do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-505/21: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège — Belgium) — FU v Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des Demandeurs d’Asile (Fedasil) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Asylum policy — Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) — Article 27 — Remedies against a transfer decision — Article 27 — Remedies against a transfer decision — No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2021-12-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: asylum seeker, judicial review, removal, return migration, right of asylum, right to justice








C_2022207EN.01000802.xml










23.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 207/8






Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège — Belgium) — FU v Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des Demandeurs d’Asile (Fedasil)
(Case C-505/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Asylum policy - Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection - Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) - Article 27 - Remedies against a transfer decision - Article 27 - Remedies against a transfer decision - No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2022/C 207/11)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal du travail de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: FU

Defendant: Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil)

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the tribunal du travail de Liège, division d’Arlon (Labour Court, Liège, Arlon Division, Belgium), by decision of 17 August 2021, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C 412, 11.10.2021.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 15 December 2021 2021/C 507/04
Date: 2021-12-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021507EN.01000901.xml










16.12.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 507/9






Euro exchange rates (1)

15 December 2021
(2021/C 507/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1262 




JPY


Japanese yen


128,25 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4362 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84980 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,2565 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0416 




ISK


Iceland króna


146,80 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,2278 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,271 




HUF


Hungarian forint


369,09 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6272 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9493 




TRY


Turkish lira


16,5612 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5763 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4496 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,7861 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6689 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5405 




KRW


South Korean won


1 335,40 




ZAR


South African rand


18,1976 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,1691 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5208 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 165,75 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7638 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,574 




RUB


Russian rouble


83,0838 




THB


Thai baht


37,615 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,4354 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,8856 




INR


Indian rupee


86,0345 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-274/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Massa — Italy) — GN, WX v Prefettura di Massa Carrara — Ufficio Territoriale del Governo di Massa Carrara (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 63 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Road traffic — Registration and taxation of motor vehicles — Driver residing in a Member State — Vehicle registered in another Member State — Vehicle provided free of charge for a short period — National legislation prohibiting persons who have resided in Italy for more than 60 days from driving in that Member State a vehicle registered in another country)
Date: 2021-12-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, discrimination on the basis of nationality, free movement of capital, residence, road traffic, tax exemption, vehicle registration








C_2022084EN.01001501.xml










21.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 84/15






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Massa — Italy) — GN, WX v Prefettura di Massa Carrara — Ufficio Territoriale del Governo di Massa Carrara
(Case C-274/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 63 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Road traffic - Registration and taxation of motor vehicles - Driver residing in a Member State - Vehicle registered in another Member State - Vehicle provided free of charge for a short period - National legislation prohibiting persons who have resided in Italy for more than 60 days from driving in that Member State a vehicle registered in another country)
(2022/C 84/16)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Giudice di pace di Massa

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: GN, WX

Defendant: Prefettura di Massa Carrara — Ufficio Territoriale del Governo di Massa Carrara

Operative part of the judgment

Article 63(1) TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which prohibits any person who has established his or her residence in that Member State for more than 60 days from driving in that Member State a motor vehicle registered in another Member State, irrespective of the person in whose name that vehicle is registered, without any account being taken of the duration of the use of that vehicle in the first Member State and without the person concerned being able to invoke any right to exemption where that same vehicle is neither intended to be used essentially in the first Member State on a permanent basis nor is, in fact, used in that manner.


(1)  OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.
State aid – Decision to raise no objections 2021/C 507/07
Date: 2021-12-16
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Iceland, State aid, audiovisual programme, broadcasting, control of State aid, press, private media, television








C_2021507EN.01001201.xml










16.12.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 507/12






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(2021/C 507/07)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


14 September 2021




Case No


87242




Decision No


206/21/COL




EFTA State


Iceland




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Production grant scheme for private media outlets




Legal basis


Act No. 58/2021 amending the Media Act No 38/2011 and Regulation No. 770/2021




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


Media pluralism




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Annual budget: ISK 392 million (approx. EUR 2,6 million)
The total budget: ISK 784 million
(approx. EUR 4,8 million)




Intensity


Up to 25 %




Duration


Until 31 December 2022




Economic sectors


Publishing of newspapers (J58.1.3); Publishing of journals and periodicals (J58.1.4); Radio broadcasting (J60.1.0); Television programming and broadcasting activities (J60.2.0); News agency activities (J63.9.1).




