do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-593/19: Judgment of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Fontana Food (GRILLOUMI BURGER) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI BURGER — Earlier national certification word marks ΧΑΛΛΟΥΜΙ HALLOUMI — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No detriment to repute — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2021-12-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, animal product, catering industry, foodstuff, milk product, processed food product, processed foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022073EN.01003501.xml










14.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/35






Judgment of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Fontana Food (GRILLOUMI BURGER)
(Case T-593/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI BURGER - Earlier national certification word marks ΧΑΛΛΟΥΜΙ HALLOUMI - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No detriment to repute - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2022/C 73/40)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz QC, S. Baran, Barrister, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and D. Botis, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Fontana Food AB (Tyresö, Sweden) (represented by: P. Nihlmark and L. Zacharoff, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 June 2019 (Case R 1297/2018 4) relating to opposition proceedings between the Republic of Cyprus and Fontana Food.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Order the Republic of Cyprus to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 363, 28.10.2019.
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur dated 8 December 2021 in the case of Anna Bryndís Einarsdóttir v the Icelandic Treasury (Case E-5/21) 2022/C 153/07
Date: 2021-12-08
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: European Economic Area, Iceland, labour market, maternity leave, pay, social-security benefit, social-security harmonisation








C_2022153EN.01001301.xml










7.4.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 153/13






Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur dated 8 December 2021 in the case of Anna Bryndís Einarsdóttir v the Icelandic Treasury
(Case E-5/21)
(2022/C 153/07)
A request has been made to the EFTA Court dated 8 December 2021 from Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur (Reykjavik District Court), which was received at the Court Registry on 13 December 2021, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Anna Bryndís Einarsdóttir v the Icelandic Treasury on the following question:
Does Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004, on the coordination of social security systems (cf. also Article 21(3) of the Regulation), oblige an EEA State, when calculating payments in connection with maternity/paternity leave, to calculate reference income on the basis of a person’s aggregate wages on the labour market across the entire European Economic Area? Does it infringe the aforementioned provision and the principles of the EEA Agreement (see, for example, Article 29 EEA) if only a person’s aggregate wages on the domestic labour market are taken into account?