do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-381/21: Order of the General Court of 22 December 2021 — D&A Pharma v EMA (Action for annulment — Medicinal products for human use — Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Hopveus — Non-renewal of a permanent scientific advisory group — No interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2021-12-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: advisory committee (EU), drug surveillance, market approval, medicinal product, scientific committee (EU)








C_2022119EN.01004602.xml










14.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 119/46






Order of the General Court of 22 December 2021 — D&A Pharma v EMA
(Case T-381/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Hopveus - Non-renewal of a permanent scientific advisory group - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 119/65)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Debregeas et associés Pharma (D&A Pharma) (Paris, France) (represented by: N. Viguié and D. Krzisch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (represented by: C. Bortoluzzi, H. Kerr, S. Marino and S. Drosos, acting as Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of EMA not to renew the scientific advisory group on psychiatry within the Committee for Human Medicinal Products, revealed implicitly by the public call for expression of interest for experts to become members of EMA’s scientific advisory groups and the press release of EMA of 5 May 2021.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the European Parliament.










3.


Debregeas et associés Pharma (D & A Pharma) shall pay the costs.










4.


The Parliament shall bear its own costs relating to its application for leave to intervene.






(1)  OJ C 329, 16.8.2021.
Case T-665/21 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 December 2021 — Civitta Eesti v Commission (Interim relief — Public supply contracts — Legal, socio-economic and technical assistance in the fields of energy and mobility and transport — Application for interim measures — No urgency)
Date: 2021-12-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: award of contract, public procurement, supplies contract, tendering








C_2022119EN.01004802.xml










14.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 119/48






Order of the President of the General Court of 22 December 2021 — Civitta Eesti v Commission
(Case T-665/21 R)
(Interim relief - Public supply contracts - Legal, socio-economic and technical assistance in the fields of energy and mobility and transport - Application for interim measures - No urgency)
(2022/C 119/68)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Civitta Eesti AS (Tartu, Estonia) (represented by: C. Ginter, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. André and S. Romoli, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU to suspend the operation of the decision of the Commission of 12 October 2021 rejecting the applicant’s tender for Lot 5 of tendering procedure MOVE/2020/OP/0008, suspend the signature of the contracts to be concluded between the Commission and the other tenderers for Lot 5 of that procedure and, where appropriate, suspend the operation of those contracts.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The order of 22 October 2021, Civitta Eesti v Commission (T-665/21 R), is revoked.










3.


The costs are reserved.
Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.9637 – IAG / AIR EUROPA) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 519/02
Date: 2021-12-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: airline, economic concentration, holding company, merger control








C_2021519EN.01000201.xml










22.12.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 519/2






Withdrawal of notification of a concentration
(Case M.9637 – IAG / AIR EUROPA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 519/02)
On 25 May 2021, the European Commission received notification (1) of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) (‘Merger Regulation’).
On 29 June 2021, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings (3) under Article 6(1)(c) of the Merger Regulation. On 16 December 2021, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification and demonstrated that it abandoned the concentration.


(1)  OJ C 209, 02.06.2021, p. 25.

(2)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(3)  OJ C 266, 06.07.2021, p. 2.
Case C-826/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 22 December 2021 — Uniunea Producătorilor de Fonograme din România (UPFR) v Societatea Națională de Transport Feroviar de Călători (SNTFC) ‘CFR Călători’ SA
Date: 2021-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: broadcasting, carriage of passengers, carrier, copyright, rail transport, traveller








C_2022191EN.01000802.xml










10.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/8






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 22 December 2021 — Uniunea Producătorilor de Fonograme din România (UPFR) v Societatea Națională de Transport Feroviar de Călători (SNTFC) ‘CFR Călători’ SA
(Case C-826/21)
(2022/C 191/11)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel București

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant at first instance and appellant: Uniunea Producătorilor de Fonograme din România (UPFR)

Defendant at first instance and respondent: Societatea Națională de Transport Feroviar de Călători (SNTFC) ‘CFR Călători’ SA

Questions referred







1.


Does a rail carrier which uses train carriages in which sound systems intended for the communication of information to passengers are installed thereby make a communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (1)?










2.


Does Article 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society preclude national legislation which establishes a rebuttable presumption of communication to the public on the basis of the existence of sound systems, where those sound systems are required by other provisions of law governing the carrier’s activity?