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministry of Education, Science and Culture




Sölvhólsgata 4




101 Reykjavík




ICELAND








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Internet: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/
Case T-765/20: Order of the General Court of 16 December 2021 — The Floow v Commission
Date: 2021-12-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Framework Programme for Research and Development, debt, eligibility criteria, interest, research and development








C_2022095EN.01004502.xml










28.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 95/45






Order of the General Court of 16 December 2021 — The Floow v Commission
(Case T-765/20) (1)

(2022/C 95/64)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 88, 15.3.2021.
Case C-793/21 P: Appeal brought on 16 December 2021 by the Federal Republic of Germany against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 6 October 2021 in Case T-196/19, AZ v Commission
Date: 2021-12-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, charges for use of infrastructure, control of State aid, electricity supply, reimbursement of aid








C_2022073EN.01002601.xml










14.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/26






Appeal brought on 16 December 2021 by the Federal Republic of Germany against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 6 October 2021 in Case T-196/19, AZ v Commission
(Case C-793/21 P)
(2022/C 73/29)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and R. Kanitz, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: AZ, European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside the judgment under appeal of the General Court of the European Union of 6 October 2021 in Case T-196/19, in so far as it dismissed the action as unfounded;










—


annul the Commission’s Decision of 28 May 2018 on State aid SA.34045 (2013/c) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Germany for baseload consumers under Paragraph 19 StromNEV C(2018) 3166 final, for the years 2012 and 2013 in accordance with Article 61(1) of the Statute of the Court of Justice;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs before the General Court and the Court of Justice.





Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The appellant relies on a single ground of appeal, in which it alleges an infringement of Article 107(1) TFEU. According to the appellant, the General Court erred in law in assuming that the scheme in Paragraph 19(2) of the German Stromnetzentgeltverordnung (StromNEV) (Regulation on electricity network charges) constitutes a State aid as provided for in Article 107(1) TFEU.
First, the General Court erred in law in finding, in the context of the assessment of the State nature of the network charges, that the existence of a mandatory charge on consumers or end users and the State control over the funds or over the administrators of those funds constituted two factors that were ‘part of an alternative’.
Secondly, the General Court erred in law in finding, in the context of the assessment whether there is a ‘mandatory charge on consumers or end users’, that the relationship between an electricity supplier and electricity end users was irrelevant. In addition, the General Court erred in law by taking into account the obligation to levy and not the legal obligation to pay network charges.
Thirdly, the General Court erred in law in holding, in the context of the assessment whether State control or State power to dispose of funds exists, that the exclusive use of the network charges collected did not rule out that the State could dispose of those funds.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2050 of 24 November 2021 concerning the authorisation of the preparation of Bacillus velezensis CECT 5940 as a feed additive for turkeys for fattening, turkeys reared for breeding, minor poultry species for fattening and reared for breeding and ornamental birds (except for reproduction) (holder of authorisation: Evonik Operations GmbH) (Official Journal of the European Union L 420 of 25 November 2021)
Date: 2021-12-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: animal feedingstuffs, fattening, market approval, poultry, texture agent








L_2021450EN.01015601.xml










16.12.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 450/156







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2050 of 24 November 2021 concerning the authorisation of the preparation of Bacillus velezensis CECT 5940 as a feed additive for turkeys for fattening, turkeys reared for breeding, minor poultry species for fattening and reared for breeding and ornamental birds (except for reproduction) (holder of authorisation: Evonik Operations GmbH)

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 420 of 25 November 2021
)


On page 18, in the fourth column of the table:
for:


                  ‘Viable spores of Bacillus velezensis ECT 5940’,

read:


                  ‘Viable spores of Bacillus velezensis CECT 5940’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10249 – DERICHEBOURG ENVIRONNEMENT / GROUPE ECORE HOLDING) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 30/01
Date: 2021-12-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: domestic waste, economic concentration, environmental industry, merger control, metals, plastic waste, provision of services, waste recycling








