ALB/AN05N




Species


Northern Albacore (Thunnus alalunga)




Zone


Atlantic Ocean, north of 5° N




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


21/TQ92






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Case C-19/22 P: Appeal brought on 10 January 2022 by Sanford LP against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 10 November 2021 in Case T-443/20, Sanford v EUIPO — Avery Zweckform (Labels)
Date: 2022-01-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: designs and models, labelling, office supplies








C_2022207EN.01001101.xml










23.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 207/11






Appeal brought on 10 January 2022 by Sanford LP against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 10 November 2021 in Case T-443/20, Sanford v EUIPO — Avery Zweckform (Labels)
(Case C-19/22 P)
(2022/C 207/15)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Sanford LP (represented by: J. Zecher, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Avery Zweckform GmbH
By order of 6 April 2022, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Sanford LP should bear its own costs.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries 2022/C 9/03
Date: 2022-01-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: EU waters, France, Norway, Norwegian Sea, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing, territorial waters








C_2022009EN.01000301.xml










10.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 9/3






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2022/C 9/03)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


8.12.2021




Duration


8.12.2021 - 31.12.2021




Member State


France




Stock or Group of stocks


HER/4AB. (incl. HER/*4N-S62)




Species


Herring (Clupea harengus)




Zone


Union and Norwegian waters of 4 north of 53°30’ N




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


22/TQ92






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Case T-15/22: Action brought on 10 January 2022 — Motel One v EUIPO — Apartment One (APART MENT ONE SLEEP CLEVER.)
Date: 2022-01-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, catering industry, hotel industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022084EN.01005201.xml










21.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 84/52






Action brought on 10 January 2022 — Motel One v EUIPO — Apartment One (APART MENT ONE SLEEP CLEVER.)
(Case T-15/22)
(2022/C 84/73)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Motel One GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. Hartmann, S. Fröhlich and H. Lerchl, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Apartment One GbR (Grasbrunn, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark APART MENT ONE SLEEP CLEVER. — Application No 18 009 642

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 October 2021 in Case R 564/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10548 – TELEKOM DEUTSCHLAND / IFM INVESTORS / JV) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 9/05
Date: 2022-01-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Germany, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, mobile communication, telecommunications industry, transmission network








C_2022009EN.01000601.xml










10.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 9/6






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10548 – TELEKOM DEUTSCHLAND / IFM INVESTORS / JV)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 9/05)

1.   
On 22 December 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Telekom Deutschland GmbH (‘TDG’, Germany), controlled by Deutsche Telekom AG (‘DT’, Germany)










—


IFM Investors Pty Ltd. (‘IFM’, Australia)










—


GlasfaserPlus GmbH (‘JV’, Germany).




TDG and IFM acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of JV.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares constituting a joint venture.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for TDG: offer of broadband network, mobile telecommunications, and other telecom services to residential and commercial customers,










—


for IFM: investor-owned global investment manager with assets under management across infrastructure, listed equities, private capital and debt investments,










—


for JV: planning, construction and subsequent operation of an optical fiber telecommunications network in certain rural and less densely populated areas of Germany.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10548 – TELEKOM DEUTSCHLAND / IFM INVESTORS / JV
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.