(1)  OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 21 December 2021 2021/C 518/01
Date: 2021-12-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021518EN.01000101.xml










22.12.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 518/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

21 December 2021
(2021/C 518/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1295 




JPY


Japanese yen


128,44 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4362 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85280 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3315 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0417 




ISK


Iceland króna


146,80 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,1488 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,240 




HUF


Hungarian forint


368,00 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6375 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9500 




TRY


Turkish lira


14,7132 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5840 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4599 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8111 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6726 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5414 




KRW


South Korean won


1 345,39 




ZAR


South African rand


17,9025 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,1965 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5215 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 135,51 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7540 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,389 




RUB


Russian rouble


83,5985 




THB


Thai baht


38,019 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,4573 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,4677 




INR


Indian rupee


85,3648 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Council Decision (EU) 2022/2193 of 22 December 2021 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Peru establishing a framework for the participation of the Republic of Peru in European Union crisis management operations
Date: 2021-12-22
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Peru, agreement (EU), common foreign and security policy, crisis management, ratification of an agreement, signature of an agreement








L_2022292EN.01001201.xml










11.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 292/12








            COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2022/2193
of 22 December 2021
         
on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Peru establishing a framework for the participation of the Republic of Peru in European Union crisis management operations


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 37 thereof, in conjunction with Article 218(5) and (6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 21 September 2020, the Council adopted a decision authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the Union and the Republic of Peru establishing a framework for the latter’s participation in Union crisis management operations.












(2)


The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, in accordance with Article 37 of the Treaty on European Union, subsequently negotiated the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Peru establishing a framework for the participation of the Republic of Peru in European Union crisis management operations (‘the Agreement’).












(3)


The Agreement should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Peru establishing a framework for the participation of the Republic of Peru in European Union crisis management operations is hereby approved on behalf of the Union (1).


Article 2
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind the Union.


Article 3
The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 17(1) of the Agreement (2).


Article 4
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 22 December 2021.


For the Council


The President

G. DOVŽAN
            





(1)  See page 14 of this Official Journal.

(2)  The date of entry into force of the Agreement will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union by the General Secretariat of the Council.
Case C-818/21 P: Appeal brought on 22 December 2021 by YG against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 20 October 2021 in Case T-599/20, YG v European Commission
Date: 2021-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: assistant, promotion, rights of the defence, staff assessment, staff regulations (EU)








C_2022191EN.01000801.xml










10.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/8






Appeal brought on 22 December 2021 by YG against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 20 October 2021 in Case T-599/20, YG v European Commission
(Case C-818/21 P)
(2022/C 191/10)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: YG (represented by: A. Champetier, avocate, S. Rodrigues, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The Appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside the contested judgment, declare the Appellant’s requests in Case T-599/20 admissible and well-founded, and consequently










—


annul the contested decisions in first instance;




or, if this is not possible,






—


refer the case before the General Court for judgment, and, in any case,










—


order the Commission to bear the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The appeal is lodged against the judgment of 20 October 2021 adopted by the General Court of the European Union, dismissing the action lodged by the Appellant in case T-599/20, YG v European Commission.
In support of his appeal, the Appellant raises the following pleas in law:






—


Distortions of evidence;










—


Misconstructions of pleas — Errors of reasoning — Breach of rights of defence;










—


Errors of law.
Case T-795/21: Action brought on 22 December 2021 — Protectoplus v EUIPO (Li-SAFE)
Date: 2021-12-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electricity storage device, electronic waste, hazardous waste, plastics industry, registered trade mark, storage of waste, trade-mark law








C_2022073EN.01006102.xml










14.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/61






Action brought on 22 December 2021 — Protectoplus v EUIPO (Li-SAFE)
(Case T-795/21)
(2022/C 73/76)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Protectoplus GmbH (Rensburg, Germany) (represented by: W. Riegger, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Li-SAFE’ — Application for registration No 18 288 094

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 October 2021 in Case R 845/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-794/21: Action brought on 22 December 2021 — Wenz Kunststoff v EUIPO — Mouldpro (MOULDPRO)
Date: 2021-12-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, plastics industry, registered trade mark, rubber industry, trade-mark law








C_2022073EN.01006101.xml










14.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/61






Action brought on 22 December 2021 — Wenz Kunststoff v EUIPO — Mouldpro (MOULDPRO)
(Case T-794/21)
(2022/C 73/75)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Wenz Kunststoff GmbH & Co. KG (Lüdenscheid, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mouldpro ApS (Ballerup, Denmark)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark MOULDPRO — EU trade mark No 10 022 317