C_2023030EN.01000101.xml










27.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 30/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10249 – DERICHEBOURG ENVIRONNEMENT / GROUPE ECORE HOLDING)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 30/01)
On 16 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10249. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-467/21: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio de Stato — Italy) — Comune di Venezia v Telecom Italia SpA, Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane SpA — Inwit SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Approximation of laws — Electronic communications networks and services — Restrictions on the installation of mobile phone base transceiver stations established by local authorities — Insufficient details concerning the reasons why an answer to the question referred is necessary for the outcome of the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2021-12-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: admissibility, mobile communication, telecommunications equipment, transmission network








C_2022207EN.01000801.xml










23.5.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 207/8






Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio de Stato — Italy) — Comune di Venezia v Telecom Italia SpA, Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane SpA — Inwit SpA
(Case C-467/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Approximation of laws - Electronic communications networks and services - Restrictions on the installation of mobile phone base transceiver stations established by local authorities - Insufficient details concerning the reasons why an answer to the question referred is necessary for the outcome of the dispute in the main proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2022/C 207/10)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio de Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Comune di Venezia

Defendant: Telecom Italia SpA, Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane SpA — Inwit SpA

Intervener: Regione Veneto

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State, Italy), by decision of 22 July 2021, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C 422, 18.10.2021.
New national sides of euro circulation coins 2021/C 507/05
Date: 2021-12-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Commission
Subjects: France, commemoration, euro, issuing of currency




C_2021507EN.01001001.xml










16.12.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 507/10






New national sides of euro circulation coins
(2021/C 507/05)
Euro circulation coins have legal tender status throughout the euro area. The Commission publishes all new euro coin designs (1) with a view to informing all parties required to handle coins in the course of their work as well as the public at large.
The French national sides of the regular 1-euro and 2-euro coins are renewed for the first time since the introduction of the euro, in order to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the introduction of the euro. It thus complies with the conditions set out in Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 729/2014, which stipulates that changes to the designs used for the national sides of regular coins may only be made once every 15 years.
The French national sides of the other denominations remain unchanged.






















1 Euro


2 Euro





Issuing country: France

Date of issue:1 January 2022

Description of the designs: The new design is in line with the symbolism that already existed on the regular 1-euro and 2-euro coins: the tree of life. The new design represents a mixture of the two species that make up the emblem of the Republic: the oak, image of strength and solidity, and the olive tree, symbol of peace.
The coins’ outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.
The edge-lettering of the 2-euro coin is: 2 * *, repeated six times, alternately upright and inverted.


(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p.1, OJ C 254, 20.10.2006, p.6 and OJ C 248, 23.10.2007, p. 8 for a reference to the other euro coins.
Case C-789/21: Action brought on 16 December 2021 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria
Date: 2021-12-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: company law, exchange of information, information system, infringement of EU law, national implementing measure, registration of a company








C_2022084EN.01003001.xml










21.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 84/30






Action brought on 16 December 2021 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria
(Case C-789/21)
(2022/C 84/40)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun, L. Malferrari and Iv. Zalogin)

Defendant: Republic of Bulgaria

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that, by failing to connect the Bulgarian commercial register to the Business Registers Interconnection System (BRIS), the Republic of Bulgaria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive (EU) 2017/1132 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 relating to certain aspects of company law (OJ 2017 L 169, p. 46), and in particular Article 166 of Directive 2017/1132 and Annex III thereto, Parts A and B, footnote 2;










—


order the Republic of Bulgaria to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In breach of the abovementioned provisions of Directive (EU) 2017/1132 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 relating to certain aspects of company law (OJ 2017 L 169, p. 46), the Republic of Bulgaria has failed to connect the Bulgarian commercial register to the Business Registers Interconnection System (BRIS).


(1)  OJ 2017 L 169, p. 46.
Case C-781/21 P: Appeal brought on 16 December 2021 by Daw SE against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 6 October 2021 in Case T-32/21, Daw SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office
Date: 2021-12-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, building materials, dyestuffs industry, metal coating, paints and varnishes, registered trade mark, resin, special chemicals, trade-mark law








C_2022222EN.01000902.xml










7.6.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/9






Appeal brought on 16 December 2021 by Daw SE against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 6 October 2021 in Case T-32/21, Daw SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office
(Case C-781/21 P)
(2022/C 222/15)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Daw SE (represented by: A. Haberl, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 28 March 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.