do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-10/22: Action brought on 7 January 2022 — Wajos v EUIPO (Shape of a bottle)
Date: 2022-01-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, beverage industry, foodstuff, processed food product, processed foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022084EN.01005102.xml










21.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 84/51






Action brought on 7 January 2022 — Wajos v EUIPO (Shape of a bottle)
(Case T-10/22)
(2022/C 84/72)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Wajos GmbH (Dohr, Germany) (represented by: N. Böhmer und J. Schneiders, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: EU tridimensional mark (Shape of a bottle) — Application for registration No 14 886 097

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 October 2021 in Case R 2958/2019-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of the binding authority of a judgment which has become final;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) 207/2009 of the Council.
Case C-22/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 7 January 2022 — T. S.A. v Przewodniczący Krajowej Rady Radiofonii i Telewizji
Date: 2022-01-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: advertising, audiovisual industry, audiovisual production, child protection, provision of services, regulation of telecommunications, television








C_2022198EN.01002002.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/20






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 7 January 2022 — T. S.A. v Przewodniczący Krajowej Rady Radiofonii i Telewizji
(Case C-22/22)
(2022/C 198/30)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: T. S.A.

Respondent: Przewodniczący Krajowej Rady Radiofonii i Telewizji

Question referred

Must Article 20(2) of Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive), (1) in conjunction with Article 4(1) thereof, and Articles 11 and 20 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, be interpreted as precluding national legislation which prohibits only television broadcasters from placing advertisements in their children’s programmes, but places no such prohibition on the broadcasters of on-demand audiovisual media services?


(1)  OJ 2010 L 95, p. 1.