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 October 2021 in Case R 646/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


reject the application of Mouldpro ApS of 30 January 2018 for cancellation of EU trade mark No 10 022 317;




in the alternative:






—


reject the application for cancellation in so far as it covers anything other than hose couplings of plastic (included in Class 17);




in the alternative:






—


refer the case back to EUIPO for a further hearing and decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Recommendation No 1/2021 of the EU-Azerbaijan Cooperation Council of 22 December 2021 on the extension of the EU-Azerbaijan Partnership Priorities for the period 2021-2024 [2023/830]
Date: 2021-12-22
Institutions: EU–Azerbaijan Cooperation Council
Subjects: Azerbaijan, Eastern Partnership, cooperation agreement (EU), cooperation policy








L_2023104EN.01003001.xml










19.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 104/30








            RECOMMENDATION No 1/2021 OF THE EU-AZERBAIJAN COOPERATION COUNCIL
         
of 22 December 2021
         
on the extension of the EU-Azerbaijan Partnership Priorities for the period 2021-2024 [2023/830]


THE EU-AZERBAIJAN COOPERATION COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Azerbaijan, of the other part (1), and in particular Article 81 thereof,


Having regard to Recommendation No 1/2018 of the EU-Azerbaijan Cooperation Council of 28 September 2018 on the EU-Azerbaijan Partnership Priorities (2),

Whereas:







(1)


The Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Azerbaijan, of the other part (the ‘Agreement’) was signed on 22 April 1996 and entered into force on 1 July 1999.












(2)


In accordance with Article 81 of the Agreement, the Cooperation Council may make appropriate recommendations for the purpose of attaining the objectives of the Agreement.












(3)


In accordance with Article 98 of the Agreement, the Parties to the Agreement are to take any general or specific measures required to fulfil their obligations under the Agreement and are to see to it that the objectives set out in the Agreement are attained.












(4)


The European Union and Azerbaijan endorsed on 28 September 2018 the EU Azerbaijan Partnership Priorities for the period 2018-2020.












(5)


The EU and Azerbaijan will bilaterally take into account in the Partnership Priorities long-term objectives and deliverables to be agreed between them in the context of the Eastern Partnership, including strengthening cooperation on public health,





HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION:



Article 1
The Cooperation Council recommends the extension of the EU-Azerbaijan Partnership Priorities, as adopted by the Cooperation Council in its meeting of 28 September 2018, until 2024. The Partnership Priorities may be updated or further extended by agreement of the Cooperation Council.


Article 2
This Recommendation shall take effect on the day of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 22 December 2021.


For the Cooperation Council


The European Union

J. BORRELL FONTELLES
            



The Republic of Azerbaijan

J. BAYRAMOV
            





(1)  
            OJ L 246, 17.9.1999, p. 3.

(2)  
            OJ L 265, 24.10.2018, p. 18.
Case T-725/20: Order of the General Court of 22 December 2021 — Guangdong Haomei New Materials and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology v Commission (Dumping — Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China — Act imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty — Act not open to challenge — Preparatory act — Inadmissibility — Definitive anti-dumping duty — No longer any interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2021-12-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, admissibility, aluminium, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), non-flat product, originating product, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2022119EN.01004401.xml










14.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 119/44






Order of the General Court of 22 December 2021 — Guangdong Haomei New Materials and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology v Commission
(Case T-725/20) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China - Act imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility - Definitive anti-dumping duty - No longer any interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 119/61)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicants: Guangdong Haomei New Materials Co. Ltd (Qingyuan, China) and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology Co. Ltd (Yuan Tan Town, China) (represented by: M. Maresca, C. Malinconico, D. Guardamagna, M. Guardamagna, D. Maresca, A. Cerruti, A. Malinconico and G. La Malfa Ribolla, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo, P. Němečková and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for, primarily, annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1428 of 12 October 2020 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of aluminium extrusions originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2020 L 336, p. 8), and, in the alternative, annulment of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (OJ 2016 L 176, p. 21).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Guangdong Haomei New Materials Co. Ltd and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology Co. Ltd shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10343 – DISCOVERY / WARNER MEDIA) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 197/01
Date: 2021-12-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, film production, mass media, merger control








C_2022197EN.01000101.xml










16.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 197/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10343 – DISCOVERY / WARNER MEDIA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 197/01)
On 22 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10343. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.